Unes Law Review
UNES Law Review adalah Jurnal Penelitian Hukum yang dikelola oleh Magister Hukum Pascasarjana, Universitas Ekasakti Padang. Penelitian yang dimuat merupakan pendapat pribadi peneliti dan bukan merupakan pendapat editor. Jurnal terbit secara berkala 4 (empat) kali dalam setahun yaitu September, Desember, Maret, dan Juni. UNES Law Review mulai Volume 4 Nomor 3 Tahun 2022 sampai Volume 9 Nomor 2 Tahun 2027 Reakreditasi Naik Peringkat dari Peringkat 5 ke Peringkat 4 sesuai nomor Akreditasi : 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 Oktober 2022 UNES Law Review is a Legal Research Journal managed by Postgraduate Law Masters, Ekasakti University, Padang. The published research is the personal opinion of the researcher and is not the opinion of the editor. The journal is published periodically 4 (four) times a year, namely September, December, March and June. UNES Law Review Volume 4 Number 3 of 2022 to Volume 9 Number 2 of 2027 Reaccreditation Raised Rank from Rank 5 to Rank 4 according to Accreditation number: 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 October 2022
Articles
580 Documents
Search results for
, issue
"Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024)"
:
580 Documents
clear
<![CDATA[Perkawinan Beda Agama dan Implikasinya Terhadap Terbitnya Kartu Keluarga Perspektif Undang-undang No. 1 Tahun 1974 dan Undang-undang No. 23 Tahun 2006 : (Studi Kasus Kecamatan Naman Teran, Kabupaten Karo) ]]>
<![CDATA[Wike Sundari]]>;
<![CDATA[Amal Hayati]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2002
<![CDATA[Marriage is a spiritual and physical relationship between a man and a woman as husband and wife, with the goal of creating a happy family based on the belief in the Almighty God. One of the marriages that often occurs in Indonesia is marriage between different religions. Law Number 1 of 1974 outlaws interfaith marriages, as stated in article 2 paragraph 1: "marriage is valid if carried out according to the laws of each religion and belief." Meanwhile, Law Number 23 of 2006 allows for interfaith marriages, as indicated in Article 35, which specifies that marriages determined by the court are 'interfaith marriages'. This research method is qualitative, it utilizes normative empirical legal research, a comparative perspective, and legal sociology, and the data is gathered from books, journals, articles and interviews. According to the author, the more relevant law is the regulation of Law Number I of 1974 which prohibits interfaith marriages. Because it allows couples to manage the legality of their marriage without having to use illegal method in order to fulfill administrative rights such as issuing Family Cards and other administrative procedures.]]>
<![CDATA[Pelanggaran Ham Dalam Konflik Israel dan Palestina ]]>
<![CDATA[Lewiandy, Lewiandy]]>;
<![CDATA[Alessandro Christian Max]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2003
<![CDATA[All human beings have human rights not because of a gift given to them, but a gift given by the Creator to every human being. Any human being does not have the right to deprive each other of their rights, if this happens then that person will also be called a human rights violator. As is happening now, Israel's human rights violations against Palestinians are a taking away of other people's rights, especially the right to live and live in safety. Even though there is international law that protects cases of human rights violations, ironically humanitarian tragedies still occur. The results of this research found that attacks carried out by the Israeli army had destroyed many residences, places of worship and other public facilities in Palestine. Most countries in all other parts of the world, especially countries with predominantly Muslim populations, strongly condemn all forms of actions committed by the Israeli army against Palestine. Israel is also stated to have violated human rights, this has been going on for a long time and continuously until now, which is happening to Palestinians.]]>
<![CDATA[Perspektif Hukum terhadap Perlindungan Anak Korban Kekerasan Seksual dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2022 ]]>
<![CDATA[Silvia Cahyadi]]>;
<![CDATA[Rasji, Rasji]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2004
