Febrianto, Surizki
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Advocating Legal Certainty in Status Transition of Individual Companies Exceeding MSEs Criteria to Limited Liability Wiriatma, Dodo Wiradana; Admiral, Admiral; Hamzah, Rosyidi; Febrianto, Surizki; Syafrinaldi, Syafrinaldi; Hyeonsoo, Kim
Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025): The Global Challenges on Advocacy and Law Enforcement
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ijals.v7i1.22263

Abstract

The enactment of Law Number 6 of 2023, concerning the Stipulation of Government Regulations in Lieu of Law Number 2 of 2022 on Job Creation, introduced the Individual Company as a legal entity designed to empower Micro and Small Enterprises (MSEs). This provision enables the establishment of a company by a single individual, a departure from the traditional requirement of at least two shareholders. The Job Creation Law, supported by Government Regulation Number 8 of 2021, outlines that an Individual Company is created through a Statement of Establishment, without the need for a Notary Deed, in line with the provisions for MSEs as stipulated in Government Regulation Number 7 of 2021. However, this legal framework creates challenges when an Individual Company exceeds the MSE criteria or gains more than one shareholder. In such cases, the company must transition into a Limited Liability Company (LLC), a process that requires the drafting of a notary deed and registration through the Ministry of Law and Human Rights’ online AHU system. This research focuses on advocating for legal certainty in the status transition of Individual Companies to Limited Liability Companies, which currently involves the dissolution of the original entity before the new LLC can be formed. The lack of a clear, comprehensive legal mechanism for this transition causes significant legal uncertainty. This paper examines the gaps in the existing legal framework and proposes solutions to streamline the conversion process, eliminating the need for dissolution. By advocating for legal certainty in the status transition, this research contributes to the broader discourse on improving the General Legal Administration system, ensuring that the legal status of businesses aligns with their evolving needs, and facilitating smoother business expansion and growth.
POLITICAL REFORM OF NATIONAL ECONOMIC LAW (Analysis of the Impact of Globalisation on National Investment Law) Febrianto, Surizki
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 22 No. 001 (2023): Pena Justisia (Special Issue)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v22i3.3035

Abstract

The objective of this study is to investigate the relationship between investment law and state sovereignty, and subsequently formulate a framework for future national investment law policies aimed at promoting economic growth and safeguarding sovereignty. The present study is characterized as normative in its methodology, employing both a statutory and conceptual approach. The findings indicate that investment plays a significant role in enhancing both the economy and employment expansion. Governments globally are engaged in a competitive effort to establish an improved business climate that facilitates investment activities. However, it is imperative to restrict this endeavor and prioritize domestic capital, as evidenced by the 1966 MPRS Decree. This directive provides guidance to Indonesian policymakers that foreign investment or aid should not be disregarded for its role in developing the struggling Indonesian economy. Nevertheless, it is crucial to first rely on the potential of domestic resources as a means of generating development funds. This approach ensures that the availability of foreign funding sources does not lead to dependence on external parties. Furthermore, foreign sources of funds must be utilized for the benefit of the domestic economy.  Foreign investment in Indonesia must also be subjected to limitations in this context
GOOD FAITH AS A BASIS FOR CONSUMER LIABILITY IN CASH ON DELIVERY (COD) TRANSACTIONS Admiral, Admiral; Seruni, Puti Mayang; Febrianto, Surizki
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 22 No. 001 (2023): Pena Justisia (Special Issue)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v22i3.3522

Abstract

Cash on Delivery (COD) is a popular type of transaction in online buying and selling. However, the implementation of the COD feature creates the issue of consumers being reluctant to make payments after the goods have come as agreed. This unilateral cancellation may result in losses for the seller, the application, and the courier. The aim of this research is to examine the legal liabilities of consumers who make unilateral cancellations to prevent losses. This is normative research that employs secondary data from primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The gathered data is then qualitatively analyzed and related with the core problem. According to the findings, the agreement must be made in good faith, which can be defined as subjective good faith (honesty) and objective good faith (propriety and justice) under Article 1338 paragraph 3 of the Civil Code. Judges have the right to evaluate an agreement and terminate it if it contains improper or unfair details.  Before the transaction, where the seller and buyer must be honest, good faith plays a significant part in online transactions using the COD method. Buyers are expected to carefully study the description of the items to be purchased because placing an order indicates that the buyer has agreed to the specifications of the goods and will pay when the goods are received. The COD payment method does not allow customers to cancel unilaterally without providing clear reasons and is therefore considered a default