cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Iyah Faniyah
Contact Email
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Phone
+6285263256164
Journal Mail Official
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Editorial Address
JL. Bandar Purus No.11, Padang Pasir, Kec. Padang Barat, Kota Padang
Location
Kota padang,
Sumatera barat
INDONESIA
Unes Law Review
Published by Universitas Ekasakti
ISSN : 26543605     EISSN : 26227045     DOI : https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1019
Core Subject : Health, Science, Education, Social,
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences
UNES Law Review adalah Jurnal Penelitian Hukum yang dikelola oleh Magister Hukum Pascasarjana, Universitas Ekasakti Padang. Penelitian yang dimuat merupakan pendapat pribadi peneliti dan bukan merupakan pendapat editor. Jurnal terbit secara berkala 4 (empat) kali dalam setahun yaitu September, Desember, Maret, dan Juni. UNES Law Review mulai Volume 4 Nomor 3 Tahun 2022 sampai Volume 9 Nomor 2 Tahun 2027 Reakreditasi Naik Peringkat dari Peringkat 5 ke Peringkat 4 sesuai nomor Akreditasi : 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 Oktober 2022 UNES Law Review is a Legal Research Journal managed by Postgraduate Law Masters, Ekasakti University, Padang. The published research is the personal opinion of the researcher and is not the opinion of the editor. The journal is published periodically 4 (four) times a year, namely September, December, March and June. UNES Law Review Volume 4 Number 3 of 2022 to Volume 9 Number 2 of 2027 Reaccreditation Raised Rank from Rank 5 to Rank 4 according to Accreditation number: 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 October 2022
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 3,910 Documents
 291   292   293   294   295 
Tinjauan Peran LPSK dalam Proses Penegakan Keadilan Terhadap Korban Inses Florencia Fevernova, Fiona; Firmansyah, Hery
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1262

Abstract

LPSK, sebagai lembaga yang berdiri berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2006 yang diubah menjadi Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2014 tentang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban, memiliki tugas dan wewenang untuk memberikan perlindungan dan bantuan kepada saksi dan korban. Namun, kendala dan tantangan muncul terutama terkait dengan pemenuhan hak korban, seperti restitusi dan kompensasi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis peran Lembaga Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban (LPSK) dalam melindungi saksi dan korban kekerasan seksual di Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah analisis dokumen resmi, termasuk undang-undang, regulasi, laporan LPSK, dan kebijakan terkait lainnya. Hasil analisis tersebut memberikan pemahaman mendalam tentang kerangka kerja dan implementasi perlindungan saksi dan korban Dalam laporan tahunan LPSK, terlihat peningkatan jumlah korban kekerasan seksual yang mendapatkan restitusi. Meski demikian, evaluasi terhadap prosedur pengajuan restitusi perlu dilakukan agar lebih transparan dan cepat. Selain itu, LPSK perlu melakukan advokasi yang lebih efektif terhadap aparat penegak hukum untuk memastikan pemberian fasilitas restitusi sesuai dengan kebutuhan korban.
Analysis of Decisions Determining the Imposition of Black List SanctiONS (Study of Decision 80/G/2022/PTUN.MKS) Sindawa, Sindawa
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1263

Abstract

This research aims to determine and analyze the validity of Decision Number: 27/KPTS/Cb29.5/2022 through Decision Number 80/G/2022/PTUN.MKS regarding the imposition of blacklist sanctions in the procurement of goods and services . This research uses normative legal research methods. The use of normative research methods in this research effort is based on the suitability of theory with the research methods required by the author. The results obtained are presented descriptively. The object of the dispute issued by LKPP is proven to contain a juridical defect in the substantive aspect, therefore, because the State Administrative Decree issued by a State Administrative Body or Official must not contain a juridical defect from the element of statutory regulations either from the sub-aspects of authority, formal procedural , or substantial, if it contains a juridical flaw in one aspect, then the State Administrative Decree must be declared null and void, so that there is sufficient legal grounds for the Panel of Judges to grant the Plaintiff's claim.
Dinamika Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah Hak Ulayat Masyarakat Adat Dikabupaten Fakfak Provinsi Papua Barat Angelia Soenartho, Grace; Sudiro, Amad
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1264

