cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
jppipa.unram@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jalan Pendidikan No. 37 Mataram, 3 Floor
Location
Kota mataram,
Nusa tenggara barat
INDONESIA
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA (JPPIPA)
Published by Universitas Mataram
ISSN : 24602582     EISSN : 2407795X     DOI : -
Core Subject : Science, Education, Agriculture, Engineering,
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Education Materials Science & Nanotechnology Physics
Science Educational Research Journal is international open access, published by Science Master Program of Science Education Graduate Program University of Mataram, contains scientific articles both in the form of research results and literature review that includes science, technology and teaching in the field of science. The Science Educational Research Journal is published twice in a year in January and July editions. The editors receive writing in Indonesian or English, either from the university or from outside the university.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 14 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 1 No. 2 (2015): July" : 14 Documents clear
PENGEMBANGAN PETUNJUK PRAKTIKUM BIOLOGI DAN INSTRUMEN PENILAIAN KINERJA PRAKTIKUM BERBASIS MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF DAN EFEKTIVITASNYA TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS SISWA SMA/MA KELAS XI St. Rahmadani; Jamaluddin -; Lalu Zulkifli
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA Vol. 1 No. 2 (2015): July
Publisher : Postgraduate, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jppipa.v1i2.13

Abstract

The aims of this study were: 1) to develop a biology practical guidance based on TGT cooperative models equipped with practical performance assessment instrument; 2) to determine the characteristics and suitability of products than have been developed; 3) to know it’s effectiveness in critical  thinking abilities on biology subject of students in class XI. Product development process in this study by following Borg and Gall’s Development. The result of the expert validation by 3 validators showed that each of  the average score in biology practical guidance based on TGT and practical performance assessment instrument were 4,41 and 4,48 and categorized as “very good”. Limited testing conducted on 10 students with high, medium, and low ability. The result of limited testing showed that each of percentage score average in biology practical guidance based on TGT and practical performance assessment instrument were 82,67% and 83,33% and categorized as “very good”. Field trial testing using a pre-test post-test control group design. The data of critical  thinking abilities are tested in this study consist of 5 indicator skills:  (1) formulate the problem; (2) recognize the existence of a logical relationship between issues; (3) collect and collate information; (4) asses and evaluate the statement of facts; (5) Make some conclude were needed. Data analysis were performed  using two independent sample test formula by SPSS 20 for windows. The analysis showed that the critical  thinking abilities for indicator 1, 2, 3, and 5 of experimental group different from the control group, while the fourth indicator not different. Data analysis equipped with calculation of the value of n-gain to determine  the effectiveness of learning by using product that have been developed. The result of the data analysis showed that the value of n-gain in experimental groupis equal to 0,71 and categorized as “high”.
PENGEMBANGAN PERANGKAT PEMBELAJARAN MODEL 5E UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS SISWA Muh Nasir; A. Wahab Jufri; Muhlis -
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA Vol. 1 No. 2 (2015): July
Publisher : Postgraduate, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jppipa.v1i2.14

Abstract

This study aims to develop of learning package 5E model and analyze the effect of its implementation on the differences in student’s critical thinking and arguing skills. Development process follows R & D model by Dick and Carey. Research design follows pretest-posttest nonequivalent control group design. The population of this study was tenth graders of SMA 1 Woha Bima. Total population is 350 students from ten class. The sample was selected by simple random sampling technique and 131 students (four class) is obtained. X1 and X2 class are taught using the 5E models, while the X5 and X9 class with EEK models. Expert judgement results meet the criteria for the development of a very good result with an average value of 3.37. The results of experimental studies showed that: there is a difference in students’ critical thinking in the experimental and control group (t = 3,501, p = 0,001).Keywords: 5E Model, Critical Thinking Skills
PENERAPAN PEMBELAJARAN DENGAN PENDEKATAN KETERAMPILAN PROSES SAINS UNTUK MENINGKATKAN HASIL BELAJAR KIMIA SISWA SMK NEGERI 3 MATARAM Henikusniati -; Yayuk Andayani; Lalu Rudyat Telly Savalas
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA Vol. 1 No. 2 (2015): July
Publisher : Postgraduate, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jppipa.v1i2.19

Abstract

This study aims to determine the application of science process skills to improve chemistry learning outcomes at SMK Negeri 3 Mataram. This study used a quasi-experimental design with pre-test post-test control group design. Sampling was done by using purposive sampling technique. The research sample for the experimental class were 37 students and 37 students in the control class. Data were retreived using multiple choice test that has been tested for its validity. Data were analyzed using independent sample t-test at a significance level of 0.05. N-Gain value calculation was also used to determine the chemistry learning outcome. The result showed that value of N-Gain in the experimental and control group were 0,45 and 0,42 respectively. The results showed that the science process skills approach increased students learning outcomes to medium category. The results of the t-test in both groups were shown not to be significant (α = 0.05). It can be concluded that there is no significant learning outcomes improvement of experimental group in comparison to the control group.Keywords: Science process skills, Learning outcomes
PENGEMBANGAN ALAT PERAGA KOTAK ENERGI MODEL INKUIRI TERBIMBING (APKEMIT) SEBAGAI PENUNJANG PEMBELAJARAN FISIKA SMA PADA MATERI SUHU DAN KALOR Budiono Basuki; Aris Doyan; Ahmad Harjono
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA Vol. 1 No. 2 (2015): July
Publisher : Postgraduate, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jppipa.v1i2.24

