cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Iyah Faniyah
Contact Email
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Phone
+6285263256164
Journal Mail Official
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Editorial Address
JL. Bandar Purus No.11, Padang Pasir, Kec. Padang Barat, Kota Padang
Location
Kota padang,
Sumatera barat
INDONESIA
Unes Law Review
Published by Universitas Ekasakti
ISSN : 26543605     EISSN : 26227045     DOI : https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1019
Core Subject : Health, Science, Education, Social,
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences
UNES Law Review adalah Jurnal Penelitian Hukum yang dikelola oleh Magister Hukum Pascasarjana, Universitas Ekasakti Padang. Penelitian yang dimuat merupakan pendapat pribadi peneliti dan bukan merupakan pendapat editor. Jurnal terbit secara berkala 4 (empat) kali dalam setahun yaitu September, Desember, Maret, dan Juni. UNES Law Review mulai Volume 4 Nomor 3 Tahun 2022 sampai Volume 9 Nomor 2 Tahun 2027 Reakreditasi Naik Peringkat dari Peringkat 5 ke Peringkat 4 sesuai nomor Akreditasi : 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 Oktober 2022 UNES Law Review is a Legal Research Journal managed by Postgraduate Law Masters, Ekasakti University, Padang. The published research is the personal opinion of the researcher and is not the opinion of the editor. The journal is published periodically 4 (four) times a year, namely September, December, March and June. UNES Law Review Volume 4 Number 3 of 2022 to Volume 9 Number 2 of 2027 Reaccreditation Raised Rank from Rank 5 to Rank 4 according to Accreditation number: 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 October 2022
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 3,910 Documents
 86   87   88   89   90 
Analisis Terhadap Pengabulan Izin Poligami dengan Alasan Telah Menghamili Calon Istri Kedua (Telaah Putusan Nomor 41/Pdt.G/2019/PA.Rtg) Alfian Arbie; Milhan Milhan
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1138

Abstract

It turns out that applications for permits for polygamy in Indonesia have various reasons for submission, applications that are very diverse not only include the three reasons stated in the legislation, namely the wife cannot carry out her obligations, has a physical disability and cannot give birth to offspring. In this research, the author found a decision regarding a polygamy permit case on the grounds that the future second wife was pregnant, whose decision was actually granted, namely the decision of the Ruteng Religious Court in Case Number.41/Pdt.G/2019/PA.Rtg. The problems observed in this research relate to the judge's basic considerations in granting permission for polygamy and the review of issues regarding the decision of the Ruteng Religious Court Number.41/Pdt.G/2019/PA.Rtg. This research is a type of library research and qualitative form. Article 57 of the Compilation of Islamic Law and the Marriage Law, impregnating a prospective second wife does not include the permissibility of polygamy. Thu all conditions outside the legislation must of course be adjusted to the conditions. So the panel of judges was guided by Article 43 of Government Regulation number 9 of 1975 that "if the court is of the opinion that there are sufficient reasons for the applicant to have more than one wife, then the court will give its decision in the form of permission to have more than one wife." If we look at maslahah murrasa, it is already known that one of the requirements of maslahah murrasa itself is for the public benefit, not for personal benefit, so that it will bring benefits to humanity and prevent harm to the public, not to reject personal harm or bring benefit. for himself. So according to the author, granting permission for polygamy on the grounds that he has already impregnated the prospective second wife cannot be justified.
General Principles of Good Government on the Competence of Government Apparatus in Making State Administration Decisions Askari Razak
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1139