Abstract

This research delves into the dynamics of resolving land disputes over customary rights among indigenous communities in Fakfak Regency, West Papua Province. The study addresses the historical context of customary rights in Fakfak, examining the growth and development of land disputes within this framework. Theoretical exploration encompasses the principles and concepts of customary rights within indigenous societies, accompanied by an analysis of relevant legal foundations and regulations in Papua Barat. Employing a multidisciplinary approach, the research scrutinizes common causes of land disputes and evaluates the role of social and political conflicts in these disputes. The study investigates various dispute resolution methods, assessing their advantages and shortcomings. Special attention is given to the active participation of indigenous communities in the resolution process, exploring factors influencing their involvement. Cultural and social dynamics affecting land dispute resolution are analyzed, identifying challenges and external factors complicating the process. The research concludes with recommendations for improvement, offering insights into effective dispute resolution strategies. Case studies from Fakfak Regency provide concrete examples, contributing to a comprehensive understanding of the subject. The findings have implications for policies and practices related to customary land dispute resolution.
Penetapan Tanah Terlantar Sebagai Bentuk Perlindungan dan Kepastian Hukum dalam Penertiban Kawasan Tanah Terlantar Zarbiyani, Farhan; Sudiro, Amad
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1265

Abstract

The purpose of writing this article is to find out how the form of legal protection and legal certainty over the determination of abandoned land as a form of controlling abandoned land areas. This article uses normative legal research, with statute approach and conceptual approach and descriptive qualitative research analysis with deductive thinking method. The form of legal protection for the community against the determination of abandoned land is through the utilisation of abandoned land by the government which is a strategic stage and the mechanism must be able to ensure that efforts to curb abandoned land must be returned to the greatest prosperity of the people through the process of determining abandoned land that applies the values of the General Principles of Good Governance and in accordance with statutory regulations, starting from the Basic Agrarian Law, Government Regulation No. 18 of 2021 concerning Management Rights, Land Rights, Flat Housing Units, and Land Registration, Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning, Head of the National Land Agency No. 20 of 2021 concerning Procedures for the Ordering and Utilisation of Abandoned Areas and Land, as a form of guarantee in providing legal certainty in the issuance of the determination of abandoned land.
Tinjauan Keabsahan Pelaksanaan Kontrak Elektronik di Indonesia Ditinjau dari Sistem Hukum Positif Indonesia Nugroho, Hizkia Ivan; Gunadi, Ariawan
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1266

Abstract

With current technological developments, various new innovations have emerged in various aspects in various parts of the world. Then the aspect that is most affected by changes in the current technological era is the agreement or contract. Where changes to the agreement or contract lie in the medium where conventional contracts innovate into electronic contracts. Electronic contracts are often used in electronic transactions because they are more efficient. Positive law regarding electronic contracts is regulated in Civil Law and Law Number 19 of 2016 Amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronics. These two regulations explain the legal requirements for implementing a contract and the validity of a contract. The legal requirements for a contract are explained in Article 1320 of the Civil Code, namely that there is an agreement from both parties, the agreement must discuss a certain matter, the parties must have the skills to make an agreement, the agreement must have a valid reason, and the agreement must discuss a matter. certain. If the agreement meets these four conditions then the agreement is considered valid. Then, referring to Article 5 and Article 6 of the Electronic Information and Transactions Law, an electronic contract is declared valid if the electronic information in it can be guaranteed and its existence can be proven. The differences in the legal requirements for the two are not too different, only the electronic media is the difference. However, in its implementation, the Electronic Information and Transactions Law needs to strictly regulate the validity of electronic contracts.
Pertanggungjawaban Direksi Atas Tindak Pidana Perpajakan Ditinjau dari Doktrin Business Judgement Rule Frisca Delicia, Nadya; Gunadi, Ariawan
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1267

Abstract

Legislation in Indonesia is coercive and all-embracing. The tax sector is no exception. Both individuals and corporate entities have an obligation to pay taxes. As a taxpayer, it cannot be denied that there are opportunities to commit tax crimes. This article aims to analyze tax evasion as a means of tax crimes committed by company directors when viewed from the business judgment rule doctrine. This research uses normative juridical legal research by collecting secondary data. The results of this research show that directors can be held personally responsible if they are proven to have committed tax evasion on behalf of the company and cannot be protected by the business judgment rule doctrine.
Harmonisasi Antara Lembaga Yudikatif Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Mahkamah Agung dalam Dinamika Hukum Tata Negara: Analisis Terkait Keseimbangan Kekuasaan Di Indonesia Abdul Aziz Nurambiya, Muhammad; Tiopan, Demson
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1269

