cover
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
jppipa.unram@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jalan Pendidikan No. 37 Mataram, 3 Floor
Location
Kota mataram,
Nusa tenggara barat
INDONESIA
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA (JPPIPA)
Published by Universitas Mataram
ISSN : 24602582     EISSN : 2407795X     DOI : -
Science Educational Research Journal is international open access, published by Science Master Program of Science Education Graduate Program University of Mataram, contains scientific articles both in the form of research results and literature review that includes science, technology and teaching in the field of science. The Science Educational Research Journal is published twice in a year in January and July editions. The editors receive writing in Indonesian or English, either from the university or from outside the university.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 141 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol 11 No 5 (2025): May" : 141 Documents clear
Bahasa Inggris Nita Arrum Sari; Ketang Wiyono
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA Vol 11 No 5 (2025): May
Publisher : Postgraduate, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jppipa.v11i5.6660

Abstract

This study aims to develop a STEM-based e-module on dynamic fluid materials contextualized in the Perjaya Dam for grade 11 high school students. Development follows the Rowntree model, which consists of the planning, development, and evaluation stages. Formative evaluations apply the Tessmer model, including expert reviews, one-to-one evaluations, and small groups. Data was collected through guides and questionnaires. The validity of the e-modules is assessed by experts in content, design, and instruction, while its practicality is evaluated based on student responses during one-to-one and small group stages. The results show that the e-module shows a very high level of validity and is considered very practical by users. These findings show that STEM-based e-modules are suitable for use as interactive learning media. Further research is recommended to assess its effectiveness on a larger scale and for different subject matter.
Improving Students’ Scientific Writing Skills through Discovery Learning in Science Learning: A Systematic Review Opik Prasetyo; Bowo Sugiharto; Harlita Harlita
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA Vol 11 No 5 (2025): May
Publisher : Postgraduate, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jppipa.v11i5.6789

Abstract

Scientific writing skills are essential for students to express ideas or thoughts in various media such as practicum reports. This skills can be trained through the implementation of learning models that can empower science process skills, namely discovery learning. This study aims to analyse various articles related to the implementation of discovery learning models in science learning to improve students' scientific writing skills. This research is a systematic review with the PRISMA method using the keywords "discovery learning" and "writing skills" during the last 10 years. There are 7 articles via Scopus reviewed from 2013 – 2023. The results of the systematic review analysis showed that the implementation of the discovery learning model in science learning can improve students' scientific writing skills that consist of various aspect and criteria.  Students' learning activities in each syntax of discovery learning are suitable to empower each aspect of this skills. The systematic review of various articles on the implementation of the discovery learning model is expected to be a reference for science teachers, especially in learning biology to improve students' scientific writing skills.
Effectiveness of E-Modules Based Learning on Project Based Learning in Chemistry Learning: A Meta-analysis Risnawati Risnawati; Diah Purwaningsih
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA Vol 11 No 5 (2025): May
Publisher : Postgraduate, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jppipa.v11i5.8306

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effectiveness of Project-Based Learning-based E-modules in Chemistry Learning. This type of research is quantitative research with a meta-analysis method. The inclusion criteria in this study are the research was obtained through the google scholar database; Mendeley, ScienceDirect and ERIC, the research must be indexed by SINTA, Web of Science or Scopus,  the research topic must be relevant,  the research must be published in 2021-2024, the research must have a value of (r), (t) or (f), the research must have N ≥ 25. The data analysis technique in this study is with the help of the JSAP application version 0.16.3. The results of this study concluded that (a) the 19 studies analyzed were heterogeneous and normal, there was a significant influence of project-based learning-based e-modules with strong categories (p < 0.05; rRE= 1.06); and in this study, there is no publication bias. These findings show that there is a positive influence of project-based learning-based E-Module learning in chemistry learning
Problem-Based Learning Based on Coastal Abrasion Cases to Improve Conceptual Understanding and Problem-Solving Ability Nur Fadilah; Suyitno Aloysius; Wahyudi Wahyudi
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA Vol 11 No 5 (2025): May
Publisher : Postgraduate, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jppipa.v11i5.8372

