Unes Law Review
UNES Law Review adalah Jurnal Penelitian Hukum yang dikelola oleh Magister Hukum Pascasarjana, Universitas Ekasakti Padang. Penelitian yang dimuat merupakan pendapat pribadi peneliti dan bukan merupakan pendapat editor. Jurnal terbit secara berkala 4 (empat) kali dalam setahun yaitu September, Desember, Maret, dan Juni. UNES Law Review mulai Volume 4 Nomor 3 Tahun 2022 sampai Volume 9 Nomor 2 Tahun 2027 Reakreditasi Naik Peringkat dari Peringkat 5 ke Peringkat 4 sesuai nomor Akreditasi : 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 Oktober 2022 UNES Law Review is a Legal Research Journal managed by Postgraduate Law Masters, Ekasakti University, Padang. The published research is the personal opinion of the researcher and is not the opinion of the editor. The journal is published periodically 4 (four) times a year, namely September, December, March and June. UNES Law Review Volume 4 Number 3 of 2022 to Volume 9 Number 2 of 2027 Reaccreditation Raised Rank from Rank 5 to Rank 4 according to Accreditation number: 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 October 2022
Articles
744 Documents
Search results for
, issue
"Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)"
:
744 Documents
clear
<![CDATA[Sumbangan Dana Kampanye Pada Pemilu 2024 (Analisis Regulasi Kepemiluan di Indonesia) ]]>
<![CDATA[Ilham, Ilham]]>;
<![CDATA[Hasba, Irham Bashori]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Ekasakti ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1141
<![CDATA[The implementation of general elections in Indonesia requires a consistent and sustainable electoral system in order to minimize changes in new laws or regulations in each election. General elections as a key element of democratic implementation which involves direct participation of citizens in the election of state and government administrators. Democracy and elections have a close relationship because elections are a means to achieve democracy and oversee the process of transferring people's power to their representatives through political candidates. Elections are governed by constitutional principles and in accordance with the direction of state policy, one of which is through financial support by the state in elections and election participants. The implementation of campaigns by election participants definitely requires sources of funds obtained and derived from various sources based on applicable legal provisions and restrictions. The existence of Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections which also regulates campaign finance aims to ensure the achievement of fairness and transparency. Campaign finance limits apply of course with strict mechanisms because election finance often intersects with issues of transparency, accountability, money politics, corruption risks and resistance to politicization. Therefore, strict regulation and effective monitoring are needed. This study analyses election regulations in Indonesia with a focus on campaign finance. The juridical-normative approach is used to understand the written law and its implementation in practice. Data analysis is descriptive qualitative which aims to understand the dynamics of the use and important role of campaign funds in organizing general elections.]]>
<![CDATA[Pertimbangan Hakim Terhadap Kepentingan Anak Dalam Mengabulkan Dispensasi Perkawinan Pasca Berlakunya Undang-Undang No. 16 Tahun 2019 ]]>
<![CDATA[Angel, Rose Benedict]]>;
<![CDATA[Hadiati, Mia]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Ekasakti ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1143
<![CDATA[Penelitian ini dilatar belakangi oleh banyaknya permohonan dispensasi perkawinan setelah penerapan undang-undang terbaru terkait batasan usia perkawinan. Penelitian ini mengkaji pertimbangan hakim baik dari aspek normatif maupun sosial agar permohonan dispensasi ini dapat diterima. Penelitian ini fokus pada bagaimana hakim meninjau permohonan dispensasi perkawinan pasca diundangkannya Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2019. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan undang-undang. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa hakim dalam memutus perkara dispensasi perkawinan tidak hanya melihat pada kelengkapan administrasi hukumnya saja. Namun juga dari sudut pandang sosiologi, pemberian permohonan dispensasi melihat aspek manfaat yang harus diperoleh untuk menghindari kerugian yang lebih besar. Implikasinya, perubahan undang-undang terkait dispensasi perkawinan semakin meningkat karena menjadi tata cara penyelesaian administrasi perkawinan bagi pasangan di bawah umur dalam ketentuan undang-undang.]]>
<![CDATA[Kedudukan Harta Bersama yang Terletak di Luar Negeri (Singapura) dari Perkawinan Campuran yang Melakukan Perceraian di Pengadilan Negeri (Studi Putusan No. 552/Pdt.G/2013/PN.DPS) ]]>
<![CDATA[Afridah, Afridah]]>;
<![CDATA[Yaswirman, Yaswirman]]>;
<![CDATA[Ferdi, Ferdi]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Ekasakti ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1144
<![CDATA[A mixed marriage will bring legal consequences to the parties who do it, namely related to property in the marriage. The joint assets formed during the marriage are not only located in the territory of Indonesia, but also located abroad (Singapore). This study examines the position of joint assets in mixed marriages located outside the territory of Indonesia who filed for divorce and property claims in the District Court. The purpose of this article, which is based on the results of this research, aims to determine legal certainty regarding the status of joint property in mixed marriages located abroad (Singapore) based on Decision No. 552 / Pdt.G/2013/PN.Dps) by Judge. The research method used in this study is a normative legal research method with a source of law, namely statutory regulations. The research method used is a normative juridical approach. Research specifications use analytical descriptive and data sources use secondary data consisting of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. Materials from the results of this study indicate that joint assets located abroad (Singapore) are subject to the Indonesian Judge's decision. In the eligibility conditions in the Strata Title rules that apply in Singapore, the holder of a Permanent Resident permit has the right to transfer or sell property located in that country.]]>
