cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Rahdiansyah
Contact Email
rahdiansyah@law.uir.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
lawreview@journal.uir.ac.id
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota pekanbaru,
Riau
INDONESIA
UIR LAW REVIEW
Published by Universitas Islam Riau
ISSN : 25487671     EISSN : 2548768X     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
UIR Law Review edisi keempat Oktober 2018, menerbitkan artikel tentang Perlindungan Penyandang Disabilitas, Perlindungan Konsumen, Asuransi, Aplikasi Berbayar, Statuta Roma, Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa, Kontrak, Pengelolaan Air Limbah, Perkawinan, Pajak dan Restribusi.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 313 Documents
 20   21   22   23   24 
Penyelesaian Sengketa Wanprestasi Akibat Keterlambatan Pelaksanaan Perjanjian Kontsruksi Bangunan Jannah, Martin Putri Nur; Musjtar, Dewi Nurul
UIR Law Review Vol. 3 No. 2 (2019): UIR Law Review
Publisher : UIR Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25299/uirlrev.2019.vol3(02).3489

Abstract

Development is an effort to create prosperity and welfare for the people. A development work cannot be separated from the construction contract. In its implementation, In its implementation, many construction service providers, both service users and contractors, did not carry out their achievements as specified in the contract. The Building Construction Contracts on the construction of the Grhatama Pustaka Library Building in the Special Region of Yogyakarta is considered as a default. The purpose of this study is to determine the dispute resolution for delays in the achievement of performance on the implementation of the Building Construction Contracts based on Decision Number: 87/Pdt.G/2013/PN.Bantul. This study uses a normative juridical approach using legislation and jurisprudence (court decisions). The results showed that dispute resolution for delays in fulfilling litigation performance through the Bantul District Court with Results of Decisions obliged service providers to submit building construction work to service users in a proper and good condition and were obliged to pay compensation and interest to service users.
Problematika Implementasi Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 tentang desa di Kabupaten Sidoarjo Mahyani, Ahmad; Suhartono, Slamet; Sartik, Dwi Putri; Widjaya, Johanes Dipa
UIR Law Review Vol. 3 No. 2 (2019): UIR Law Review
Publisher : UIR Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25299/uirlrev.2019.vol3(02).3749

Abstract

The state recognizes and respect the Village as a legal community unit that has the authorithy to regulate and manage gonverment affairs and the rights of origin and traditional autonomous. In the context of recognition and respect, since the independence of Indonesia several regulation have been enacted which from the legal basic for implementing village governance. The enactment of Law number of 2014 concerning villages and their implementing laws and regulations also bring legal consequences to the administration of the village administration, including the restructuring of village apparatus, the preparation of village development plans and other legal consequences. This research focuses on the implementation of law no 6 of 2014 specifically the preparation of the village budget and the orderly administration of the village so that it can be seen the problems experienced by the village government.
Koordinasi PT. Pegadaian (Persero) Dengan Direktorat Reserse Narkoba Polda Sumbar Dalam Penimbangan Barang Bukti Penyalahgunaan Narkotika Arliman S, Larensius
UIR Law Review Vol. 4 No. 1 (2020): UIR Law Review
Publisher : UIR Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25299/uirlrev.2020.vol4(1).3779

