Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.547
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal UICELL Conference Proceeding Esteem Journal of English Study Programme Jurnal Ilmiah Aquinas Joal : Journal of Applied Linguistics TELL - US JOURNAL Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan Jurnal ABDIMAS MUTIARA Journal of Community Service
siahaan, junita
UNJ
Humanities Chemistry Computer Science & IT Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Mathematics Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Social Sciences Other

Published : 12 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : uicell conference proceeding

 1 
AN An Analysis of Adjacency Pairs in The Conversation between David Frost and Paul Mc.Cartney siahaan, junita
UICELL No 2 (2018): UICELL Conference Proceedings 2018
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. DR. HAMKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (832.449 KB)

Abstract

This study investigated about the adjacency pairs in the conversation between David Frost and Paul Mc.Cartney. The aims of this study are to find out what types of adjacency pairs appeared in the conversation and what types of communicative function contained in the conversation between David and Paul. This research used qualitative descriptive method as a research design. The data were a video containing conversation between David Frost and Paul Mc.Cartney. The data were transcribed into written form and analyzed using theory of adjacency pairs and communicative function. The findings of this research revealed that: first, there were two types of adjacency pairs appeared in the conversation. From those two types of adjacency pairs, there were 12 adjacency pairs that represent question-answer; 2 adjacency pairs represent Assessment-Agreement/Disagreement. Second, for communicative function, there were 14 referential function contained in the conversation, followed by phatic functions with 3 occurrences, 1 occurrence for each emotive function and metalingual function. From the finding, it can be concluded that question-answer was the mostly-appeared type of adjacency pairs in the conversation between David Frost and Paul Mc.Cartney and Assessment-Agreement/Disagreement were the least pairs. While for communicative function, referential function was the mostly-served function in the conversation.   Keywords: Discourse Analysis, Adjacency pairs, Conversation
AN An Analysis of Adjacency Pairs in The Conversation between David Frost and Paul Mc.Cartney junita siahaan
UICELL No 2 (2018): UICELL Conference Proceedings 2018
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. DR. HAMKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (832.449 KB)

Abstract

This study investigated about the adjacency pairs in the conversation between David Frost and Paul Mc.Cartney. The aims of this study are to find out what types of adjacency pairs appeared in the conversation and what types of communicative function contained in the conversation between David and Paul. This research used qualitative descriptive method as a research design. The data were a video containing conversation between David Frost and Paul Mc.Cartney. The data were transcribed into written form and analyzed using theory of adjacency pairs and communicative function. The findings of this research revealed that: first, there were two types of adjacency pairs appeared in the conversation. From those two types of adjacency pairs, there were 12 adjacency pairs that represent question-answer; 2 adjacency pairs represent Assessment-Agreement/Disagreement. Second, for communicative function, there were 14 referential function contained in the conversation, followed by phatic functions with 3 occurrences, 1 occurrence for each emotive function and metalingual function. From the finding, it can be concluded that question-answer was the mostly-appeared type of adjacency pairs in the conversation between David Frost and Paul Mc.Cartney and Assessment-Agreement/Disagreement were the least pairs. While for communicative function, referential function was the mostly-served function in the conversation. Keywords: Discourse Analysis, Adjacency pairs, Conversation
Co-Authors Apriani, Reni Aprilianti, Charmelita Bogor Lumbanraja Br.Ginting, Novfiana Buaton, Dionisius Eka Margareta Sinaga Eska Agustinus Sihotang Ginting, Fiber Yun Almanda Ginting, Novfiana Br Hamid, Syifa Fadhilah Maniur A Siahaan MEIKARDO SAMUEL PRAYUDA Nurpratiwi, Fheby Indriyanti Reni Apriani Sianturi, Jelita Fransiska Sihotang, Eska Agustinus Silalahi, Anzelina Simamora, Binaria Juliana Sitorus, Maryanti Lucciana