cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Iyah Faniyah
Contact Email
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Phone
+6285263256164
Journal Mail Official
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Editorial Address
JL. Bandar Purus No.11, Padang Pasir, Kec. Padang Barat, Kota Padang
Location
Kota padang,
Sumatera barat
INDONESIA
Unes Law Review
Published by Universitas Ekasakti
ISSN : 26543605     EISSN : 26227045     DOI : https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1019
Core Subject : Health, Science, Education, Social,
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences
UNES Law Review adalah Jurnal Penelitian Hukum yang dikelola oleh Magister Hukum Pascasarjana, Universitas Ekasakti Padang. Penelitian yang dimuat merupakan pendapat pribadi peneliti dan bukan merupakan pendapat editor. Jurnal terbit secara berkala 4 (empat) kali dalam setahun yaitu September, Desember, Maret, dan Juni. UNES Law Review mulai Volume 4 Nomor 3 Tahun 2022 sampai Volume 9 Nomor 2 Tahun 2027 Reakreditasi Naik Peringkat dari Peringkat 5 ke Peringkat 4 sesuai nomor Akreditasi : 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 Oktober 2022 UNES Law Review is a Legal Research Journal managed by Postgraduate Law Masters, Ekasakti University, Padang. The published research is the personal opinion of the researcher and is not the opinion of the editor. The journal is published periodically 4 (four) times a year, namely September, December, March and June. UNES Law Review Volume 4 Number 3 of 2022 to Volume 9 Number 2 of 2027 Reaccreditation Raised Rank from Rank 5 to Rank 4 according to Accreditation number: 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 October 2022
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 552 Documents
 18   19   20   21   22 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023)" : 552 Documents clear
PENGUATAN SANKSI ADMINISTRATIF SEBAGAI PERWUJUDAN PERLINDUNGAN LINGKUNGAN GUNA SUMBER DAYA ALAM BERKELANJUTAN (SEKTOR PERKEBUNAN, PERTAMBANGAN DAN KEHUTANAN) Teguh Soedarto; L. Budi Kagramanto; Teddy Prima Anggriawan
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.692

Abstract

Sumber daya alam yang berkelanjutan pada dasarnya sangat penting guna menumbuhkan ekonomi sekaligus pembangunan masyarakat. Namun hal tersebut seringkali harus mengorbankan degradasi lingkungan. Hal ini memerlukan penerapan mekanisme pengaturan yang efektif untuk melindungi lingkungan dan mengurangi dampak negatif. Tulisan ini mengeksplorasi peran sosialisasi penguatan sanksi administrasi sebagai perwujudan perlindungan lingkungan dalam konteks pembangunan sumber daya alam. Penulis mengkaji kerangka hukum, sifat dan jenis sanksi administratif, serta pentingnya transparansi dan partisipasi publik dalam menegakkan sanksi tersebut. Studi ini menyoroti perlunya pendekatan komprehensif untuk menyebarkan informasi tentang sanksi administratif, termasuk kampanye kesadaran publik, keterlibatan pemangku kepentingan, dan penggunaan platform digital. Dengan menumbuhkan budaya kepatuhan, upaya ini dapat berkontribusi pada pengembangan sumber daya alam yang berkelanjutan dan perlindungan lingkungan jangka panjang.
PERSETUJUAN TINDAKAN KEDOKTERAN SEBAGAI PEMENUHAN HAK PASIEN PADA PELAKSANAAN TINDAKAN KEDOKTERAN DI RUMAH SAKIT SEMEN PADANG Rama Arsa Faisal; Syofirman Syofyan; Yussy Adelina Mannas
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.695

