Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

A Comparative Study of Corporate Criminal Liability Systems in Indonesia and the United States Ismaidar Ismaidar; Azhar AR; Servasius Edwin Telaumbanua; Rudi Salam Tarigan; Ansori Maulana; Restika Ndruru; Zeno Eronu Zalukhu; Lasma Sinambela; Haris Putra Utama Limbong; Elisabeth Saragih; Robby Yusuf S Sembiring; Mus Mulyadi; Zahrana Syavica; Tengku Muhammad Reza Fikri Dharmawan; Muhammad Faiz Hadi; Ibrahim Ibrahim; Erwin Efendi Rangkuti; T. Ikhsan Ansyari Husny; Netty br Siahaan; Andi Gultom; Yoldy Israq; Putriani Nduru; Yulia Christy Shintara Aruan; Christine Natalia Pangaribuan
Mutiara : Jurnal Penelitian dan Karya Ilmiah Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): Juni : Mutiara : Jurnal Penelitian dan Karya Ilmiah
Publisher : STAI YPIQ BAUBAU, SULAWESI TENGGARA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59059/mutiara.v3i3.2268

Abstract

Corporate criminal liability has become a pivotal issue in modern criminal law, particularly in response to the increasing prevalence of crimes committed by legal entities. This article provides a comparative analysis of the corporate criminal liability systems in Indonesia and the United States, focusing on the legal foundations, models of liability, and enforcement practices. The United States adopts the principle of vicarious liability, allowing corporations to be held accountable for the acts of their employees performed within the scope of employment. In contrast, Indonesia employs a more fragmented approach through sectoral laws, without a unified criminal liability doctrine for corporations. The study reveals that while Indonesia has begun to recognize corporate liability, it still faces significant challenges in legal harmonization and effective enforcement. This comparison aims to contribute to the development of a more comprehensive and adaptive corporate criminal liability system in Indonesia, in line with international best practices.
Tindak Pidana Terorisme, Radikalisme dan Deradikalisasi di Indonesia Yasmirah Mandasari Saragih; Zeno Eronu Zalukhu; Angga Sahputra Sirait; Zubaidah Zubaidah; Ansori Maulana
Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): JURRISH: Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jurrish.v4i3.5647

Abstract

Terrorism is considered a crime against humanity and poses a serious threat to the sovereignty of states as it has an international scope and impact. This crime threatens global security and peace and undermines the welfare of society, thus requiring decisive and sustained eradication efforts to protect and respect human rights at large. radicalism reflects an attitude or view that is extreme and seeks social or political change in ways that are controversial or outside the norm. Perpetrators of terrorism often have radical views and choose violent acts as a way to achieve their goals. Prevention of terrorism through deradicalization is a proactive step and requires caution with consideration of the plurality of Indonesian society and the vulnerability of plurality to social conflict.
Legal Protection for Victims in Fake Investment on Telegram Zeno Eronu Zalukhu; Yasmirah Mandasari Saragih; Fauzan Fauzan
Green Social: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70062/greensocial.v2i1.64

Abstract

The Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia is a country of law that guarantees justice and protection for its citizens. This protection is stated in the 1945 Constitution Article 28G paragraph (1), namely: "Everyone has the right to protection of themselves, their families, their honor, their dignity, and their property under their control, and has the right to a sense of security and protection from the threat of fear to do or not do something that is a basic human right". Fraudulent investment is an act of investment fraud, where the perpetrator asks for funds to be invested in a business that is in fact illegal and does not have a permit from the competent authority. This study aims to determine the form of legal protection for victims and to find out how to avoid fraudulent investment. The research method used is qualitative by using the type of literature study of journal analysis, or other media to become a literature reading that is arranged coherently and neatly. This literature study will look for various relevant articles by citing from various sources.
JURIDICAL ANALYSIS OF AGGRAVATED THEFT BASED ON (DECISION NUMBER 1150/PID.B/2024/PN MDN) Zeno Eronu Zalukhu; Suci Ramadani; Ismaidar
Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue (MORFAI) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/morfai.v6i2.4991

Abstract

This study aims to conduct a juridical analysis of the application of criminal law in cases of aggravated theft as adjudicated in Decision Number 1150/PID.B/2024/PN MDN (Medan District Court). The primary focus is to identify and examine the conformity between the legal facts revealed during the trial and the elements of theft as stipulated in Article 363 of the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP), as well as the legal considerations of the judge in rendering the verdict. The research method employed is normative-empirical with a case study approach. The main data source is Decision Number 1150/PID.B/2024/PN MDN, supported by literature studies related to criminal law theory, aggravated theft, and court decisions. The analysis indicates that the panel of judges carefully considered the fulfillment of the elements of aggravated theft, particularly the existence of at least one aggravating factor (for instance, the act was committed at night or involved two or more individuals). The juridical considerations of the judges in this decision are deemed consistent with the provisions of Article 363 KUHP and the applicable principles of criminal law. This study concludes that the decision reflects a balanced law enforcement approach between legitimate proof and the imposition of fair sanctions. The implication of this research highlights the importance of careful verification of aggravating elements to ensure legal certainty and justice.