Jurnal Jatiswara
Jatiswara adalah jurnal peer-review yang diterbitkan oleh Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram, merupakan Indonesian Journal of Law sebagai forum komunikasi dalam studi teori dan aplikasi dalam Hukum Berisi teks artikel di bidang Hukum. Tujuan dari jurnal ini adalah untuk menyediakan tempat bagi akademisi, peneliti, dan praktisi untuk mempublikasikan artikel penelitian orisinal atau ulasan artikel.
Articles
533 Documents
<![CDATA[Lembaga Rechtsverwerking Dalam Sistem Pendaftaran Tanah Di Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Arief Rahman Hakim]]>
<![CDATA[ Jatiswara Vol 27 No 1 (2012): Jatiswara ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (404.135 KB)
<![CDATA[In Indonesia, land registration is promulgated in articles 19 of UUPA. To follow up such article, then PP No 10 of 1961 is established. Both regulations require negative system within land registration. This becomes one of the shortcomings of PP No 10 of 1961 which is then completed by PP No 24 of 1997. PP No 24 of 1997 itself adheres to negative system with positive system tendency. Negative system in the land registration means that information or official statements described within land certificate (land book) is absolutely could be changed. Hence, everyone deserves or has a chance to file a lawsuit to the court as long as he/she is able to prove his/her legal right of land. Such a lawsuit can only be submitted within period of 5 years after the certificate published. As for positive system tendency indicate the active role of relevant official in the application of land registration. Such official has to examine the land record carefully. Hence, it is land registration requires long duration to publish (30 days for systematic way and 60 days for sporadic way) in order to give everyone a chance to submit a protest or objection.This policy is established to prevent error or mistake as well as to gain the conformity between land certificate (land book) and the physics of land. Furthermore, it is for the holder of certificate (either private person or legal entity) couldn’t be charged after 5 years of legally possessing such certificate as long as he/she obtain it on the basis of good faith as well as real occupation principles (article 32 (2) PP No 24 of 1997). It indicates that such article adopts the concept of “Rechtsverwerking” (Waiver of Right) established in Adat law as one of the causes of losing land’s right; it is called “rechtsverwerking” if someone or the holder of land right do not within long term exploit the land and it is occupied by other party through transfer of right which based on good faith.]]>
<![CDATA[Persepsi Masyarakat Tentang Pentingnya Akta PPAT Dalam Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah Di Kecamatan Wera ]]>
<![CDATA[Arba Arba]]>;
<![CDATA[Muhammad Umar]]>;
<![CDATA[Sahruddin Sahruddin]]>
<![CDATA[ Jatiswara Vol 33 No 2 (2018): Jatiswara ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (347.694 KB)
|
DOI: 10.29303/jatiswara.v33i2.165
<![CDATA[Peraturan perundang-undangan memerintahkan kepada semua orang yang melakukan peralihan hak atas tanah wajib didaftar. Pendaftaran peralihan hak ini dilakukan apabila dibuktikan dengan akta peralihan hak yang dibuat dihadapan dan ditanda tangani oleh PPAT. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis penerapan peraturan perundang-undangan di bidang peralihan hak atas tanah; Untuk memahami persepsi masyarakat desa tentang pentingnya akta PPAT dalam transaksi peralihan hak atas tanah; dan Untuk menganlisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi pelaksanaan pembuatan akta PPAT dalam peralihan atas tanah di masyarakat kecamatan Wera. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum Empiris, maka metode pendekatan yang digunakan adalah pendekatan hukum empiris, yaitu: pendekatan konsep, stuta, dan sosiologis. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa penerapan ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan di bidang peralihan hak atas tanah, khususnya pembuatan akta PPAT dibidang peralihan hak atas tanah di kecamatan Wera sudah terlaksana dengan baik; Persepsi masyarakat desa tentang pentingnya akta PPAT dalam transaksi peralihan hak atas tanah sudah sangat baik, namun pelaksanaannya masih mengalami hambatan-hambatan disebabkan dua faktor utama, yaitu faktor masyarakat itu sendiri, yakni lingkungan di mana hukum itu berlaku dan diterapkan; dan faktor kebudayaan, yakni sebagai hasil karya, cipta, dan rasa yang didasarkan pada karsa manusia di dalam pergaulan hidup. Kedua faktor ini sekarang sangat dinamis karena dipengaruhi oleh kemajuan ilmu pengetahuan, telekomunikasi dan transportasi. Faktor-faktor ini bukan ditiadakan tetapi harus dikelola dengan baik.]]>
<![CDATA[Penyelesaian Sengketa Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara Melalui Upaya Banding Administratif ]]>
<![CDATA[Abdul Khair]]>;
<![CDATA[Sunarjo Edy Siswanto]]>;
<![CDATA[Sarkawi -]]>;
