cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kab. sleman,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Jurnal Pemikiran Sosiologi
Published by Universitas Gadjah Mada
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Social Sciences
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 157 Documents
 12   13   14   15   16 
OnlyFans and the Plebeians: Emancipatory moments in contemporary Indonesia Nawangsari, Tri; Wiesrecker, Sven
Jurnal Pemikiran Sosiologi Vol 12, No 1 (2025): June
Publisher : Departemen Sosiologi Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jps.v12i1.107259

Abstract

The online platform OnlyFans has attracted a lot of attention in empirical research in recent years. In this analysis, we use a special approach that connects concepts from political philosophy and empirical research. First, we provide a detailed explanation of Jacques Rancière’s notion of the “distribution of the sensible”. Rancière’s example of the plebeians serves to illustrate how certain groups are excluded from participation. Rancière's philosophical perspective on emancipation in Indonesia is of added value because it links the embodiment of roles, which has already been addressed many times in research, with political moments. Secondly, we examine empirical data to explore how OnlyFans is perceived in Bali. By doing so, we trace how narratives surrounding sexuality, morality, and digital labor intersect with local cultural and social frameworks. These insights allow us to identify emerging tensions that reflect deeper structural issues within the social fabric. Thirdly, we argue that these tensions can be read as disruptions of the current social order — ruptures that may reveal emancipatory potential. We interpret them through the lens of Jacques Derrida’s concept of deconstruction. Our aim is not to reconstruct or stabilize social orders, but to highlight the fractures, inconsistencies, and instabilities that reveal the possibility for change within an existing system.
Sexism and Gendered Medical Specialty Preferences among Medical Students at UIN Jakarta Maharani, Hasina Putri
Jurnal Pemikiran Sosiologi Vol 12, No 2 (2025): December
Publisher : Departemen Sosiologi Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jps.v12i2.100121

Abstract

Anchored in Joan Acker’s theory of gendered organizations, this study examines how institutionalized gender norms influence medical specialty preferences. Gendered perceptions often reinforce occupational segregation, where “masculine” specialties are male-dominated and “feminine” ones by women. This research aims to identify gender differences in specialty preferences and the extent to which stereotypes, segregation, sexism, and patriarchy shape these preferences among 211 medical students at UIN Jakarta. Data were collected via questionnaires and analyzed using T-tests and logistic regression in STATA 13. Results reveal that female students show stronger preferences for Dermatology and Venereology, and Obstetrics and Gynecology, fields typically associated with femininity. Hostile sexism had no significant effect, while benevolent sexism exhibited nuanced influences: beliefs in female purity positively correlated with Internal Medicine, whereas beliefs in female frailty correlated positively with Dermatology and Venereology, and Obstetrics and Gynecology, but negatively with Internal Medicine. Segregation negatively affected Internal Medicine preference, and stereotypes were negatively associated with Dermatology and Venereology, and Cardiovascular. Domestic patriarchal roles increased preference for Surgery but decreased interest in Pediatrics and Psychiatry. While public patriarchal roles had opposite effects, promoting Pediatrics preference while reducing interest in Obstetrics and Gynecology. These findings highlight how entrenched gendered and cultural logics continue to shape medical specialty preferences within institutional contexts.
Sexism and Gendered Medical Specialty Preferences among Medical Students at UIN Jakarta Maharani, Hasina Putri
Jurnal Pemikiran Sosiologi Vol 12, No 2 (2025): December
Publisher : Departemen Sosiologi Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jps.v12i2.100121

Abstract

Anchored in Joan Acker’s theory of gendered organizations, this study examines how institutionalized gender norms influence medical specialty preferences. Gendered perceptions often reinforce occupational segregation, where “masculine” specialties are male-dominated and “feminine” ones by women. This research aims to identify gender differences in specialty preferences and the extent to which stereotypes, segregation, sexism, and patriarchy shape these preferences among 211 medical students at UIN Jakarta. Data were collected via questionnaires and analyzed using T-tests and logistic regression in STATA 13. Results reveal that female students show stronger preferences for Dermatology and Venereology, and Obstetrics and Gynecology, fields typically associated with femininity. Hostile sexism had no significant effect, while benevolent sexism exhibited nuanced influences: beliefs in female purity positively correlated with Internal Medicine, whereas beliefs in female frailty correlated positively with Dermatology and Venereology, and Obstetrics and Gynecology, but negatively with Internal Medicine. Segregation negatively affected Internal Medicine preference, and stereotypes were negatively associated with Dermatology and Venereology, and Cardiovascular. Domestic patriarchal roles increased preference for Surgery but decreased interest in Pediatrics and Psychiatry. While public patriarchal roles had opposite effects, promoting Pediatrics preference while reducing interest in Obstetrics and Gynecology. These findings highlight how entrenched gendered and cultural logics continue to shape medical specialty preferences within institutional contexts.
Screening Interpreting on the Social Construction of the Turkish in Economic Crisis 2025 Rosidi, Rizka Ayuning; Surwandono, Surwandono
Jurnal Pemikiran Sosiologi Vol 12, No 2 (2025): December
Publisher : Departemen Sosiologi Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jps.v12i2.109649

