Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Journal Sovereignty Law and Diplomatic Politics
Ahmad Jafar Sidik
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Dinamika Eksekusi Putusan Hakim Pasca Peninjauan Kembali dalam Perspektif Kepastian Hukum dan Perlindungan Hak Terpidana Pardamean Harahap; Mochamad Yulian Fadhli Saputra; Muhamad Noval Faris Pratama; Ahmad Jafar Sidik
Khatulistiwa: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 4 (2025): Desember : Khatulistiwa: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/khatulistiwa.v5i4.10342

Abstract

The implementation of the execution of judges' decisions after the Review (PK) raises a dilemma between legal certainty and the protection of the human rights of convicts. On the one hand, the execution of decisions that have had legal force is still necessary to maintain judicial authority and legal consistency. However, on the other hand, the PK as an extraordinary legal remedy opens up room for correction to potentially erroneous decisions, so that the execution cannot be carried out in a hurry. This research uses a normative-sociological approach by examining the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), the Constitutional Court Decision, and the Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA) No. 7 of 2014, accompanied by an analysis of the practices of law enforcement officials. The results of the study show the need for regulatory synchronization and institutional reform so that post-PK executions reflect a balance between legal certainty, substantive justice, and the state's responsibility to protect the rights of convicts. Thus, this study emphasizes the importance of harmonization between legal norms and judicial practice to ensure that the execution of judgments not only upholds legal certainty, but also guarantees the protection of human rights.
Peran Intervensi Pihak Ketiga terhadap Kekuatan Pembuktian dalam Proses Persidangan Perdata Wahida , Nova Reana; Alisya Putri Santoso; Syifa Ramadani; Claraditha Adelia Nelson; Asyifa Nayla Jingga; Owen Novail Firmansyah; Ahmad Jafar sidik
Journal Sovereignty Law And Diplomatic Politics Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): Journal Sovereignty Law and Diplomatic Politics
Publisher : CV Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jlsdp.v2i1.1985

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis peran intervensi pihak ketiga terhadap kekuatan alat bukti dalam persidangan perdata serta implikasinya terhadap objektivitas hakim. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif melalui studi literatur terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan, yurisprudensi, dan pendapat para ahli. Hasil dan pembahasan menunjukkan bahwa intervensi pihak ketiga dapat berfungsi sebagai instrumen penguat pembuktian melalui penambahan bukti dan informasi yang relevan, namun juga berpotensi menimbulkan distorsi fakta apabila tidak didasarkan pada legitimasi dan relevansi kepentingan hukum. Kesimpulan penelitian menegaskan bahwa intervensi pihak ketiga perlu diatur dan diawasi secara ketat agar mendukung objektivitas hakim serta menjamin tercapainya keadilan prosedural dan substantif dalam persidangan perdata.
Co-Authors Alisya Putri Santoso Asyifa Nayla Jingga Claraditha Adelia Nelson Mochamad Yulian Fadhli Saputra Muhamad Noval Faris Pratama Owen Novail Firmansyah Pardamean Harahap Syifa Ramadani Wahida , Nova Reana