cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Jurnal yuridis
Contact Email
yuridis@upnvj.ac.id
Phone
+6221-7656971
Journal Mail Official
yuridis@upnvj.ac.id
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota depok,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Jurnal Yuridis
Published by Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta
ISSN : 16934458     EISSN : 25985906     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal yuridis Fakultas Hukum universitas pembangunan Nasional veteran Jakarta JL. RS. Fatmawati, Pondok Labu - Jakarta Selatan 12450
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 10 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 11 No 1 (2024): Jurnal Yuridis" : 10 Documents clear
ANALISIS LEGALITAS ASET KRIPTO SEBAGAI OBYEK JAMINAN DI INDONESIA Siregar, Dahris; Wahyuni, Sri; Br Surbakti, Nindytha Elfiana; Lubis, Vasya Salsabilla; Zebua, Riyan Putra
Jurnal Yuridis Vol 11 No 1 (2024): Jurnal Yuridis
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35586/jyur.v11i1.6954

Abstract

The level of financing to meet human needs continues to increase as human needs are increasing. In this case, a guarantee agreement is drawn up to protect creditors and debtors. With the advancement of technology, to guarantee accounts receivable, can use crypto assets, are digital assets that have economic value even though they are not visible. In this study, the author uses legal and conceptual approaches. It belongs to the normative research category. Three categories of legal materials are used: primary, secondary, and tertiary. Researchers analyze and search for literature sources as a method of collecting data to collect this legal material. Within this research, legal sources are acquired through collecting, reading or recording legal sources relevant to the research problem. Studying the idea of using cryptocurrency as collateral is the aim of this project and how cryptocurrency is used as collateral in Indonesia. The study's findings revealed several things: 1) that crypto as collateral is not protected by positive law. 2) that if crypto able to serve as security, it can be used as fiduciary guarantee.
UPAYA PRAPERADILAN ATAS PENGHENTIAN PENYIDIKAN TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA PEMALSUAN SURAT MENGANDUNG OBSCUUR LIBEL Munthe, Riswan; Pasaribu, Yusuf Hanafi; Hidayani, Sri
Jurnal Yuridis Vol 11 No 1 (2024): Jurnal Yuridis
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35586/jyur.v11i1.7087

Abstract

The aim of this research is only to focus on discussing the authority of pre-trial institutions regarding the termination of investigations carried out by the Police regarding criminal acts of document forgery and procedures for whether or not the termination of an investigation (SP3) is valid based on evidence as well as pre-trial applications containing obscuur libel based on decision Number 43/Pid. Pra/2023/PN Mdn. The research method used is normative legal research, which refers to library materials or secondary data. The collection of materials used is literature study based on books, journal articles and field studies by taking court decision data, then the data is analyzed qualitatively. The results of this research found that the pre-trial authority to terminate investigations carried out by the Police regarding criminal acts of forgery of documents, namely pre-trial in accordance with the provisions of Article 1 point 10 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Article 77 of the Criminal Procedure Code and based on the decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 21/PUU-XII/2014 has been given three new pretrial object authority, namely the determination of suspects, search and confiscation. The procedure for whether to stop an investigation (SP3) is valid or not if it refers to the provisions of Article 109 paragraph (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, namely stopping the investigation because there is not enough evidence or the incident turns out not to be a criminal act or the investigation is stopped by law. Meanwhile, the pretrial petition containing obscuur libel in decision Number 43/Pid.Pra/2023/PN Mdn, based on the judge's considerations in the posita and petitum of the applicant's pretrial petition, has conflicted with one another, so that the judge's obscuur libel petition contains formal defects.
KEWENANGAN HAKIM MELAKUKAN PENAHANAN TERHADAP TERDAKWA YANG DALAM PERKARA SEBELUMNYA KEBERATAN TERDAKWA/PENASIHAT HUKUM DITERIMA Susilo, Erwin; Sembiring, Eddy Daulatta
Jurnal Yuridis Vol 11 No 1 (2024): Jurnal Yuridis
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35586/jyur.v11i1.7271