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to analyse how the balance of power in Indonesia is reflected through the harmonisation of judicial institutions, namely between the Constitutional Court (MK) and the Supreme Court (MA). This research is written through a normative juridical approach by relying on existing secondary data. The result of this research is that harmonisation between the Constitutional Court (MK) and the Supreme Court (MA) plays an important role in maintaining the balance of power in Indonesia, especially in the context of constitutional law. There is disharmony between the two institutions in several decisions, such as in the case of the nomination of DPD RI candidates in the 2019 simultaneous elections, which shows the need for better coordination between the two institutions to ensure clarity and harmony in constitutional law regulations. Proper coordination between the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court, such as in the case of interfaith marriage, can provide clarity and harmony in regulations. In addition, efforts to maintain harmonisation between the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court also include amending the 1945 Constitution and ensuring that decisions or actions of other government institutions remain within the corridors of the law. This shows the need for the aforementioned concrete efforts to strengthen cooperation between the two institutions in order to achieve harmonisation in Indonesia's legal system.
Bewijsvoering Analysis of Electronic Evidence in Criminal Cases’s Proving Wisnubroto, Aloysius; Setyawan, Vincentius Patria
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1270

Abstract

An important aspect that cannot be separated from the evidentiary process is related to how to obtain and present evidence to the judge before the trial. Wiretapping as electronic evidence obtained secretly often gives rise to debate from the perspective of bewijsvoering, and the evidentiary value of electronic evidence obtained through wiretapping. This article will discuss the use of wiretapping results as electronic evidence in relation to its evidentiary value in court. The results of this research show that there is a dualism in bewijsvoering the results of wiretapping as electronic evidence, some are of the opinion that bewijsvoering the results of wiretapping as electronic evidence must be obtained legally, and other opinions state that bewijsvoering is a separate matter from proof, as long as the evidence is submitted to the front. the trial is in accordance with the facts and other evidence, then the evidence is considered valid.
Relevansi Yurisprudensi Mahkamah Agung RI No.1506 K/Pdt/2002 dalam Transaksi Bisnis Internasional Tendra, Denny
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1271

Abstract

In international business transactions carried out by Indonesian business actors, both on an UMKM and large scale, with foreign business actors, there are those who do not make anchor agreements regarding the sales and purchases they make, and only use purchase orders and the sender's email as their sales and purchase agreements. However, when a dispute arises and is tried in an Indonesian court regarding a purchase order, this has different meanings and interpretations by legal and economic experts, so a uniform interpretation of purchase orders is needed that has legal certainty. In this regard, there is legal certainty regarding the purchase order, namely the Supreme Court jurisprudence No.1506 K/Pdt/2022. This jurisprudence can be used by parties in protecting international sales and purchases that are tried in Indonesian courts.
Analisis Perlindungan Hukum bagi Pemegang Polis Asuransi Jiwa Terkait dengan Aksesibilitas Rekam Medis Indah Sari, Carissa
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1272

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis perlindungan hukum yang diberikan kepada pemegang polis asuransi jiwa dalam konteks aksesibilitas rekam medis. Aksesibilitas rekam medis menjadi isu sentral dalam klaim asuransi jiwa, di mana informasi kesehatan pemegang polis memegang peran krusial dalam penentuan klaim. Studi ini melibatkan analisis mendalam terhadap peraturan dan kebijakan hukum yang mengatur hubungan antara pemegang polis dan perusahaan asuransi jiwa. Penelitian juga mencakup tinjauan terhadap perkembangan teknologi dan keamanan informasi yang dapat mempengaruhi aksesibilitas rekam medis. Hasil analisis menyoroti perlunya kejelasan norma hukum terkait privasi dan keamanan data kesehatan, seiring dengan meningkatnya risiko kebocoran informasi. Selain itu, diperlukan kajian lebih lanjut terkait etika penggunaan data kesehatan dalam konteks asuransi jiwa. Temuan penelitian ini dapat memberikan kontribusi pada penyempurnaan kerangka hukum yang melindungi pemegang polis asuransi jiwa, khususnya terkait dengan aksesibilitas rekam medis. Peningkatan kejelasan aturan dapat memberikan kepercayaan kepada pemegang polis sambil tetap memperhatikan aspek keamanan dan privasi dalam pengelolaan informasi kesehatan.

Page 293 of 391 | Total Record : 3910

 291   292   293   294   295 

Filter by Year

2018 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 8 No. 3 (2026) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 4 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2023) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023) Vol 5 No 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol 5 No 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol 4 No 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol 4 No 3 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2022) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2022) Vol 4 No 2 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2021) Vol 4 No 1 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2021) Vol 3 No 4 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2021) Vol 3 No 3 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2021) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 4 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 3 (2021) Vol 3 No 2 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2020) Vol 3 No 1 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2020) Vol 2 No 4 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2020) Vol 2 No 3 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2020) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 4 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 3 (2020) Vol 2 No 2 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2019) Vol 2 No 1 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2019) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 4 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 3 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018) More Issue