Abstract

Kesehatan merupakan salah satu unsur kesejahteraan bagi manusia, yang harus diwujudkan sesuai cita-cita Bangsa Indonesia yang tertera dalam UUD45, Universal Declaration of HumanRights (UUDHR), UUKesehatan, UUPraktik Kedokteran, UU Rumah sakit, KUHperdata dan ketentuan terkait lainnya. Pelayanan kesehatan merupakan alat yang digunakan untuk menyelenggarakan upaya kesehatan, baik promotif, preventif, kuratif maupun rehabilitative, yang dilakukan oleh Pemerintah, Pemerintah Daerah, dan/atau masyarakat. Praktik kedokteran merupakan rangkaian kegiatan yang dilakukan oleh dokter … terhadap pasien dalam melaksanakan upaya kesehatan. Hal ini merupakan hubungan hukum berupa persetujuan yang disebut persetujuan terapeutik. Persetujuan ini memiliki sifat yang khusus karena objek yang diperjanjikan adalah upaya atau terapi untuk penyembuhan pasien. Menariknya ini untuk diteliti dengan rumusan masalah, Bagaimana pelaksanaan persetujuan tindakan kedokteran dalam pemenuhan hak pasien di Semen Padang Hospital? Metode penelitian digunakan yuridis empiris, dan hasil yang ditemukan ternyata persetujuan ini memang persetujuan khusus, yang disebut inspaning verbintenis, dan pelaksanaannya di Semen Padang Hospital (SPH) telah sesuai ketentuan terkait. Setiap perjanjian terapeutik selalu didahului dengan informed Consent (IC) yang merupakan alat bukti terjadinya persetujuan terapeutik baik dilakukan lisan atau tertulis. Di SPH IC selalu dilakukan meskipun dalam kondisi gawat.
PEMBAGIAN WARISAN DAN PERAN NOTARIS DALAM MASYARAKAT HUKUM ADAT NIAS Sri Ayu sukmawati Loi; Jeane Neltje Saly
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.611

Abstract

Customary inheritance law in Indonesia is influenced by the existence of a family system such as in terms of the form of marriage and how to draw lineage to determine who has the right to be the heir and has the right to inherit. The indigenous people of Nias who adhere to an inheritance system based on a patrilineal descent system are generally known as honest marriages, namely marriages that are carried out by paying honestly (BÖwÖ) from the man to the woman. In the inheritance system in the Nias tribal community, the role of men is as the heirs of their parents, while women are not heirs. This study uses an empirical juridical approach. The problem in this research is how the division of inheritance and the role of the Notary in the customary law community of Nias. This research is important to carry out to find out the development of inheritance law and the role of the notary in the customary law community of Nias where there has been development in terms of inheritance of female heirs who have received a share of the inheritance of their parents even though the share is not larger than the male heirs and this is a family policy and agreement
ANALISIS PUTUSAN NOMOR : 2508/Pdt.G/2022/PA.Mdn MENGENAI PEMBAGIAN HARTA WARISAN TERHADAP AHLI WARIS DALAM GUGATAN KABUR (Abscruur Libels) Muliyati Muliyati; Akmaluddin Syahputra
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.686

Abstract

The division of inheritance is a very sensitive issue and there are even frequent disputes between the heirs because it relates to the dissatisfaction and selfishness of the heirs. The type of research used is normative research based on secondary data from primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. This study analyzes the problems of implementing Decision Letter Number: 2508/Pdt.G/2022/PA.Mdn regarding the distribution of inheritance to heirs in fleeing lawsuits (Abscruur Libels). from the Compilation of Islamic Law; and the basic considerations of the Medan Islamic Religious Court judge in deciding the inheritance case Number: 2508/Pdt.G/2022/PA.Mdn with an escape lawsuit (Abscruur Libels). This study concludes that in the opinion of the plaintiff's lawsuit registered in the partnership of the Medan Religious Court Number: 2508/Pdt.G/2022/PA.Mdn contains material defects in the form of lack of parties (Plurium Litis Consortium) and blur (Abcsruur Libels). Therefore, the Panel of Judges stated that the Plaintiff's claim was unacceptable, all evidence and rebuttals as well as the final conclusions submitted by the litigants were not considered again.
ANALISIS HUKUM PROSES PENGAMBILALIHAN SAHAM ANAK PERUSAHAAN PT KRAKATAU STEEL TBK OLEH PT CHANDRA ASRI PETROCHEMICAL TBK MELALUI PERJANJIAN JUAL BELI SAHAM BERSYARAT Feridha Medina Hidayat; Tamarine Camalia; Katya Benalda; Lina Budiarti; Desti Rahpriangan; Fatma Namira Maudya
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.687