Abstract

In cases where the objection raised by the Defendant/Legal Advisor is accepted, the Defendant must be released from detention, allowing the Public Prosecutor to initiate a fresh prosecution with an amended indictment. Challenges arise during re-prosecution concerning the authority of the District Court Judge to order detention. This research adopts a normative legal approach. The findings indicate that, firstly, the District Court Judge lacks the authority to detain the Defendant, as the release from detention resulted solely from an error by the Public Prosecutor in indictment preparation. Re-detention by the District Court Judge is deemed a violation of the presumption of innocence and the principle of equality before the law. Secondly, future reforms to the Criminal Procedure Code should encompass provisions for the release of the Defendant from detention upon acceptance of objection, coupled with a confirmation of the District Court Judge's non-authorization to detain in the subsequent case. This study recommends a reform of the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) to enhance legal certainty regarding the detention of the Defendant in subsequent cases. Keywords: Indictment, Objection, Detention, Public Prosecutor, and Defendant.
MEMBANGUN PERADILAN MEDIS DI BAWAH KEKUASAAN KEHAKIMAN Buamona, Hasrul; Febriana, Irma; Bihaqqis, Rika Aulia
Jurnal Yuridis Vol 11 No 1 (2024): Jurnal Yuridis
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35586/jyur.v11i1.7565

Abstract

Selama ini apabila terjadi pelanggaran disiplin keilmuan kedokteran diselesaikan di melalui MKDKI. Padahal disisi lain, pelanggaran disiplin keilmuan kedokteran sebenarnya bagian dari dimensi hukum pidana. Namun dalam praktiknya, hingga saat ini posisi hukum MKDKI, dikarenakan MKDKI masih di wilayah eksekutif dan tidak terdapat upaya banding. Sedangkan MKDKI telah melaksanakan quasi peradilan seperti halnya peradilan dibawah kekuasaan kehakiman, sehingga memunculkan kerugian konstitusional terhadap dokter. Penulisan hukum ini, menggunakan pendekatan metodologi hukum normatif dengan sumber data sekunder di dukung data primer. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa MKDKI telah melakukan fungsi peradilan sedangkan MKDKI berada diwilayah eksekutif. Selain itu, dalam putusan MKDKI tidak ada upaya banding, maka secara hukum sangat penting mendirikan peradilan profesi medis dibawah kekuasaan kehakiman untuk mewujudkan law enforcement dan fair trial dan dalam konteks ius constituendum, pertama, peradilan profesi medis berdiri secara tetap dalam peradilan umum, dalam hal ini pengadilan negeri diseluruh Indonesia. Kedua, peradilan profesi medis berdiri secara tetap dalam peradilan umum dalam hal ini pengadilan negeri di seluruh Indonesia, akan tetapi sifatnya ad hoc.
ENHANCING THE CREATIVE ECONOMY: LEVERAGING INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS AS LEGAL COLLATERAL IN CREDIT FINANCING IN INDONESIA Atikah, Ika; Sari, Rofa Agnia
Jurnal Yuridis Vol 11 No 1 (2024): Jurnal Yuridis
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35586/jyur.v11i1.7617

Abstract

This research explores the newfound avenues for capital acquisition among creative economy stakeholders through banking institutions, leveraging intellectual property rights (IPR) as valuable collateral following the enactment of PP No.24/2022 in tandem with Law No.24/2019. Employing normative-empirical methodologies encompassing regulatory analysis, conceptual frameworks, and case studies, the study underscores the imperative for banking institutions to minimize risk exposure while extending credit facilities. PP No.24/2022 elucidates provisions within Law No.24/2019, offering creative economy actors opportunities to access credit capital by leveraging registered intellectual property assets. Notably, registration with the Director General of Intellectual Property Rights Center of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights confers state legitimacy on IP ownership. The intrinsic economic potential of intellectual property assets underscores their viability as collateral, prompting banking institutions to facilitate business capital loans, contingent upon adherence to legal protocols and due diligence. Integral to this process are adherence to regulatory standards, prudent risk management, and consideration of prospective debtors' credibility and economic viability. While collateralization remains pivotal, each bank exercises discretion in evaluating collateral based on individual assessments of prospective debtors. Furthermore, ongoing reviews within the banking and non-banking sectors aim to standardize policies concerning credit provision for creative economy actors. Key considerations include methodologies for valuing intellectual property, ranging from conventional cost, income, and market approaches to contemporary methods encompassing cost-benefit analyses, expert evaluations, and innovation surveys.
PERTIMBANGAN HUKUM DALAM PERKARA BANTAHAN (DERDEN VERZET) ATAS SENGKETA TANAH MENURUT SURAT EDARAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 3 TAHUN 2018 Retnaningsih, Sonyendah; Suherman; Setyono, Yoni Agus; Ramadhan, Muhammad Rizqi Alfarizi
Jurnal Yuridis Vol 11 No 1 (2024): Jurnal Yuridis
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35586/jyur.v11i1.7743