Abstract

This research will focus on specific aspects in PTUN decisions that can act as a guide for government officials in improving the quality of administrative decision making. Investigating the impact of PTUN decisions on changes or improvements to administrative policies within government officials is also the aim of this research. This research will identify potential gaps between PTUN decisions and administrative decision-making practices by government officials, as well as analyze the implications of these gaps for their competence. Furthermore, this research will examine how participation and coordination between government officials and legal institutions such as PTUN, can contribute to enriching the process of making better administrative decisions. The research method used is the normative juridical method. It is hoped that the results of this research will provide new insight into the importance of collaboration between government officials and legal institutions in improving the quality of administrative decision making in Indonesia.
Akibat Hukum Kartu Keluarga Bagi Pasangan Kawin Tidak Tercatat Menggunakan Surat Pernyataan Tanggungjawab Mutlak Berdasarkan Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 108 Tahun 2019 Tentang Persyaratan Dan Tata Cara Pendaftaran Penduduk Dan Pencatatan Sipil Dian Amelia; Ulfanora Ulfanora; M. Iflah Febrizal
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1140

Abstract

Marriage in society many occur without registration by the state, or known marriages have not been registered. According to The Domestic Affairs Minister Number 108 Year 2019 regarding the terms and regulations of the registration of the population and the civil record of married couples who have no record of marriage books can also record marriages in the occupational and civil record service by signing a waivement of marriage responsibilities. The purpose of this study is to find out the mechanisms and consequences of the law of issuing family cards for unregistered married couples using a letter of absolute liability based on The Domestic Affairs Minister Number 108 Year 2019. Research using normative juridical method with the nature of descriptive analysis research. The results of this study explain that violations ways to make a new family card for unregistered married couples must complete the requirements of filling the form F1.05 or A letter of absolute liability of marriage/divorce has not been registered and known by two witnesses and attaching a letter marriage has not been registered. Second, The legal result of publishing a family card for a married couple has not been recorded using a a letter of absolute liability based on Domestic affairs minister number 108 year 2019. In general, the increase in marriage practice has not been registered, Increased application for marriage books through the validation path, Increased demand for marriage confirmation, It also affects wife and children.
Pertimbangan Hakim Terhadap Kepentingan Anak Dalam Mengabulkan Dispensasi Perkawinan Pasca Berlakunya Undang-Undang No. 16 Tahun 2019 Rose Benedict Angel; Mia Hadiati
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1143

Abstract

Penelitian ini dilatar belakangi oleh banyaknya permohonan dispensasi perkawinan setelah penerapan undang-undang terbaru terkait batasan usia perkawinan. Penelitian ini mengkaji pertimbangan hakim baik dari aspek normatif maupun sosial agar permohonan dispensasi ini dapat diterima. Penelitian ini fokus pada bagaimana hakim meninjau permohonan dispensasi perkawinan pasca diundangkannya Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2019. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan undang-undang. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa hakim dalam memutus perkara dispensasi perkawinan tidak hanya melihat pada kelengkapan administrasi hukumnya saja. Namun juga dari sudut pandang sosiologi, pemberian permohonan dispensasi melihat aspek manfaat yang harus diperoleh untuk menghindari kerugian yang lebih besar. Implikasinya, perubahan undang-undang terkait dispensasi perkawinan semakin meningkat karena menjadi tata cara penyelesaian administrasi perkawinan bagi pasangan di bawah umur dalam ketentuan undang-undang.
Kedudukan Harta Bersama yang Terletak di Luar Negeri (Singapura) dari Perkawinan Campuran yang Melakukan Perceraian di Pengadilan Negeri (Studi Putusan No. 552/Pdt.G/2013/PN.DPS) Afridah Afridah; Yaswirman Yaswirman; Ferdi Ferdi
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1144

