Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Perselisihan Waris dan Validitas Surat Keterangan Hibah: Kajian Hukum dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Akbar Hidayatullah Daud; Agung Prayuda Yahya; Muhammad Khairun Kurniawan Kadir; Nurul Fazri Elfikri; Ramadhan Usman; Janwar Hippy
Journal of Law, Human Rights, Immigration, and Corrections Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): Journal of Law, Human Rights, Immigration, and Corrections
Publisher : Yayasan Cerdas Pedia Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65101/lawric.v1i1.216

Abstract

Inheritance land grant disputes often arise in the Indonesian judiciary, especially regarding the validity of grants that do not use notarial deeds. This study aims to analyze the validity of the grant certificate (SKH) in the transfer of rights to undivided land inheritance and its impacts. The research method used is normative law with a legislation approach and case approach, specifically analyzing Manado High Court Decision Number 32/PDT/2024/PT MND. Results show that land grants not made by notarial deeds violate Article 1682 of the Civil Code, making them legally invalid and unusable as a basis for land registration. Registration of the transfer of rights to undivided inherited land is also not possible because the land remains an inheritance boedel owned collectively by all heirs. Registering the transfer of rights to undivided inherited land requires valid legal documents and must comply with applicable laws to ensure legal certainty for concerned parties.
Okinotorishima dan Ambiguitas UNCLOS 1982 Agung Prayuda Yahya; Akbar Hidayatullah Daud; Lisnawaty W Badu; Rickiyanto Jacksen Monintja; Mohammad Rifki Daud
Jurnal QOSIM : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial & Humaniora Vol 4 No 4 (2026): 2026
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/jq.v4i4.9291

Abstract

Sebagai Konstitusi laut dunia, Konvensi Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa tentang Hukum Laut tahun 1982 (UNCLOS) menghadapi krisis normatif karena ketidakmampuannya untuk menanggapi perkembangan teknologi abad ke-21 dan ambiguitas ketentuan hukum. Studi ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis urgensi revisi UNCLOS 1982 dan merumuskan model reformasi hukum laut internasional yang relevan untuk masa depan tata kelola maritim global. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan undang-undang dan pendekatan kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Pasal 121 ayat (3) UNCLOS mengandung ambiguitas yang signifikan mengenai definisi klaim fitur maritim, sebagaimana tercermin dalam sengketa atol Okinotorishima antara Jepang dan Tiongkok yang dipicu oleh intervensi teknologi geoteknik. Ketidakpastian parameter objektif mengenai konsep batuan, tempat tinggal manusia, dan kehidupan ekonomi berpotensi menggeser rezim kepastian hukum menjadi rezim yang didominasi oleh kekuatan teknologi dan politik negara-negara besar. Oleh karena itu, model reformasi yang realistis adalah melalui pembentukan protokol tambahan (perjanjian pelaksanaan) untuk memperjelas rezim kepulauan, yang didukung oleh komisi teknis independen internasional untuk melakukan verifikasi ilmiah atas klaim maritim. Reformasi progresif ini merupakan kebutuhan mendesak untuk menjaga stabilitas, keadilan, dan integritas hukum laut internasional dalam menghadapi dinamika zaman yang kompleks.
Urgensi Regulasi Hak Cipta Atas Produk Dari Generative Artificial Intelligence Dalam Menjamin Kepastian Bisnis Industri Kreatif Nurul Fazri Elfikri; Ramadhan Usman; Akbar Hidayatullah Daud; Nur Insani Aulia
Al-Mizan (e-Journal) Vol. 22 No. 1 (2026): Al-Mizan (e-Journal)
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Institut Agama Islam Negeri Sultan Amai Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30603/am.v22i1.7681

Abstract

The rapid development of generative artificial intelligence (AI) is significantly transforming the creative process across creative industries, while also presenting new challenges to copyright law. AI's capacity to produce artwork, music, writing, and designs that mimic human creations raises critical questions regarding authorship, ownership, and the economic rights associated with these outputs. This article examines the need to establish adaptable copyright regulations within the Indonesian legal framework to address the implications of generative AI. Utilizing a normative legal method that incorporates legislative, conceptual, and comparative analyses, the research evaluates national laws, legal doctrines, and international practices. Findings reveal that the existing Indonesian copyright law, which focuses on human creators, inadequately addresses the unique aspects of generative AI, resulting in legal uncertainty. Consequently, there is a pressing need to reformulate copyright laws to ensure legal clarity, protect creators' interests, and foster sustainable technological innovation.
Legal education and land mediation as an effort to build legal certainty on border land in Dembe I Village Dolot Alhasni Bakung; Zainal Abdul Aziz Hadju; Fitran Amrain; Sofyan Piyo; Nurul Fazri Elfikri; Akbar Hidayatullah Daud; Muhamad Khairun Kurniawan Kadir
Society : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol. 5 No. 4 (2026): Juli
Publisher : Edumedia Solution

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55824/qfnr7x42

Abstract

Border Land Management in coastal areas often presents juridical and social problems, including in Dembe I Village, Gorontalo City. Communities in this region face uncertainty about the legal status of the boundary land they occupy, although some have pocketed title certificates. The lack of legal understanding, the absence of village mediation institutions, and overlapping land administration add to the complexity of the problem. The thematic real work lecture (KKN) Program Phase II of Gorontalo State University was implemented to respond to these problems through a participatory and collaborative approach. The methods taken include legal counseling with the National Land Agency and the Faculty of law, citizen dialogue forums, participatory mapping, and the preparation of operational standards for land mediation procedures. The results of the activity showed an increase in Community Legal Literacy, the birth of critical awareness about the differences in formal rights and functions of space, as well as the drafting of mediation SOP documents as a local instrument for non-litigation dispute resolution. The conclusion of this activity confirms that the law can be presented in a communicative way to bridge the interests of the state in maintaining protected areas with the rights of communities in maintaining living space. This finding also implies that the model of service based on participatory legal education can be replicated in other coastal areas facing similar problems