Abstract

Problem-solving ability is one of the higher-order thinking skills that students must possess, as it enables them to apply scientific knowledge to real-life situations. This study aimed to investigate the effect of problem-based learning (PBL), based on coastal abrasion cases, on improving students’ conceptual understanding and problem-solving ability. A quasi-experimental method with a pretest-posttest control group design was employed. The research was conducted in two classes: the experimental class used PBL, while the control class applied Discovery Learning. The sample consisted of 60 students. Instruments included tests designed to measure both conceptual understanding and problem-solving ability. Data were analysed using ANOVA. The results showed that the significance value was less than 0.05. This indicates that students who received PBL instruction achieved significantly higher scores in conceptual understanding and problem-solving ability than those taught using Discovery Learning. These findings suggest that PBL based on real-world issues, such as coastal abrasion, is effective in enhancing students’ scientific thinking and problem-solving skills
Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi: Solusi Tepat untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa PGSD dalam Mata Kuliah Konsep Dasar IPA Lisanun Thoyibah Yusuf; Agus Basuki; Azzumardin Syaidi; Fatia Rosyida
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA Vol 11 No 5 (2025): May
Publisher : Postgraduate, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jppipa.v11i5.9482

Abstract

This research aims to determine the effect of differentiated learning on the critical thinking skills of PGSD students in the basic IPA concepts course. The approach used in this research is quantitative, with a quasi-experimental design. The research was conducted on first-semester students at Yogyakarta State University, specifically in class A as the experimental class with 26 people and class B as the control class with 30 people.  The results of the paired sample t-test for critical thinking skills between the pretest and post-test in the control class are 8.744 > 1.697 (t-table N=30) and in the experimental class are 33.303 > 1.706 (t-table N=26). In each class, the significance value is 0.001. If compared to the required value for a significance level of 0.05, the calculated significance is less than 0.05, it is stated that there is a positive influence. The findings indicate a positive and significant impact of differentiated learning on enhancing students' critical thinking skills in the basic IPA concepts course. These results indicate that educators need to consider integrating differentiated learning into their teaching strategies to improve the quality of education.
Review of Relevant Literature About Critical Thinking Skills in a Science Perspective Ana Silfiani Rahmawati; Ida Hamidah; Achmad Samsudin; Diana Rochintaniawati
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA Vol 11 No 5 (2025): May
Publisher : Postgraduate, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jppipa.v11i5.9687

Abstract

Critical Thinking (CR) is one of the most important thinking skills and is a widely recognized measure of the quality of student learning. The literature reviewed shows the importance of integrating critical thinking (CR) into curriculum content and teaching methods in a tiered manner. This study uses the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method, to map where CT is taught, which countries have research trends on CT, how to teach and assess CT, and the influence of technology on CT. Documents were analyzed comprehensively in the Scopus database for the 2018-2023 period. There are five stages of SLR research, namely determining keywords, searching for data, selecting documents, validating data, and analyzing data. Only documents in the form of articles published in the journals used were analyzed. The results of the study indicate that critical thinking skills must be taught and trained at the school level, both in elementary schools, secondary schools, and in certain courses. CT teaching is carried out by choosing the right model or strategy, for example using a modified inquiry model or STEM approach strategy. Assessment is carried out using instruments such as critical thinking skills tests or observation rubrics that have been standardized or modified to obtain accurate results.
Development Instrument Independence Study in Chemistry Learning Using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Factor Analysis Confirmatory (CFA) Aurelia Revi Pusbelina; Hari Sutrisno
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA Vol 11 No 5 (2025): May
Publisher : Postgraduate, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jppipa.v11i5.9790

