cover
Contact Name
Ismail Marzuki
Contact Email
ismail.mz2805@gmail.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
jurnal.atturas@unuja.ac.id
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kab. probolinggo,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
AT-TURAS: Jurnal Studi Keislaman
ISSN : 2355567X     EISSN : 24601063     DOI : -
Two decades or more, in the global scheme, Islamic studies have been enforced to take broader paradigms from dogmatic-theology to popular-religious. Islamic studies is not merely discussing on sacred corpus only, but everyday life of Islam also. In academic space, this field has increasingly been an intersection -if not a contestation- across disciplines, such as political science, anthropology, sociology, history, economics, media, and cultural studies.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 213 Documents
Shari’ah Perspectives on Cryptocurrency Contracts: Blockchain Transactions in Light of Lubab al-Tafsir and Contemporary Islamic Economic Thought Pranata, Imam Sufardi; Finaldy, Auli Robby; Musafa’ah, Suqiyah
JURNAL AT-TURAS Vol 12, No 3 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Nurul Jadid

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33650/at-turas.v12i3.11576

Abstract

The rapid expansion of cryptocurrency as a digital financial instrument raises critical concerns about the validity of contracts and their alignment with Shari’ah principles, particularly regarding price volatility and the absence of comprehensive regulatory frameworks. While cryptocurrency transactions promise substantial returns, they also entail considerable risks due to speculative behavior and market instability. This study examines the validity of such contracts and the practice of cryptocurrency transactions in light of classical Qur’anic exegesis and contemporary Islamic economic thought. Employing a qualitative hermeneutic analysis of Lubab al-Tafsir min Ibn Katsir combined with thematic comparison to contemporary Islamic economic models, this research explores the contractual principles of honesty, justice, legal certainty, documentation, and mutual consent in regulating cryptocurrency practices. The novelty of this study lies in constructing a framework for Shari’ah-compliant digital contracts, integrating classical tafsir insights with the challenges of blockchain-based finance. The findings reveal that although blockchain technology enhances transparency and security, persistent challenges such as volatility and regulatory ambiguity require urgent Shari’ah-based governance. This study contributes to Islamic economic jurisprudence by offering a novel evaluative framework with practical implications for policymakers, regulators, and Islamic financial institutions, ensuring that innovation in financial technology remains ethically grounded and Shari’ah-compliant.
Social and Economic Factors Influencing the Choice of Halal-Labeled Food and Beverages Among Muslim Generation Z: A Case Study of FEBI UINSU Students Putri, Diva Anisyah; Marliyah, Marliyah; Imsar, Imsar
JURNAL AT-TURAS Vol 12, No 3 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Nurul Jadid

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33650/at-turas.v12i3.12627

Abstract

This study explores how social and economic factors simultaneously influence the choice of halal-labeled food and beverages among Muslim Generation Z, with a particular focus on students of the Faculty of Islamic Economics and Business at the State Islamic University of North Sumatra. Previous research has largely examined these factors in isolation, leaving limited attention to their simultaneous effects in shaping halal consumption. Employing a quantitative survey of 100 respondents analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), the study reveals that social factors, such as family and peer influence, serve as the strongest drivers of halal choices, while economic factors, including price and accessibility, function as moderating conditions. The findings contribute to the halal consumption literature by integrating social and economic dimensions within the context of Islamic higher education, thereby addressing a gap concerning young Muslim consumers. Practically, the study suggests that policymakers and halal certification bodies should enhance community-based halal literacy, while businesses may strengthen market engagement through price affordability strategies and the utilization of family and peer influence.
A Theological Analysis Of Interfaith Dialogue And Its Relevance To Pluralistic Society Based On Hamka’s Tafsir Al-Azhar Armiya, Armiya; Shalahudin, Henri; Choirunnissa, Ranya
JURNAL AT-TURAS Vol 12, No 4 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Nurul Jadid

