Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Law Enforcement Against Criminal Acts of Drug Abuse Committed by Children Ryan Fadli Siregar; Yasmirah Mandasari Saragih; Fauzan Fauzan; Putriani Nduru; Ibrahim Ibrahim
International Journal of Law and Society Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): International Journal of Law and Society
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijls.v2i1.295

Abstract

Children are the future generation of the nation that must be protected, especially when dealing with the law. Law enforcement against perpetrators of drug abuse crimes committed by children has been effective. Drug abuse has a very bad impact on the continuity of a nation's generation. To anticipate this, cooperation is needed from all components of society, such as families, from school to university level, and the government must unite in efforts to prevent narcotics in the surrounding environment. Using the perspective of Law Number 35 of 2009, this study attempts to analyze how narcotics crimes committed by children are prosecuted legally. Drug abuse is a serious crime that can endanger the security and sovereignty of the state, as well as the growth and future of the state, according to a normative legal approach that includes analysis of laws and regulations and previous events. Illegal drug use is prohibited, according to Law Number 35 of 2009. Research findings show that, despite the need for legal action against children who use drugs, the juvenile criminal justice system uses Restorative Justice strategies along with the concept of diversion to protect children from stigma.
A Comparative Study of Corporate Criminal Liability Systems in Indonesia and the United States Ismaidar Ismaidar; Azhar AR; Servasius Edwin Telaumbanua; Rudi Salam Tarigan; Ansori Maulana; Restika Ndruru; Zeno Eronu Zalukhu; Lasma Sinambela; Haris Putra Utama Limbong; Elisabeth Saragih; Robby Yusuf S Sembiring; Mus Mulyadi; Zahrana Syavica; Tengku Muhammad Reza Fikri Dharmawan; Muhammad Faiz Hadi; Ibrahim Ibrahim; Erwin Efendi Rangkuti; T. Ikhsan Ansyari Husny; Netty br Siahaan; Andi Gultom; Yoldy Israq; Putriani Nduru; Yulia Christy Shintara Aruan; Christine Natalia Pangaribuan
Mutiara : Jurnal Penelitian dan Karya Ilmiah Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): Juni : Mutiara : Jurnal Penelitian dan Karya Ilmiah
Publisher : STAI YPIQ BAUBAU, SULAWESI TENGGARA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59059/mutiara.v3i3.2268

Abstract

Corporate criminal liability has become a pivotal issue in modern criminal law, particularly in response to the increasing prevalence of crimes committed by legal entities. This article provides a comparative analysis of the corporate criminal liability systems in Indonesia and the United States, focusing on the legal foundations, models of liability, and enforcement practices. The United States adopts the principle of vicarious liability, allowing corporations to be held accountable for the acts of their employees performed within the scope of employment. In contrast, Indonesia employs a more fragmented approach through sectoral laws, without a unified criminal liability doctrine for corporations. The study reveals that while Indonesia has begun to recognize corporate liability, it still faces significant challenges in legal harmonization and effective enforcement. This comparison aims to contribute to the development of a more comprehensive and adaptive corporate criminal liability system in Indonesia, in line with international best practices.