UIR LAW REVIEW
UIR Law Review edisi keempat Oktober 2018, menerbitkan artikel tentang Perlindungan Penyandang Disabilitas, Perlindungan Konsumen, Asuransi, Aplikasi Berbayar, Statuta Roma, Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa, Kontrak, Pengelolaan Air Limbah, Perkawinan, Pajak dan Restribusi.
Articles
313 Documents
<![CDATA[Aspek Hukum Perjanjian Pemberian Bantuan Pinjaman Modal Antara Badan Usaha Mlik Negara Kepada Usaha Mikro Kecil ]]>
<![CDATA[Rahdiansyah, Rahdiansyah]]>
<![CDATA[ UIR Law Review Vol. 2 No. 1 (2018): UIR Law Review ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[UIR Press ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25299/uirlrev.2018.2.01.1434
<![CDATA[State-Owned Enterprises as the implementer of partnership programs, has an obligation to provide business capital loan assistance to small businesses in accordance with the decision of the Minister of State-Owned Enterprises and State-Owned Enterprises No. 236 / MBU / 2003 on partnership programs State-Owned Enterprises with Small Business and Community Development Program. The provision of grant of business capital loan to small business which is better known as this partnership program has a goal to increase the capability of small scale business through the utilization of fund from the profit share of State Owned Enterprises in this program. BUMN Pembina is prohibited to provide business loan small businesses that have become partners of other State-Owned Enterprises (BUMN).]]>
<![CDATA[Implementasi Prinsip Yurisdiksi Universal Mengenai Pemberantasan Kejahatan Perompakan Laut Di Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Korea, Dian]]>
<![CDATA[ UIR Law Review Vol. 2 No. 1 (2018): UIR Law Review ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[UIR Press ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25299/uirlrev.2018.2.01.1435
<![CDATA[The high seas are all parts of the sea that are not included in the exclusive economic zone, territorial sea, inland waters of a country, or in the archipelagic waters of an archipelago country. Consequently, the case of the interpretation of the case. This happens with the MV Ship. Sinar Kudus is an Indonesian ship that is a jurisdiction of the Indonesian state. For the case, Indonesia is obliged to participate in resolving the piracy case that happened on the MV ship. Sinar Kudus, so the jurisdiction of the Indonesian state against the MV ship. The Holy Light captured by Somali pirates is a passive nationality jurisdiction. In this jurisdictional principle, Indonesia has the right to protect its citizens who are victims of crimes abroad. Constraints in the implementation of Indonesian state jurisdiction over MV Ship. Sinar Kudus which was held hostage by Somali pirates such as MV ship. The holy rays while sailing in international waters were not accompanied by Indonesian warships, so the Indonesian Navy could not directly attack the pirates at the time of piracy. MV Ship. The holy rays are brought to the territorial waters of Somalia by pirates, so what prevails here is the jurisdiction of the Somali state. Seeing the weakness of law enforcement in Somalia makes it difficult for Indonesia to cooperate in the release of the crew of the Sinar Kudus ship held hostage by Somali pirates. Indonesia voted for negotiations on the release of the crew of Sinar Sudus for the safety of crew members being held hostage by Somali pirates.]]>
<![CDATA[Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia: Persoalan Dan Jalan Keluarnya ]]>
<![CDATA[Hajri, Wira Atma]]>;
<![CDATA[Rahdiansyah, Rahdiansyah]]>
<![CDATA[ UIR Law Review Vol. 2 No. 1 (2018): UIR Law Review ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[UIR Press ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25299/uirlrev.2018.2.01.1436
<![CDATA[The existence of two institutions that review of legislation in Indonesia resulted in various problems especially in terms of legal certainty, institutional authority, and legal vacuum. In terms of legal certainty, which decisions to follow, the decision of the Supreme Court or the decision of the Constitutional Court. When the Constitutional Court tests the law, while the Supreme Court examines under the law, it does not mean that the Constitutional Court is higher than the Supreme Court. In terms of authority, the neglect of the Supreme Court ruling as has been done by the General Election Commission, of course, disturbs the authority of the Supreme Court. How is the decision of the institution of the Supreme Court not run by the Election Commission. The issue is due to a Constitutional Court ruling which provides a different interpretation of the law as a test case by the Supreme Court, that is another matter. In terms of legal vacuum, suppose the absence of a judicial institution authorized to test the Decree of the People's Consultative Assembly.]]>
<![CDATA[Kodifikasi RUU KUHP Melemahkan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi ]]>
<![CDATA[Arliman S, larensius]]>
<![CDATA[ UIR Law Review Vol. 2 No. 1 (2018): UIR Law Review ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[UIR Press ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25299/uirlrev.2018.2.01.1437