<![CDATA[Muhammad Saleh]]>
<![CDATA[ Jatiswara Vol 31 No 3 (2016): Jatiswara ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (608.965 KB)
<![CDATA[The purpose of this study was to determine and analyze the dispute resolution process KTUN through appeals of administration according to Law Number 51 Year 2009 regarding the Second Amendment to Law Number 05 Year 1986 concerning State Administrative Court and to know and analyze the strengths and weaknesses in the process dispute resolution through an administrative appeal case in Indonesia. This research is a normative empirical research, the method of approach to legislation, analytical approach. The results of the study are as follows: (1) The process of dispute resolution KTUN through the efforts of Appeals Administration according to Law Number 51 Year 2009 regarding the Second Amendment to Law Number 05 Year 1986 regarding Administrative Court Negaraialah dispute resolution TUN administratively conducted by agencies supervisor or other agencies from issuing the decision in question. Administrative appeals procedure is done by filing an administrative appeal letter addressed to the head of an official or other agencies and bodies / administrative official of the State which issued a decision that the authority to examine the disputed KTUN (SEMA 2 of 1991 dated July 9, 1991). Judging from the elucidation of Article 48 of Law Administrative Court, there are two categories of institutions / agencies authorized to deal with the Administrative Appeal, namely: (a) Agencies supervisor of officials who issued KTUN and; (B) any other authorized. While Strengths and Weaknesses in the Settlement of Disputes through the Administrative Appeals Efforts in Indonesia is; (1) Ratings administrative effort carried out fully against an administrative decision both in terms of legality (rechtmatigheid) as well as aspects Opportunitas (doelmatigheid) (2) the Parties are not faced with the decision win or lose (Winor Loose) as well as in the judiciary; (3) approach to dispute resolution is done with deliberation; (4) The trial is simple and quick no such formality in the Administrative Court; (5) There is no need to pay money matters; (6) Completed at internal concerned agencies; (7) An appeal is not bound to wear procedural administrative proceedings such as in the Administrative Court; (8) Do not need a lawyer; (9) The decision according to desire of the applicant; (10) Direct executable (strong eksekutorial). Weakness Settlement through the Administrative Appeals Efforts are; (1) At the level of objectivity of the assessment for the Agency / State Officials system that issued the Decree is sometimes associated interests, directly or indirectly, thereby reducing the maximum assessment that should be pursued; (2) There are no definite rules specifically time expired ratings or siding; (3) There is a chance of ignoring the report or appeal an administrative person.]]>
<![CDATA[Rekontruksi Prinsip Keadilan dalam Kontrak Pembiayaan Dengan Sistim Kemitraan Musyarakah dan Mudharabah di Perbankan Syariah ]]>
<![CDATA[Atin Meriati Isnaini]]>
<![CDATA[ Jatiswara Vol 30 No 1 (2015): Jatiswara ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (131.556 KB)
<![CDATA[Contract or agreement among the system muamalah an integral part of the content of the Qur'an and Sunnah, either in the form of figurative and most actual cases and contemporary. Norms and rules of the game have been set to be applied in life. New or old system applied in life not be a problem, because the important thing is for a system that meets Shar'ie rule does not contain elements that are prohibited, such as; riba, gharar, and qimar (speculation) is not a new issue to be decided by the new Islamic law as well, but decided on the basis of a comprehensive Sharia law which can cope with and decide how the complexity of the problem. It is a problem in this paper is How the reconstruction of the principle of fairness in financing agreement with Musharaka and Mudaraba partnership system. The conclusion that can be drawn based on the discussion of this paper is Construction Mudaraba and Musharaka financing agreement in the Islamic Bank / Bank Indonesia imposed Mumalat now not reflect fairness and equality. Therefore, the contract needs to be reconstructed based on the opinion of the scholars, National Sharia Board fatwa Majlis Ulama Indonesia and refers to the theories of Islamic contract. Reconstruction must be carried out by the competent authorities, such as the National Islamic Council, the policy makers and experts. The results of the reconstruction will give birth to a standard contract which applies to all Islamic banks in Indonesia.]]>
<![CDATA[Pengaturan Pemilihan Kepala Daerah dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia Setelah Perubahan ]]>