Abstract

Derden Verzet adalah upaya hukum luar biasa untuk melawan keputusan hakim yang merugikan seseorang. Perlawanan pihak ketiga diatur dalam Pasal 195 ayat (6) dan (7) HIR, atau Pasal 206 ayat (6) RBG. Pasal 195 ayat (6) HIR. Perlawanan pihak ketiga terhadap penyitaan eksekutorial hanya dapat dilakukan setelah ada putusan yang memiliki kekuatan hukum tetap. Pada prinsipnya, perlawanan yang diajukan oleh pihak ketiga terhadap penyitaan eksekutorial tidak menghentikan eksekusi. Dalam hal ini, pihak ketiga harus dapat membuktikan bahwa dia adalah pemilik dari barang yang disita. Selain itu, penentang harus benar-benar memiliki kepentingan untuk meminta pengangkatan penyitaan eksekusi tersebut karena telah merugikan haknya. Jika pihak ketiga dapat membuktikan bahwa barang tersebut adalah miliknya dan bukan milik tergugat, maka penentang harus diakui sebagai penentang yang jujur, dan perintah penyitaan harus dicabut. Dengan demikian, putusan mengenai perlawanan pihak ketiga terhadap penyitaan eksekusi hanya berhubungan dengan pencabutan penyitaan eksekusi atas barang milik pihak ketiga dan tidak memutuskan hak kepemilikan tanah. Namun, dalam prakteknya, terdapat keputusan-keputusan mengenai Derden Verzet yang memutuskan mengenai kepemilikan hak atas tanah yang dipersengketakan. Hal ini menimbulkan masalah hukum dalam pelaksanaan eksekusi karena bantahan atau perlawanan pihak ketiga terhadap keputusan eksekusi hanya berhubungan dengan pencabutan penyitaan eksekusi atas barang milik pihak ketiga.
PENERAPAN NILAI-NILAI PANCASILA DALAM PENGHARMONISASIAN PERATURAN DAERAH Nurfi Utami, Wiji; Setiadi, Wicipto
Jurnal Yuridis Vol 11 No 1 (2024): Jurnal Yuridis
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35586/jyur.v11i1.8039

Abstract

Regional regulations are the product of Regional Government legislation which must not conflict with higher regulations according to the hierarchy of statutory regulations and must not be outside the will of the Central Government. In the context of supervision by the Central Government, it is necessary to harmonize the Draft Regional Regulations. This research focuses on discussing the urgency of harmonizing Regional Regulations and the application of Pancasila values ​​in harmonizing Regional Regulations. The research method used is qualitative with a normative juridical approach and prescriptive characteristics. From the results of the study, it was found that the urgency of harmonizing regional regulations is summarized in 3 (three) reasons, namely first, because regional regulations are a sub-system in the national legal system and are in the hierarchy of statutory regulations. Second, regional regulations can be tested through the judicial review or executive review. Third, to ensure legal certainty in the process of forming regional regulations. In essence, the harmonization of regional regulations is based on the application of Pancasila values, this is carried out as a form of preventive effort to prevent overlapping legal products. Keywords : Pancasila, Harmonization, Regional Regulations.
URGENSI PEMILIHAN KEPALA OTORITA MELALUI DEMOKRASI PERWAKILAN DENGAN SISTEM PENUNJUKAN LANGSUNG Mentari, Mahardika Dewi
Jurnal Yuridis Vol 11 No 1 (2024): Jurnal Yuridis
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35586/jyur.v11i1.8167

Abstract

The Nusantara Capital City (IKN) is a designated region as the Capital of Indonesia, replacing the DKI Jakarta. As a special administrative region, IKN led by a Chief Authority, whose appointment is directly designated, appointed, and terminated by the President in consultation with the DPR. This article delves deeply into the democratic phrase within the provisions of Article 18 paragraph (4) of the UUD 1945. The importance of electing the Chief Authority through direct appointment, and the participation of the people in the election of the Chief Authority. This research is a normative empirical legal study, utilizing a legislative framework approach and a survey involving 20 respondents, based on qualitative analysis. The results of this research indicate that the democratic phrase in Article 18 paragraph (4) of the 1945 Constitution is not accommodated in the IKN Law. The urgency of direct appointment in elections is to streamline bureaucratic processes, resulting in a greater role for the central government, Furthermore, the absence of a Regional Budget (APBD) for conducting regional elections, and from the distributed questionnaires, it is evident that, on the whole, people are aware of the plan to relocate the capital city but are unaware of who the local leaders are and how the selection process for the Chief and Deputy Chief Authority is conducted
PELAKSANAAN SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA ANAK DI INDONESIA PERSPEKTIF NILAI KEADILAN Simatupang, Rajarif Syah Akbar
Jurnal Yuridis Vol 11 No 1 (2024): Jurnal Yuridis
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35586/jyur.v11i1.8356