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33650/at-turas.v12i4.13302

Abstract

Contemporary global challenges such as relativism, the fragmentation of meaning, and the increasing escalation of religion-related conflicts demonstrate the urgency of strengthening interfaith dialogue as a means of fostering social harmony, tolerance, and peace within society. In this context, this study analyzes Hamka’s interpretation of Qur’anic verses in Tafsir al-Azhar to explore how Islamic theological principles can guide constructive interreligious relations. Using a qualitative philosophical approach and thematic analysis of verses pertaining to interfaith relations, this research systematically identifies the key concepts emphasized by Hamka. The study finds that Hamka affirms three fundamental foundations of interreligious interaction: (a) the principle of universal human dignity, (b) justice and ethical responsibility toward others, and (c) guidance for peaceful coexistence rooted in Qur’anic moral values. The study also finds that Hamka underscores these principles as the basis for interreligious relations. Conceptually, this research contributes to the development of Islamic philosophy of religion; practically, it offers a normative framework to support tolerance, coexistence, and peace among diverse religious communities amid contemporary global challenges.
Revisiting K.H. Hasyim Asy’ari’s Sufi Ethics in the Context of Contemporary Islamic Social Activism in Indonesia Varyda, Vateen Nayla Nurul; Rosidi, Rosidi; Cholil, Abdul Mun'im
JURNAL AT-TURAS Vol 12, No 4 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Nurul Jadid

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33650/at-turas.v12i4.13185

Abstract

In post-Reform Indonesia (1998–present), social challenges such as radicalism, moral disorientation, and identity fragmentation demand a religious approach integrating spirituality with social realities. This study revisits the ethical Sufism (tasawuf akhlaki) of K.H. Hasyim Asy'ari (1871–1947), founder of Nahdlatul Ulama and Pesantren Tebuireng, examining its contemporary relevance for Islamic social activism in Indonesia. Specifically, it analyzes how his Sufi ethics—rooted in sincerity (ikhlas), self-purification (tazkiyah al-nafs), moral conduct (adab), and spiritual struggle (mujahadah) are reappropriated by NU-affiliated organizations and pesantren-based movements addressing modern societal issues. Employing a qualitative historical-hermeneutic method, data were collected through close reading of Hasyim Asy'ari's original works (Adab al-'Alim wa al-Muta'allim, Risalah Ahl al-Sunnah wa al-Jama'ah), secondary sources, and academic journals documenting NU social initiatives (2000–2024). Findings reveal that his ethical Sufism functions as a moral framework cultivating social awareness and civic engagement, institutionalized through pesantren education and manifested in grassroots movements addressing religious pluralism, deradicalization, and community empowerment. This research contributes to recontextualizing Sufism in modern civic ethics by demonstrating how classical Islamic spirituality operates as a framework for contemporary social activism, bridging religious scholarship on tasawuf and sociological studies of Islamic movements. The study suggests further comparative research between pesantren-based moral education and global character formation models, plus empirical investigation into Sufi ethics' measurable impacts on community resilience.
Thematic Content Analysis of Theological, Moral, and Spiritual Messages in the 7th Ngaji Tasawuf Session (2025) at Nurul Jadid Islamic Boarding School Suwito, Suwito; Wazis, Kun
JURNAL AT-TURAS Vol 12, No 4 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Nurul Jadid

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33650/at-turas.v12i4.13153

Abstract

The proliferation of digital preaching raises concerns about the marginalization of contemplative religious traditions. This study addresses the research gap in analyses of how classical sufistic preaching is rearticulated for and through digital media. The study examines the da’wah delivered by KH. Moh. Zuhri Zaini during the 7th Ngaji Tasawuf session (2025) at Nurul Jadid Islamic Boarding School, a program also broadcast live on the pesantren’s YouTube channel. The purpose is to identify and classify the dominant theological, moral, and spiritual themes and to interpret their communicative functions in a mediated setting. Using qualitative content analysis, the study applies inductive coding and thematic categorization to the full transcript, triangulated with video recordings and relevant literature. Results show four interrelated thematic clusters; theological (tauhid and existential awareness), moral (niyyah, sincerity, and ethical prioritization), spiritual (dhikr, tafakkur, tazkiyah), and social (digital conduct and communal responsibility) which together constitute a coherent model of Sufistic preaching adapted to online formats. The paper proposes a preliminary framework of “digital Sufistic communication” that conceptualizes how pesantren ritual discourse is remediated for participatory digital publics. Implications include suggestions for (a) designing digital preaching frameworks that preserve contemplative depth, (b) pesantren pedagogy responsive to mediated audiences, and (c) future empirical testing of the proposed framework across other pesantren livestreams.
Evaluating the Effectiveness of 5c-Based Risk Mitigation and Sharia-Compliant Restructuring in Reducing NPF in Sharia Mortgage Financing: A Case Study of Bank BTN Syariah Diponegoro Surabaya Rifantini, Adinda; Ardyansyah, Farid
JURNAL AT-TURAS Vol 12, No 4 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Nurul Jadid

