cover
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
Department of Medical-Health Professions Education and Bioethics Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing Universitas Gadjah Mada Radioputro Bld, 6th floor, West Wing Farmaco St., Sekip Utara, Yogyakarta, 55281
Location
Kab. sleman,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia: The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education
ISSN : 22525084     EISSN : 26545810     DOI : https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.46690
Core Subject : Health,
The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education (Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia) is a peer-reviewed open-access journal which publishes research and innovation in curriculum development, student-centred learning, faculty development, assessment, and learning resources in health professions education. Aiming to improve literacy on health professions education in Indonesia and globally, this journal publishes three issues annually in English and Bahasa Indonesia.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 383 Documents
EVALUATING INTERPROFESSIONAL EDUCATION PRINCIPLE IN A LONGITUDINAL COMMUNITY-BASED PROGRAM FOR 3 SCHOOLS OF HEALTH PROFESSIONS: MEDICINE, NURSING, AND NUTRITION Doni Widyandana
Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia: The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education Vol 7, No 1 (2018): MARET
Publisher : Asosiasi Institusi Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (139.722 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jpki.35553

Abstract

Background: Interprofessional education (IPE) is a method offered to support the collaboration of two health professions or more in order to create an ideal teamwork. This study aims to evaluate students’ interprofessional attitudes during the implementation of IPE in a community-based program among 3 health professions students.Method: Second and third year undergraduate students from three health profession schools in Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Gadjah Mada, medicine (n = 50), nursery (n = 50), and nutrition (n = 50), were recruited in 2015. Students were sent to a community setting in a small group of 10 consisting of those three schools’ students. They were assigned to a certain family and followed them longitudinally in a curriculum called the Community and Family Health Care program. Quantitative data were collected with a survey using Interprofessional Attitude Scale instrument containing 5 subscales (27 items): teamwork, roles and responsibilities; patient-centeredness; interprofessional biases; diversity and ethics; and community-centeredness. The items used 5-level Likert scale. Descriptive analysis was performed for the quantitative data and comparison among those three groups used Kruskal-Wallis test.Results: Most of the students strongly agreed they learned a lot about interprofessional attitudes during this program (mean scores of each subscale: 3.85, 4.19, 3.18, 3.83, and 3.99, respectively). There were significant differences among mean scores of each subscale (p< 0.05). Medical and nursery students had higher mean scores compared to nutrition students, except in the subscale of community-centeredness (p = 0.197).Conclusion: IPE can be implemented successfully in a longitudinal community-based education curriculum and benefits undergraduate students in studying interprofessional attitudes. The program should be evaluated and improved to assure all students to get equal benefits.
IMPLEMENTATION OF SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT IN PBL TUTORIALS: CULTURAL PERSPECTIVES Umatul Khoiriyah; Chris Roberts
Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia: The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education Vol 7, No 1 (2018): MARET
Publisher : Asosiasi Institusi Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (177.689 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jpki.35554

Abstract

Background: Problem-based learning was developed firstly in western country which is dominated by western culture. The benefits of PBL implementaion in Eastern culture such as Asia have been studied. Many  innovations have been developed to optimise the advantages of PBL on students learning in Asian countries. Faculty of Medicine Islamic University of Indonesia (FM IUI) has made an innovation by applying summative assessment in PBL tutorials. This study aims to evaluate the positive and negative effects of summative assessment in PBL tutorials based on a cultural perspective and to know whether this inovation could support students learning in PBL tutorials. Method: The research was conducted qualitatively through semi-structure interview among 10 students and tutors of FM IUI , who have at least one year experience in PBL tutorials. Data was analysed thematically using Hofstede’s cultural dimension. Results: Ten themes that were distributed into 4 cultural dimensions were captured from the data. It consisted of Power distance ( 2 themes), uncertainty avoidance (3 themes), Individualism vs collectivism ( 2 themes), short orientation vs long orientation ( 2 themes). Summative assessment were able to stimulate student to participate actively in tutorial, to have willingness conducting self-improvement and the need of feedback from tutor. On the other hand, this assessment induced the students to be a score oriented. It also reduced group harmonisation.Supporting factors such as case design, tutor capability and students’ understanding about PBL need to be considered. Conclusion: Summative assessment in PBL tutorials has both positive and negative impacts on the quality of tutorial process. It could support students learning in some aspects, however; it also reduce the quality of tutorial process. To minimise the negative effects, supporting factors should be optimised. Faculty should also consider other innovations that are more appropriate with Eastern culture and PBL characteristics.   
STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION ABOUT CLINICAL LEARNING ENVIRONMENT IN THE PRIMARY, SECONDARY AND TERTIARY MEDICAL FACILITIES Dian Puspita Dewi; Gandes Retno Rahayu; Tri Nur Kristina
Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia: The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education Vol 7, No 1 (2018): MARET
Publisher : Asosiasi Institusi Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (190.997 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jpki.35555

