Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

The scope of state finances and their implications for combating corruption in Indonesia Ahwan Ahwan; Yuni Ristansti
Priviet Social Sciences Journal Vol. 5 No. 12 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Privietlab

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55942/pssj.v5i12.1191

Abstract

The law enforcement of corruption crimes within the scope of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) continues to spark debate. The epicenter of the debate has been the use of the Business Judgment Rule (BJR) doctrine by law enforcement officials, which is considered disproportionate. A fundamental issue that has been overlooked is the scope of state finances. Excessively broad state financial regulations create grey areas and tend to contribute to chaos in law enforcement. The cases of Richard Joost Lino in 2009 and Ira Puspadewi in 2025 seem to prove that the real problem is not solely related to the use of the Business Judgment Rule doctrine, but more fundamentally to the scope of state finances. The enactment of Law Number 1 of 2025 concerning the Third Amendment to the Law on State-Owned Enterprises, which separates state finances from state-owned enterprise finances, reopens this discourse. Using normative legal research, with a legislative, conceptual, and case approach, this article seeks to respond to several criticisms that have arisen, particularly the assumption that the Law on State-Owned Enterprises will become an instrument that exacerbates corruption within the scope of state-owned enterprises. The analysis shows that several provisions in the State-Owned Enterprises Law clarify the boundaries between state finances and state-owned enterprise finances. This legal instrument is not an obstacle; rather, it provides clear guidelines for law enforcement officials to combat corruption within state-owned enterprises.
Degrading Penal Populism Through Alternative Sanctions in The Indonesian Penal Code Ahwan Ahwan; Ika Yuliana Susilawati
Rechtsvinding Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Civiliza Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59525/rechtsvinding.1732

Abstract

The enactment of the Penal Code (Law No. 1/2023) marks a historic shift in national penal policy, revealing a complex dualism between retributive penal populism and modern sentencing moderation. This paper aims to analyze the structure of penal policy within the Penal Code to examine how alternative sanctions are normatively designed to control, limit, and degrade the expansive destructive power of penal populism. Employing a doctrinal legal research method with legislative, conceptual, and legal-historical approaches, this study examines how the New Penal Code exhibits a “Janus-faced penal policy.” On one hand, this codification accommodates public punitive sentiment through the retention of the death penalty, the expansion of overcriminalization in public spaces, and intervention in the private sphere. On the other hand, however, it institutionalizes balancing mechanisms through the incorporation of new alternative sanctions, namely probation and community service. Guided by the “Principle of Balance” enshrined in the sentencing guidelines (Articles 51–54), these alternative sanctions function as a safety valve. This study concludes that the convergence of these two opposing paradigms is not merely a forced pragmatic political compromise, but rather a systemic normative design intended to curb the public’s punitive zeal while simultaneously preventing the judicial system from collapsing due to prison overcrowding. The success of this de-escalation of penal populism ultimately rests on the standardization of judicial risk assessment tools and a progressive shift in the mindset of law enforcement officials.
The Principle of Lex Favor Reo in Moral Crimes: A Study of the Legal Implications of the Transitional Period of the National Ika Yuliana Susilawati; Ahwan Ahwan
Rechtsvinding Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Civiliza Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59525/rechtsvinding.1754

Abstract

The transitional period following the implementation of the National Criminal Code (KUHP) has raised issues regarding the application of the Lex Favor Reo principle to changes in the provisions of moral offenses. This normative legal research aims to outline the criteria for determining the most favorable rules and analyze the legal effectiveness of applying this principle during the transitional period of the National Criminal Code. The research was conducted using a regulatory and contextual approach, utilizing primary and secondary legal materials analyzed qualitatively and prescriptively through systematic, contextual, and comparative interpretation. The results indicate that determining the most favorable rules cannot be based solely on quantitative calculations of criminal penalties but must be conducted in a hierarchical manner through three dimensions of analysis: criminalization, procedural, and punitive. The application of the Lex Favor Reo principle creates legal implications in the procedural aspect, affecting the use of the right to file a complaint and the withdrawal of a complaint, which determine the continuity of the legal process. In the penal aspect, it also raises the possibility of implementing alternative punishments that are more favorable to the perpetrator. Thus, the principle of lex favor reo during the transitional period of the National Criminal Code must be understood multidimensionally, taking into account the full legal consequences arising from the changes in the regulation of crimes against morality, thereby ensuring legal certainty, justice, and uniform application of the law in criminal practice.
Perisai “Kebenaran Informasi” Dalam Delik Penghinaan Presiden Dan Wakil Presiden Menurut Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) Ahwan Ahwan; R. Fahmi Natigor Daulay
Journal Kompilasi Hukum Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Kompilasi Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jkh.v11i1.364

