Maula, Putri Ni’matul
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Peran Wawancara Narasumber Kompeten Pada Acara Talkshow Dalam Menciptakan Kesadaran Masyarakat Indonesia Sebagai Warga Negara yang Baik Maula, Putri Ni’matul; Ginting, Gladies Agina; Syafi’i, Azhari Dwi; Friyadhi, Naufal Farros; Maniari, Elsa; Yohana, Maria; Hasnakusumah, Raisha Tiara; Marsanthy, Talitha Aqiella; Mahardika, Agus; Verrell Y.S, Jevon; Asri, Muh Rozi; S, Subakdi
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 3, No 3 (2025): September
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The role of interviews in talk shows as a medium for shaping public awareness of civic values is an effective way to convey values from various aspects and experiences of the interviewees with the talk show host through casual conversation, but still within the scope of the discussion. The study employed a qualitative method with a content analysis approach on various talk show episodes covering social, legal, educational, and cultural themes. Data collection was conducted using the observation-recording method from a total of 33 talk show episodes across 11 national television programs and digital platforms. The research results indicate that talk shows have strong educational potential in conveying moral messages, national values, and encouraging active community participation in national and state life. The civic values that emerge in the programs include: integrity, justice, equality, inclusivity, environmental awareness, legal compliance, and social participation. The inclusive representation of sources reflects the diversity and involvement of various elements of society in building civic values. The findings and recommendations discussed in this article emphasize the importance of monitoring and developing the quality of talk show content as an effective non-formal civic education tool.
Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kreditur Serta Legalitas Penahanan Jaminan Oleh Kreditur: Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung No 1733 K/PDT/2014 Amalia, Selma Dwi; Maula, Putri Ni’matul; Firdaus, Muhammad Bintang; Purnama, Rendika; Tarina, Dwi Desi Yayi
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 3, No 3 (2025): September
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Credit agreements as principal agreements are often followed by additional agreements such as collateral, which are interrelated in their implementation. This study aims to analyze the legal relationship between the principal agreement (credit agreement) and additional agreement (collateral) and the legality of collateral retention by creditors in the case of Supreme Court Decision No. 1733 K/Pdt/2014. The background of this study is based on a dispute between debtors and creditors regarding default, debt collection that is not in accordance with the agreement, and retention of collateral certificates without a clear legal basis. The research method used is a normative legal approach with an analysis of legal documents and court decisions. The results of the study indicate that credit agreements as principal agreements have direct implications for the validity of additional agreements, especially in terms of collateral execution. The Supreme Court ruled that the creditor's action of withholding collateral without a legal basis violated the principles of contract law, so that some of the debtor's demands were granted. In conclusion, this case emphasizes the importance of transparency and balance of rights and obligations in credit agreements to ensure legal certainty for the parties.
REFORMULASI HUKUM DAN PERBAIKAN ETIKA TERHADAP KEPOLISIAN ATAS PELANGGARAN PENGGUNAAN GAS AIR MATA STADION KANJURUHAN Akbar, Sahda Saraswati; Safitri, Nadila; Yulistio, Muhammad Raihan; Fath, Al; Maula, Putri Ni’matul
Jurnal Hukum Statuta Vol 2 No 1 (2022): Volume 2, Nomor 1, Desember 2022
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35586/jhs.v2i1.9159

Abstract

The police as a state tool that functions to maintain security, maintain order, protect and serve the community should be able to provide protection to the community. However, what is happening now is quite the opposite. As happened at the Kanjuruhan stadium where the police in controlling the crowd actually committed human rights violations. Human rights violations committed by the police show that at this time the police have not been able to position themselves proportionally. The purpose of this study was to determine the legitimacy of the use of tear gas in controlling the crowd at the Kanjuruhan Stadium by the police and to find out the legal reformulation and ethical improvement of the violation of mass control at the Kanjuruhan Stadium by the police. This study uses a normative juridical research method with a statute approach and a conceptual approach regarding the rules that should be the basis for mass control carried out by the police. Based on the results of the study, in terms of the validity of the actions taken by the police, it was stated that they did not take into account the level of threat or the safety of the community. Therefore, the way that can be done by the police in order to build a civilian character and improve their image is to carry out legal reformulation and ethical improvement over the violation of the Kanjuruhan Stadium crowd control by the police. The recommendations that the author gives to the PSSI institution, the match organizers, the police, the general public to the government so that this paradox does not happen again.