<![CDATA[AR, Hamdani]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Jatiswara Vol 32 No 2 (2017): Jatiswara ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[The Implementation of elections in accordance with the provisions of the Regional Head UUDN RI 1945 after a change of the Article 18 paragraph 4 can be interpreted that the implementation of the Regional Chief Elections system can be implemented indirectly (through election by parliament) and direct local elections (by the people directly), the whole process is carried out in a democratic manner. Commentaries can cause legal problems (conflict of norm, disconsistency of norm, and vague of norm) so that in practice cause multiinterpretasi Indonesia in the state system, which can lead to injustice, undemocratic, there is no rule of law and contrary to human rights particularly in the intellectual, empowerment and restrictions of expression orally or in writing. As for direct elections by the people as is done now are those many negative impacts on the development of people's lives so that the purpose and benefits of regional head elections is not achieved directly in line with expectations (hopeless). Therefore the issues raised in this writing is How to Perspective setting in the future local elections?. Based on the research, the authors ultimately conclude in answer to the problems is that; the local elections Setting Perspective for the Future is done by direct democratic election in accordance with Article 18 paragraph 4 UUDN RI 1945 which followed the democratis indirect approaches, namely democratic elections by the people's representatives are elected by the Council of the Regional Perwaikilan (Parliament), because of various considerations such as: efficiency budgets, Avoiding conflict, Minimizing the anarchic actions, prevent the use of the bureaucracy or the direction of civil servants (PNS), Avoiding political money. Therefore it is expected that in the future will be done democratically through the parliament elections, in order to provide more safety and comfort of the community.]]>
<![CDATA[Efektifitas Kebijakan Pemekaran Wilayah Terhadap Peningkatan Pelayanan Publik ]]>
<![CDATA[Rahmawati Kusuma]]>
<![CDATA[ Jatiswara Vol 26 No 3 (2011): Jatiswara ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (294.462 KB)
<![CDATA[The Principle of local autonomy using the principle of broad outonomy.in the sense the area is given authority to manage and regulate all the affairs of goverment into the affairs of goverment beyond that specified in the law number 32 of 2004 on regional goverment. Region expansion is intended to realize the welfare of the community in the area and improve local democracy, and improve the effectiveness of public service in fact deviated from the purpose. lot of probem that arise in the expansion area, ranging from the problem associated with the legislation until at such implementation. But region expansion continues to flow and seem difficult dammed either by local goverment (parent) and goverment (interior ministry) parliaments and council representative also indicated that the space of regional area. Its not just a matter of goverment administration but also including with economic, political, including strong political dimension in the expansion area. It is therefore important to have a grand design the arrangement of the regions, associated with the central goverment,s role in controlling the formation of new outonomous regions in order to achieve the goals of ethablishing a new area,which realize the objectives of regional autonomy both political goals, economic and objectives of the central goverment and area.]]>
<![CDATA[Sifat Melawan Hukum Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi ]]>
<![CDATA[Idi Amin]]>
<![CDATA[ Jatiswara Vol 33 No 1 (2018): Jatiswara ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (647.93 KB)
|
DOI: 10.29303/jatiswara.v33i1.152
<![CDATA[Korupsi merupakan perbuatan tercela dan bentuk dari penyakit sosial masyarakat, sehingga korupsi dikategorikan sebagai suatu tindak pidana (Straafbaarfeit). Diberlakukannya Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 sebagai penyempurnaan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 1971 tentang pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 disempurnakan kembali dan diubah dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001. Penyempurnaan ini dimaksud untuk lebih menjamin kepastian hukum, menghindari keragaman penafsiran hukum dan memberikan perlindungan terhadap hak-hak sosial dan ekonomi masyarakat, serta perlakuan yang adil dalam memberantas tindak pidana korupsi. Berdasarkan pokok pemikiran diatas maka dapat dirumuskan permasalahan yaitu bagaimanakah sifat melawan hukum dalam tindak pidana korupsi. Penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif, dengan menggunakan metode pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder yang merupakan bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder, bahan hukum tersier, maka teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan yaitu studi kepustakaan dan dokumenter dari data sekunder yang telah dianalisis. Dari hasil penelitian