<![CDATA[Rekognisi Sistem Pemerintahan Daerah di Indonesia Perspektif Konstitusional ]]>
<![CDATA[Triwahyuningsih, Triwahyuningsih]]>;
<![CDATA[Shanty Saleh, Indah Nur]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Ekasakti ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1147
<![CDATA[Philosophically, the State as a forum for realizing national ideals requires a basis that can bring together the various characteristics of Indonesian society. Therefore, a Government of the Republic of Indonesia was formed which was able to protect the entire Indonesian nation and all of Indonesia's blood to prosper the people. The commitment of the Founding Fathers to the special and special rights of regional origin was proven by its inclusion in the Law. The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia is hereinafter referred to as the 1945 Constitution. Research objectives: to analyze the importance of recognizing special and special regions within the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia based on the 1945 Constitution. Research Method: normative legal research type, data collection method in the form of secondary data with primary legal materials, in the form of statutory regulations and various proclamations. Meanwhile, secondary legal materials are in the form of literature that is relevant to the object under study. This research uses a statutory and historical approach. Qualitative descriptive data analysis method through data display, data reduction and drawing conclusions. The results of the research show: the importance of recognition of special and special regional government systems in Indonesia because recognition is a basic human need in an expanded spectrum, regions within the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia want to receive fair treatment from countries that are different from other regions due to historical background factors , culture and position.]]>
<![CDATA[Royalty Fee Penggunaan Merek pada Sistem Franchise UMKM Kebab Goceng di Kota Medan Persfektif Fatwa DSN MUI No.114/dsn mui/ix/2017 ]]>
<![CDATA[Hafsari, Vita]]>;
<![CDATA[Sativa, Annisa]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Ekasakti ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1148
<![CDATA[A franchise is an agreement regarding how to distribute products and services to customers. The party providing the license called the Franchisor, permits another party, called the Franchise, to run a product and service distribution business using the Franchisor's name in a certain area for a certain period of time. This business must be operated in accordance with the procedures and methods determined by the Franchisor. The Franchisor also provides support to the Franchisee, and in return, the Franchisee pays initial fees and royalties. In order to create a franchise business model that is in line with Islamic principles, it is necessary to apply the sharia value system as an ethical basis for business, aimed at preventing ethical violations in business (moral hazard). This research aims to examine the process of determining royalty fees for brand use within the framework of a franchise system, with a focus on the perspective explained in the DSN MUI Fatwa No:114/DSN-MUI/IX/2017. A review of the MUI's (Indonesian Ulema Council) fatwa and views on intellectual property rights and franchise practices shows the importance of complying with sharia principles in franchise agreements. These principles include clear profit calculations, profit sharing based on proportional ratios, and commitment to risks and losses. This case study focuses on the Kebab Goceng Franchise in Medan City, using a qualitative approach, including in-depth interviews and document analysis as data collection methods. The research results show that the Kebab Goceng franchise in Medan City has not implemented the DSN MUI Fatwa No: 114/DSN-MUI/IX/2017 in determining royalties. This determination is based on the criteria of fairness, mutual agreement and business sustainability. However, there are challenges regarding the interpretation and practical application of this fatwa.]]>
<![CDATA[Dampak Perkembangan Fintech Terhadap Perlindungan Konsumen: Kasus Pinjaman Uang Online di Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Syarifah, Nurul]]>;
<![CDATA[Saly, Jeane Neltje]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Ekasakti ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1150
<![CDATA[Penelitian ini mengkaji perlindungan hukum yang diberikan kepada penerima pinjaman online di Indonesia berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Bertujuan untuk menganalisis perlindungan hukum terhadap penerima pinjaman uang online terutama dalam mekanisme penagihan pinjaman ilegal yang tidak memiliki izin dari Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) dan menguji keabsahan perjanjian antara pemberi dan penerima pinjaman online berdasarkan Pasal 1320 dan Pasal 1338 KUH Perdata. Melalui pendekatan penelitian normatif dengan menggunakan bahan kepustakaan, dapat disimpulkan bahwa perlindungan konsumen dalam praktik pinjaman uang online harus memperhatikan prinsip-prinsip transparansi, perlakuan yang adil, keandalan, kerahasiaan data, dan penanganan pengaduan yang efisien. Selain itu, pentingnya menjaga kepastian hukum dan menghormati perjanjian yang telah dibuat, serta peran OJK dan aparatur penegak hukum dalam menindak pelaku usaha ilegal juga menjadi fokus dalam penelitian ini. Hasil penelitian ini diharapkan dapat memberikan kontribusi dalam menjaga hak dan kepentingan penerima pinjaman uang online serta mendorong pematuhan terhadap peraturan hukum yang berlaku.]]>
<![CDATA[Modus Of Operandi and Sanctions For Criminal Actions In The Health Field (Study Decision Number 90/Pid.Sus/2023/Pn Mks) ]]>
<![CDATA[Th. Timbonga, Yotham]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Ekasakti ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1152