Abstract

Background: Learning environment is an important factor in learning process and can affect students' competence and work-readiness. Learning environment is not only about physical facilities but also social and psychological condition. The complexity of clinical learning environments pose challenges and problems that may affect students learning process so it is necessary to monitoring and evaluating students learning environments. This study aims to assess students' perception of their learning environment and the effect of primary, secondary and tertiary health care services utilization as clinical learning environments.Method: This study was conducted with a cross sectional study design. The subjects were 36 students of obstetrics and gynecology department. Data obtained from learning environment questionnaires in tertiary, secondary and primary health care services. A non-parametric test was applied to compared learning environment score in each health care level.Results: Students perception of their learning environment between tertiary and secondary as well as tertiary and primary health care services were significantly different. Students stated advantages and disadvantages of each learning environment that can affect their competence level. Conclusion: Students have a good perception of the their learning environment. There was significant difference between tertiary and two other health care services.
CRITICAL REFLECTION AND FEEDBACK FOR MEDICAL STUDENTS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY Imelda Ritunga; Gandes Retno Rahayu; Yoyo Suhoyo
Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia: The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education Vol 7, No 1 (2018): MARET
Publisher : Asosiasi Institusi Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (178.939 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jpki.35556

Abstract

Background: The physician who reflects critically will interpret the experience, aware of its limitations, and will become life long learner. When implementing reflection learning in medical education, it is necessary to assess the ability of learners to help improve the ability of reflection. The objective of the research is to know the students 'reflection ability by giving feedback and different of reflection ability between intervention group and control group.Method: Research using pre and post control group design. The subjects of the study were 62 students medical students of Faculty of Medicine UGM year II who had collected narrative reflection to Gamel (n = 176 students) and willing to participate, divided into 2 groups with simple random sampling. Intervention of treatment group are giving feedback based on the result of narrative reflection from Gamel followed by narrative reflection assignment. The subjects' narrative reflection was assessed using the REFLECT rubric, and analyzed by Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney tests.Results: The results showed that students' pre and post test reflection ability is in the reflection stage. Giving feedback once does not increase the ability from  reflection stage to the critical reflection stage. This result may be due to several things: critical reflection does not occur without significant / dramatic experience that shifts perspective resulting in transformative learning, feedback is given regularly, lack of trustworhty to instructors who are not university lecturers. Another result of a decrease in the ability of reflection in general after 6 months indicates the need to do reflection activity / assignment in each semester to maintain and improve the ability of reflection. Conclusion: Increased reflection ability from reflection stage to critical reflection stage does not occur with single feedback. If reflection is not done regularly, it can cause a decrease in reflection ability.
THE COMPARISON OF THE CUMULATIVE GRADE POINT AVERAGE ON MEDICAL STUDENTS LIVING IN DORMITORY AND BOARDING HOUSE OF A MEDICAL SCHOOL Resiana Karnina
Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia: The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education Vol 8, No 1 (2019): Maret
Publisher : Asosiasi Institusi Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (155.653 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jpki.35778

Abstract

Background: In educational institution, learning achievement is an important indicator to measure the success of the learning process. Academic achievement can be defined as a result of the work that has been achieved by someone in his learning process, which is avoud as a GPA (Grade Point Average) in Higher Education or collage. Many factors that affect the value of GPA one of them comes from external factors ie residence. Medical Program Student of University of Muhammadiyah Jakarta is free to stay in dormitory or boarding house (indekos) during lectures in Faculty of Medicine and Health University of Muhammadiyah Jakarta. The purpose of this research is to determine the comparison and relationship of the Cumulative GPA on Students Living in Dormitory and Boarding House (Indekos) at Medical University of Muhammadiyah Jakarta Class of 2016. Method: This research uses quantitative analytic research type with cross sectional study. The subject of this research is a Student of Medical Studies at University of Muhammadiyah Jakarta. The Analysis was done by Mann Whitney Test. Results: There was no correlation between cumulative GPA in Students Living in Dormitory with Indekos with p value 0,292. Conclusion: There was no correlation between residence’s respondent and cumulative grade point of respondents in the research, but with Mann-Whitney test results comparing the rankings between groups, respondents with residence showed that the possibility of cumulative GPA is better than those living in the dormitory.
STUDENT-CENTERED LEARNING IN RELATION TO CLASS PERFORMANCES AND SOFT SKILLS: A META-ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMATIC REVIEW Elisabeth Rukmini; Cindy Cindy; Pricillia Tanoto
Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia: The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education Vol 7, No 2 (2018): JULI
Publisher : Asosiasi Institusi Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (803.594 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jpki.39098

