cover
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota mataram,
Nusa tenggara barat
INDONESIA
Unram Law Review
Published by Universitas Mataram
ISSN : 25489267     EISSN : 25492365     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Universitas Mataram(Unram) Law Review(ULREV) is a peer-reviewed journal published by the Law Faculty of Mataram University, is Indonesian Journal of Law as a forum for communication in the study of theory and application in Law Contains articles texts in the field of Law. The purpose of this journal is to provide a place for academics, researchers, and practitioners to publish original research articles or article reviews. The scope of the articles contained in this journal discusses various topics in Criminal Law, Civil Law, International Law, Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, Islamic Law, Economic Law, Medical Law, Customary Law, Environmental Law and Other contemporary issues in the field of law. Articles are considered to be loaded are in the form of research or scientific simulations that have never been published or are waiting for publishing in other publications. ULREV is published three times a year in April, August, and December. This journal provides direct open access to its content based on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports greater global knowledge exchange. Scope: Contains articles texts discusses various topics in Criminal Law, Civil Law, International Law, Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, Islamic Law, Economic Law, Medical Law, Customary Law, Environmental Law and Other contemporary issues in the field of law.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 183 Documents
Anticipatory Governance In Land Readiness Policy For Addressing The 2045 Demographic Bonus Surge Yuswanto, Slamet; Tjenreng, M.B. Zubakhrum
Unram Law Review Vol 9 No 2 (2025): Unram Law Review (ULREV)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ulrev.v9i2.453

Abstract

Indonesia’s projected demographic bonus, expected to peak in 2045, presents both an opportunity and a major challenge for land availability to support housing, industrial development, and food security. This study aims to analyze the readiness of government policies in anticipating land demand amid the demographic bonus, identify the gap between existing regulations and empirical conditions, and formulate strategies based on the concept of anticipatory government. The research employs a qualitative descriptive method with a normative juridical approach through a review of policy documents, statutory regulations, and relevant academic literature. The findings reveal that although the government has developed long-term planning documents such as the National Long-Term Development Plan (RPJPD) 2025–2045 and the Grand Design of Population Development (GDPK) 2010–2035, their implementation faces persistent challenges in institutional coordination, regulatory enforcement, and the high rate of productive land conversion. The discrepancy between legal norms and field practices indicates that spatial planning policies remain reactive rather than forward-looking. The proposed anticipatory government strategy encompasses three key dimensions: (1) long-term projections based on demographic and spatial data; (2) policy innovations, including vertical housing and land-use conversion control; and (3) multi-actor participation through collaborative governance. Implementing these strategies is expected to strengthen the integration of spatial planning, food security, and social welfare policies, ensuring that Indonesia’s demographic bonus in 2045 becomes a driver of sustainable development rather than a demographic burden.
Kekuatan Mengikat Perjanjian Internasional dan Hukum Kebiasaan Internasional: Analisis Perbandingan Monica Viny Angraini; Grace Putri Waghe; Ria Wierma Putri; Le Thi Minh Phuong
Unram Law Review Vol 9 No 2 (2025): Unram Law Review (ULREV)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ulrev.v9i2.417

Abstract

International treaties and customary international law are two main sources in the international legal system. Both have the function of regulating relations between countries and international actors, but there are differences in the mechanisms of formation and its binding force. This study contributes to fill the analytical gap in previous comparative works by examining how legitimacy and enforceability differ under modern international adjudication contexts.Using normative legal research methods, specifically the statute approach and conceptual analysis, an analysis is conducted on the legal principles, doctrines, and practices of states to understand how the legitimacy and effectiveness of both are recognized in the international legal system.. The results of the study show that international treaties generally have more explicit and specific binding force because they are based on the formal agreement of the parties, while customary international law is binding based on general practices accepted as law (opinio juris). However, in certain situations, customary law can apply more broadly, including to countries that are not parties to an agreement. This study emphasizes the importance of understanding the interaction between the two in an effort to maintain legal certainty and stability of international relations.
Gender Discrimination in Artificial Intelligence: An International Human Rights Law Perspective and the Quest for Binding Regulation Ayu Riska Amalia; Diva Pitaloka; Adhitya Nini Rizki Apriliana
Unram Law Review Vol 9 No 2 (2025): Unram Law Review (ULREV)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ulrev.v9i2.450

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed and reshaped the way people work and interact. While AI provides convenience, it also poses significant challenges to human rights, particularly gender equality. The use of AI in recruitment processes, healthcare diagnosis, and discriminatory content moderation illustrates how it can exacerbate existing inequalities. This study employs a normative juridical method with a qualitative approach, analyzing primary instruments of international human rights law such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR),the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW). It also examines non-binding frameworks, namely the UNESCO Recommendation on the Ethics of AI and the OECD AI Principles, and compares them with the binding EU AI Act. The findings indicate that AI has the potential to violate fundamental rights of women, including the rights to equality and non-discrimination, work, privacy, health, participation in public and political life, as well as representation and identity. Furthermore, soft-law mechanisms remain insufficient to prevent gender bias, as their implementation relies heavily on states’ political will. Nevertheless, states have a positive obligation under international law to respect, protect, and fulfil the right to equality; thus, a binding international legal framework is urgently needed to ensure accountability and gender-sensitive AI governance.