cover
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota adm. jakarta barat,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Wanastra : Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra
ISSN : 20866151     EISSN : 25793438     DOI : 10.31294/w
Core Subject : Education,
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 232 Documents
The Code Mixing Between Waiters and Customers At Pizza Hut Gunung Sahari Pangestu, Maulani; Buansari, Istihayyu
Wanastra: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra Vol 17, No 2 (2025): September 2025
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31294/wanastra.v17i2.23034

Abstract

Code mixing is part of linguistics. Many people uses code mixing in everyday conversation for example, often found when in a mall, supermarket or restaurant. Code mixing is the use of one language unit into another language. The code mixing occurs when the speaker enters a foreign language into the language that is more dominantly  used.  This  research  investigates  the  use  of  code  mixing  applied  by waiters and customers at Pizza Hut Gunung Sahari by using descriptive qualitative method. As a result of the analysis, it can be found that there are two types of code mixing used in conversations between waiters and customers at Pizza Hut Gunung Sahari, they are Word Insertion and Phrase Insertion. The writer also found there are six reasons of code mixing used: Bilingualism, Speaker and Partner Speaking, Social Community, Situation, Vocabulary and Prestige. Based on Khairunas theory using code mixing can increase knowledge in other languages and if overeating is used it will have a bad effect because the speaker will always rely on code mixing and can change the speaker's accent.
A Critical Discourse Analysis of Presidents’ Inaugural Speeches in Indonesia: A Fairclough Perspective Purwaningrum, Prapti Wigati; Harmoko, Danang Dwi
Wanastra: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra Vol 17, No 2 (2025): September 2025
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31294/wanastra.v17i2.25221

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menelaah hubungan antara bahasa dan struktur sosial budaya dengan membandingkan teks pidato perdana Presiden Joko Widodo (2014) dan Prabowo Subianto (2024) melalui perspektif Analisis Wacana Kritis Fairclough. Penelitian ini berupaya menjawab tiga pertanyaan: (1) bagaimana pilihan kebahasaan digunakan untuk merepresentasikan visi politik kedua presiden? (2) ideologi apa yang terkandung dalam pidato mereka? dan (3) bagaimana praktik wacana mencerminkan konteks sosial-budaya yang lebih luas? Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pidato perdana Joko Widodo merefleksikan ideologi nasionalisme populis melalui penekanan pada kerja keras, gotong royong, dan persatuan yang menekankan kolektivitas dan inklusivitas. Sebaliknya, pidato Prabowo Subianto mengandung ideologi reformisme otoritatif yang ditandai dengan wacana pemberantasan korupsi, swasembada pangan, dan “demokrasi santun” untuk membangun legitimasi melalui bahasa ketertiban, otoritas moral, serta kedaulatan bangsa. Dengan demikian, pidato perdana tidak hanya menyajikan arah kebijakan, tetapi juga membangun posisi ideologis yang memengaruhi legitimasi politik kepemimpinan masing-masing. This study aims to examine the relationship between language and socio-cultural structure by comparing the inaugural speeches of President Joko Widodo (2014) and Prabowo Subianto (2024) through the lens of Fairclough’s Critical [ll1] Discourse Analysis. The research seeks to answer the following questions: (1) How are linguistic choices used to represent the leaders’ political vision? (2) What ideologies are embedded in their speeches? and (3) How do discourse practices reflect broader socio-cultural contexts? The findings indicate that Joko Widodo’s inaugural address foregrounded the ideology of populist nationalism through emphasis on “hard work,” “mutual cooperation,” and “unity,” reflecting an image of collective struggle and inclusivity. In contrast, Prabowo Subianto’s speech articulated an ideology of authoritative reformism, marked by discourses of corruption eradication, food self-sufficiency, and “polite democracy,” which positioned him as a strong leader seeking order, moral authority, and national sovereignty. While Jokowi’s discourse leaned toward constructing solidarity among the people, Prabowo’s discourse sought legitimacy through the language of discipline and protection of national dignity. These results demonstrate that inaugural speeches not only present policy directions but also construct ideological positions that shape political legitimacy.