cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Baiq Nurul Aini
Contact Email
baiqaini@unram.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
jurnalhukumjatiswara@unram.ac.id
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota mataram,
Nusa tenggara barat
INDONESIA
Jurnal Jatiswara
Published by Universitas Mataram
ISSN : 0853392X     EISSN : 25793071     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jatiswara adalah jurnal peer-review yang diterbitkan oleh Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram, merupakan Indonesian Journal of Law sebagai forum komunikasi dalam studi teori dan aplikasi dalam Hukum Berisi teks artikel di bidang Hukum. Tujuan dari jurnal ini adalah untuk menyediakan tempat bagi akademisi, peneliti, dan praktisi untuk mempublikasikan artikel penelitian orisinal atau ulasan artikel.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 533 Documents
 13   14   15   16   17 
Budaya Hukum dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Pengusaha Batik Dalam Rangka Menanggulangi Limbah Batik di Kota Pekalongan Ita Surayya
Jatiswara Vol 31 No 3 (2016): Jatiswara
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (639.661 KB)

Abstract

Environment and Development have strong correlation. The two of terms can be separable. In Pekalongan, rapid development of batik industry had increased serious pollution due to industries’ bad behaviour, which transfer batik waste to rivers without proper process based on AMDAL standard. UU No. 23 /1997 concerning Management of Environment provides equitable legal framework in supporting to industries to endeavour business activities with friendly environment. However, this thesis analyse that generally big hindrance in legal enforcement of environment lies at human behaviour, their commitment, and discipline to avoid and prevent pollution and environment destruction. The fracture society in social economic with low education level accumulates to lack of knowledge causes despairing society, which in turn to raise no conducive legal culture. The lack awareness in legal culture of society tends to receive any consequence of the bad quality of environment. This is because they believe that batik business is the only source of their life. They have no choose to find another job. Powerless of society is reflected to bad condition of socio-economic of society which reluctant and fracture to any change in their environment so that they loss their self-independence. Poor economic condition cause lack of fund to make installation of waste management. The low of socio-economic refers to poorness raise hopeless. Consequently, society just throw batik waste without proper process. Empowerment as awareness instrument is keyword to anticipate the problem. Improving legal knowledge of society through empowerment is highly necessary to improve positive legal awareness to prevent pollution. Government’s support to society empowerment becoming fundamental issue in analysing the legal culture. This is because through the empowerment, community will build their self-independence. It is important to strengthen societies values into societies involvement in managing natural resource based on legal justice. This program may allow society to have capacity in anticipating environment issues including batik waste problem that threats health and environment as main interest should be protected by law.
Absorbsi Prinsip ”Rebus Sic Stantibus” Dalam Kerangka Pembaharuan Hukum Perjanjian Nasional Dwi Primilono Adi
Jatiswara Vol 30 No 1 (2015): Jatiswara
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (187.152 KB)

Abstract

Rebus Sic Stantibus principle is an unpopular principle in civil law system because this principle is taken by Common Law principle. In theory, contractual implementation, in the essence, submit to pacta sunt servanda principle. Pacta sunt servanda principle, in the contemporary, has a challenge from they who argue the principle prevail only when there is no radically change condition in the contract. Rebus Sic Stantibus doctrine or it is well known with clausula Rebus Sic Stantibus is a radically change condition because extrime trouble for each other party to fulfill the contract and imposibble the contract to be implemented. Thus, it must be renegotiate to requirement in the contract. The purpose of this research is to know what the change condition charateristic (rebus sic stantibus) in the implementation of contract as a diffrentiation with state of emergency (force majeure). Research method is juridical normative where a legal reserach procedure to discover truth base on logical law from nomative side. The result of this research that the change condition charateristic (Rebus Sic Stantibus) in the implementation of contract as a diffrentiation with state of emergency (Force Majeure) is in the implementation of contract imposibble to do it because of the legal reason, avoid economic trouble or economic imposibility, whereas in Rebus Sic Stantibus, the reason why the contract is not implemented because the contractual implementation is too difficult to do it, so include economic imposibility. Therefore, difficult level of Rebus Sic Stantibus is under Force Majeure.
Penalaran Hukum Dalam Kritik Ilmu Dwi Primilono Adi
Jatiswara Vol 30 No 3 (2015): Jatiswara
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (496.446 KB)