Abstract

Direktorat Narkoba Polda Sumatera Barat (Ditresnarkoba Polda Sumbar) untuk mengetahui berat barang bukti narkotika, maka penyidik harus melakukan penimbangan barang bukti yang bekerjasama dengan PT. Pegadaian. Hal ini berguna untuk menciptakan kerjasama agar mencegah dan pemberantasan penyalahgunaan dan peredaran gelap nerkotika di Sumatera Barat. Atas hal tersebut maka dibahas koordinasi yang dilakukan oleh Ditresnarkoba dengan Pihak PT. Pegadaian Padang dalam penimbangan barang bukti? Serta kendala apa saja yang dihadapi Ditresnarkoba dengan Pihak PT. Pegadaian Padang dalam penimbangan barang bukti? Penelitian ini menjelaskan bahwa koordinasi yang dilakukan oleh Ditresnarkoba dengan Pihak PT. Pegadaian Padang dalam penimbangan barang bukti adalah sebagai berikut: dalam kegiatan penimbangan berat barang bukti narkoba, wajib melampirkan surat permintaan penimbangan barang bukti narkoba dan setelah selesai penimbangan, wajib dibuatkan Berita Acara yang ditandatangani kedua belah pihak dengan diketahui dan disaksikan oleh saksi penyidik atau penyidik pembantu dan tersangka, demi kelancaran pelaksanaan penyidikan yang dilakukan, maka para pihak saling berkoordinasi, saling membantu dalam lingkup tugas dan kewenangan masing-masing. Kendala yang dihadapi adalah: kurangnya sarana dan prasarana, kurangnya personil penyidik narkoba, kurangnya pemahaman anggota kepolisian dalam melakukan timbangan di lapangan, kurangnya senjata dalam melakukan pengawalan, baik terhadap tersangka maupun barang bukti, saling terikatnya tiap pelaku, teknik peradaran narkotika yang berubah-rubah dan hari libur menjadi kendala dalam melakukan penimbangan. kendala di pegadaian.
Perlindungan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (HaKI) Ditinjau Dari Epistimologi Nizwana, Yulia; Rahdiansyah, Rahdiansyah
UIR Law Review Vol. 3 No. 2 (2019): UIR Law Review
Publisher : UIR Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25299/uirlrev.2019.vol3(02).4006

Abstract

Along with the times, the protection of the rights possessed by every human being needs to be regulated, including the case with Intellectual Property Rights (IPR). As one of the countries that is very diverse and has a lot of potential in the field of IPR, Indonesia has also long been actively involved in both regional and international frameworks in the field of IPR. Philosophy of science is really worth studying by anyone. Philosophy of science has a role in human life. Philosophy of science is knowledge that seeks truth. Branches of philosophy include Ontology, Epistemology, and Axiology. Then IPR protection will be assessed in terms of epistemology and axiology. The formulation of the problem discussed is why IPRs need to be protected, how IPR Protection is evaluated from Epistemology,. The approach method used is Normative Juridical, discussion of issues relating to the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights in terms of Epistemology. The results of the discussion, the reason why Intellectual Property Rights Need to be Protected is because IPR is natural rights, Reputation Protection, Encouragement and rewards from innovation and creation, Then supported by 5 basic theories of IPR protection: Reward Theory, Recovery Theory, Incentive Theory, Risk Theory, Economic Growth Stimulus Theory. Protection of Intellectual Property Rights in terms of Epistemology. Epistemology discusses three things, namely the object of philosophy (ie thought), how to obtain philosophical knowledge and measure of truth (philosophical knowledge) how humans seek philosophical knowledge. For example why IPR needs to be protected, the most profound and fundamental answer is IPR protection is a protection against the intellectual idea of ​​someone who was born naturally the gift of the God, that is from God where every human being was created with advantages including the advantages of intellectual ideas that are certainly different every human beings, so that intellectual ideas need to be protected because they are subjective and natural.
Kewenangan Hakim Dalam Mengubah Klausul Kontrak Yang Dibuat Atau Dilaksanakan Dengan Itikad Buruk Malye, Timothee Kencono; Rahdiansyah, Rahdiansyah
UIR Law Review Vol. 4 No. 1 (2020): UIR Law Review
Publisher : UIR Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25299/uirlrev.2020.vol4(1).4132

Abstract

Para praktiknya kadangkala pihak-pihak yang terikat dalam sebuah kontrak tidak memiliki kedudukan yang seimbang, baik dari segi ekonomi, pengetahuan, maupun pengalaman. Hal ini menyebabkan potensi adanya klausul pada perjanjian yang merugikan salah satu pihak apabila ditinjau dari kacamata orang pada umumnya yang berakal sehat. Penulis berpendapat bahwa hakim tidak perlu ragu untuk membatalkan maupun mengubah klausul pada kontrak yang demikian, dengan didasari Pasal 1338 dan Pasal 1339 KUH Perdata maupun konsep misbruik van omstandigheden. Adapun mekanisme perubahan atau pembatalannya adalah dengan pengajuan gugatan perbuatan melawan hukum oleh Penasihat Hukum ataupun masyarakat pada umumnya. Penasihat Hukum pada khususnya harus menyadari hal ini untuk melindungi klien yang secara ekonomi dan pendidikan berada dalam posisi yang lebih lemah. Kata Kunci: Kontrak, Misbruik van omstandigheden, Itikad Buruk
Eksaminasi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Tentang Penjatuhan Sanksi Pidana Pada Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Sepanjang Tahun 2018: Bahasa Indonesia Wiarti, July; Pratama, Aprinda Dika
UIR Law Review Vol. 3 No. 2 (2019): UIR Law Review
Publisher : UIR Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25299/uirlrev.2019.vol3(02).4268