<![CDATA[Social phenomenon called corruption is the reality of human behavior in social interaction that is considered deviant, and endangering society and state. Corruption as a form of extraordinary crime that is very detrimental to the people, the idea to weaken the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), one of them by incorporating the Corruption Act (Corruption Act) and Money Laundering Criminal Act (UU TPPU) into the Draft Law of the Penal Code (RUU KUHP). Corruption greatly weakens the existence of the KPK later. Just imagine as long as the KPK, many cases that can be dismantled, the government should anticipate the weakening of this KPK, where the author tries to offer the government open the formation of other laws to regulate this. If this is implemented then there will be 3 (three) institutions that continue to oversee corruption, namely: Police, Prosecutors and KPK primarily. This is to eradicate corruption in Indonesia as soon as possible.]]>
<![CDATA[Latar Belakang Penjatuhan Sanksi Pidana Mati Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Narkotika didalam UU No. 35 Tahun 2009 Tentang Narkotika ]]>
<![CDATA[susanti, heni susanti]]>
<![CDATA[ UIR Law Review Vol. 2 No. 1 (2018): UIR Law Review ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[UIR Press ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25299/uirlrev.2018.2.01.1438
<![CDATA[Peredaran narkotika di Indonesia semakin marak, hal itu dapat kita lihat fakta-fakta yang ada sekarang bahwa Indonesia tidak lagi sebagai tempat peredaran narkotika bahkan telah menjadi tempat untuk memproduksi narkotika. Hal ini dikarenakan Indonesia dengan jumlah penduduk yang tinggi menjadikan daya tarik tersendiri bagi para pelaku kajahatan narkotika. Yang menjadi masalah pokok dalam penelitian ini adalah sebagai berikut:Apakah yang melatar belakangi penjatuhan pidana mati terhadap pelaku tindak pidana narkotika didalam uu no.35 Tahun 2009 Tentang Narkotika? Pendekatan masalah yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode yuridis normatif. Penelitian ini mengkaji sanksi pidana mati didalam uu no. 35 tahun 2009 tentang narkotika. Data yang diperoleh dalam penelitian ini berasal dari Penelitian kepustakaan (library research).Yang melatarbelakangi terjadinya penjatuhan pidana mati dalam tindak pidana narkotika adalah dikarenakan kejahatan narkotika menimbulkan dampak buruk bagi kehidupan masyarakat Indonesia juga terhadap eksistensi nilai nilai budaya dan kepribadian bangsa yang akhirnya akan melemahkan ketahanan dan kestabilan nasional dan juga sangat berdampak bagi kehidupan sosial, ekonomi, politik, budaya sehingga membahayakan bangsa Indonsia.]]>
<![CDATA[Urgensi Ratifikasi Statuta Roma Bagi Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Situngkir, Danel Aditia]]>
<![CDATA[ UIR Law Review Vol. 2 No. 2 (2018): UIR Law Review ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[UIR Press ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25299/uirlrev.2018.vol2(02).1548
<![CDATA[Kehadiran Pengadilan Internasional permanen merupakan realisasi dari upaya masyarakat internasional untuk memberikan perlindungan terhadap hak asasi manusia dari kejahatan-kejahatan luar biasa terhadap kemanusiaan. Pengadilan yang didirikan berdasarkan Statuta Roma tersebut telah diratifikasi oleh 123 negara. Indonesia tidak termasuk negara yang meratifikasi statuta roma tersebut yang telah mulai berlaku sejak 1 Juli 2002. Permasalahan yang akan dibahas pada tulisan ini adalah yurisdiksi Yurisdiksi Mahkamah Pidana Internasional dibandingkan dengan Pengadilan Ham di Indonesia dan urgensi statuta roma dalam kaitan dengan kedaulatan bagi indonesia. Metode Penelitian dilakukan dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan metode pengumpulan data melalui studi kepustakaan yang kemudian dianalisa sebagai suatu isu hukum untuk membahas urgensi ratifikasi statuta roma bagi indonesia. Dari pembahasan disimpulkan bahwa Yurisdiksi Mahkamah Pidana Internasional lebih lengkap dari Pengadilan HAM di Indonesia dan urgensi ratifikasi statuta roma jika dikaitkan dengan kedaulatan negara tidak perlu dikhawatirkan karena mahkamah hanya untuk melengkapi sebagaimana prinsip komplementaris dalam statuta roma.]]>
<![CDATA[Tinjauan Hukum Terhadap Penjualan Aplikasi Berbayar Dengan Cara Pinjam Akun Pribadi (Apple ID) ]]>
<![CDATA[ramadhani, ika]]>
<![CDATA[ UIR Law Review Vol. 2 No. 2 (2018): UIR Law Review ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[UIR Press ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25299/uirlrev.2018.vol2(02).1551
<![CDATA[The research was aimed at knowing the validity of the sales of paid apps by lending personal account (Apple ID) based on software lisence and the legal impact of selling paid apps by lending personal account (Apple ID). The research was a normative legal research. The approach used were statutory and conceptual approaches. Legal source used were primary, secondary, tertiary legal resources. Legal sources were collected by using literature study supplemented with interview. The collected legal sources were analyzed qualitatively. The research results indicate that the sales of paid apps by lending personal account (Apple ID) based on software lisence constitutes an illegal act because there is no right use transfer between Apple as the provider of apps that are available in App Store to the owner of Apple ID as the user of the application. The legal impact of the sales of paid apps by lending personal account constitutes branch of a contract which can be asked for liability based on Article 32 Law No 11 of 2008 concerning Information Electronic Transactions, Law No 28 of 2014 corcerning Copyright. And Terms and Condition provided by Apple Inc.The research was aimed at knowing the