<![CDATA[A nation's legal system must provide for the legal protection of children who are the victims of sexual assault. One of the main initiatives to give children who are victims of sexual assault proper legal protection is Law Number 12 of 2022 about Sexual assault Crimes. This article examines the numerous legal protection measures provided by Law Number 12 of 2022 through a content analysis. These measures include rules pertaining to the definition of sexual violence, court procedures, penalties for offenders, and victim rehabilitation initiatives. The investigation focuses on the potential and difficulties in implementing Law Number 12 of 2022 throughout society, as well as how it offers a thorough legal framework to safeguard the rights of children who are sexually abused.]]>
<![CDATA[Akibat Hukum Wanprestasi Yang Dilakukan Nasabah Terhadap Koperasi Simpan Pinjam Dalam Perjanjian Tidak Tertulis ]]>
<![CDATA[Yuriz Wibowo]]>;
<![CDATA[Gunawan Djajaputra]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2005
<![CDATA[In unwritten agreements between customers and savings and loan cooperatives, defaults by customers can have significant legal consequences for both parties. Default occurs when customers do not fulfill their obligations in accordance with the agreed agreement, such as not paying installments on time. The legal consequences of this default may vary depending on the provisions contained in the agreement and the applicable law. The research method used is normative law. The results showed that for customers, the legal consequences of default can be in the form of fines or surcharges, cancellation of the agreement, or even lawsuits. Meanwhile, for savings and loan cooperatives, the legal consequences can include financial losses due to not receiving payments on time and a tainted reputation in the industry. The importance of clarity and certainty in agreements is an important emphasis in this context, so that the rights and obligations of both parties can be clearly understood. In addition, compliance with applicable laws and regulations is also a key factor in responding to defaults, so that both parties can maintain balance and fairness in their contractual relationship.]]>
<![CDATA[Kebijakan Hukum terhadap Problematika Pemberian Pemenuhan Hak Restitusi Korban Tindak pidana yang diatur KUHAP dan diluar KUHAP ]]>
<![CDATA[Alyafedri, Youfan]]>;
<![CDATA[Koto, Ismail]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2006
<![CDATA[Restitution is compensation given to the victim or their family by the perpetrator or a third party. Victims of criminal acts that can be given restitution are criminal acts of serious human rights violations, terrorism, human trafficking, racial and ethnic discrimination, criminal acts related to children, as well as other criminal acts determined by the LPSK Decree in accordance with the provisions of statutory regulations. . Of course, fulfilling the right to restitution for victims of criminal acts has several problems which are sometimes very detrimental to victims of criminal acts. Providing restitution still has not received attention from the government. It is still not balanced when compared with attention to perpetrators of criminal acts. The aim of this research is 1) to find out arrangements for providing restitution for victims of criminal acts. 2) to find out the implementation of providing restitution as a fulfillment of the rights of victims of criminal acts according to the KUHAP and outside the KUHAP, and 3) to find out the problems of giving the right to restitution to victims of criminal acts regulated by the KUHAP and outside the KUHAP. The method used is normative juridical research. The results of the research show that 1) Arrangements for providing restitution for victims of criminal acts have of course been regulated in the Criminal Procedure Code, namely in article 98, while outside the Criminal Procedure Code, regulations relating to restitution are regulated, one of which is stipulated in Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2022. 2) Implementation of providing restitution in fulfillment of The rights of victims of criminal acts can be exercised in 2 ways, namely before the decision has permanent legal force and after the decision has permanent legal force. 3) The problem of granting restitution rights to victims of criminal acts is of course 3 factors, namely legal factors, law enforcement factors and community factors.]]>