Abstract

Jurisprudence in knowledge science philosophy goes into science that based on the ratio in order the truth that found must base on using deductive logic and to get the truth must coherent. Law is not a tangible things, but it is the concept. as a concept, law will be in abstract area, where all of empirical science can’t be able to get it easily. In the abstract area, discourse of law is a discourse of philosophy, or at least from a discourse of philosophy. It is right what the people said that concept is result of perception, but processing of result perception (subjective and individual) to a concept (collective and intersubjective) base on a paradigm that assumed as a root of together thinking, whatever the assumption. Thus, it is to be clear that the law has prescriptive character or normative which base on the ratio, where constructed base on the perception concept. Reasoning that done must use deductive logic, whereas the truth which gotten is coherent. Law as a concept will be in nomenon area and not in phenomenon area.
Judicial Review Di Mahkamah Agung Ratna Rumingsih
Jatiswara Vol 26 No 2 (2011): Jatiswara
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (397.314 KB)

Abstract

In Indonesia, the legal arrangements concerning judicial review into a matter that seriously debated since the founding fathers talked about the constitution that will apply when Indonesia has been independent. Whether to include or not judicial review in its constitution. The Supreme Court has the authority to test the material only to the laws and regulations under the legislation, Article 31 of Law No. 14 of 1985 on the Supreme Court and Article 26 of Law No. 14 of 1970 Law No. jo. 31 of 1999 on the provision on the Fundamentals of Judicial Power. The right test is materially against the law is an authority given to the judiciary to examine whether a regulation does not conflict with higher regulations. This authority is given to the Supreme Court so that regulations made by the legislature and executive can be tested whether or not in accordance with the rules is higher. The authority of the Supreme Court in a right to test the material against the legislation is limited to the regulations under the statute.
Problematika Sertipikat Hak Atas Tanah Sebagai Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara Febby Fajrurrahman
Jatiswara Vol 32 No 1 (2017): Jatiswara
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (458.844 KB) | DOI: 10.29303/jatiswara.v32i1.145

Abstract

Pasal 19 ayat (1) Undang-undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960, pokoknya menyatakan: pendaftaran tanah adalah demi kepastian hukum dimana dalam perkembangannya, sertipikat hak atas tanah tak hanya berfungsi sebagai alat pembuktian yang kuat, namun juga bernilai ekonomis tinggi karena dapat dilekati hak accessoir semisal Hak Tanggungan. Sertipikat Hak Atas Tanah tak hanya mengandung kaidah hukum perdata mengenai eksistensi subyek dan obyek hak atas tanah, melainkan juga kaidah hukum administrasi mengenai pengakuan dan aspek legal formal hak atas tanah. Problematika keabsahan sertipikat hak atas tanah dalam penegakan hukum administrasi umumnya berkaitan dengan 3 hal, yakni kewenangan penerbitan, prosedural penerbitan, serta kebenaran substansial. Persoalan yang muncul/berpotensi muncul pasca disahkannya Undang-undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014, adalah reposisi dan kajian mengenai telah tepatkan sertipikat menjadi obyek dalam sengketa administrasi pertanahan? Disahkannya Undang-undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2012 dan Undang-undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014, juga berdampak pada perkembangan sengketa administrasi pertanahan, sehingga tak hanya berkenaan dengan gugatan keabsahan sertipikat hak atas, tapi juga aspek lain: sengketa pengadaan tanah serta putusan penerimaan permohonan yang berkaitan dengan administrasi pertanahan. Hal ini menimbulkan gagasan untuk menyelesaikan sengketa tersebut secara terpadu dan holistik di satu pengadilan khusus. Pasal 19 ayat (1) Undang-undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960, pokoknya menyatakan: pendaftaran tanah adalah demi kepastian hukum dimana dalam perkembangannya, sertipikat hak atas tanah tak hanya berfungsi sebagai alat pembuktian yang kuat, namun juga bernilai ekonomis tinggi karena dapat dilekati hak accessoir semisal Hak Tanggungan. Sertipikat Hak Atas Tanah tak hanya mengandung kaidah hukum perdata mengenai eksistensi subyek dan obyek hak atas tanah, melainkan juga kaidah hukum administrasi mengenai pengakuan dan aspek legal formal hak atas tanah. Problematika keabsahan sertipikat hak atas tanah dalam penegakan hukum administrasi umumnya berkaitan dengan 3 hal, yakni kewenangan penerbitan, prosedural penerbitan, serta kebenaran substansial. Persoalan yang muncul/berpotensi muncul pasca disahkannya Undang-undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014, adalah reposisi dan kajian mengenai telah tepatkan sertipikat menjadi obyek dalam sengketa administrasi pertanahan? Disahkannya Undang-undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2012 dan Undang-undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014, juga berdampak pada perkembangan sengketa administrasi pertanahan, sehingga tak hanya berkenaan dengan gugatan keabsahan sertipikat hak atas, tapi juga aspek lain: sengketa pengadaan tanah serta putusan penerimaan permohonan yang berkaitan dengan administrasi pertanahan. Hal ini menimbulkan gagasan untuk menyelesaikan sengketa tersebut secara terpadu dan holistik di satu pengadilan khusus.
Kajian Kriminologi Terhadap Praktek Prostitusi Berkedok Bisnis Panti Pijat Di Kota Merauke Mulyadi Alrianto Tajuddin
Jatiswara Vol 31 No 2 (2016): Jatiswara
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (479.552 KB)

