Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

TRANSFORMATION OF RESTORATIVE JUSTICE IN THE INDONESIAN CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM TOWARDS A JUST AND REHABILITATIVE LEGAL APPROACH Tengku Muhammad Reza Fikri Dharmawan; Ismaidar, Ismaidar; Tamaulina Br. Sembiring
International Journal of Synergy in Law, Criminal, and Justice Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): SLP-IJSLCJ
Publisher : PT. Sinergi Legal Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70321/ijslcj.v2i1.74

Abstract

Restorative Justice (RJ) offers a new paradigm in the Indonesian criminal justice system that focuses on restoration, reconciliation, and rehabilitation rather than just punishment. Although various regulations such as Attorney General Regulation Number 15 of 2020, Circular Letter of the Chief of Police Number SE/8/VII/2018, and PERMA Number 2 of 2012 have supported the implementation of RJ, this approach still faces various challenges. Inconsistent regulations and minimal capacity of law enforcement officers are the main obstacles in the effective implementation of RJ principles. This lack of integration of regulations creates legal uncertainty, while the lack of training and technical guidance hinders officers from managing conflicts fairly and inclusively. This study analyzes the importance of RJ transformation through the establishment of an independent Restorative Justice Law. This law is expected to unify various sectoral regulations, expand the scope of RJ implementation, increase accountability, and equip officers with adequate capabilities to implement RJ consistently. With a clear legal basis, the Indonesian criminal justice system can move towards a more just and rehabilitative approach, in accordance with the values ​​of Pancasila. The research results recommend the establishment of an integrated legal framework, intensive training for law enforcement officers, and public education to improve public understanding of RJ. Thus, RJ can be an effective transformation tool in realizing a humanistic and sustainable criminal law system.
A Comparative Study of Corporate Criminal Liability Systems in Indonesia and the United States Ismaidar Ismaidar; Azhar AR; Servasius Edwin Telaumbanua; Rudi Salam Tarigan; Ansori Maulana; Restika Ndruru; Zeno Eronu Zalukhu; Lasma Sinambela; Haris Putra Utama Limbong; Elisabeth Saragih; Robby Yusuf S Sembiring; Mus Mulyadi; Zahrana Syavica; Tengku Muhammad Reza Fikri Dharmawan; Muhammad Faiz Hadi; Ibrahim Ibrahim; Erwin Efendi Rangkuti; T. Ikhsan Ansyari Husny; Netty br Siahaan; Andi Gultom; Yoldy Israq; Putriani Nduru; Yulia Christy Shintara Aruan; Christine Natalia Pangaribuan
Mutiara : Jurnal Penelitian dan Karya Ilmiah Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): Juni : Mutiara : Jurnal Penelitian dan Karya Ilmiah
Publisher : STAI YPIQ BAUBAU, SULAWESI TENGGARA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59059/mutiara.v3i3.2268

Abstract

Corporate criminal liability has become a pivotal issue in modern criminal law, particularly in response to the increasing prevalence of crimes committed by legal entities. This article provides a comparative analysis of the corporate criminal liability systems in Indonesia and the United States, focusing on the legal foundations, models of liability, and enforcement practices. The United States adopts the principle of vicarious liability, allowing corporations to be held accountable for the acts of their employees performed within the scope of employment. In contrast, Indonesia employs a more fragmented approach through sectoral laws, without a unified criminal liability doctrine for corporations. The study reveals that while Indonesia has begun to recognize corporate liability, it still faces significant challenges in legal harmonization and effective enforcement. This comparison aims to contribute to the development of a more comprehensive and adaptive corporate criminal liability system in Indonesia, in line with international best practices.