<![CDATA[Implementasi Insolvency Test Dalam Menyatakan Debitur Pailit Berdasarkan Hukum Kepailitan di Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Fuad, Assyifa]]>;
<![CDATA[Paidi Aritonang, Parulian]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2007
<![CDATA[A bankruptcy application can be submitted by the debtor or creditor with a minimal prerequisite, namely having at least 2 (two) creditors and having a debt that has fallen due and is payable in accordance with the provisions of Article 2 paragraph 1 of Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (“The Bankruptcy Law”). The ease of filing bankruptcy petitions has raised concerns about its potential to disadvantage debtors and perpetuate malpractices among bankruptcy petitioners. This concern is particularly evident in cases where debtors possess assets that exceed their outstanding debts, rendering them solvent rather than insolvent. A prime example of this issue is the landmark case of Putusan Pengadilan Niaga 48/Pailit/2012/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst, where the Commercial Court declared PT Telkomsel bankrupt without first establishing or obtaining evidence that PT Telkomsel's assets were less than its debt to PT PJI, thereby placing it in a state of insolvency. Based on this, the Author will examine the necessity of implementing an insolvency test whose provisions are currently adopted in Government Regulation Number 74 of 2020 regarding the Investment Management Institution.]]>
<![CDATA[Tinjauan Hukum Kesepakatan Suami Istri Diluar Ketentuan Mengenai Pemisahan Harta dalam Perjanjian Perkawinan ]]>
<![CDATA[Salsabilla, Denintya Indri]]>;
<![CDATA[Endah Hartati]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2009
<![CDATA[This study examines the regulations regarding a prenuptial agreement which contain agreements between husband and wife outside of provisions regarding the separation of assets. In marriage, apart from assets, there are also other personal matters that can be agreed upon, but the legal provisions only stipulate that a prenuptial agreement specifically concern about separation of assets. This study uses research methods with a qualitative approach and in its discussion uses a juridical-normative approach. The results of this study found that husband and wife agreements outside of assets can be made if necessary but are considered difficult to include in a prenuptial agreement. This is because there are several differences, so the way it made must also be differentiated.]]>
<![CDATA[Penegakan Kepastian Hukum Dalam Unsur Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Berencana Pada Putusan Pengadilan Negeri MARISA 72/PID.B/2019/PN.MAR ]]>
<![CDATA[Arif Al Jibran, Farel]]>;
<![CDATA[Adhari, Ade]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2011
<![CDATA[Enforcing legal certainty in criminal acts of serious abuse is an important aspect of a just justice system. This study analyzes the application of the elements "whoever" and "commits serious maltreatment" in the crime of serious maltreatment and their relevance to legal certainty in law enforcement. Clear provisions regarding actions that are considered serious abuse and who is responsible for these actions are the main key. With this clarity, justice can be better served because all parties are subject to the same laws. Apart from that, applying appropriate punishment is also a means of providing justice to victims and society as a whole. The research results show that the application of these two elements is in accordance with the principles of justice and legal certainty. Thus, legal certainty in enforcing criminal acts of serious ill-treatment is an important basis for creating a just and civilized society. Through normative juridical analysis research methods, and supported by the fact that clarity in the law provides certainty for society and upholds justice. So enforcing legal certainty in criminal acts of serious abuse is a crucial step in maintaining justice and public order. By understanding and applying the principles of legal certainty, the justice system can function effectively to protect individual rights and provide justice to all parties involved.]]>
