Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Peran Analisis Podcast Terhadap Media Pembelajaran Digital Mahasiswa di Era Milenial Sariski, Aldo; Tanjung, Salsas Bila Juniyanti; Nirwana, Rena Putri; Julio, Christopher Elia; Nandita, Lufna; Rasyad, Pasha Athallah; Hibatullah, Abdurrafi; Handhani, Muhammad Gading Bintang; Tambunan, Daniel; Herley, Airiique Bintang Merah; Zulfikar, Faiz Raudhin; S, Subakdi
Madani: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Vol 3, No 4 (2025): May
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15510758

Abstract

The development of digital technology in the millennial era has revolutionized the way students obtain and process information, especially in the context of higher education. Podcasts, as an audio-based digital learning medium, offer flexibility, accessibility and special appeal for the younger generation who are familiar with digital content. This article analyzes the role of podcasts as a legal learning medium with a case study of three episodes of the "Mata Najwa" podcast which discuss legal issues, especially corruption cases and the justice system in Indonesia. This research uses a qualitative approach with a content analysis method, which focuses on the cognitive, affective and conative aspects of students after watching the show. The research results show that podcasts not only increase legal understanding (cognitive), but also build empathy (affective), and trigger active participation of students as agents of change (conative). Inspirational narratives and relevant content in podcasts have proven effective in building legal awareness, integrity, and student motivation to get involved in social issues. However, the use of podcasts as an educational medium also faces regulatory challenges, digital literacy, and the risk of spreading inaccurate information. With proper management and adequate policy support, podcasts can be a transformative learning strategy in the era of digital education.
Analisis Peran Etika dan Profesionalisme Polisi Sebagai Penegak Hukum Dalam Menjaga Kepercayaan Masyarakat: Studi Kasus Ferdy Sambo Widiyanto, Alif Putra; Febriani, Anggie; Julio, Christopher Elia; Rahmawati, Dian Istimeisyah; Nandita, Lufna; Friyadhi, Naufal Farros; Tanjung, Salsas Bila Juniyanti; M, Mulyadi
Socius: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Vol 2, No 10 (2025): May
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15369303

Abstract

This study examines the role of ethics and professionalism of the police as law enforcers in maintaining public trust, with a case study of ethical and legal violations committed by Ferdy Sambo. This case highlights the gap between public expectations of the integrity of the police and the reality of practices in the field, which has an impact on the crisis of public trust in the police institution. The study uses a descriptive qualitative method through literature studies and data analysis from various news sources and related literature. The findings show that violations of the code of ethics and abuse of power by officers, especially in the case of Ferdy Sambo, worsen the image and legitimacy of the police institution. The failure of the internal monitoring system and the weak implementation of sanctions for ethical violations are the main factors in the decline in public trust. This study emphasizes the importance of implementing the principles of integrity, justice, and responsibility as stipulated in Law No. 2 of 2002 and Regulation of the Chief of Police No. 14 of 2011. This study also provides strategic recommendations to strengthen the monitoring system and enforcement of the code of ethics in order to restore public trust. Thus, improving ethics and professionalism within the police force is key to restoring the legitimacy and public trust in the police institution in Indonesia.
A Philosophical Analysis of the Principle of Justice in Judicial Decisions in Indonesia Julio, Christopher Elia; Triadi, Irwan
Socius: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Vol 3, No 4 (2025): November
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17576982

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the philosophical foundation of justice as a legal principle in judicial decisions in Indonesia. Using a normative juridical research method, this paper examines the alignment between judicial considerations and the philosophical conception of justice proposed by thinkers such as Aristotle, John Rawls, and Gustav Radbruch. The analysis is based on a literature review of laws, legal doctrines, and selected court decisions that reflect the application of justice as a guiding principle in judicial reasoning. The results show that the philosophical meaning of justice has not been fully realized in every judicial decision, as some judgments still emphasize legal certainty over fairness and moral substance. Therefore, strengthening the philosophical awareness of judges is essential to harmonize justice, certainty, and expediency in Indonesia’s legal system.
The Normative Relationship Between Moral Values and Justice in Modern Legal Philosophy and Its Consequences for Indonesian Legal Practice Julio, Christopher Elia; Putra, Gilang; Istimeisyah, Dian; Maniari, Elsa; Triadi, Irwan
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 3, No 4 (2025): December
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17621563

Abstract

This study explores the relationship between moral values and justice from the perspective of modern legal philosophy and examines their implementation in Indonesia’s legal practice. The research is grounded in the classical debate between natural law, which positions morality as the source of legal legitimacy, and legal positivism, which separates law from moral considerations. The study aims to analyze how moral values and justice can interact to shape a fair and dignified legal system in Indonesia. Using a normative qualitative approach, the study reviews philosophical theories and national legal practices, including Constitutional Court decisions and the application of restorative justice. The findings reveal that the implementation of moral values and justice in Indonesia’s legal system remains imperfect due to the gap between positive law and substantive justice. Nevertheless, integration efforts continue through progressive legal approaches and human rights, based reforms that emphasize humanity and social justice. In conclusion, moral values and justice are interdependent within modern law, morality provides the ethical foundation for legitimacy, while justice represents its tangible realization in social life.