diperoleh kesimpulan bahwa secara konsepsional tentunya sifat melawan hukum seperti diatur dalam Pasal 2 ayat (1) Undang-undang No. 31 Tahun 1999 hanya menganut ajaran sifat melawan hukum dalam pengertian materiil. Hal tersebut didasarkan Putusan Mahkmah Konstitusi yang telah memutuskan bahwa frasa Penjelasan pasal 2 ayat (1), yaitu “dimaksud dengan ‘secara melawan hukum’ dalam pasal ini mencakup perbuatan melawan hukum dalam arti formil maupun arti materiil, yaitu meskipun perbuatan tersebut tidak diatur dalam peraturan perundang-undangan, namun apabila perbuatan tersebut dianggap tercela karena tidak sesuai dengan perasaan keadilan atau norma-norma kehidupan sosial dalam masyarakat, maka perbuatan tersebut dapat dipidana” bertentangan dengan Undang-undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 serta menyatakan tidak mempunyai kekuatan hukum mengikat]]>
<![CDATA[Jaminan Kerahasiaan Informasi Pajak Atas Harta Benda Wajib Pajak Dalam Pemeriksaan Pengelolaan dan Tanggung Jawab Keuangan Negara Yang Dijalankan Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan ]]>
<![CDATA[Johannes Johny Koynja]]>
<![CDATA[ Jatiswara Vol 31 No 2 (2016): Jatiswara ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (635.134 KB)
<![CDATA[This study departs from the legal issues that were born from the conflict of two interests are equally protected by the constitution, namely: First, the interest in the form of the constitutional rights of the taxpayer on his property, in this case the guarantee of confidentiality is protected by law on all the information that has been given to the state (tax authorities) in respect of its obligations to pay taxes according to the principle of self-assessment; Secondly, the benefit in the form of constitutional authority of Audit Board of the Republic of Indonesia (BPK) to audit state finances freely and independently. There are two questions of urgency in the research related to the conflict norm constitutional authority of Audit Board of the Republic of Indonesia (BPK) to information on property tax taxpayer, namely: First, where was the norm conflicts related to the constitutional authority of the Supreme Audit Agency (BPK) to get property tax on the Taxpayer? Second, how real implementation Taxpayer confidentiality to information on property tax Taxpayer with the implementation of self assessment system in the Indonesian tax system? egislation governing state finances, namely the Act Number 17 of 2003 on State Finance and the Act Number 15 of 2004 concerning Management and Accountability of State Finance, and the Act Number 15 of 2006 regarding the Supreme Audit Agency (BPK) has placed the Supreme Audit Agency (BPK) as a body that tends to monopoly the inspections on state finances, in addition to creating instability in the taxation sector.]]>
<![CDATA[Eksistensi Putusan Ultra Petita dalam Polemik Pengujian Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) dalam Rangka Penegakan Hukum ]]>
<![CDATA[Muhammad Saleh]]>;
<![CDATA[AD Basniwati]]>
<![CDATA[ Jatiswara Vol 27 No 3 (2012): Jatiswara ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (262.485 KB)
<![CDATA[As stipulated in the article 24 (1 and 2) of the constitution of Republic ofIndonesia 1945, Constitutional courts is, beside Supreme Court, one of the judicial courts element. This means that constitutional court is bound to general principles of judicial power, i.e. freedom, impartial and independent from any other institution in enforcing law and justice. One of the constitutional court’s decisions assumed to be controversy is what so called “ultra petita decision”. In the context of procedural law prevails in the court, ultra petita is decision which contains things out of claimant’s request within a judicial review process. This clearly will bring about legal discussion among legal experts.]]>
<![CDATA[Pengaruh Lampau Waktu Terhadap Gugatan ]]>
<![CDATA[Nurun Ainuddin]]>
<![CDATA[ Jatiswara Vol 30 No 3 (2015): Jatiswara ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (406.345 KB)
<![CDATA[This research is aliteraturestudies that conductedsolely basedonwritten work, includingeither published research or not published research.This studydoes notdirectlygo to the fieldin search ofthe source data butcan be doneat home, in the libraryandotherplaces.The objectivesofthis study were (1) To provethatthe effect oftheexpiryof thelawsuitis a vitalcommunity needs, (2) To provethatthe effect ofexpiryoftenlead tolegal problemsand mostly ends in the court roomand(3) Toknow how far thegovernment's effortsto regulate expiry,through regulationsandlegislationin thevarious policies.Asresults to be achievedishow far the right of substitutionby the plaintiffinthe casecan be decidedby a judgeto becompletelyfair. The conclusion ofthis studyis theEffect ofexpiry,resulting inalawsuitwhich oftenled to disputesin all circles. This should beevaluated fromcase to caseandis alwaysconsideredthe development ofthe communitywhere the caseoccurred.]]>