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33650/at-turas.v12i4.13299

Abstract

This study analyzes the implementation and effectiveness of risk mitigation strategies in Sharia Home Ownership Loan (KPR) financing using the 5C principles (Character, Capacity, Capital, Collateral, Condition) and sharia-compliant restructuring mechanisms to reduce Non-Performing Financing (NPF) at Bank BTN Syariah Diponegoro Surabaya. The issue is critical because the national NPF ratio for sharia mortgages has shown fluctuations in recent years, posing threats to portfolio quality and institutional stability. Using a descriptive qualitative approach, data were collected through semi-structured interviews with three key informants directly involved in consumer financing analysis, collection, and documentation, complemented by secondary data from internal bank reports and regulatory sources. Data validity was ensured through source triangulation, technical triangulation, and member checking. The findings show that the rigorous application of the 5C principles helped prevent high-risk applicants from entering the financing portfolio, with 23% of applications rejected during 2024–2025 due to 5C deficiencies. Meanwhile, restructuring measures—through rescheduling, reconditioning, and contract adjustments—helped stabilize debtor repayment abilities and contributed to a decline in potential NPF escalation. Internal branch records indicate that these combined mitigation strategies helped maintain NPF at a controlled level despite wider national fluctuations. This study contributes to the literature by integrating pre-disbursement (5C) and post-disbursement (restructuring) mitigation frameworks within sharia mortgage financing, addressing a gap in existing studies that often examine these mechanisms separately. Practically, the results provide guidance for Islamic banks in strengthening responsive and sharia-compliant risk management systems.
A Historical-Philological Reassessment of Al-Arba'ūna fi Al-Tasawwuf and Its Contribution to Early Sufi Engagements with Hadith Azhary, Muhammad Royyan Faqih; Firdaus, Ahmad; Hazim, M.; Roziqi, Achmad; Zubaidi, Advan Navis
JURNAL AT-TURAS Vol 12, No 4 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Nurul Jadid

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33650/at-turas.v12i4.13352

Abstract

This study analyzes the epistemological intersection between Sufism and Hadith Science through an in-depth examination of the work of Abū ‘Abd al-Raḥmān al-Sulamī, al-Arbaʿūn fī al-Taṣawwuf. Using a historical-philological method, the research reveals the mechanism of the "methodological dialogue" initiated by al-Sulamī, which seeks to reconcile the authority of hadith transmission (naql) with the spiritual epistemology of Sufism (kashf). Empirical philological findings indicate that the majority of hadiths in this collection are of weak (ḍaʿīf) or even fabricated (mawḍūʿ) status, yet doctrinally, al-Sulamī strategically employs them to construct a Sufi ethical-spiritual foundation centered on the concepts of zuhud, maḥabbah, and maʿrifah. This study clearly distinguishes between the findings of problematic sanad authenticity and al-Sulamī's interpretative claims that validate hadith through the alignment of meaning (ṣiḥḥat al-maʿnā) and spiritual considerations. The resulting epistemological insight demonstrates that this work is not merely a harmonious reconciliation, but rather a negotiation arena reflecting the creative tension between the historical-textual authority of the muhaddithūn and the inner experiential authority of the Sufis within the medieval Islamic intellectual tradition.
Protection of Children’s Rights in Post-Divorce Custody Decisions: A Socio-Legal Analysis of Case No. 0461/Pdt.G/2020/PA Gresik Anindya, Salma Elsa; Winanti, Atik
JURNAL AT-TURAS Vol 12, No 4 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Nurul Jadid