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to develop APKEMIT as learning tool for high school physics on temperature and heat concepts. This study used Borg & Gall approach on R & D which includes the step of development, pilot testing, and final testing. In the development stage, five APKEMIT models are produced: PKTSB, PW, PPSTUB, PK, and AB. Pilot testing stage is divided into two phase, limited testing and large scale testing. The first limited testing carried out on 6 eleventh grade science students in SMA 3 Mataram. The second phase carried on 2 groups (12 students) of accelerated tenth graders in SMA Negeri 1 Woha. Large-scale trials given to 8 groups (46 students) of tenth graders in SMA Negeri 3 Mataram. Pilot testing shows that APKEMIT is very good and ready to be used in learning activity. APKEMIT final testing stage is the stage to determine the effect of APKEMIT on the improvement of learning outcomes, which is determined by the Gain Score. Analysis shows that the gain of each model is: PKTSB Score of 0.50 (medium), PW of 0.15 (low), PPSTUB of 0.40 (medium), PK at 12:27 (low), AB of 0.34 (medium) and overall Gain Score at 0:36 (medium). This development received good response from the students with score 80.8% and according to observers, learning process has been going very well. The result of research  and validation of test show that the developed APKEMIT become as references in subject temperature and heats concepts.

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 14

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2015 2015


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 12 No 1 (2026) Vol 11 No 12 (2025): December Vol 11 No 11 (2025): November Vol 11 No 10 (2025): October Vol 11 No 9 (2025): September Vol 11 No 8 (2025): August Vol 11 No 7 (2025): July Vol 11 No 6 (2025): June Vol 11 No 5 (2025): May Vol 11 No 4 (2025): April Vol 11 No 3 (2025): March Vol 11 No 2 (2025): February Vol 11 No 1 (2025): January Vol 10 No 12 (2024): December Vol 10 No 11 (2024): November Vol 10 No 10 (2024): October Vol 10 No 9 (2024): September Vol 10 No 8 (2024): August Vol 10 No 7 (2024): July Vol 10 No 6 (2024): June Vol 10 No 5 (2024): May Vol 10 No 4 (2024): April Vol 10 No 3 (2024): March Vol. 10 No. 2 (2024): February Vol 10 No 2 (2024): February Vol 10 No 1 (2024): January Vol 10 No SpecialIssue (2024): Science Education, Ecotourism, Health Science Vol 9 No 12 (2023): December Vol. 9 No. 12 (2023): December Vol. 9 No. 11 (2023): November Vol 9 No 11 (2023): November Vol. 9 No. 10 (2023): October Vol 9 No 10 (2023): October Vol. 9 No. 9 (2023): September Vol 9 No 9 (2023): September Vol 9 No 8 (2023): August Vol. 9 No. 8 (2023): August Vol 9 No 7 (2023): July Vol 9 No 6 (2023): June Vol. 9 No. 6 (2023): June Vol 9 No 5 (2023): May Vol. 9 No. 5 (2023): May Vol 9 No 4 (2023): April Vol. 9 No. 4 (2023): April Vol 9 No 3 (2023): March Vol 9 No 2 (2023): February Vol. 9 No. 2 (2023): February Vol 9 No 1 (2023): January Vol. 9 No. 1 (2023): January Vol 9 No SpecialIssue (2023): UNRAM journals and research based on science education, science applic Vol. 9 No. SpecialIssue (2023): UNRAM journals and research based on science education, science appl Vol. 8 No. 6 (2022): December Vol 8 No 6 (2022): December Vol. 8 No. 5 (2022): November Vol 8 No 5 (2022): November Vol. 8 No. 4 (2022): October Vol 8 No 4 (2022): October Vol. 8 No. 3 (2022): July Vol. 8 No. 2 (2022): April Vol 8 No 2 (2022): April Vol. 8 No. 1 (2022): January Vol 8 No SpecialIssue (2022): December Vol. 8 No. SpecialIssue (2022): December Vol. 7 No. 4 (2021): October Vol. 7 No. 3 (2021): July Vol. 7 No. 2 (2021): April Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021): January Vol. 7 No. SpecialIssue (2021): December Vol. 6 No. 2 (2020): July Vol. 6 No. 1 (2020): January Vol. 5 No. 2 (2019): July Vol. 5 No. 1 (2019): January Vol. 4 No. 2 (2018): July Vol. 4 No. 1 (2018): January Vol. 3 No. 2 (2017): July Vol. 3 No. 1 (2017): January Vol. 2 No. 2 (2016): July Vol. 2 No. 1 (2016): January Vol. 1 No. 2 (2015): July Vol. 1 No. 1 (2015): January More Issue