Abstract

Background: Studies showed that SCL improved quality of medical education through knowledge acquisition, class performance, students’ attitude and soft skills. Although research about SCL and its impact has been widely known, overall correlation of SCL to the class performances has not yet been established. Strong correlation between SCL to class performances would serve the purpose of teaching and learning and more importantly would answer the skepticism of institution or faculty members in implementing SCL. In addition, learning through systematic review of others’ studies, how SCL influenced soft skill aspects would be benefited for medical educators. Soft skills such as learning motivation, communication skills, and teamwork may lead educators to the favor of SCL approaches. This review was to find the correlation of student-centered learning to the students’ performances and soft skill aspects in medical education.Method: To find the correlation of the SCL and class performances, we used meta-analysis. We also performed a systematic review to qualitatively find the relationship between SCL and other aspects, such as teamwork, communication skills, and learning motivation. Literatures were filtered from databases of: Proquest, Springerlink, Biomed Central (BMC) open, BMJ open, and Google Scholar. The inclusion criteria were published empirical articles (2000-2013) reported SCL’s effect on class performances or other aspects (learning motivation, teamwork, communication skills). We utilized PRISMA protocol to filter the inclusion articles. By reading abstracts and further snowballing searching, we found 12 articles for the meta-analysis and 33 articles for the systematic review.                                                                 Results: Among 12 articles of the meta-analysis, 9 articles showed positive correlation between SCL and class performances. Three studies reported that SCL had no effect on the class performances. None of the articles reported any negative impact. We utilized the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software to analyze the data and found r = 0.46 and 95% CI: 0.32 - 0.57. It showed a statistically significant correlation between SCL and class performances. On the systematic review, we found that SCL improved communication skills, team work, and learning motivation.Conclusion: From the meta-analysis we found that SCL improved class performances about 46%. It was showed that SCL methods were superior in improving soft skills such as communication skills, teamwork, and learning motivation.                
DELPHI TECHNIQUE: CONSENSUS OF ANATOMY CIRCULATORY SYSTEM CORE SYLLABUS FOR MEDICAL STUDENT Siti Munawaroh; Farhah Millata Hanifa; Nanang Wiyono; Yunia Hastami; Nur Dewi Kartikasari; Bulan Kakanita Hermasari
Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia: The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education Vol 7, No 2 (2018): JULI
Publisher : Asosiasi Institusi Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (254.034 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jpki.39101

Abstract

Background: Anatomy is a very important basic science in medical education. However, the advance of science and technology affected medical curriculum. One of the changes is the decreased time available for anatomy learning. Therefore, an anatomy lecturer needs to sort and choose from many existing anatomical materials to adjust with time allocation. The purpose of this study is to gain consensus on what minimum anatomical knowledge is for a physician candidate in order to practice safely. Method: This study was design in qualitative approach with two round Delphi Technique. Using purposive sampling method, the subjects of the study were 20 general-physicians in Indonesia. The questionnare was arranged based on anatomy text book and the research about anatomic core syllabus. The firts Delphi aimed to select the anatomical course material and additional course material. The second Delphi round intended to provide level range from 1-4. The consensus level established by researcher at 60% point.Results: There is not any additional topics in the first Delphi round. So the number of first and second round topics is 270 topics. The Delphi second round agree that anatomic core syllabus of circulation system is 110 of 270 topics. There are 30 topics of cor, 3 topics of pericardium, 10 topics of mediastinum, 37 topics of artery, 9 topics of vena, 9 topics of lymphathic system, 4 topics of postnatal circulation, 5 topics of prenatal circulation, and 3 topics of portal hepatic system.Conclusion: The anatomy core syllabus consists of 110 of the 270 anatomical circulatory system topics.
THE EFFECTIVENESS OF JIGSAW LEARNING METHOD COMPARED TO LECTURE-BASED LEARNING IN ANATOMY LECTURES Saharnauli J. Verawaty Simorangkir
Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia: The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education Vol 7, No 2 (2018): JULI
Publisher : Asosiasi Institusi Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (178.358 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jpki.39102