Abstract

A mixed marriage will bring legal consequences to the parties who do it, namely related to property in the marriage. The joint assets formed during the marriage are not only located in the territory of Indonesia, but also located abroad (Singapore). This study examines the position of joint assets in mixed marriages located outside the territory of Indonesia who filed for divorce and property claims in the District Court. The purpose of this article, which is based on the results of this research, aims to determine legal certainty regarding the status of joint property in mixed marriages located abroad (Singapore) based on Decision No. 552 / Pdt.G/2013/PN.Dps) by Judge. The research method used in this study is a normative legal research method with a source of law, namely statutory regulations. The research method used is a normative juridical approach. Research specifications use analytical descriptive and data sources use secondary data consisting of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. Materials from the results of this study indicate that joint assets located abroad (Singapore) are subject to the Indonesian Judge's decision. In the eligibility conditions in the Strata Title rules that apply in Singapore, the holder of a Permanent Resident permit has the right to transfer or sell property located in that country.
Rekognisi Sistem Pemerintahan Daerah di Indonesia Perspektif Konstitusional Triwahyuningsih Triwahyuningsih; Indah Nur Shanty Saleh
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1147

Abstract

Philosophically, the State as a forum for realizing national ideals requires a basis that can bring together the various characteristics of Indonesian society. Therefore, a Government of the Republic of Indonesia was formed which was able to protect the entire Indonesian nation and all of Indonesia's blood to prosper the people. The commitment of the Founding Fathers to the special and special rights of regional origin was proven by its inclusion in the Law. The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia is hereinafter referred to as the 1945 Constitution. Research objectives: to analyze the importance of recognizing special and special regions within the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia based on the 1945 Constitution. Research Method: normative legal research type, data collection method in the form of secondary data with primary legal materials, in the form of statutory regulations and various proclamations. Meanwhile, secondary legal materials are in the form of literature that is relevant to the object under study. This research uses a statutory and historical approach. Qualitative descriptive data analysis method through data display, data reduction and drawing conclusions. The results of the research show: the importance of recognition of special and special regional government systems in Indonesia because recognition is a basic human need in an expanded spectrum, regions within the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia want to receive fair treatment from countries that are different from other regions due to historical background factors , culture and position.
Royalty Fee Penggunaan Merek pada Sistem Franchise UMKM Kebab Goceng di Kota Medan Persfektif Fatwa DSN MUI No.114/dsn mui/ix/2017 Vita Hafsari; Annisa Sativa
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1148

Abstract

A franchise is an agreement regarding how to distribute products and services to customers. The party providing the license called the Franchisor, permits another party, called the Franchise, to run a product and service distribution business using the Franchisor's name in a certain area for a certain period of time. This business must be operated in accordance with the procedures and methods determined by the Franchisor. The Franchisor also provides support to the Franchisee, and in return, the Franchisee pays initial fees and royalties. In order to create a franchise business model that is in line with Islamic principles, it is necessary to apply the sharia value system as an ethical basis for business, aimed at preventing ethical violations in business (moral hazard). This research aims to examine the process of determining royalty fees for brand use within the framework of a franchise system, with a focus on the perspective explained in the DSN MUI Fatwa No:114/DSN-MUI/IX/2017. A review of the MUI's (Indonesian Ulema Council) fatwa and views on intellectual property rights and franchise practices shows the importance of complying with sharia principles in franchise agreements. These principles include clear profit calculations, profit sharing based on proportional ratios, and commitment to risks and losses. This case study focuses on the Kebab Goceng Franchise in Medan City, using a qualitative approach, including in-depth interviews and document analysis as data collection methods. The research results show that the Kebab Goceng franchise in Medan City has not implemented the DSN MUI Fatwa No: 114/DSN-MUI/IX/2017 in determining royalties. This determination is based on the criteria of fairness, mutual agreement and business sustainability. However, there are challenges regarding the interpretation and practical application of this fatwa.
Dampak Perkembangan Fintech Terhadap Perlindungan Konsumen: Kasus Pinjaman Uang Online di Indonesia Nurul Syarifah; Jeane Neltje Saly
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1150