Abstract

This study examines the early development of student learning independence instruments in chemistry learning using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The purpose of this study is to develop a learning independence instrument that specifically measures chemistry learning independence. A quantitative survey approach was used in this investigation. The research sample used was 642 students of class XI MIPA 1 from 10 State Senior High Schools in Bantul Regency, then the sample determination was carried out using a random sampling technique. The instrument used was a questionnaire consisting of 16 items. Sixteen items on a 5-point Likert scale representing students' perceptions of themselves were used to collect data. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) is the data analysis method used. The learning independence questionnaire filled out by 642 respondents was analyzed using the JASP for Windows 10 application. All items from the EFA analysis results were acceptable because they had a factor value of >0.3. While the results of the CFA test showed that all items were valid with a p value <0.05; *** significance and SLF value ≥ 0.5 and reliable with CR value ≥ 0.70 and AVE value of at least 0.5. The results obtained prove that the instrument is valid and can be used to measure the independence of learning chemistry.
Effect of Scientific Discovery Learning on Critical Thinking in Biology Education Students Nurmiati Nurmiati; Jirana Jirana; Nenny Indrawati; Mesra Damayanti
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA Vol 11 No 5 (2025): May
Publisher : Postgraduate, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jppipa.v11i5.9835

Abstract

The scientific-based discovery learning model encourages students to actively search for and construct concepts independently, thereby improving their critical thinking skills. Field observations show that students' critical thinking abilities in the Plant Development Structure 2 (SPT 2) course remain low. This study aims to determine the effect of the scientific-based discovery learning model on the critical thinking abilities of biology education students at the University of West Sulawesi. Using a true experimental design with randomly assigned control and experimental groups, data were collected through a critical thinking ability test. Statistical analysis using an independent samples t-test shows a significant difference between the two groups. This study finds that scientific-based discovery learning significantly improves students’ critical thinking abilities, with the experimental group achieving higher scores and a very large effect size.
Identification of Misconception Using Diagnostic Tests: Systematic Literature Review Ditya Lufita; Heru Kuswanto; Dadan Rosana; Ficha Aulia Indah Pratiwi; Lucy Triananda
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA Vol 11 No 5 (2025): May
Publisher : Postgraduate, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jppipa.v11i5.9986

Abstract

This study aims to review studies that use diagnostic tests to identify misconceptions in physics learning and examine the methods used to overcome them. The results of the review can be used by educators in choosing the type of diagnostic test and method to overcome misconceptions. The methods used are PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) and content analysis. A total of 50 articles published in 2018–2023 were analyzed, which focused on the development of diagnostic tests and the application of methods to overcome misconceptions. The results of the study indicate that misconceptions can be identified through various forms of diagnostic tests, such as two-tier, three-tier, four-tier, five-tier, six-tier, and multiple-choice tests. In addition, an educational computing-based approach or computer-assisted learning has proven effective in overcoming misconceptions, especially when supported by the right learning process and model.
Identification of Phenolic Compounds Content in Tinospora crispa Stem Decoction by FTIR and UV-Visible Spectrophotometry Elisabet Sa Wulo; Yunike Kurnia Unda; Suparno
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA Vol 11 No 5 (2025): May
Publisher : Postgraduate, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jppipa.v11i5.10069

Abstract

Phenolics are compounds that have a hydroxyl (OH) group attached to an aromatic ring, and are known for various health benefits such as antioxidant, antimicrobial, and anti-inflammatory properties. This study aims to measure the total phenolic content and characterize the functional groups in Tinospora crispa stem extract using a decoction method, as well as evaluate its potential as a source of bioactive compounds. Extraction was performed by boiling dried Tinospora crispa stems in water. Total phenolic content was quantified using UV-Vis spectrophotometry (λ = 765 nm) via the Folin-Ciocalteu reaction, with a gallic acid calibration curve (R² = 0.998). Functional group analysis was conducted using FTIR (4000–400 cm⁻¹). The extract showed high phenolic content (384.909 mg GAE/g), supported by the identification of characteristic functional groups such as O-H (3255.55 cm⁻¹), C=C (2121.59 cm⁻¹), and C-O (1261.45 cm⁻¹) in the FTIR spectrum. These groups are associated with the presence of bioactive compounds such as phenolics. Therefore, Tinospora crispa has potential as a source of phenolic compounds, one of which can be obtained using the decoction method.

