Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pendas : Jurnah Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar Birokrasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Negara Jurnal Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Ahmad Jafar Sidik
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Dinamika Eksekusi Putusan Hakim Pasca Peninjauan Kembali dalam Perspektif Kepastian Hukum dan Perlindungan Hak Terpidana Pardamean Harahap; Mochamad Yulian Fadhli Saputra; Muhamad Noval Faris Pratama; Ahmad Jafar Sidik
Khatulistiwa: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 4 (2025): Desember : Khatulistiwa: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/khatulistiwa.v5i4.10342

Abstract

The implementation of the execution of judges' decisions after the Review (PK) raises a dilemma between legal certainty and the protection of the human rights of convicts. On the one hand, the execution of decisions that have had legal force is still necessary to maintain judicial authority and legal consistency. However, on the other hand, the PK as an extraordinary legal remedy opens up room for correction to potentially erroneous decisions, so that the execution cannot be carried out in a hurry. This research uses a normative-sociological approach by examining the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), the Constitutional Court Decision, and the Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA) No. 7 of 2014, accompanied by an analysis of the practices of law enforcement officials. The results of the study show the need for regulatory synchronization and institutional reform so that post-PK executions reflect a balance between legal certainty, substantive justice, and the state's responsibility to protect the rights of convicts. Thus, this study emphasizes the importance of harmonization between legal norms and judicial practice to ensure that the execution of judgments not only upholds legal certainty, but also guarantees the protection of human rights.
AKIBAT HUKUM PUTUSAN PEMBUBARAN PARTAI POLITIK DAN EKSKLUSIVITAS HAK PEMOHON OLEH MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI TERHADAP PUTUSAN MK NOMOR 53/PUU-IX/2011 Pardamean Harahap; Mochamad Yulian Fadhli Saputra; Muhamad Noval Faris Pratama; Ahmad Jafar Sidik; Galuh Candra Utami; Talitha Kamilah; Claraditha Adelia Nelson; Zahra Ramadhanty Drajat; Asyifa Nayla Jingga
Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar Vol. 11 No. 03 (2026): Volume 11 Nomor 03, September 2026 Publish
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar FKIP Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23969/jp.v11i03.65151

Abstract

The dissolution of political parties is one of the Constitutional Court’s authorities to safeguard democracy, state ideology, and the integrity of the Republic of Indonesia. Constitutional Court Decision Number 53/PUU-IX/2011 affirms that the Government is the only party with legal standing to petition for the dissolution of a political party. This study aims to analyze the juridical implications of such exclusivity and the legal consequences arising from a dissolution decision. This research employs a normative legal method through statutory, case, and literature approaches. The results show that limiting legal standing is intended to maintain national stability, but it also restricts citizens’ participation in monitoring political parties. Furthermore, the dissolution of a political party results in the revocation of its legal entity status, termination of its activities, state acquisition of its assets, and restrictions on certain political rights of its officials. Therefore, strengthening legal mechanisms is necessary to ensure legal certainty and uphold constitutional democracy.
Penerapan Pidana Percobaan dalam Tindak Pidana Pencemaran Sungai: Analisis Yuridis terhadap Putusan Nomor 168/Pid.B/LH/2023/PN Bls Farida Nurun Nazah; Galuh Candra Utami; Ahmad Jafar Sidik; Sekar Galuh Ardelia; Shifa Arifatunnisa; Astri Anggraeni Putri
Birokrasi: JURNAL ILMU HUKUM DAN TATA NEGARA Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): September: Birokrasi: JURNAL ILMU HUKUM DAN TATA NEGARA
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi (STIA) Yappi Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/birokrasi.v4i3.2775

Abstract

River contamination by the palm oil industry threatens the constitutional right to a healthy environment, creating a jurisprudential dilemma between ecological justice and socio-economic stability. District Court Decision No. 168/Pid.B/LH/2023/PN Bls, which imposed a probationary sentence on a corporate executive for river pollution, has sparked academic debate regarding the efficacy of non-custodial sanctions. This study examines the judge’s legal reasoning in applying probation and evaluates its juridical implications for environmental criminal law enforcement and river ecosystem protection. Employing a normative legal research methodology with statutory and case approaches, secondary data were analyzed qualitatively through deductive legal syllogism. The findings reveal that the ratio decidendi integrates three dimensions: the defendant’s subjective-personal circumstances, the principle of proportionality, and a restorative-sociological approach prioritizing ecological recovery and local economic continuity. Juridically, probation signifies a paradigm shift from retributive-punitive to restorative-reparative justice, yet risks undermining deterrence if decoupled from autonomous corporate liability and rigorous institutional oversight. It is concluded that probation constitutes a progressive instrument in environmental criminal law when applied selectively, supported by sustained monitoring mechanisms, and reinforced by a robust corporate accountability framework to ensure equilibrium between ecological restoration and legal certainty.
Co-Authors Astri Anggraeni Putri Asyifa Nayla Jingga Claraditha Adelia Nelson Galuh Candra Utami Mochamad Yulian Fadhli Saputra Muhamad Noval Faris Pratama Nazah, Farida Nurun Pardamean Harahap Sekar Galuh Ardelia Shifa Arifatunnisa Talitha Kamilah Zahra Ramadhanty Drajat