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji perlindungan hukum yang diberikan kepada penerima pinjaman online di Indonesia berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Bertujuan untuk menganalisis perlindungan hukum terhadap penerima pinjaman uang online terutama dalam mekanisme penagihan pinjaman ilegal yang tidak memiliki izin dari Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) dan menguji keabsahan perjanjian antara pemberi dan penerima pinjaman online berdasarkan Pasal 1320 dan Pasal 1338 KUH Perdata. Melalui pendekatan penelitian normatif dengan menggunakan bahan kepustakaan, dapat disimpulkan bahwa perlindungan konsumen dalam praktik pinjaman uang online harus memperhatikan prinsip-prinsip transparansi, perlakuan yang adil, keandalan, kerahasiaan data, dan penanganan pengaduan yang efisien. Selain itu, pentingnya menjaga kepastian hukum dan menghormati perjanjian yang telah dibuat, serta peran OJK dan aparatur penegak hukum dalam menindak pelaku usaha ilegal juga menjadi fokus dalam penelitian ini. Hasil penelitian ini diharapkan dapat memberikan kontribusi dalam menjaga hak dan kepentingan penerima pinjaman uang online serta mendorong pematuhan terhadap peraturan hukum yang berlaku.
Modus Of Operandi and Sanctions For Criminal Actions In The Health Field (Study Decision Number 90/Pid.Sus/2023/Pn Mks) Yotham Th. Timbonga
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1152

Abstract

The aim of this research is to determine the modus operandi of criminal acts in the health sector (study of decision Number 90/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Mks) and the judge's legal considerations in handing down decision Number 90/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Mks. This research was conducted using a type of normative legal research with the approach method in this research being the statutory regulation approach. The conclusions of this research are: 1) The modus operandi carried out by the defendant who was a distributor of pharmaceutical preparations without a distribution permit in Decision Number 90/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Mks was by buying the drug from his friend secretly or secretly, then hiding it. the medicines are taken to their home first and the aim is to distribute them to consumers and make a profit from selling pharmaceutical preparations without a distribution permit. 2) The judge's consideration in imposing a criminal sentence on the perpetrator in Decision Number 90/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Mks is based on both juridical and non-juridical considerations. The judge's imposition of sanctions is based more on the facts of the trial and valid evidence and takes into account demands of the Public Prosecutor. The sentence imposed in the form of imprisonment for 1 (one) year and 10 (ten) months on the defendant is sufficient to have a deterrent effect on the perpetrator so that he does not repeat his actions again.
Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Pencoretan Pihak dalam Akta Notaris yang Berindikasi Nominee Serta Menimbulkan Ketidakpastian Hukum (Studi Penelitian di Majelis Pengawas Daerah Kota Batam) Elviani Elviani; Soerya Respationo; Muhammad Tartib; Erniyanti Erniyanti
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1153

Abstract

This research uses normative research methods supported by empirical research. By examining the positive laws that apply in Indonesia and analyzing data obtained directly from the field or facts that occur in society. The aim is to find out how the legal regulations, the implementation of deletion and the factors that become obstacles/obstacles and solutions to the deletion of parties in Notarial deeds which are indicated as nominees occur in Indonesia. The research results show that legal regulations in Indonesia still do not have specific regulations regarding the removal of parties in Notarial Deeds who are indicated as nominees. However, in practice, deletions in a Notarial Deed can refer to Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notaries. Researchers hope that there will be special rules regarding the procedure for writing off a Notarial Deed, based on Court Decision regulations. So as not to create legal uncertainty in implementing law in Indonesia.

Page 88 of 391 | Total Record : 3910

 86   87   88   89   90 

Filter by Year

2018 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 8 No. 3 (2026) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 4 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2023) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023) Vol 5 No 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol 5 No 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol 4 No 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol 4 No 3 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2022) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2022) Vol 4 No 2 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2021) Vol 4 No 1 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2021) Vol 3 No 4 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2021) Vol 3 No 3 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2021) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 4 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 3 (2021) Vol 3 No 2 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2020) Vol 3 No 1 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2020) Vol 2 No 4 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2020) Vol 2 No 3 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2020) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 4 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 3 (2020) Vol 2 No 2 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2019) Vol 2 No 1 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2019) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 4 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 3 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018) More Issue