Abstract

One of the elements that must exist in a legal and democratic state is the protection of human rights, including child protection, which will determine the future of the Indonesian state and ensure that future generations have clear regulations. This research is normative legal research, namely legal research that places law as a building block of norms. The juvenile criminal justice system is used by law enforcement to decide criminal sanctions against children who commit criminal acts or children who are in conflict with the law. The best interests of the child must be the main priority in child punishment. However, according to Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System, Juvenile criminal justice falls under the scope of the General Court. In completing diversion and restorative justice procedures in accordance with statutory provisions for children in conflict with the law, Settlement efforts use mediation, conciliation, and restitution methods simultaneously to unite the parties in a settlement. Therefore, it is mandatory to ensure that cases of children in conflict with the law do not involve the judicial process. Instead, the case was transferred outside the judicial process (non-litigation).
ANALISIS KRITIS TERHADAP WEWENANG PENUNTUT UMUM DALAM PENUTUPAN PERKARA DEMI KEPENTINGAN HUKUM BERDASARKAN PENYELESAIAN DI LUAR PENGADILAN MENGGUNAKAN PENDEKATAN KEADILAN RESTORATIF Subhan, Ahmad; Ravizki, Eka Nanda
Jurnal Yuridis Vol 11 No 1 (2024): Jurnal Yuridis
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35586/jyur.v11i1.7777

Abstract

Penelitian ini menganalisis secara kritis indikasi kesalahan dalam pengaturan wewenang Penuntut Umum dalam penutupan perkara demi kepentingan hukum berdasarkan penyelesaian di luar pengadilan menggunakan pendekatan keadilan restoratif. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif. Wewenang penutupan perkara demi kepentingan hukum berdasarkan penyelesaian di luar pengadilan menggunakan pendekatan keadilan restoratif yang dimiliki oleh Penuntut Umum berdasarkan Pasal 3 Perja Nomor 15 Tahun 2020 mengandung sejumlah permasalahan hukum seperti permasalahan karena terdapat ketidaksesuaian dengan teori dan praktik-praktik tentang jenis-jenis seponeering, permasalahan karena bertentangan dengan Undang-Undang tentang Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia yang telah mengatur bentuk diskresi penuntutan atau asas oportunitas, permasalahan karena bertentangan dengan praktik penerapan KUHAP dan KUHP dalam praktik di pengadilan sehingga restorative justice berpotensi untuk dipraperadilankan dan dilimpahkan perkaranya ke pengadilan serta permasalahan-permasalahan lainnya. Permasalahan tersebut kian jelas jika mengingat ratio legis diaturnya pelaksanaan diskresi penuntutan yang hanya dimiliki oleh Jaksa Agung dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 15 Tahun 1961 adalah untuk menghindarkan penyalahgunaan wewenang dan tindakan negatif bernegara lainnya seperti kolusi, korupsi dan nepotisme Oleh karenanya untuk mencegah terjadinya konflik hukum dikemudian hari Jaksa Agung harus mencabut Perja Nomor 15 Tahun 2020.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 10

 1 

Filter by Year

2024 2024


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 12 No 1 (2025): Jurnal Yuridis Vol 11 No 2 (2024): Jurnal Yuridis Vol 11 No 1 (2024): Jurnal Yuridis Vol 10 No 2 (2023): Jurnal Yuridis Vol 10 No 1 (2023): Jurnal Yuridis Vol 9 No 2 (2022): Jurnal Yuridis Vol 9, No 1 (2022): Jurnal Yuridis Vol 8, No 2 (2021): Jurnal Yuridis Vol 8, No 1 (2021): Jurnal Yuridis Vol 7, No 2 (2020): JURNAL YURIDIS Vol 7, No 1 (2020): Jurnal Yuridis Vol 6, No 2 (2019): Jurnal Yuridis Vol 6, No 1 (2019): Jurnal Yuridis Vol 5, No 2 (2018): Jurnal Yuridis Vol 5, No 1 (2018): Jurnal Yuridis Vol 4, No 2 (2017): Jurnal Yuridis Vol 4, No 1 (2017): Jurnal Yuridis Vol 3, No 2 (2016): Jurnal Yuridis Vol 3, No 1 (2016): Jurnal Yuridis Vol 2, No 2 (2015): Jurnal Yuridis Vol 2, No 1 (2015): Jurnal Yuridis Vol 1, No 2 (2014): Jurnal Yuridis Vol 1, No 1 (2014): Jurnal Yuridis More Issue