Abstract

Background: Jigsaw is a cooperative learning method in which students work together in small groups, helping one another towards a common goal. The aim of this research were to find out the different effect of Jigsaw cooperative learning method with conventional method in terms of anatomy learning achievement and retention. Method: Forty-nine students were randomly assigned into two groups, control group (n=24) and experimental group (n=25). A pretest was administered to all students before classes. The Jigsaw learning method was applied to the experimental group for one session. At the same day, control group was taking classes using the lecture-based learning method. At the end of session, all students were retested (post test) on subject. A retention test was administered 3 weeks after the post test. Mean scores were calculated for each test for the experimental and control groups, and the data obtained were analysed using the independent samples t-test.Results: No significant difference was determined between the Jigsaw and lecture based methods at pretest or post-test. The highest mean test score was observed in the post-test with the Jigsaw method. In the retention test, no significant difference between the Jigsaw and lecture-based methods. The highest mean retention test score was observed in the lecture-based method.Conclusion: The Jigsaw method is less effective than lecture-based method. 
EVALUATION OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SIMULATION-BASED LEARNING IN FOURTH YEAR MEDICAL STUDENTS OF ATMA JAYA CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF INDONESIA Rhevensa Santoso; Natalia Puspadewi; Tommy Tanumiharja
Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia: The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education Vol 7, No 2 (2018): JULI
Publisher : Asosiasi Institusi Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (205.487 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jpki.39103

Abstract

Background: Health care providers must achieve and maintainthe required competencyin providing services to patients; even more so in complex and stressful situations. Medical simulation is a method to facilitate training and assessment of clinical skills in medical students and physicians. This method has been implemented and recognized in many areas outside medicine, but because of various problems this method is relatively difficult to apply in the field of medicine.Methods: The design of this study was cross-sectional with quantitative method. Study participants were the fourth year students of Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia, School of Medicine. Simulation-based learning (SBL) was implemented by a 2-day workshop. Participants were given a pretest and posttest to assess the cognitive aspect of their clinical skills, and assessment of case simulation using Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) and Team Observed Structured Clinical Examination(TOSCE) for their clinical and soft skills.Results: The difference of the knowledge before and after the intervention was not significant(p = 0,071). However, there was a significant difference of the clinical skills (p < 0,001) and soft skills (p < 0,001).Conclusion: Using SBL as a learning method can increase clinical skills and soft skills of the students significantly. To a smaller extent, using simulation based learning as learning method can increase knowledge of the students about SBL and cognitive aspect of clinical skills although itis statistically insignificant.
LEARNING PROFESSIONALISM: MEDICAL STUDENTS’ PERSPECTIVE ON IDENTIFYING CLINICAL STAFFS’ BEHAVIOUR Fithriyah C. Ummah; Gandes Retno Rahayu; Yayi Suryo Prabandari
Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia: The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education Vol 7, No 2 (2018): JULI
Publisher : Asosiasi Institusi Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (705.978 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jpki.39105

Abstract

Background: Role modeling is known as one of the most effective methods in learning professionalism, especially in the workplace. Each role model shows a different substantial values of professionalism, therefore the 'positive' or 'negative' role model criterion are difficult to set. This study aims to understand how students identify 'professional behavior’ (positive role model) and ‘unprofessional behavior’ (negative role model).Method: The design was a qualitative with case study approach. The sample was 20 students of undergraduate medical school at one university in Indonesia, selected by purposive sampling using maximum variation strategy. Gender, GPA, origin, and clinical rotation are used as key dimensions. Data collection used two methods, written narrative and focus group discussion. While the steps of qualitative analysis refers to Miles and Huberman.Results: This study found four themes as ‘behavioral identification’, namely: 'self-principle', 'self-standard of professionalism', 'normative standard of professionalism' and 'subjectivity'.Conclusion: Differences in identification are a reflection of students’ cognitive maturity. The outcome of learning professionalism can be improved from ‘valuing’ to ‘organizing’ and ‘internalizing’ through role model exposure and facilitation that provides the opportunity to explore and to reflect on professional values, before the student chooses them independently. This is part of the development of internal belief systems that are closely related on how students build their professional identity.