Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Kedudukan Hakim dalam Proses Pembuktian Perkara Perdata: Tinjauan Kepustakaan atas Doktrin dan Yurisprudensi Ismaya Rahailia Nasution; Sidi Ahyar Wiraguna
Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Desember : Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/progres.v2i4.2597

Abstract

The position of judges in the process of proving civil cases occupies a fundamental role in upholding justice and legal certainty within the Indonesian judicial system. This study aims to examine the judge’s position, duties, and authority in the evidentiary process of civil cases through a literature review focusing on doctrines and jurisprudence. Using a normative juridical method with a library research approach, this paper analyzes legal theories, statutory provisions, and judicial precedents that regulate evidentiary procedures in civil law. The findings show that a judge is not merely a passive law enforcer but an active truth-seeker who must interpret and assess evidence based on principles of fairness, propriety, and moral values. The judge’s discretion in evaluating evidence reflects the responsibility to harmonize formal legal norms with the pursuit of substantive justice. Jurisprudence demonstrates that judges play an essential role in shaping evidentiary standards and ensuring that court decisions reflect the ideals of justice and legal certainty. The study concludes that the authority and independence of judges are crucial in realizing a fair trial, as they ensure that decisions are based on verified facts, logical reasoning, and moral responsibility. Strengthening the professionalism and integrity of judges is necessary to guarantee that the evidentiary process in civil proceedings fulfills the principles of equality before the law and promotes justice in society.
PEMBAJAKAN LAUT DI SOMALIA SEBAGAI KEJAHATAN INTERNASIONAL DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM LAUT INTERNASIONAL Siti Aisyah; Salwa Putri Septiana; Karindra Alvian Nugraha; Delvi Eka Ariyanti; Ismaya Rahailia Nasution; Angela Maranatha Sibarani; Zulpan Syahputa Gulo
Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar Vol. 11 No. 03 (2026): Volume 11 Nomor 03, September 2026 Published
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar FKIP Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23969/jp.v11i03.61175

Abstract

Piracy is one of the forms of international crime that threatens maritime security, international trade, and regional stability. One of the regions that has attracted global attention regarding piracy is the waters off Somalia and the Gulf of Aden. The widespread occurrence of piracy in this area is driven by several factors, including weak governance in Somalia, poor economic conditions, prolonged conflicts, and inadequate maritime law enforcement. This study aims to analyze piracy off the coast of Somalia as an international crime from the perspective of international law of the sea and to examine the measures undertaken by the international community to combat it. The research employs a normative legal research method using statutory and conceptual approaches, primarily based on international legal instruments, particularly the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) 1982. The findings indicate that acts of piracy in Somali waters fulfill the elements of piracy as defined under UNCLOS 1982 and therefore constitute crimes of international concern. Furthermore, the principle of universal jurisdiction grants all states the authority to apprehend, prosecute, and punish pirates regardless of the nationality of the offenders or victims. Various international operations conducted by states and international organizations have contributed significantly to reducing piracy incidents in the Somali region, although challenges related to law enforcement and political instability remain. Therefore, sustained international cooperation is essential to ensure maritime security and prevent the recurrence of piracy in the future.
Disparitas Pemidanaan dalam Tindak Pidana Penambangan Tanpa Izin: Analisis Putusan Nomor 44/Pid.B/2021/PN Amp Ditinjau dari Tujuan Pemidanaan dan Efektivitas Penegakan Hukum Farida Nurun Nazah; Delvi Eka Ariyanti; Elika Maulidia; Talitha Kamilah; Michel Priscila; Ismaya Rahailia Nasution
Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar Vol. 11 No. 03 (2026): Volume 11 Nomor 03, September 2026 Published
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar FKIP Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23969/jp.v11i03.61178

Abstract

Illegal mining operations (PETI) cause permanent ecological destruction and substantial state financial losses. Using a comprehensive normative legal approach, this article carefully examines the lenient sentence in Judgment Number 44/Pid.B/2021/PN Amp regarding enforcement efficiency and returning heavy machinery to owners. The study reveals a sharp sentencing disparity; the offender received only two months' imprisonment. The judges' rigid legalistic-formal adherence completely overlooked tangible environmental damage. Returning the leased excavator weakens deterrence and inherently legitimizes illegal exploitation. Thus, environmental law supremacy remains suboptimal. Judges must adopt progressive legal steps through the polluter pays doctrine to ensure future ecological justice for the public