Abstract

Acquisition (takeover) can be one of the company's development strategies for the economic interests of each takeover company or company that is taken over, one way of acquisition is carried out through a share sale and purchase agreement, either all or most of the company's shares which results in the transfer of control of the company. In this case, it will be reviewed regarding the acquisition made by a subsidiary of PT Krakatau Steel with PT Chandra Asri Petrochemical in accordance with applicable regulations. The purpose of this writing is to find out how the acquisition process occurred at PT Krakatau Steel with PT Chandra Asri Petrochemical. Next to find out what legal consequences occur after the acquisition. The research method used in this study is normative juridical, which is based on positive legal rules or norms through the relevant legislation. The research specification used is descriptive analysis, which is carried out by analyzing and describing completely and thoroughly which is associated with legal theory regarding the process and legal consequences of the acquisitions made by the two companies above. Based on the writing, it was obtained: First, the acquisition made between Krakatau's subsidiary and CAP is categorized as a vertical acquisition with the aim of strengthening the supply chain of business fields carried out by CAP. Then the process of acquiring shares carried out by CAP against KSI through its subsidiaries, namely KTI and KDL is by purchasing shares in each company as stated in the Deed of Takeover. Second, due to the law of the acquisition of PT Krakatau Daya Listrik and PT Krakatau Tirta Industry by PT Chandra Asri Petrochemical Tbk is a change in control of PT Krakatau Daya Listrik company by PT Chandra Asri Petrochemical, changes in shareholder composition, as well as the obligation to report material information to OJK and the public as well as notification to KPPU regarding the takeover. Acquisitions can also have an effect on the company's structure and workforce structure.
THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ONLINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN INDONESIA’S DIGITAL ECONOMIC SECTOR (CASE STUDY: TOKOPEDIA) Angela Yohanna Hutagalung
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.689

Abstract

Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) is a form of Alternative Dispute Resolution (APS) with the help of electronic media. This research provides a thorough analysis of the implementation of ODR in disputes that occur in the digital economy sector with a case study of Tokopedia. This research is also supported by a review of regulations and literature related to the legal issues that the author examines. Regarding the implementation and existence of Online Dispute Resolution in Indonesia, there is no specific regulation that specifically regulates it. However, the existence of Law Number 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions as amended by Law Number 19 of 2016 ("ITE Law"), Government Regulation Number 80 of 2019 on Trading Through Electronic Systems ("PPE-Commerce"), Law Number 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution ("Arbitratrion and ADR Law") can be said to be sufficient to support the validity of ODR mechanisms and decisions. Looking at digital developments, special arrangements for ODR in an electronic or online-based transaction have become urgent at this time. This is due to the potential disputes that may arise in daily transactions.
DISKRIMINASI HARGA BERBASIS GENDER (PINK TAX) : PELANGGARAN UNDANG-UNDANG PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN Ammi Yustisha
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.690

Abstract

The practice of gender-based price discrimination is known as the "Pink Tax". The "Pink Tax" phenomenon reflects an unfair price gap (discrimination) based on the gender of consumers. Gender-based price discrimination not only harms female consumers financially, but also reflects unfairness and inequality in the market. Consumer protection plays an important role in safeguarding the rights and interests of consumers from harmful practices. This research focuses on analyzing whether the practice of gender-based price discrimination (pink tax) is a violation of consumer protection laws in Indonesia? This research uses normative juridical research methods by analyzing the positive law governing consumer protection in Indonesia, namely Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection (UUPK). Although the UUPK has accommodated efforts to protect consumers from discriminatory behavior of business actors, unfortunately the term "discriminatory" is only limited to regulating discriminatory treatment based on ethnicity, religion, culture, region, education, rich, poor and other social status, not including discriminatory treatment based on sex/gender. So it can be concluded that the practice of gender-based price discrimination (pink tax) in Indonesia cannot be categorized as a violation of Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection.
PEMBERLAKUAN PERJANJIAN INVESTASI BILATERAL (BILATERAL INVESTMENT TREATIES) DI SEKTOR KELAUTAN DAN PERIKANAN DI INDONESIA Salsabila Salsabila
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.691

Abstract

The Bilateral Investment Agreement is one of the ways that the Indonesian government and other countries have implemented to support the implementation of foreign investment in Indonesia in the hope that mutually beneficial conditions will be created for the two countries, especially with the existence of principles regarding standard of treatment in a BIT. which is expected to provide protection for both parties. This research was conducted using a normative juridical approach by conducting research on legal principles and using analytical descriptive methods. Indirect expropriation is something that can be done by the Indonesian government in supervising foreign companies operating in Indonesia, thus it is hoped that it will reduce losses experienced by Indonesia in carrying out foreign investment so that people's welfare will be realized.
THE EXISTENCE OF BASYARNAS IN THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN INDONESIA Sahrudi Sahrudi; Teuku Syahrul Ansari; Indra Koswara; Margo Hadipura
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.693