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33650/at-turas.v12i4.13215

Abstract

This study examines the regulation of child custody after divorce in Indonesia, focusing on the legal dynamics arising from the general provisions of Article 105 letter (a) of the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI) which tends to grant custody to the mother, imagining it as the best interest of the child. The problem in this study is how legal provisions in Indonesia regulate the granting of custody to the father after divorce, and the judge's legal considerations in the Gresik Religious Court Decision Number 0461/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Gs consider the best interests of the child. This study uses a Normative Juridical research type with a regulatory, case, and conceptual approach. The data analysis technique used is descriptive qualitative. This shows that custody of the three children, including those who are not yet mumayyiz, is given to the father because the mother is proven to have committed verbal and physical violence. The judge specifically Article 105 letter (a) of the KHI and adheres to Article 4 of Law No. 35 of 2014 concerning Child Protection. This decision is also based on the father's capabilities in psychological, moral, religious, and economic aspects. This study aims to analyze the legal basis and judicial reasoning for granting custody to fathers post-divorce in Indonesia, using a normative juridical method with statutory and case approaches. The findings reveal that the court prioritized the child’s holistic welfare over maternal presumption under Article 105(a) KHI. The study contributes to strengthening the interpretation of child protection law consistent with the principle of the best interests of the child.
Genealogy and Epistemological Configuration of Malay Islam and Nusantara Islam in Contemporary Islamic Studies Farozah, Hendri; Syarkoni, Syarkoni; Rusli, Ris’an
JURNAL AT-TURAS Vol 12, No 4 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Nurul Jadid

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33650/at-turas.v12i4.13453

Abstract

This study analyses the conceptual genealogy of Malay Islam and Nusantara Islam and examines the similarities and differences between them in contemporary scientific discourse. Although the two terms are often used interchangeably in academic and public discourse, systematic studies comparing their historical foundations, epistemic actors, and conceptualisation processes are still limited. This gap is the main focus of this study. This study uses a library method with a historical-critical approach and conceptual analysis, which is operationalised through discourse tracing of historical and academic sources, as well as conceptual mapping of the construction of meaning of the two terms. The research data includes classical Malay manuscripts, works of Islamic philology and historiography, religious anthropology literature, and recent scientific publications in Islamic and Southeast Asian studies. The results of the analysis show that Malay Islam is rooted in a pre-modern Islamisation process that was institutionalised through a network of scholars, kingdoms, and classical literacy traditions, while Islam Nusantara is a modern discursive construction that has developed in an academic and religious organisational context since the early 21st century. This study identifies three main findings: similarities between the two in their accommodative and moderate orientation towards Islam; differences in their historical basis, cultural space, and discourse-forming actors; and the strategic role of both in formulating a contextual Islamic paradigm. Theoretically, this research contributes to strengthening the study of Islamic epistemology and Southeast Asian studies by offering a more precise comparative framework for understanding local Islam as a historical and discursive construct.
Vasectomy as Social Assistance Policy Discourse: A Normative Juridical Analysis from Ibn ʿUthaymīn’s Fatwa Husaini, Akhmad; Mas'ud, Marwan; Cahyadi, Goliz; Aji Pratama, Sylvano Wijaya
JURNAL AT-TURAS Vol 13, No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Nurul Jadid

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33650/at-turas.v13i1.13486

Abstract

This research examines the normative and ethical implications of the West Java Governor’s statement proposing vasectomy as a prerequisite for prioritizing social assistance, by addressing the central question of whether such policy discourse constitutes a violation of maqāṣid al-syarīʿah and generates legal–ethical conflicts within Islamic and national legal frameworks. Employing a qualitative approach with library-based research methodology, this study analyzes secondary data through descriptive and content analysis. The analytical framework is grounded in maqāṣid al-syarīʿah theory, while conclusions are drawn using a deductive reasoning approach. The findings demonstrate that conditioning social assistance on vasectomy represents a normative inconsistency that contradicts the principle of preserving progeny (ḥifẓ al-nasl), as articulated in Ibn al-ʿUthaymīn’s fatwas, which prohibit permanent sterilization except in cases of medical necessity. Furthermore, the study identifies significant legal and ethical tensions, including the erosion of religious commitment, distortion of the concept of tawakkul, and violations of bodily autonomy and reproductive rights as protected under national law and human rights norms. The research concludes that such policy discourse risks producing structural injustice against economically marginalized groups. As an alternative, this study proposes rights-based and maqāṣid-oriented solutions, including sustainable economic empowerment programs, comprehensive reproductive health education, voluntary use of non-permanent contraception, and the reinforcement of a fair, non-discriminatory social security system to achieve public welfare without compromising fundamental religious values and human rights.