<![CDATA[Perjanjian Distributor dengan Pedagang Kelontong (Studi Kasus Perjanjian Distributor Pemasok Snack ke Pedagang Kelontong di Pasar Cipete Utara Jakarta Selatan) ]]>
<![CDATA[Rosid, Abdul]]>;
<![CDATA[Suparji, Suparji]]>;
<![CDATA[Fuad, Fokky]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2012
<![CDATA[Perjanjian merupakan suatu peristiwa di mana seorang berjanji kepada seorang lainnya atau di mana dua orang itu saling berjanji untuk melaksanakan suatu hal. Sebuah perikatan dapat menjadi undang-undang bagi para pihak yang melakukan perikatan tersebut apabila ada kata sepakat (Pasal 1338 KUHPer). Konsinyasi merupakan jenis pendistribusian produk maupun barang yang dikirim dari pihak pengirim atau produsen oleh supplier untuk dititip kepada pedagang yang memiliki outlet. Perjanjian konsinyasi disebut perjanjian tidak bernama (innominaat) yang merupakan perjanjian yang dikenal secara umum karena perjanjian ini tidak mempunyai nama secara khusus dalam KUHPer maupun KUHD. Perjanjian konsinyasi berlandaskan asas konsensualisme, pacta sunt servanda, serta itikad baik. Dalam pemenuhan hak dan kewajibannya dalam perjanjian harus didasari dari substansi perjanjian yang mereka sepakati. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini bertujuan memecahkan masalah terkait Pengaturan hukum yang mengatur perjanjian terkait hak dan kewajiban antara pemasok snack dan pedagang kelontong dalam perjanjian distributor di Pasar Cipete Utara serta Pertanggungjawaban Hukumnya. Kerangka teori yang dugubakan dalam penelitian ini berlandaskan pada teori dan konsep perjanjian, seperti teori kesepakatan, hukum perjanjian, serta unsur-unsur yang harus dipenuhi dalam perjanjian yang dibuat. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian dengan pendekatan Social legal research yang memiliki sifat penelitian yang eksplanatoris dan bersumber pada yuridis normatif. Sehingga menghasilkan kesimpulan bahwa dalam melakukan perjanjian distributor, para pihak secara yuridis memiliki hak dan kewajiban mereka dalam memenuhi perjanjian yang diperjanjikan, serta para pihak bertanggungjawab penuh demi hukum dan perjanjian atas kesepakatan yang telah mereka buat dengan pemberian sanksi berupa denda atau ganti kerugian.]]>
<![CDATA[Kelemahan Penanganan Pelanggaran Tindak Pidana Pemilihan Umum Di Negara Republik Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Wilde, Aisya Avrylia Elskan]]>;
<![CDATA[Hery Firmansyah]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2013
<![CDATA[Demokrasi adalah pemerintahan dari rakyat, oleh rakyat, dan untuk rakyat. Hal ini diucapkan oleh Abraham Lincon di dalam pidatonya di Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, 19 November 1863. Belau mengatakan “Democracy is a government of the people, by the people, and for the people”. Indonesia merupakan salah satu negara yang menerapkan sistem demokrasi. Hal ini dapat dilihat dalam Pancasila dan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Salah satu bentuk Demokrasi di Indonesia adalah dengan dijalankannya Pemilihan Umum dimana warga negara Indonesia memiliki kesempatan untuk menentukan pemerintahan itu sendiri. Oleh karena itu jalannya sebuah Pemilihan Umum harus lancar, adil, dan transparan. Dalam jalannya Pemilihan Umum sudah dipastikan akan terjadinya sebuah pelanggaran, salah satu dari pelanggaran tersebut adalah pelanggaran pidana Pemilihan Umum. Proses penanganan perkara pelanggaran pidana Pemilihan Umum tercantum di dalam Undang-Undang No. 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum Pasal 476. Berdasarkan Teori Efektivitas Hukum dan Teori Keadilan terjadinya kelemahan dalam proses penanganannya, dapat di lihat dari waktu penanganan yang cenderung singkat dengan proses yang cukup Panjang dan rumit. Hal tersebut menyebabkan terhambatnya penyampaian keadilan kepada para pelapor atau orang-orang yang percaya bahwa telah terjadinya pelanggaran tersebut, hal ini dapat dikatakan sebagai tidak tersampaikannya keadilan atau keadilan yang terlambat sama denga ketidakadilan. Hukum seharusnya bersifat Lex nemini operatur iniquum, neminini facit injuriam atau hukum tidak memberikan ketidakadilan kepada siapapun dan tidak melakukan kesalahan kepada siapapun.]]>
