cover
Contact Name
Iyah Faniyah
Contact Email
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Phone
+6285263256164
Journal Mail Official
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Editorial Address
JL. Bandar Purus No.11, Padang Pasir, Kec. Padang Barat, Kota Padang
Location
Kota padang,
Sumatera barat
INDONESIA
Unes Law Review
Published by Universitas Ekasakti
ISSN : 26543605     EISSN : 26227045     DOI : https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1019
UNES Law Review adalah Jurnal Penelitian Hukum yang dikelola oleh Magister Hukum Pascasarjana, Universitas Ekasakti Padang. Penelitian yang dimuat merupakan pendapat pribadi peneliti dan bukan merupakan pendapat editor. Jurnal terbit secara berkala 4 (empat) kali dalam setahun yaitu September, Desember, Maret, dan Juni. UNES Law Review mulai Volume 4 Nomor 3 Tahun 2022 sampai Volume 9 Nomor 2 Tahun 2027 Reakreditasi Naik Peringkat dari Peringkat 5 ke Peringkat 4 sesuai nomor Akreditasi : 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 Oktober 2022 UNES Law Review is a Legal Research Journal managed by Postgraduate Law Masters, Ekasakti University, Padang. The published research is the personal opinion of the researcher and is not the opinion of the editor. The journal is published periodically 4 (four) times a year, namely September, December, March and June. UNES Law Review Volume 4 Number 3 of 2022 to Volume 9 Number 2 of 2027 Reaccreditation Raised Rank from Rank 5 to Rank 4 according to Accreditation number: 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 October 2022
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 3,910 Documents
Perbedaan Putusan Bpsk Dan Pengadilan Negeri Atas Perjanjian Pembiayaan Dengan Penyerahan Hak Milik Secara Fidusia Kusumonegoro, Kea Ezzati Ascarya; Djajaputra, Gunawan
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1112

Abstract

Penelitian ini membandingkan penyelesaian sengketa antara Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (BPSK) dan Pengadilan Negeri dalam kasus perjanjian pembiayaan dengan jaminan fidusia. Dalam konteks perubahan kehidupan manusia yang memerlukan tambahan sumber dana, pinjam-meminjam dengan jaminan fidusia umumnya digunakan. Rumusan masalah penelitian adalah perbandingan dalam penyelesaian sengketa antara BPSK dan Pengadilan Negeri. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian normatif dengan analisis data berdasarkan undang-undang, regulasi, putusan pengadilan, dokumen akademik, dan literatur terkait. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan perbedaan signifikan dalam kekuatan hukum putusan antara BPSK dan Pengadilan Negeri. Pengadilan Negeri memiliki kekuatan eksekusi langsung, sedangkan BPSK mengandalkan kesepakatan sukarela. Selain itu, pendekatan penentuan kompensasi juga berbeda, dengan Pengadilan Negeri cenderung memberikan kompensasi lebih tegas. Dalam konteks perjanjian pembiayaan dengan jaminan fidusia, pemilihan metode penyelesaian harus mempertimbangkan karakteristik sengketa dan tujuan pihak yang bersengketa. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah bahwa pemilihan antara BPSK dan Pengadilan Negeri perlu mempertimbangkan kebutuhan dan kompleksitas sengketa yang bersangkutan. Pihak ketiga yang terpengaruh juga harus melindungi hak-hak mereka sesuai dengan hukum yang berlaku. Saran penelitian adalah untuk mempertimbangkan karakteristik sengketa dengan cermat. Jika penyelesaian dengan kekuatan hukum dan eksekusi diperlukan, Pengadilan Negeri mungkin menjadi pilihan yang lebih sesuai. Namun, jika sengketa bersifat lebih fleksibel dan lebih memilih kesepakatan sukarela, maka BPSK bisa menjadi alternatif yang baik, memungkinkan para pihak untuk mencapai kesepakatan yang moderat.
Balik Nama Sertipikat Hak Milik Atas Tanah Berdasarkan Akta Lelang Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan di Kota Pariaman Heriyus, Anisa Noverina; Warman, Kurnia; Andora, Hengky
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1113

