Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

Tinjauan Kasus Pemerkosaan Berdasarkan Hasil Putusan PN Jayapura Dalam Perspektif Kriminologi Hukum Pidana Indonesia (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 139 / Pid.B / 2017 / PN Jap) Aristias, Adinda; Andari, Astriana; Syahrani, Devy Fitri; Fatimah, Ghefira Nur; Nandita, Lufna; Rinanti, Pitra; Syawal, Zahra Auliana Putri; M, Mulyadi
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 2, No 3 (2024): September
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.11561974

Abstract

Many rape cases occur in environments that should provide a sense of security, but actually do the opposite. The term sexual violence is an unreasonable sexual act or act that can harm the victim. This research uses qualitative research methods involving analysis of legal documents and legal literature (Decision Number 139/Pid.B/2017 /PN Jap). This research uses library research to collect data. This research uses secondary data sources such as books, journals, articles and the decision of the Jayapura District Court Number 139/Pid.B/2017/PN Jap. Normative legal research is the type of research used. The results of this research show that the crime of sexual crime or rape is to satisfy the perpetrator's desires by force or not with the consent of both parties. Based on the juridical side, the criminal act of rape is seen based on existing elements, one of which is the occurrence of violence. If seen based on the decision in case Number 139 / Pid.B / 2017 / PN Jap, it is clear that this is a criminal act of rape. However, based on criminology, the benchmark is consent, not violence. These factors determine and classify the act as rape.
Peran Analisis Podcast Terhadap Media Pembelajaran Digital Mahasiswa di Era Milenial Sariski, Aldo; Tanjung, Salsas Bila Juniyanti; Nirwana, Rena Putri; Julio, Christopher Elia; Nandita, Lufna; Rasyad, Pasha Athallah; Hibatullah, Abdurrafi; Handhani, Muhammad Gading Bintang; Tambunan, Daniel; Herley, Airiique Bintang Merah; Zulfikar, Faiz Raudhin; S, Subakdi
Madani: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Vol 3, No 4 (2025): May
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15510758

Abstract

The development of digital technology in the millennial era has revolutionized the way students obtain and process information, especially in the context of higher education. Podcasts, as an audio-based digital learning medium, offer flexibility, accessibility and special appeal for the younger generation who are familiar with digital content. This article analyzes the role of podcasts as a legal learning medium with a case study of three episodes of the "Mata Najwa" podcast which discuss legal issues, especially corruption cases and the justice system in Indonesia. This research uses a qualitative approach with a content analysis method, which focuses on the cognitive, affective and conative aspects of students after watching the show. The research results show that podcasts not only increase legal understanding (cognitive), but also build empathy (affective), and trigger active participation of students as agents of change (conative). Inspirational narratives and relevant content in podcasts have proven effective in building legal awareness, integrity, and student motivation to get involved in social issues. However, the use of podcasts as an educational medium also faces regulatory challenges, digital literacy, and the risk of spreading inaccurate information. With proper management and adequate policy support, podcasts can be a transformative learning strategy in the era of digital education.
Analisis Peran Etika dan Profesionalisme Polisi Sebagai Penegak Hukum Dalam Menjaga Kepercayaan Masyarakat: Studi Kasus Ferdy Sambo Widiyanto, Alif Putra; Febriani, Anggie; Julio, Christopher Elia; Rahmawati, Dian Istimeisyah; Nandita, Lufna; Friyadhi, Naufal Farros; Tanjung, Salsas Bila Juniyanti; M, Mulyadi
Socius: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Vol 2, No 10 (2025): May
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15369303

Abstract

This study examines the role of ethics and professionalism of the police as law enforcers in maintaining public trust, with a case study of ethical and legal violations committed by Ferdy Sambo. This case highlights the gap between public expectations of the integrity of the police and the reality of practices in the field, which has an impact on the crisis of public trust in the police institution. The study uses a descriptive qualitative method through literature studies and data analysis from various news sources and related literature. The findings show that violations of the code of ethics and abuse of power by officers, especially in the case of Ferdy Sambo, worsen the image and legitimacy of the police institution. The failure of the internal monitoring system and the weak implementation of sanctions for ethical violations are the main factors in the decline in public trust. This study emphasizes the importance of implementing the principles of integrity, justice, and responsibility as stipulated in Law No. 2 of 2002 and Regulation of the Chief of Police No. 14 of 2011. This study also provides strategic recommendations to strengthen the monitoring system and enforcement of the code of ethics in order to restore public trust. Thus, improving ethics and professionalism within the police force is key to restoring the legitimacy and public trust in the police institution in Indonesia.
PENDEKATAN RESTORATIVE JUSTICE DALAM MEMBERIKAN PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM DAN KEADILAN BAGI KELOMPOK MASYARAKAT MARGINAL DI INDONESIA Nandita, Lufna; Lewoleba, Kayus Kayowuan
Jurnal Review Pendidikan dan Pengajaran Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): Volume 7 No 3 Tahun 2024 (Special Issue)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/jrpp.v7i3.32029

