cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
M. Rifqi Ariyul Haq
Contact Email
ariu@padanghost.com
Phone
+62751-29889
Journal Mail Official
jurnal@tarbiyahiainib.ac.id
Editorial Address
Al-Ta'lim Jurnal State Institute for Islamic Studies IB Padang, Indonesia -Jl. Prof. Mahmud Yunus Lubuk Lintah Padang 25153, West SumateraPhone- +62 751-29889Faks.- +62 751-29889 Email: jurnal@tarbiyahiainib.ac.id
Location
Kota padang,
Sumatera barat
INDONESIA
Al-Ta'lim
Published by Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bonjol Padang
ISSN : 14107546     EISSN : 23557893     DOI : https://doi.org/10.15548/jt
Core Subject : Religion, Education,
Religion Education
Al-Talim, a peer-reviewed journal, is an interdisciplinary publication of original research and writing on education. The journal aims to provide a forum for scholarly understanding of the field of education and plays an important role in promoting the process that accumulated knowledge, values, and skills. Scientific manuscript dealing with contemporary educational topics are particularly welcome to be submitted. The journal encompasses research articles, original research report, reviews, short communications and scientific commentaries in education in any fields including: Teaching Education development Education management Curriculum Philosophies of education Educational approaches, etc.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Pendidikan
Articles 391 Documents
 36   37   38   39   40 
Evaluation of Assessment Quality in Islamic Religious Education Teaching Modules within the Implementation of the Merdeka Curriculum Retno Wahyuningsih; Suprapti Suprapti; Pratiwi Rahmah Hakim
AT-TA'LIM Vol 33, No 2 (2026)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Imam Bonjol Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15548/jt.v33i2.1165

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the quality of assessment embedded in Islamic Religious Education teaching modules within the implementation of the Merdeka Curriculum. The research employed an evaluative design using a quantitative descriptive approach. Data were collected through systematic document analysis of Islamic Religious Education teaching modules developed by teachers at elementary, junior high, and senior high school levels in the Surakarta residency area. An assessment evaluation instrument was used to examine diagnostic, formative, and summative assessments, their alignment with Learning Outcomes, Learning Objectives, and Criteria for Learning Objective Achievement, as well as compliance with national assessment policies and principles. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics to identify dominant quality levels across assessment aspects. The findings indicate that formative and summative assessments generally demonstrate satisfactory quality, particularly in measuring students’ cognitive achievement and aligning with learning objectives. However, diagnostic and skills-based assessments remain relatively weak. These weaknesses are mainly associated with limited assessment techniques, insufficient attention to students’ initial learning conditions, and inadequate use of scoring rubrics for evaluating performance and practical skills. Overall, assessment practices embedded in Islamic Religious Education teaching modules are generally aligned with curriculum standards and national policy requirements, although their pedagogical quality varies across assessment components. These findings highlight the need to strengthen teachers’ assessment literacy and professional competence, particularly in designing diagnostic, authentic, and skills-based assessments. Enhancing these competencies is essential to support comprehensive, contextual, and holistic learning assessment and improve the quality of Islamic Religious Education under the Merdeka Curriculum.

Page 40 of 40 | Total Record : 391

 36   37   38   39   40 

Filter by Year

2012 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 33, No 2 (2026) Vol 33, No 1 (2026) Vol 32, No 3 (2025) Vol 32, No 2 (2025) Vol 32, No 1 (2025) Vol 31, No 3 (2024) Vol 31, No 2 (2024) Vol 31, No 1 (2024) Vol 30, No 3 (2023) Vol 30, No 2 (2023) Vol 30, No 1 (2023) Vol 29, No 3 (2022) Vol 29, No 2 (2022) Vol 29, No 1 (2022) Vol 28, No 3 (2021) Vol 28, No 2 (2021) Vol 28, No 1 (2021) Vol 27, No 3 (2020) Vol 27, No 2 (2020) Vol 27, No 1 (2020) Vol 26, No 3 (2019) Vol 26, No 2 (2019) Vol 26, No 1 (2019) Vol 25, No 3 (2018) Vol 25, No 2 (2018) Vol 25, No 1 (2018) Vol 24, No 3 (2017) Vol 24, No 2 (2017) Vol 24, No 1 (2017) Vol 23, No 3 (2016) Vol 23, No 2 (2016) Vol 23, No 1 (2016) Vol 22, No 3 (2015) Vol 22, No 2 (2015) Vol 22, No 1 (2015) Vol 21, No 3 (2014) Vol 21, No 2 (2014) Vol 21, No 1 (2014) Vol 20, No 3 (2013) Vol 20, No 2 (2013) Vol 20, No 1 (2013) Vol 19, No 3 (2012) Vol 19, No 2 (2012) Vol 19, No 1 (2012) More Issue