Abstract

The study, entitled "Study of Criminology Against the Practice of Prostitution Business guise Massage parlor in the town of Merauke" As for the issues to be examined is how the view of criminology against prostitution under the guise of business parlors, factors What factors encourage prostitution under the guise of business of massage parlors in the town of Merauke, what efforts are being made to overcome the practice of prostitution under the guise of business massage parlors in the city merauke. While the purpose of this study was to investigate and analyze issues. To achieve the study researchers used a qualitative research method using juridical and empirical approach. The results showed that in terms of criminology prostitution is regarded as a crime against morality / decency and against the law. But prostitution is a crime but did not constitute a crime in the sight of the Criminal Code, the factors that encourage the practice of prostitution under the guise of business, the form factor that comes from within the individual and also factors outside the individual, efforts were made to prevent work under the guise of massage parlors prostitution business is by way of preventive and repressive.
Perlindungan Terhadap Paten Asing Berdasarkan Sistem Hukum Paten di Indonesia Pasca TRIPs-WTO Kurniawan -
Jatiswara Vol 27 No 3 (2012): Jatiswara
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (438.097 KB)

Abstract

The establishment of Law number 14 of 2001 concerning Patent as a follow up policy after the ratification of the World Trade Organization (WTO) including its attachment concerning Trade Related Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPs) has brought legal consequence. That is to apply The TRIPs agreement in national law where one of the principle is knows as the National principle toward foreign patents in Indonesia. The foreign Patent rights will be preserved as long as the invention has registered to directorate-general of Intellectual Property Rights of the Republic of Indonesia. The invention registration could be applied in 2 (two) mechanism i.e. priority right registration and Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) and the application must be authorized by Indonesian IPR consultant.
Kajian Yuridis Terhadap Merek Sebagai Jaminan Pada Lembaga Perbankan Dewi Asri Jayanto
Jatiswara Vol 32 No 3 (2017): Jatiswara
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (407.826 KB)

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to analyze the brand setting as guarantee according to positive law in Indonesia and to analyze the brand can be used as credit guarantee in banking. The research method used in the writing of this thesis is a normative legal research that examines the positive law or legislation applicable in Indonesia relating to the guarantee and the brand. Approach method used is approach of legislation, comparative and conceptual. The analysis was done by using interpretation and analogy method. The result show that; First, Brand as a guarantee has not been regulated specifically and clearly in positive law in Indonesia, it is generally regulated in brand laws and geographical and fiduciary guarantee laws. Secondly, the Bank has not been able to accept the mark as the main guarantee, because the legal basis of the brand as an unclear guarantee which will have an impact on execution, in addition to the nature of a brand that can not be assured to the existence becomes on of the constraints of brand acceptance as a guarantee in the institution banking.
Penegakan Hukum Persaingan Usaha Di Negara Berkembang Mansur Amin Bin Ali
Jatiswara Vol 31 No 1 (2016): Jatiswara
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (77.828 KB)

Abstract

The development of international economic very dynamically not only regulate international economic regulation but also for national competition law aspects. It is have relation with state sovereignty in law enforcement affairs. The sovereignty Indonesia as a state to regulate competition law is right of Indonesian as international subject law. But the entity of other state have opportunity to appellate the regulation of a state through national legal mechanism. Further that the decide of commission of competition law in Temasek case as realization of state sovereignty that recognized by international law and Singapore has obliged to respect to these decide.
Kajian Yuridis Tentang Keberadaan Pertambangan Rakyat Arief Rahman; Diman Ade Mulada
Jatiswara Vol 33 No 3 (2018): Jatiswara
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (328.347 KB) | DOI: 10.29303/jatiswara.v33i3.177