Abstract

In legal matters, there are two attempts to resolve disputes between parties, one of which is by using a sharia-based dispute resolution system. Settlement of sharia-based disputes includes non-litigation (outside court) and/or litigation in court). Sharia disputes in court (Litigation) are requested through religious courts, and dispute resolution outside the court (Non Litigation) through sharia Arbitration bodies. In Indonesia, the institution that resolves sharia arbitration disputes is called BASYARNAS (National Sharia Arbitration Board), and the procedures for settlement are not much different from arbitration procedures in general. The legal basis for the settlement of sharia arbitration disputes is regulated in Law No. 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution and furthermore regarding the execution of sharia arbitral awards is regulated in Supreme Court Circular Letter No. 08 of 2008. This research uses a qualitative method with a normative approach and uses a library research collection method, as well as analyzing documents, data, information related to BASYARNAS. The results of research on the existence of BASYARNAS still depend on the district court.
PENGAJUAN SURAT PENOLAKAN OLEH TERSANGKA TERKAIT ACCESS TO JUSTICE UNTUK MEMPEROLEH BANTUAN HUKUM SECARA CUMA-CUMA PADA TINGKAT PENYIDIKAN DI POLRESTA PADANG Putri Cempaka Mukhti; Ismansyah Ismansyah; Aria Zurnetti
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.694

Abstract

Surat penolakan adalah surat pernyataan yang dibuat oleh Tersangka untuk menyatakan bahwa Tersangka tidak perlu didampingi oleh Penasihat Hukum untuk memperoleh bantuan hukums secara cuma-cuma dalam tingkat pemeriksaan. Pelaksanaan Surat Pernyataan Penolakan oleh Tersangka tidak Didampingi oleh Penasihat Hukum untuk memperoleh bantuan hukum secara cuma-cuma di tingkat penyidikan adalah praktik yang tidak ditemukan aturan hukumnya di dalam KUHAP. Dalam Pasal 56 KUHAP hanya mengatur bahwa aparat penegak hukum wajib menunjuk Penasehat Hukum pada semua tingkat pemeriksaan dalam proses peradilan bagi Tersangka. Adapun Rumusan Masalah (1) Bagaimanakah tata cara pengajuan surat penolakan oleh Tersangka terkait access to justice untuk memperoleh bantuan hukum secara cuma-cuma pada tingkat penyidikan di Polresta Padang? (2) Apakah pertimbangan atau alasan Tersangka melakukan penolakan untuk memperoleh bantuan hukum secara cuma-cuma pada tingkat penyidikan di Polresta Padang dan (3) Bagaimanakah konsekuensi Tersangka melakukan penolakan untuk memperoleh bantuan hukum secara cuma-cuma pada tingkat penyidikan di Polresta Padang?. Jenis penelitian adalah yuridis empiris. Sumber data meliputi data primer dan data sekunder. Teknik pengumpulan data adalah wawancara dan studi dokumen. Data di analisis secara kualitatif. Kesimpulan hasil penelitian ini adalah: (1) Pengajuan Surat Pernyataan Penolakan oleh Tersangka untuk memperoleh bantuan hukum secara cuma-cuma di tingkat penyidikan adalah praktek yang tidak ditemukan aturan hukumnya di dalam KUHAP. Pasal 56 KUHAP tidak dilaksanakan dengan baik oleh aparat penegak hukum, terutama para penyidik dan terlihat dari rendahnya penggunaan Penasehat Hukum dalam pendampingan penyidikan di wilayah Polresta Padang. (2) Alasan Tersangka melakukan penolakan untuk memperoleh bantuan hukum secara cuma-cuma pada tingkat penyidikan adalah karena Tersangka dapat memberikan dan menjawab pertanyaan dari Penyidik dengan sendiri. (3) Konsekuensi bagi Tersangka dapat menimbulkan akibat hukum yang berat karena tidak didampingi oleh Penasehat hukum, bisa saja Tersangka yang seharusnya dapat dihukum dengan hukuman minimal apabila didampingi oleh Penasehat Hukum, menjadi mendapatkan hukuman yang maksimal karena tidak didampingi oleh Penasehat Hukum.

Page 20 of 56 | Total Record : 552

 18   19   20   21   22 

Filter by Year

2023 2023


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 8 No. 3 (2026) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 4 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2023) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol 5 No 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol 5 No 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol 4 No 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol 4 No 3 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2022) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2022) Vol 4 No 2 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2021) Vol 4 No 1 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2021) Vol 3 No 4 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2021) Vol 3 No 3 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2021) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 4 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 3 (2021) Vol 3 No 2 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2020) Vol 3 No 1 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2020) Vol 2 No 4 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2020) Vol 2 No 3 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2020) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 4 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 3 (2020) Vol 2 No 2 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2019) Vol 2 No 1 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2019) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 4 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 3 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018) More Issue