Abstract

The study is based on a paradoxical phenomenon: during a severe inflation crisis in 2025, with the annual rate reaching 35.41%, Turkish society appears to respond relatively calmly, showing no massive social turmoil or widespread protests. The economic pressure is significant, with the prices of necessities, housing, and utilities increasing sharply, eroding real purchasing power, and exacerbating inequality. This paradox raises the question of how Turkish society constructs its social reality under such economic stress. This study aims to understand this phenomenon through the lens of Peter L. Berger theory of social construction. Using a descriptive qualitative method, the research collects data through literature studies, media discourse analysis, policy document reviews, and in-depth interviews with workers, students, and community members in Turkey. The findings reveal that the Turkish government deliberately shapes social reality by restricting demonstrations, controlling narratives through mainstream media, and reinforcing nationalism as a unifying ideology. Through the stages of externalization, objectification, and internalization, the state produces an illusion of social stability which, in practice, masks forms of socio-political repression. Moreover, the rational-instrumental actions, such as adaptation to new prices and wage adjustments, and affective actions, such as pride in national identity, further contribute to society’s seemingly passive response. Overall, the study shows that the Turkish case is not merely about economic resilience but about how power constructs, directs, and sustains a dominant social reality during times of crisis.
Examining Student Motivations and Socioeconomic Realities in Kampus Merdeka Internship in Indonesia Prasastisiwi, Afra Hanifah; Alimah, Qonita Luthfia; Nurisa, Winda Sukma; Calista, Saffanah; Sabtu, Ester Dwi; Widhyharto, Derajad Sulistyo
Jurnal Pemikiran Sosiologi Vol 12, No 2 (2025): December
Publisher : Departemen Sosiologi Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jps.v12i2.111665

Abstract

The Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka (MBKM) internship program represents an effort to address the demands of modern industrialization in Indonesia. The growing need for highly educated and skilled young workers aligns with students’ aspirations to prepare for their future careers. This study aims to examine the perspectives, motivations, and socio-economic conditions of Kampus Merdeka internship participants. To achieve this, a mixed-method approach with a phenomenological perspective was employed to capture the experiences of undergraduate students across Indonesia. The study found that student interns are driven to prepare themselves for transitioning into the workforce by allocating their time and resources to work directly with partners provided by the Ministry of Education and Culture. High job competition and the need for work experience are the primary motivations for choosing Kampus Merdeka internship activities, ultimately outweighing the risks and uncertainties surrounding them, such as job insecurity, out-of-pocket expenses, opportunity costs, and high work pressure. Nevertheless, the student interns in this study managed to endure these challenges by framing the risks and uncertainties as valuable learning opportunities while pursuing professional experience. This situation reflects an illusion created by the Kampus Merdeka internship program, in which the social and economic disadvantages borne by students are obscured by the imperatives of labor market demands.
Restored Karst Areas: A Multi-Case Study of Community-Based Conservation in Gunungkidul Fatmayanto, Ali Hidayat; Suharko, Suharko
Jurnal Pemikiran Sosiologi Vol 12, No 2 (2025): December
Publisher : Departemen Sosiologi Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jps.v12i2.112121