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan mengkaji keberadaan wilayah pertambangan rakyat di Kabupaten Sumbawa apakah telah sesuai atau tidak dengan ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku dan mengkaji langkah-langkah apa yang dilakukan oleh Pemerintah Daerah terkait dengan keberadaan dan aktifitas pertambangan rakyat tersebut. Adapun Jenis penelitiannya adalah penelitian normatif empris dengan metode pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual, dan pendekatan Empiris. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Keberdaaan wilayah petambangan rakyat di Kabupaten Sumbawa belum sesuai dengan ketentuan yang berlaku, karena sampai saat ini lokasi yang dijadikan sebagai tempat melakukan kegiatan pertambangan rakyat belum ditetapkan sebagai wilayah pertambangan rakyat dan para pelaku kegiatan pertambangan rakyat tidak memiliki izin pertambangan rakyat (IPR) dalam melaksankan kegiatan pertambangan rakyat dan Adapun langkah-langkah dilakukan oleh pemerintah Kabupaten Sumbawa terkait dengan keberadaan dan aktifitas pertambangan rakyat yaitu melakukan sosialisasi berkaitan dengan peraturan perundang-undangan pertambangan Mineral dan Batubara serta sosialisasi berkaitan dengan dampak negatif dari adanya kegiatan pertamabangan rakyat bagi lingkungan dan kesehatan dan melakukan penertiban bagi pelaku pertambangan rakyat.

Page 15 of 54 | Total Record : 533

 13   14   15   16   17 

Filter by Year

2011 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 41 No. 1 (2026): Jatiswara Vol. 40 No. 3 (2025): Jatiswara Vol. 40 No. 2 (2025): Jatiswara Vol. 40 No. 1 (2025): Jatiswara Vol. 39 No. 3 (2024): Jatiswara Vol. 39 No. 2 (2024): Jatiswara Vol. 39 No. 1 (2024): Jatiswara Vol. 38 No. 3 (2023): Jatiswara Vol. 38 No. 2 (2023): Jatiswara Vol. 38 No. 1 (2023): Jatiswara Vol. 37 No. 3 (2022): Jatiswara Vol. 37 No. 2 (2022): Jatiswara Vol 37 No 1 (2022): Jatiswara Vol. 37 No. 1 (2022): Jatiswara Vol 36 No 3 (2021): Jatiswara Vol. 36 No. 3 (2021): Jatiswara Vol 36 No 2 (2021): Jatiswara Vol. 36 No. 2 (2021): Jatiswara Vol 36 No 1 (2021): Jatiswara Vol. 36 No. 1 (2021): Jatiswara Vol 35 No 3 (2020): Jatiswara Vol. 35 No. 3 (2020): Jatiswara Vol. 35 No. 2 (2020): Jatiswara Vol 35 No 2 (2020): Jatiswara Vol 35 No 1 (2020): Jatiswara Vol. 35 No. 1 (2020): Jatiswara Vol. 34 No. 3 (2019): Jatiswara Vol 34 No 3 (2019): Jatiswara Vol 34 No 2 (2019): Jatiswara Vol. 34 No. 2 (2019): Jatiswara Vol 34 No 1 (2019): Jatiswara Vol. 34 No. 1 (2019): Jatiswara Vol. 33 No. 3 (2018): Jatiswara Vol 33 No 3 (2018): Jatiswara Vol 33 No 2 (2018): Jatiswara Vol. 33 No. 2 (2018): Jatiswara Vol 33 No 1 (2018): Jatiswara Vol. 33 No. 1 (2018): Jatiswara Vol 32 No 3 (2017): Jatiswara Vol 32 No 3 (2017): Jatiswara Vol 32 No 2 (2017): Jatiswara Vol 32 No 2 (2017): Jatiswara Vol 32 No 1 (2017): Jatiswara Vol 31 No 3 (2016): Jatiswara Vol 31 No 2 (2016): Jatiswara Vol 31 No 2 (2016): Jatiswara Vol 31 No 1 (2016): Jatiswara Vol 30 No 3 (2015): Jatiswara Vol 30 No 2 (2015): Jatiswara Vol 30 No 1 (2015): Jatiswara Vol 27 No 3 (2012): Jatiswara Vol 27 No 2 (2012): Jatiswara Vol 27 No 1 (2012): Jatiswara Vol 26 No 3 (2011): Jatiswara Vol 26 No 2 (2011): Jatiswara More Issue