Abstract

The mortgage execution auction occurs if the debtor defaults, the first mortgage holder has the right to sell the mortgage object on his own authority through a public auction and collect the settlement of his receivables from the proceeds of the sale. In this case the creditor is always the party that directly does have a legal relationship with the debtor through the agreement that they have entered into, of course they are ready with all the attitudes of the debtor, but what about the auction winner, in this case the auction winner is just an individual/legal entity legally and legally carry out sales and purchases in a manner determined and carried out based on law, the auction winner, who in this case becomes the buyer of the collateral object through auction, even gets a lawsuit from the debtor or other parties because he is dissatisfied and has his rights those who are harmed by the creditor's decision to carry out the auction. Of course, this needs to be reviewed again so that the auction winners do not become an outlet for any party's dissatisfaction with the auction of collateral items given to the creditor bank. This study aims to determine the execution of mortgage execution auctions, the process of transferring title certificates of property rights based on auctions, as well as legal protection guarantees for auction winners, the protection referred to here is legal protection that guarantees the auction winner's rights to the object won. From the results of this study it is known that the form of legal protection obtained by the auction winner is a court decision which says that the auction is legal and strengthens the rights of the auction winner over the object of the auction he won. Meanwhile, if the auction is canceled by the court due to law, in this case the legal protection that the winner of the auction gets is that he can demand payment of money for the auction object that has been deposited with the auction official, and can demand costs incurred if he has already registered the auction object.
Pendaftaran Tanah untuk Pertama Kali Berdasarkan Jual Beli di Bawah Tangan di Kabupaten Lamandau Provinsi Kalimantan Tengah Al Amin, M. Rizkal; Warman, Kurnia; Rias, Irzal
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1114

Abstract

Relgistration comels from thel word cadastrel (Dultch Cadastral) a telchnical telrm for a relcord (relcord), showing thel arela, valulel and ownelrship of a plot of land. This word comels from thel Latin Capitastrulm which melans a relgistelr or capita or ulnit madel for thel Roman land tax (Capotatio Telrrelns). In a clelar selnsel, Cadastrel is a relcord (a relcord of lands, thel valulel of land and its rights holdelrs and for tax pulrposels). Land relgistration in Indonelsia consists of 2 (two) stagels, namelly land relgistration for thel first timel and theln maintelnancel of land relgistration data. Land relgistration for thel first timel is carrield oult throulgh 2 (two) typels relgistration namelly systelmatic land relgistration and land relgistration sporadic. Systelmatic land relgistration is carrield oult simulltaneloulsly with initiativel of thel Govelrnmelnt, in this casel thel National Land Agelncy (helrelinaftelr relfelrreld to as BPN), to relgistelr land parcells that havel not beleln celrtifield baseld on a long-telrm and annulal work plan as welll carrield oult in arelas deltelrmineld by thel Statel Ministelr of Agrarian Affairs Helad of BPN whilel sporadic land relgistration is carrield oult on initiativel ulnrelgistelreld landlord. Thel delfinition of bulying and sellling in gelnelral is an agrelelmelnt beltweleln onel party who binds himsellf to sulrrelndelr ownelrship rights to an itelm, and thel othelr party to pay a preldeltelrmineld pricel. Melanwhilel, thel delfinition of an ulndelrhand salel and pulrchasel agrelelmelnt is an agrelelmelnt beltweleln partiels withoult beling accompanield by an aulthelntic deleld by a notary or withoult involving a notary.
Penetapan Hak Asuh Anak Yang Belum Mumayyiz Kepada Ayah Perspektif Maqashid Syari’ah (Analisis Putusan PTA Padang No.18/Pdt.G/2022/PTA.Pdg) Azmi, Muhammad Nurul; Khalid, Khalid
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1115

Abstract

The impact of divorce must be very significant for a child, especially if the child is still underage. A child needs the affection, attention and supervision of both parents. This research aims to explore the custody of children to fathers according to the Islamic Law Compilation and the Shariah Maqashid perspective. In this study the author uses a qualitative method of normative jurisprudence. According to the results of research that has been carried out in the Compilation of Islamic Law, the custody of a child who has not been fully mumayyized is the right of the mother. But when the child is self-sufficient and can distinguish between good and bad, then the child can be categorized as already mumayyiz. Then the child has the right to decide to whom he will be raised.
Kajian Hukum Dasar Penuntut Umum Menentukan Lamanya Hukuman Pada Penjatuhan Tuntutan Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan yang Mengakibatkan Cacat Permanen: Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Nomor 371/Pid.B/2020/PN.Jkt.Utr Kirana, Kartika Chandra; Hutabarat, Rugun Romaida
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1116