Abstract

The results of criminal case decisions greatly affect the eradication of the relevant criminal offenses. So it is necessary to examine these decisions to see whether or not such judges' decisions can eradicate corruption or not. Moreover, it is understood that one of the purposes of criminal giving is a deterrent effect for both the perpetrators and others. Therefore the focus of this study: first, What is the form of criminal sanctions imposed by the Judge of the Pekanbaru District Court on Corruption Cases during 2018; second, how the imposition of criminal sanctions by the Pekanbaru District Court Judge in the Corruption Case in 2018 is related to the eradication of corruption. This type of research is a normative legal research that is based on mere secondary data and supplemented with interviews with certain parties. The research results obtained are the form of criminal sanctions given by judges in cases of corruption in the Pekanbaru District Court is only in the range of one to four years, twenty cases and for five years to ten years there are three remaining cases are cases that the prosecution does not can be accepted and the defendant is released from punishment. The sentence given by the judge on corruption cases in the Pekanbaru district court is still far from being said to have an impact on the eradication of corruption itself. Because, from the form of the sentence alone there are still many light and only given a special minimum sentence. Even though the losses suffered by the State are quite large. Then, many cases are subject to Article 3 of Article 2, where the sentence is lighter than Article 2
Problematics Violence in Household Reviewed From Viewpoint Criminology and Victimology Wijanarko, Dwi Seno; Eleanora, Fransiska Novita
UIR Law Review Vol. 4 No. 1 (2020): UIR Law Review
Publisher : UIR Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25299/uirlrev.2020.vol4(1).4279

Abstract

Domestic violence is an increasingly widespread problem, and is often triggered or caused by a variety of things, but the most prominent is economic problems or primary needs. Perpetrators as people who commit violence can be reviewed why to do it, due to several factors in him, such as the environment, heredity, psychiatric disturbed so that in solving household problems is often done with high emotions and full of inappropriate words spoken to the interlocutor. While the victim as the party suffering due to the treatment given by the perpetrator must also be seen, the perception of the victim as a weak party, the victims here based on the type there are victims who really want themselves to be victims, there are victims who are truly themselves victims, exploited by the perpetrators, where violence there are various forms of physical, psychological, sexual violence and neglect of the household, this is seen when viewed from the perception of criminology and victimization. The research method used is normative juridical that is by tracing the literature and legislation relating to the problem under study. The result is that the perpetrators of domestic violence are seen from the aspect of the perpetrators' responsibilities regarding their age to be able to punish and sanction, the victims see their role when the crime is related to the loss suffered, and the settlement of the household according to the law on the elimination of violence in the household namely number 23 of 2004, namely by preventing the occurrence of criminal acts, protecting victims, providing emergency assistance, assisting the process of determining the application for protection.
Presentase Dan Jaringan Korupsi Angelina Sondakh Pada Putusan Hakim Mahkamah Agung No 1616kPis.Sus2013 Setiawan, Anang; Nurmandi, Achmad
UIR Law Review Vol. 4 No. 1 (2020): UIR Law Review
Publisher : UIR Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25299/uirlrev.2020.vol4(1).4384