Page 1 of 15 | Total Record : 141


Filter by Year

2025 2025


Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 12 No 1 (2026) Vol 11 No 12 (2025): December Vol 11 No 11 (2025): November Vol 11 No 10 (2025): October Vol 11 No 9 (2025): September Vol 11 No 8 (2025): August Vol 11 No 7 (2025): July Vol 11 No 6 (2025): June Vol 11 No 5 (2025): May Vol 11 No 4 (2025): April Vol 11 No 3 (2025): March Vol 11 No 2 (2025): February Vol 11 No 1 (2025): January Vol 10 No 12 (2024): December Vol 10 No 11 (2024): November Vol 10 No 10 (2024): October Vol 10 No 9 (2024): September Vol 10 No 8 (2024): August Vol 10 No 7 (2024): July Vol 10 No 6 (2024): June Vol 10 No 5 (2024): May Vol 10 No 4 (2024): April Vol 10 No 3 (2024): March Vol 10 No 2 (2024): February Vol. 10 No. 2 (2024): February Vol 10 No 1 (2024): January Vol 10 No SpecialIssue (2024): Science Education, Ecotourism, Health Science Vol. 9 No. 12 (2023): December Vol 9 No 12 (2023): December Vol. 9 No. 11 (2023): November Vol 9 No 11 (2023): November Vol 9 No 10 (2023): October Vol. 9 No. 10 (2023): October Vol 9 No 9 (2023): September Vol. 9 No. 9 (2023): September Vol. 9 No. 8 (2023): August Vol 9 No 8 (2023): August Vol 9 No 7 (2023): July Vol. 9 No. 6 (2023): June Vol 9 No 6 (2023): June Vol 9 No 5 (2023): May Vol. 9 No. 5 (2023): May Vol. 9 No. 4 (2023): April Vol 9 No 4 (2023): April Vol 9 No 3 (2023): March Vol 9 No 2 (2023): February Vol. 9 No. 2 (2023): February Vol 9 No 1 (2023): January Vol. 9 No. 1 (2023): January Vol. 9 No. SpecialIssue (2023): UNRAM journals and research based on science education, science appl Vol 9 No SpecialIssue (2023): UNRAM journals and research based on science education, science applic Vol 8 No 6 (2022): December Vol. 8 No. 6 (2022): December Vol. 8 No. 5 (2022): November Vol 8 No 5 (2022): November Vol. 8 No. 4 (2022): October Vol 8 No 4 (2022): October Vol. 8 No. 3 (2022): July Vol 8 No 2 (2022): April Vol. 8 No. 2 (2022): April Vol. 8 No. 1 (2022): January Vol 8 No SpecialIssue (2022): December Vol. 8 No. SpecialIssue (2022): December Vol. 7 No. 4 (2021): October Vol. 7 No. 3 (2021): July Vol. 7 No. 2 (2021): April Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021): January Vol. 7 No. SpecialIssue (2021): December Vol. 6 No. 2 (2020): July Vol. 6 No. 1 (2020): January Vol. 5 No. 2 (2019): July Vol. 5 No. 1 (2019): January Vol. 4 No. 2 (2018): July Vol. 4 No. 1 (2018): January Vol. 3 No. 2 (2017): July Vol. 3 No. 1 (2017): January Vol. 2 No. 2 (2016): July Vol. 2 No. 1 (2016): January Vol. 1 No. 2 (2015): July Vol. 1 No. 1 (2015): January More Issue