Abstract

The public prosecutor is indeed given freedom in determining charges and demands, including determining the time limit for a criminal sentence for a criminal offense being handled. Of course, the public prosecutor must remain guided by KUHP, KUHAP and Guideline No. 3/2019 concerning Prosecution, which can also refer to pre-existing prosecutions in similar cases. This is for the sake of creating legal certainty, benefit, and justice. However, unfortunately, in the case of the defendant Rahmat Kadir throwing acid on the victim, Novel Baswedan (an investigator with the Corruption Eradication Commission), The problem that wants to be studied is the basis for the public prosecutor to determine the time limit for punishment in the letter of prosecution for the crime of abuse that resulted in permanent disability in District Court Decision Number 371/Pid.B/2020/PN.Jkt.Utr. This research method is normative legal research with data in the form of secondary data supported by primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials, where all data comes from literature studies. The approaches used are legislation (the status approach) and cases (the case approach), which are then analyzed using deductive methods. The results of this research show that the basis for the public prosecutor's considerations is very unclear and cannot be understood. By stating that the defendant was proven to have violated Article 353 paragraph (2) KUHP and demanded a sentence of only 1 (one) year in prison, The elements of inadvertence, cooperation, admitting mistakes, and requesting a request made by the defendant are also mitigating factors, while aggravating factors and other factors as stipulated in Guideline No. 3/2019 concerning Prosecution were actually ignored. This shows a bad portrait and an example of failure in implementing law enforcement by the public prosecutor to create the principles of legal certainty, benefit, and justice. On the other hand, in this case, the public prosecutor appears to be the defendant's representative legal advisor.
Pelaksanaan Pengadaan Tanah untuk Kepentingan Umum oleh PT. PLN (Persero) di Riak Danau Tapan Kabupaten Pesisir Selatan Fahlevi, Fahlevi; Warman, Kurnia; Nurdin, Zefrizal
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1117

Abstract

Procurement for the construction of a 150 KV substation by PT. PLN (Persero) UIP Sumbagteng, which is in Nagari Riak Danau Tapan, Basa Ampek Balai Tapan District, Pesisir Selatan Regency. that the stipulation of land acquisition for the construction of the 150 KV substation took place in 2017 with a total area of ​​1.8 hectares with the holder of the communal land rights being a legitimate member of their clan but the attempt to relinquish their rights was a mistake because it was directed at a person who is not the owner of the rights over the land. The type of research in the preparation of this thesis is sociological juridical research. The results of this study are 1) Land Acquisition Process for the Construction of a 150 KV Substation in Nagari Siak Danau Tapan, Pesisir Selatan Regency, which consists of several stages, namely (a) The planning stage which contains the aims and objectives of the development plan, Compliance with the Regional Spatial Plan (RTRW) ), and National and Regional Development Plans, Land layout includes administrative areas such as name of village, kelurahan, sub-district, province, Required land area, General description of land status, Estimated time for land acquisition implementation, Estimated timeframe for construction implementation, Estimated land value, (b) the Preparation Stage which includes notification of Development Planning, Dissemination in the form of face-to-face meetings, Letters of notification, Initial data collection of development plan locations, Determination of Development Locations, and (c) Implementation Phase which includes Inventory and Identification, Determination of Appraisers. Deliberation on determining compensation, granting compensation. In carrying out land acquisition for the purposes of building a 150 KVA substation in Nagari Riak Danau Tapan by PT. PLN (Persero) in the process of land acquisition and payment of compensation has made a mistake, which is a personal error (error in persona) because the person conducting the negotiations and dealings is the person who is only cultivating the land and is not the real owner of the rights. 2) Legal Consequences Arising from the Land Acquisition Process for Public Interests that Does Not Use the Deed of Relinquishment of Rights, namely: legal defects due to the statement of Relinquishment of Rights made before a Notary is more accountable both formally and materially even though the law allows for other ways other than the existence notary deed regarding the release of rights. Thus the fulfilment of the Theory of Responsibility that the researcher uses in this thesis is not fulfilled, because apart from not being able to account for the authenticity of the statement of waiver of rights from the owner of the right, in the process of completing documents the statement made underhand is also vulnerable to falsification and this is a crime.
Identifikasi Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Debitur Atas Pelaksanaan Lelang Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Hak Tanggungan Natalia Lumare, Lawrina Cristi; Djajaputra, Gunawan
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1118