Abstract

The rise of corruption cases that occur in Indonesia today, if we see corruption cases in Indonesia every year is always increasing, not decreasing, this causes people to feel angry with corruptors. The percentage and network of corruption Angelina Sondakh of the Supreme Court Judge's Decision No. 1616k / Pis.Sus / 2013 is quite interesting to examine especially if we can see who the dominant actors are in this case, both from the planning process, the bidding process, the bid evaluation process, and implementation and evaluation. This study uses a descriptive qualitative approach which illustrates the phenomenon of Angelina sondakh corruption case in the Supreme Court's Decision No. 1616 K / Pid.Sus / 2013. Descriptive analysis in this study uses the Nvivo 12 Plus software. Data from this study were sourced from the Supreme Court Decision No. 1616 K / Pid.Sus / 2013 and previous research relating to the Corruption of Angelina Sondakh. The results of this discussion The conclusions that the author can take from the presentation of the analysis above are based on the decision of the Supreme Court No. 1616 K / Pid.Sus / 2013 analyzed with Nvivo 12 Plus in general from the four processes above can be seen Corporate 9.05%, Government 7.62%, Political Parties 0.32% and Political Consultants 0%. Keyword: Corruption; Bribery; Network
Pelaksanaan Yurisdiksi Universal Terhadap Modern Piracy Jure Gentium Asfarosya, Nadiyah
UIR Law Review Vol. 4 No. 1 (2020): UIR Law Review
Publisher : UIR Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25299/uirlrev.2020.vol4(1).4463

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the relevance of the approach of universal jurisdiction in law enforcement against the crime of modern pirates. This study looks at piracy itself which changes over time and the effectiveness of universal jurisdiction in minimizing back piracy that can affect the international community. This research is normative. The focus of this research is to find out if Universal jurisdiction can still be used in law enforcement against Modern Piracy. Universal jurisdiction has long been in law enforcement against piracy. However, turning the numbers of countries implementing universal jurisdiction raises the question of what constitutes an obstacle to implementing universal jurisdiction over the crime of piracy. In addition, several solutions have emerged that are considered more effective in enforcing the law against modern piracy in order to prevent the culture of impunity.
Deliberation, Southeast Asian Local Wisdom in Resolving Disputes Rahdiansyah, Rahdiansyah; Nizwana, Yulia
UIR Law Review Vol. 3 No. 2 (2019): UIR Law Review
Publisher : UIR Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25299/uirlrev.2019.vol3(02).4557

Abstract

Cultural disputes, and others, often occur between neighboring countries in Southeast Asia and can be the seeds of disharmony, of course, this is not desirable. Southeast Asia as a cultural scope that is interrelated in history, has local wisdom in resolving disputes, resolving this dispute is known as deliberation. Deliberation is an identity that must be prioritized as a wise cultural approach for the ASEAN community. The purpose of this study is to explore the local wisdom of Southeast Asian people in resolving disputes in their communities and implementing them as a solution for the ASEAN community. Recognizing each other as cultural origins often occur between Malaysian and Indonesian communities. As a nation of the same family, this is commonplace, but the most important thing is how to solve it. Interviewing the people of both countries is the first thing to do in looking at this problem, how they understand and see culture in their culture. Questionnaires are distributed as much as possible, each data obtained will be processed and classified according to nationality, education, age, and others. The findings will be a study to see the perspectives of the two countries in understanding history, culture, and cultural results in addressing the differences of opinion that occur. At least the description of the root of the problem is obtained, why this problem occurs, what are the main causes, how to understand it, how to react to it, and lead to the resolution of the dispute over ownership of culture itself

Page 22 of 32 | Total Record : 313

 20   21   22   23   24 

Filter by Year

2017 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): UIR Law Review Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025): UIR LAW REVIEW Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025): UIR LAW REVIEW Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): UIR Law Review Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024): UIR Law Review Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): UIR Law Review Vol. 7 No. 2 (2023): UIR Law Review Vol. 7 No. 1 (2023): UIR Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2022): UIR Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2022): UIR Law Review Vol. 5 No. 2 (2021): UIR Law Review Vol. 5 No. 1 (2021): UIR Law Review Vol. 4 No. 2 (2020): UIR Law Review Vol. 4 No. 1 (2020): UIR Law Review Vol 3 No 01 (2019): UIR Law Review Vol. 3 No. 2 (2019): UIR Law Review Vol. 3 No. 1 (2019): UIR Law Review Vol 2 No 02 (2018): UIR Law Review, Oktober 2018 Vol 2 No 01 (2018): UIR Law Review, April 2018 Vol. 2 No. 2 (2018): UIR Law Review Vol. 2 No. 1 (2018): UIR Law Review Vol 1 No 02 (2017): UIR Law Review, Oktober 2017 Vol. 1 No. 2 (2017): UIR Law Review Vol. 1 No. 1 (2017): UIR Law Review More Issue