Abstract

This study underscores the importance of conservation movements, which relies on local knowledge to sustain the environment and enhance community welfare, by examining the Resan Gunungkidul Community as a representative case from Indonesia’s Gunungsewu Karst Landscape. We using qualitative descriptive methods through multi-case approaches, and the data were collected through in-depth interviews and participatory observations with some communities in field. This study analyzes the KRG's educating strategies for common pool resource management with any local movements. The results of the study confirmed that KRG successfully developed a conservation model in the name “resan”. That conservation model through the use of a broad social network, the application of a common-pool resources (CPR) approach, and the horizontal leaders. The emergence of KRG does not only affect its core movement, but also significantly impacts the development of other communities. Even with limitations, such as a small scale of action, low member flexibility, limited segmentation, and minimal financial resources, KRG was able to maintain local conservation movements. Their educating innovations boosted biodiversity, improved pest monitoring, expanded conservation knowledge, and strengthened collaboration networks. This study highlights that multidisciplinary engagement and the application of similar models in other contexts are essential to strengthen the impact of community-based conservation in ecologically vulnerable areas.
Beyond State Recognition of Customary Forests: Initiating Agrarian Reform in Indigenous Peoples Cahyono, Eko; Satria, Arif; Soetarto, Endriatmo; Adiwibowo, Soeryo; Suhardjito, Didik
Jurnal Pemikiran Sosiologi Vol 12, No 2 (2025): December
Publisher : Departemen Sosiologi Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jps.v12i2.112143

Abstract

This article examines the socio-political dynamics of agrarian issues surrounding the recognition of customary forests in Kasepuhan Karang, Lebak Regency, Banten. The recognition of customary forests is interpreted by indigenous peoples as a political victory. The political policy of recognition provides opportunities for indigenous peoples to reclaim their customary lands that have been subjected to agrarian colonialism, although this is limited to the recognition of customary forest areas. The data presented is based on the author's periodic research, which was intensive during 2018 and 2019, and continued through various field studies in 2020, 2023, 2024, and early 2025. Field data was collected using qualitative methods, through direct observation, live-in, in-depth interviews with key informants, and focus group discussions. The findings of this research show that the state's recognition of customary forests is half-hearted, partial, and fragmentary, so that socio-agrarian conditions remain unchanged and the previous structure of agrarian inequality remains intact. The state unilaterally recognized only some of the proposed customary forests, while ignoring the social dynamics and changes in the Kasepuhan Karang community, which experienced social differentiation due to the concentration of land ownership. The ideas and recommendations proposed are to encourage agrarian reform in indigenous peoples. This is to ensure agrarian justice, which has been ignored by the existing political recognition model. Among the requirements for agrarian reform in indigenous peoples is interconnectivity between ecological aspects, tenure systems, and local socio-cultural aspects, so that its implementation is flexible and contextual, and certainly cannot be standardized.

Page 16 of 16 | Total Record : 157

 12   13   14   15   16 

Filter by Year

2012 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 12, No 2 (2025): December Vol 12, No 1 (2025): June Vol 11, No 2 (2024): December Vol 11, No 1 (2024): June Vol 10, No 2 (2023): December Vol 10, No 1 (2023): June Vol 9, No 2 (2022): December Vol 9, No 1 (2022): September Vol 8, No 2 (2021): December Vol 8, No 1 (2021): July Vol 8, No 1 (2021): June Vol 7, No 2 (2020): Modernitas Lanjut dan Masyarakat Berisiko (Tatanan Sosial, Pengorganisasian dan Vol 7, No 1 (2020): Menelisik Konsep, Lembaga dan Pengorganisasian Tatanan Sosial di Indonesia Vol 6, No 2 (2019): Memposisikan "Global South" dalam Peta Kajian Akademik di Indonesia Vol 6, No 1 (2019): Dekolonisasi Ilmu Sosial Humaniora Dari Pengetahuan Lokal ke Pemberdayaan Masyar Vol 5, No 2 (2018): Dimensi Kesejahteraan dalam Perspektif Sosiologi Kritis: Praktik Ekonomi Baru, P Vol 5, No 1 (2018): Dimensi Kesejahteraan Dalam Perspektif Sosiologi Kritis Vol 4, No 2 (2017): Merangkai Kebhinnekaan Indonesia Vol 4, No 1 (2017): Menerjemahkan-ulang Konsep Ruang dan Urbanisme Vol 3, No 2 (2016): Tantangan Gerakan Sosial Vol 3, No 1 (2016): Menggagas Kajian Digital Humanities di Indonesia Vol 2, No 2 (2013): Tantangan Global Dalam Perubahan Lokal Vol 2, No 1 (2013): Kontestasi Mendidik Bangsa di Era Reformasi Vol 1, No 2 (2012): Dinamika Sosial dalam Masyarakat Indonesia Kontemporer Vol 1, No 1 (2012): Menerobos Kemandekan Demokrasi di Indonesia More Issue