Abstract

This paper research uses the Normative Juridical research method. Land is the safest object of collateral and has relatively high economic value. The land that is pledged as collateral is then tied up and registered with the local land office to be encumbered with mortgage rights. The consequence of having a mortgage right is that if the debtor breaks his promise, the bank has the authority to auction the collateral object. In order to provide legal protection for the debtor's interests in the auction of mortgage objects, the bank is obliged to carry out the execution in accordance with applicable regulations, one of which is that the auction of mortgage objects must be in accordance with the Mortgage Rights Law in accordance with the market price or in accordance with the limit value, so that does not harm the debtor.
Penyelesaian Wanprestasi dalam Perjanjian Kredit dengan Jaminan Fidusia Pada PT Reksa Finance di Kota Jakarta Asri Putri, Tiyas; Djajaputra, Gunawan
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1119

Abstract

This research aims to examine the resolution of defaults in credit agreements with fiduciary guarantees at PT REKSA FINANCE in the City of Jakarta. Collateral in a credit agreement can be in the form of material collateral and personal collateral. Factors causing default involve debtor errors in managing their business, health problems that require medical costs, irregularities in the use of credit facilities, and bad faith in paying debts. PT REKSA FINANCE in Jakarta City is facing difficulties in returning loans that are not paid by debtors. This research underlines the need for PT REKSA FINANCE to focus more on non-litigation resolution in order to maintain its reputation and minimize default problems. Apart from that
Identifikasi Risiko Terjadinya Wanprestasi Terhadap Perjanjian Kartu Kredit yang Diajukan Secara Online di Bank Mega Axfelia, Deviana; Rasji, Rasji
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1120

Abstract

This research was conducted to identify the risk of default in online credit card application agreements at Bank Mega. This research discusses the legal terms of an agreement, skill risks, the use of standard agreements, and the consequences of default. In addition, other risks such as personal financial conditions, lack of verification, high interest, irresponsible use, hidden fees, identity theft, and technical errors in online credit card applications are also explored. The results of this research underline the need for the socialization of laws governing online transactions so that people understand and comply with applicable regulations. Additionally, a solid understanding of the terms of the agreement and the risks involved in online transactions is essential to avoid future problems.
Jaminan Kepastian Hukum Balik Nama Didasarkan Kewarisan Tanpa Persetujuan Ahli Waris Putera, Christoper; Lukito, Hilda
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1121

Abstract

In order to provide definite guarantees according to law, land registration is carried out according to the provisions in Government Regulation no. 24/1997. The act of transferring a plot of land due to inheritance is recorded, a death certificate is completed, a statement of land rights if it has been registered, a deed of information on the party entitled to inheritance, registered at the Land Office (Kantah). The recording of the act of transferring a plot of land due to inheritance without a certificate of inheritance being included is problematic for the party entitled to other inheritance. The research used a statutory approach and a case approach, and the conclusion was obtained: To provide definite guarantees according to the law, the act of transfer must be registered in Kantah for the purpose of changing the name of the information of rights as stipulated in Article 19 of the UUPA. The act of transferring due to inheritance must be submitted by the party entitled to inheritance in addition to information on land plot rights, including death certificates, certificates of information as parties entitled to inheritance as stated in PP No. 24/1997 in conjunction with ATR Ministerial Regulation/Head of BPN No. 16/2021. The act of transferring a plot of land due to inheritance without the consent of the party entitled to inheritance even though Kantah issues a statement of rights, does not provide a definite guarantee according to the law for someone whose name is recorded in the statement of rights.

Filter by Year

2018 2026


Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 8 No. 3 (2026) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 4 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2023) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol 5 No 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol 5 No 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol 4 No 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol 4 No 3 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2022) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2022) Vol 4 No 2 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2021) Vol 4 No 1 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2021) Vol 3 No 4 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2021) Vol 3 No 3 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2021) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 4 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 3 (2021) Vol 3 No 2 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2020) Vol 3 No 1 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2020) Vol 2 No 4 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2020) Vol 2 No 3 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2020) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 4 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 3 (2020) Vol 2 No 2 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2019) Vol 2 No 1 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2019) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 4 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 3 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018) More Issue