Abstract

The substance of the offenses of insulting the president and vice president in the Criminal Code has indeed accommodated Constitutional Court Decision No. 013-022/PUU-IV/2006. The change in the nature of the offense to an absolute complaint-based offense and the reduction of the criminal penalty from six years to three years constitute substantial modifications. However, in certain sections, the legislature has retained the old classification, in which the president and vice president are designated as exclusive subjects in the offenses of defamation and insult. This has structural implications that concern not only the issue of freedom of expression but also the burden of proving the “truth of the information,” which serves as a crucial safeguard for citizens in expressing criticism. This article aims to examine how the mechanism for proving “truth of information” is regulated in the Criminal Code. Using doctrinal legal research with a legislative, conceptual, and comparative approach, this article seeks to examine the “truth of information” defense mechanism in defamation offenses involving the President and Vice President as subjects. This article finds that, in both the old and new Criminal Codes, the “truth of information” defense in defamation offenses applies only to “any person” and “public officials”/“civil servants.” This fact demonstrates that criticism of the public and government officials, on the one hand, and criticism of the “president and vice president,” on the other, are afforded different levels of protection. Furthermore, this also has the potential to create a chilling effect and foster a high degree of apathy among citizens regarding the exercise of their freedom of expression.
Internalization Of Gender Equality Values In Family Law As An Effort To Prevent Violence Against Women Ayang Afira Anugerahayu; Nathania Permata S; Ika Yuliana Susilawati; Ade Sultan Muhammad; I Gusti Bagus Sakah Sumaragatha; Lalu Panca Tresna; Ahwan Ahwan
Abdi Masyarakat Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): Abdi Masyarakat
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pendidikan (LPP) Mandala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58258/1rwhqm42

Abstract

Violence against women within the family remains a complex social issue in Indonesia, influenced by patriarchal culture and limited public understanding of gender equality in family law. This community service aims to internalize gender equality values through legal education in family law as a preventive effort against violence toward women. The methods used include legal counseling, participatory discussions, and community assistance in Penujak Village, Central Lombok Regency. The results indicate an increased public understanding of equal rights and obligations between spouses and greater legal awareness regarding women's protection. The implication of this activity is the formation of a more inclusive and gender-just mindset in family life. Therefore, the internalization of gender equality values can serve as a preventive strategy to reduce violence against women in society. The main output of this activity focuses on strengthening public legal literacy and establishing a collective awareness among villagers to independently prevent gender-based violence
Edukasi Hukum: Dampak Negatif Judi Online (Judol) Bagi Generasi Muda Di Desa Tanak Awu: edukasi hukum Lalu Panca Tresna D; Muhammad Rifaldi Setiawan; Ahwan Ahwan; Ayang Afira Anugerahayu; Ika Yuliana Susilawati Ika Yuliana Susilawati
Jurnal Risalah Kenotariatan Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Risalah Kenotariatan
Publisher : Magister Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/risalahkenotariatan.v7i1.433

Abstract

Abstrak Judi Online atau biasa disebut (Judol) merupakan kegiatan taruhan atau perjudian yang dilakukan melalui Internet. Ini bisa mencakup berbagai jenis permainan seperti, taruhan Olahraga, Slot, Permainan Kasino Online, Togel Online dan Domino Online. Didukung oleh data bahwa di Seluruh wilayah Indonesia Begitu Maraknya permainan Judol Tanpa Terkecuali di Daerah Lombok. Oleh karena itu melalui “Edukasi Hukum:Dampak Negatif Judi Online (Judol) bagi generasi Muda, akan memberikan manfaat berupa pengetahuan dalam hal Dampak Negatif Judi Online (Judol). Metode yang digunakan dalam melaksanakan pengabdian kepada masyarakat dilakukan secara langsung di lapangan untuk tahap survei dan pelaksanaan sosialisasi di masyarakat. Hasil dari sosialisasi tersebut menyimpulkan bahwa Dampak Negatif Judi Online (Judol) memiliki urgensi yang sangat besar bagi kehidupan masyarakat terlebih generasi muda. Segala bentuk Perjudian, lansung di dunia nyata maupun di dunia maya, salah satunya bentuknya berupa Judi Online (Judol) Status hukumnya dilarang Indonesia. Pemerintah sudah melakukan berbagai cara untuk Pemberatasan judol berupa penangkapan bandar pemilik situs dan pemblokiran situs-situs Judi online (Judol). Karena Dampak negatifnya begitu besar Seperti Kerugian financial, ketergantungan dan gangguan psikologis, Penipuan, kebocoran data pribadi dan masalah Hukum. Dengan demikian, dalam pemberantasan judol ini tidak cukup dengan hanya peran pemerintah saja tetapi perlu adanya peran masyarakat dengan melibatkan tokoh masyarakat, agama, dan pemuda, dengan cara memberikan edukasi dan penyadaran kepada generasi muda mengenai dampak negatif dari Judi Online (judol).