Abstract

Masyarakat marginal merupakan kelompok masyarakat yang paling rentan diperlakukan secara tidak adil dan diskriminasi. Dilihat dari kenyataan yang ada, seringkali masyarakat marginal menjadi korban ketidakadilan dalam proses penegakan hukum di Indonesia. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan restorative justice, maka upaya negara dalam memberikan perlindungan hukum dan keadilan bagi masyarakat marginal yang melakukan suatu tindak pidana ringan dapat direalisasikan. Namun hingga saat ini, sistem peradilan pidana masih belum sepenuhnya mengatur terkait penyelesaian tindak pidana melalui pendekatan restorative justice. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana cara penerapan konsep restorative justice sehingga dapat memberikan perlindungan hukum dan keadilan dalam penyelesaian perkara tindak pidana ringan yang melibatkan kaum marginal. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan menggunakan metode pendekatan yuridis normatif dan teknik pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan studi kepustakaan, menggunakan sumber data sekunder. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa mekanisme penyelesaian perkara menggunakan restorative justice, dapat dilakukan dengan menggunakan musyawarah mufakat maupun mediasi, dimana para pihak yang berkepentingan dapat berkompromi agar tercapainya suatu kesepakatan bersama. Selain itu, proses penyelesaian perkara melalui pendekatan restorative justice dilakukan dengan mencari solusi bersama-sama antara semua pihak yang terkait, tanpa adanya salah satu pihak yang dominan, dan semua pihak tersebut diberikan perhatian serta kesempatan yang sama.
Land Ownership by Foreign Nationals Through Nominee Agreements: A Comparative Study of Thailand and the Philippines Nandita, Lufna; Fahrozi, Muhammad Helmi
Jurnal Daulat Hukum Vol 8, No 4 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/jdh.v8i4.48962

Abstract

The development of the tourism sector in various tourist cities in Indonesia and the surge in investment in the property sector after the COVID-19 pandemic may trigger an increase in interest among foreign nationals to acquire land in Indonesia through nominee agreements. This practice can trigger land ownership disputes between nominees and beneficiary owners, as well as threaten the state's sovereignty over land. This study will examine the legal provisions of nominee agreements and formulate prevention strategies based on comparative studies with Thai and Philippine regulations. This study uses a normative juridical method with a comparative, legislative, and case analysis approach. Data was collected through literature study with qualitative descriptive analysis techniques, using deductive reasoning. This was followed by prescriptive analysis to produce recommendations or practical suggestions as preventive measures against nominee agreement practices in Indonesia. The results of the study show that nominee agreements contradict the objective requirements of agreements, the principle of good faith, and the provisions of the UUPA. This can cause such agreements to be null and void. However, the disharmony between the UUPA and SEMA No. 10 of 2020 causes uncertainty in law enforcement. The weaknesses of the national legal system demonstrate the urgency of imperative regulatory reform. Based on a comparative analysis with Thai and Philippine regulations, it can be seen that both regulations demonstrate the active role of the state in maintaining state sovereignty over land through different mechanisms. By integrating these two regulations into the Indonesian agrarian legal system, it is possible to close loopholes in the law and ensure that land ownership remains under state control. 
Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Penerima Gadai (Kreditur) Dalam Sengketa Perjanjian Gadai Rumah: Studi Putusan Nomor 20/Pdt.G.S/2024/PN Cjr Salampessy, Fauzan Hamzah; Nandita, Lufna; Azahra, Nawalia; Tarina, Dwi Desi Yayi
RIGGS: Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business Vol. 4 No. 4 (2026): November - January
Publisher : Prodi Bisnis Digital Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/riggs.v4i4.3696

Abstract

Perjanjian gadai merupakan salah satu bentuk jaminan kebendaan yang banyak digunakan masyarakat untuk memperoleh pinjaman, namun praktiknya sering menimbulkan sengketa ketika salah satu pihak tidak memenuhi kewajibannya. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis bentuk wanprestasi dalam perjanjian gadai rumah serta bentuk perlindungan hukum bagi kreditur berdasarkan Putusan Nomor 20/Pdt.G.S/2024/PN Cjr. Metode yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif, dengan pendekatan studi kasus terhadap putusan pengadilan yang dikaji bersama ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan, KUH Perdata, asas-asas hukum perjanjian, serta doktrin para ahli. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Tergugat selaku pemberi gadai telah melakukan beberapa bentuk wanprestasi, yaitu tidak mengembalikan pokok gadai sebesar Rp60.000.000, tidak melaksanakan kewajiban meskipun telah diberikan perpanjangan waktu, menunggak pembayaran sewa rumah, serta mengabaikan somasi yang dikirimkan oleh Penggugat. Majelis Hakim menilai perjanjian gadai tersebut sah menurut Pasal 1320 KUH Perdata, dan dengan demikian seluruh akibat hukumnya mengikat para pihak. Hakim menyatakan Tergugat terbukti melakukan wanprestasi dan menghukum Tergugat untuk membayar Rp59.000.000 sebagai pemulihan kerugian Penggugat. Meskipun permohonan sita jaminan ditolak karena tidak memenuhi syarat formil pembuktian, namun perlindungan hukum bagi kreditur tetap terwujud melalui pemberian ganti rugi sebagai bentuk pemulihan hak. Putusan ini menegaskan pentingnya kepastian hukum, keadilan, serta keseimbangan dalam hubungan perjanjian gadai. Selain itu, putusan juga memperlihatkan bahwa pengadilan berperan memberikan perlindungan hukum efektif kepada kreditur ketika debitur mengingkari kewajibannya.