<![CDATA[The aim of this research is to determine the modus operandi of criminal acts in the health sector (study of decision Number 90/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Mks) and the judge's legal considerations in handing down decision Number 90/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Mks. This research was conducted using a type of normative legal research with the approach method in this research being the statutory regulation approach. The conclusions of this research are: 1) The modus operandi carried out by the defendant who was a distributor of pharmaceutical preparations without a distribution permit in Decision Number 90/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Mks was by buying the drug from his friend secretly or secretly, then hiding it. the medicines are taken to their home first and the aim is to distribute them to consumers and make a profit from selling pharmaceutical preparations without a distribution permit. 2) The judge's consideration in imposing a criminal sentence on the perpetrator in Decision Number 90/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Mks is based on both juridical and non-juridical considerations. The judge's imposition of sanctions is based more on the facts of the trial and valid evidence and takes into account demands of the Public Prosecutor. The sentence imposed in the form of imprisonment for 1 (one) year and 10 (ten) months on the defendant is sufficient to have a deterrent effect on the perpetrator so that he does not repeat his actions again.]]>
<![CDATA[Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Pencoretan Pihak dalam Akta Notaris yang Berindikasi Nominee Serta Menimbulkan Ketidakpastian Hukum (Studi Penelitian di Majelis Pengawas Daerah Kota Batam) ]]>
<![CDATA[Elviani, Elviani]]>;
<![CDATA[Respationo, Soerya]]>;
<![CDATA[Tartib, Muhammad]]>;
<![CDATA[Erniyanti, Erniyanti]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Ekasakti ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1153
<![CDATA[This research uses normative research methods supported by empirical research. By examining the positive laws that apply in Indonesia and analyzing data obtained directly from the field or facts that occur in society. The aim is to find out how the legal regulations, the implementation of deletion and the factors that become obstacles/obstacles and solutions to the deletion of parties in Notarial deeds which are indicated as nominees occur in Indonesia. The research results show that legal regulations in Indonesia still do not have specific regulations regarding the removal of parties in Notarial Deeds who are indicated as nominees. However, in practice, deletions in a Notarial Deed can refer to Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notaries. Researchers hope that there will be special rules regarding the procedure for writing off a Notarial Deed, based on Court Decision regulations. So as not to create legal uncertainty in implementing law in Indonesia.]]>
<![CDATA[Analisis Yuridis Pencantuman Klausul Force Majeure dalam Perjanjian Sewa Menyewa dan Pengelolaan Hak Milik Atas Satuan Rumah Susun Untuk Meneguhkan Kepastian Hukum (Studi Penelitian Di Kota Batam) ]]>
<![CDATA[Kirtan, Tivonli]]>;
<![CDATA[Respationo, Soerya]]>;
<![CDATA[Erniyanti, Erniyanti]]>;
<![CDATA[Fadlan, Fadlan]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Ekasakti ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1154
<![CDATA[A rental agreement is a mutual agreement that creates rights and responsibilities fot the parties involved in the agreement. Rental activities for apartment units in Batam City are often conducted verbally or through informal written agreement and ingnoring the inclusion of force majeure clauses so that there is no legal certainty for the parties. The research method used in this study is a combination of normative research and empirical research, which involves primary data through interviews and then correlating it with secondary data, such as statutory regulations and theories used in the study. The research findings indicate that there is Article 45 of Law Number 20 of 2011 which regulates the occupation of apartment units through written agreements made in the presence of authorizes officials and also Article 28 of the Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 14 of 2016 concerning Imprementation of Housing and Settlement Areas addresses the inclusion of force majeure clauses. However, these provisions are often overlooked due to factors such as knowledge, age, social factors, and economic circumstances that influence people’s daily decision-making.]]>
<![CDATA[Penetapan Terutang Pajak Saat Terjadinya Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah dan/atau Bangunan ]]>
<![CDATA[Rachman, Alifa Ramadhanty]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Ekasakti ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1155
<![CDATA[The Indonesian government has promulgated Government Regulation Number 35 of 2023 concerning General Provisions for Regional Taxes and Regional Retributions (refers to PP General PDRD Provisions), which is the implementing provision of Law Number 1 of 2022 concerning Financial Relations Between the Central Government and Regional Governments (hereinafter called as the HKPD Law). This research raises two promblem statements, the determination of tax payable when the rights to land and/or buildings are transferred based on the PDRD General Provisions PP, and the notary's obligations regarding the confidential principle of office in the PDRD General Provisions PP. This research is normative legal research, with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach, where the data analysis is qualitative, carried out through legal science interpretation. The research results show that the determination of what is owed by BPHTB when the rights to land and/or buildings are transferred based on the PDRD General Provisions PP still raises legal concern, both at a theoretical and practical level. The notary's obligation to comply with the confidential principle of office in the PP does not have a basis because the HKPD Law does not regulate this obligation. Hence, this obligation can be overridden]]>