validity of the sales of paid apps by lending personal account (Apple ID) based on software lisence and the legal impact of selling paid apps by lending personal account (Apple ID). The research was a normative legal research. The approach used were statutory and conceptual approaches. Legal source used were primary, secondary, tertiary legal resources. Legal sources were collected by using literature study supplemented with interview. The collected legal sources were analyzed qualitatively. The research results indicate that the sales of paid apps by lending personal account (Apple ID) based on software lisence constitutes an illegal act because there is no right use transfer between Apple as the provider of apps that are available in App Store to the owner of Apple ID as the user of the application. The legal impact of the sales of paid apps by lending personal account constitutes branch of a contract which can be asked for liability based on Article 32 Law No 11 of 2008 concerning Information Electronic Transactions, Law No 28 of 2014 corcerning Copyright. And Terms and Condition provided by Apple Inc.]]>
<![CDATA[Mediasi Melalui Pendekatan Mufakat Sebagai Lembaga Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Untuk Mendukung Pembangunan Ekonomi Nasional ]]>
<![CDATA[Arliman S, larensius]]>
<![CDATA[ UIR Law Review Vol. 2 No. 2 (2018): UIR Law Review ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[UIR Press ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25299/uirlrev.2018.vol2(02).1587
<![CDATA[Pembangunan ekonomi adalah pilar utama dalam mendukung pertumbuhan dan pembangunan suatu bangsa. Dinamika pembangunan ekonomi terkadang menimbulkan sengketa akibat pertentang dan perseteruan bisnis. Penyelesaian sengketa dengan konvensional dikerjakan lewat satu tempat saja, yaitu pengadilan. Penyelesaian sengketa di luar pengadilan pada umumnya menggunakan cara-cara yang berbeda dengan penyelesaian sengketa melalui pengadilan, yakni digunakannya beberapa cara antara lainnya ialah mediasi dalam sengketa bidang ekonomi. Tulisan ini membahas bagaimana peran mediasi sebagai lembaga alternatif penyelesaian sengketa untuk mendukung pembangunan ekonomi nasional serta peran pendekatan mufakat. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis nomatif dengan pendekatan deskriptif analitis. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa peran mediasi sebagai lembaga alternatif penyelesaian sengketa ada yang berperan penting dan ada yang tidak terutama di dalam sengketa- sengketa pengadilan niaga; sengketa yang pengadilan hubungan industrial; persaingan usaha; sengketa konsumen, dan sengketa lain yang pemeriksaannya di persidangan ditentukan tenggang waktu penyelesaiannya dalam ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan misalkan sengketa dalam dunia perbankan dan asuransi. Pendekatan mufakat sangat penting di dalam melaksanakan mediasi penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi, karena mufakat merupakan simbol dari bangsa Indonesia.]]>
<![CDATA[Pertimbangan Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Daerah Mengenai Pengelolaan Air Limbah Domestik Di Kabupaten Bengkalis ]]>
<![CDATA[Bur, Arifin]]>;
<![CDATA[Hajri, Wira Atma]]>
<![CDATA[ UIR Law Review Vol. 2 No. 2 (2018): UIR Law Review ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[UIR Press ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25299/uirlrev.2018.vol2(02).1608
<![CDATA[Environmental protection and management of domestic wastewater according to Article 63 Paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) of Law Number 32 Year 2009 shall be mandatory affairs related to basic services of regency / municipality governments, among them the provision of infrastructure and domestic waste water treatment facilities. Through the RPJMN 2015-2019 the government attempts, by 2019 every rural and urban Indonesian community already has access to proper sanitation facilities for domestic wastewater. In fact, the availability of domestic wastewater service to date is only 60.91% and not yet in Bengkalis Regency. This issue should not occur, because it will cause damage and / or environmental pollution. To respond to the needs of Bengkalis society it is treated a tool (tools) to regulate the management of domestic waste water in the form of local regulations. The result of the research shows that the consideration of the formulation of the regional regulation in Bengkalis Regency concerning the Management of Domestic Wastewater is philosophically the responsibility of the state and the government's duty to do so in order to realize the happiness of all Indonesian people and all mankind based on Pancasila and the Preamble of the 1945 Constitution. Juridical is based on the 1945 Constitution and other relevant legislation.]]>
<![CDATA[Aspek Hukum Kontrak Leasing dan Kontrak Financing ]]>
<![CDATA[Admiral, Admiral]]>
<![CDATA[ UIR Law Review Vol. 2 No. 2 (2018): UIR Law Review ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[UIR Press ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25299/uirlrev.2018.vol2(02).1663
<![CDATA[Leasing Contract and Financing Contract is an Innominaat Contract. Both of this contract have a different goals, characteristic and regulation. Leasing Contract is identical with common Lease Contract, but with an option (Finance Lease) and without an option (Operating Lease),while Financing Contract is a Consumer Finance Contract, where is the debitur is an owner and not a lessee]]>
