Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Politik Hukum dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa terhadap Kepemilikan Hak Atas Tanah Ismaidar Ismaidar; Tamaulina Br. Sembiring; Yoldy Israq
Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/humif.v2i1.1188

Abstract

The issue of land ownership disputes is a complex issue and often triggers prolonged conflicts in Indonesia. Land disputes can be caused by various factors, such as overlapping certificates, illegal land control, and weak law enforcement. In this context, legal politics becomes an important instrument in formulating policies to resolve land disputes fairly and efficiently. This paper aims to analyze the role of legal politics in resolving land ownership disputes, identify obstacles in policy implementation, and offer solutions to increase the effectiveness of dispute resolution. The research uses a normative approach with analysis of statutory regulations, official documents and academic literature. The research results show that existing regulations, such as the Basic Agrarian Law no. 5 of 1960, requires harmonization with other policies to overcome overlapping regulations. In addition, the role of mediation and arbitration institutions is considered crucial in reducing the burden on courts. However, weak legal dissemination to the community is a significant obstacle in policy implementation. This paper recommends strengthening regulations, increasing the capacity of mediation institutions, and legal education to the community as strategic steps to create a more effective land dispute resolution system.
Efforts to Combating Terrorism in Indonesia Wida Azlina; Yasmirah Mandasari Saragih; Tamaulina Br. Sembiring; Widya Meilani; Yoldy Israq; Zahrana Syavica
International Journal of Sociology and Law Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): International Journal of Sociology and Law
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijsl.v2i1.365

Abstract

Indonesia needs get rid of terrorism For forever . Journal This aiming For describe and analyze with use approach various effort countermeasures crime terrorism in Indonesia. Methods research used​ in study This use approach qualitative descriptive For serve description about terrorism and some strategy For to fight crime This is in Indonesia. Formulation problem based on description background back on top is as following : what just factor crime terrorism in Indonesia and how method overcome crime terrorism in Indonesia. Terrorism is disturbing phenomenon . Efforts​ countermeasures crime terrorism committed​ Government implemented through effort repressive . There are five factors that cause crime terrorism in Indonesia, namely : ethnicity , nationalism / separatism , poverty and inequality and globalization , non-democracy , violations dignity humans and religious radicalism .
A Comparative Study of Corporate Criminal Liability Systems in Indonesia and the United States Ismaidar Ismaidar; Azhar AR; Servasius Edwin Telaumbanua; Rudi Salam Tarigan; Ansori Maulana; Restika Ndruru; Zeno Eronu Zalukhu; Lasma Sinambela; Haris Putra Utama Limbong; Elisabeth Saragih; Robby Yusuf S Sembiring; Mus Mulyadi; Zahrana Syavica; Tengku Muhammad Reza Fikri Dharmawan; Muhammad Faiz Hadi; Ibrahim Ibrahim; Erwin Efendi Rangkuti; T. Ikhsan Ansyari Husny; Netty br Siahaan; Andi Gultom; Yoldy Israq; Putriani Nduru; Yulia Christy Shintara Aruan; Christine Natalia Pangaribuan
Mutiara : Jurnal Penelitian dan Karya Ilmiah Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): Juni : Mutiara : Jurnal Penelitian dan Karya Ilmiah
Publisher : STAI YPIQ BAUBAU, SULAWESI TENGGARA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59059/mutiara.v3i3.2268

Abstract

Corporate criminal liability has become a pivotal issue in modern criminal law, particularly in response to the increasing prevalence of crimes committed by legal entities. This article provides a comparative analysis of the corporate criminal liability systems in Indonesia and the United States, focusing on the legal foundations, models of liability, and enforcement practices. The United States adopts the principle of vicarious liability, allowing corporations to be held accountable for the acts of their employees performed within the scope of employment. In contrast, Indonesia employs a more fragmented approach through sectoral laws, without a unified criminal liability doctrine for corporations. The study reveals that while Indonesia has begun to recognize corporate liability, it still faces significant challenges in legal harmonization and effective enforcement. This comparison aims to contribute to the development of a more comprehensive and adaptive corporate criminal liability system in Indonesia, in line with international best practices.