Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Perselisihan Waris dan Validitas Surat Keterangan Hibah: Kajian Hukum dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Akbar Hidayatullah Daud; Agung Prayuda Yahya; Muhammad Khairun Kurniawan Kadir; Nurul Fazri Elfikri; Ramadhan Usman; Janwar Hippy
Journal of Law, Human Rights, Immigration, and Corrections Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): Journal of Law, Human Rights, Immigration, and Corrections
Publisher : Yayasan Cerdas Pedia Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65101/lawric.v1i1.216

Abstract

Inheritance land grant disputes often arise in the Indonesian judiciary, especially regarding the validity of grants that do not use notarial deeds. This study aims to analyze the validity of the grant certificate (SKH) in the transfer of rights to undivided land inheritance and its impacts. The research method used is normative law with a legislation approach and case approach, specifically analyzing Manado High Court Decision Number 32/PDT/2024/PT MND. Results show that land grants not made by notarial deeds violate Article 1682 of the Civil Code, making them legally invalid and unusable as a basis for land registration. Registration of the transfer of rights to undivided inherited land is also not possible because the land remains an inheritance boedel owned collectively by all heirs. Registering the transfer of rights to undivided inherited land requires valid legal documents and must comply with applicable laws to ensure legal certainty for concerned parties.
Education Assistance and Legal Consultation Related to Community Legal Protection in Digital Transactions Heru Kurniawan; Weny Almorafid Dungga; Muhamad Khairun Kurniawan Kadir; Apripari; Nurul Fazri Elfikri; Fitran Amrain; Ramadhan Usman; Akbar Hidayatullah Daud
Society : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol. 5 No. 3 (2026): Mei
Publisher : Edumedia Solution

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55824/0f5y7z02

Abstract

The development of digital technology has encouraged the increasing use of electronic transactions in various walks of life, including in rural areas. However, the rapid utilization of digital transactions has not been balanced with an adequate level of public understanding of the law, causing various legal risks such as online fraud, misuse of personal data, and legal uncertainty in electronic agreements. This community service activity aims to improve the legal literacy of the community through educational assistance and legal consultation related to legal protection in digital transactions. The method used is in the form of legal counseling and direct consultation held in Mekar Jaya village, Duhiadaa District, Pohuwato Regency, involving village officials and the general public. The results of the activities show that the public has been actively using digital transaction services, but still has a limited understanding of the legal rights and obligations as digital consumers. Through practical and contextual education, people are beginning to understand the importance of personal data protection, the validity of electronic agreements, and dispute resolution mechanisms in digital transactions. This legal assistance and consultation proved to be effective in increasing the legal awareness of the public and strengthening their position in facing the risks of digital transactions. This activity is expected to contribute to creating a secure, fair, and equitable digital transaction ecosystem, as well as being a model for sustainable legal service in the era of digital transformation.
Okinotorishima dan Ambiguitas UNCLOS 1982 Agung Prayuda Yahya; Akbar Hidayatullah Daud; Lisnawaty W Badu; Rickiyanto Jacksen Monintja; Mohammad Rifki Daud
Jurnal QOSIM : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial & Humaniora Vol 4 No 4 (2026): 2026
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/jq.v4i4.9291

Abstract

Sebagai Konstitusi laut dunia, Konvensi Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa tentang Hukum Laut tahun 1982 (UNCLOS) menghadapi krisis normatif karena ketidakmampuannya untuk menanggapi perkembangan teknologi abad ke-21 dan ambiguitas ketentuan hukum. Studi ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis urgensi revisi UNCLOS 1982 dan merumuskan model reformasi hukum laut internasional yang relevan untuk masa depan tata kelola maritim global. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan undang-undang dan pendekatan kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Pasal 121 ayat (3) UNCLOS mengandung ambiguitas yang signifikan mengenai definisi klaim fitur maritim, sebagaimana tercermin dalam sengketa atol Okinotorishima antara Jepang dan Tiongkok yang dipicu oleh intervensi teknologi geoteknik. Ketidakpastian parameter objektif mengenai konsep batuan, tempat tinggal manusia, dan kehidupan ekonomi berpotensi menggeser rezim kepastian hukum menjadi rezim yang didominasi oleh kekuatan teknologi dan politik negara-negara besar. Oleh karena itu, model reformasi yang realistis adalah melalui pembentukan protokol tambahan (perjanjian pelaksanaan) untuk memperjelas rezim kepulauan, yang didukung oleh komisi teknis independen internasional untuk melakukan verifikasi ilmiah atas klaim maritim. Reformasi progresif ini merupakan kebutuhan mendesak untuk menjaga stabilitas, keadilan, dan integritas hukum laut internasional dalam menghadapi dinamika zaman yang kompleks.