Yoyo Suhoyo
Department Of Medical Education And Bioethics, Faculty Of Medicine, Public Health, And Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Published : 19 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 19 Documents
Search

Konsep Inovasi Strategi Pendidikan di Institusi Pendidikan Kedokteran Yoyo Suhoyo
Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia: The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education Vol 1, No 2 (2012): JULI
Publisher : Asosiasi Institusi Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (260.385 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jpki.25077

Abstract

Innovation in medical education is essentially a reaction towards various demands and changes in the medical education institutions environment. The innovation of educational strategy is a part of the effort. Innovation in medical education should consider the feasibility level, resources needed, time and duration of implementation, scale and degree, that failure can occur, obstacles faced and the pattern of innovation that will be done. Considering the current condition of medical education institutions that are known through self-evaluation and strategic plan, and a growing trend in medical education at this time, severalinnovation can be proposed. SPICES approach can be taken as a guide in designing innovation in medical education.  
Mini-CEX Sebagai Metode Penilaian Keterampilan Klinis Mahasiswa Program Pendidikan Kepaniteraan Klinik Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Gadjah Mada - Studi Pendahuluan Reza M. Munandar; Yoyo Suhoyo; Tridjoko Hadianto
Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia: The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education Vol 1, No 2 (2012): JULI
Publisher : Asosiasi Institusi Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (220.585 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jpki.25083

Abstract

Background: Mini-CEX was developed to assess clinical skills by direct observation. Mini-CEX as a clinical skills assessment tool had to fulfill four requirements: validity, reliability, effects on students, and practicality. The purpose of this study is to understand validity, reliability, and feasibility of Mini-CEX as a clinical skills assessment tool in medical core clerkship program at Faculty of Medicine Universitas Gadjah Mada.Method: Seventy four clerkship students from Internal Medicine and 42 clerkship students from Neurology Department were asked to do an observed Mini-CEX encounter for minimum amount of four in Internal Medicine and two in Neurology Department in the period of September 2010 to January 2011. The validity was analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis method for Internal Medicine, and Mann-Whitney Method for neurology Department, reliability was analyzed based on G coefficient, and feasibility was analyzed using descriptive statistic.Results: Mini-CEX’s validity is shown by p < 0,001 in Internal Medicine and p = 0,250 in Neurology Department, G coefficient for Internal Medicine and Neurology Department is 0,98 and 0,61 respectively. Feasibility in Internal Medicine and Neurology Department is 79,7 % and 100% respectively.Conclusion: Mini-CEX is valid and reliable in Internal Medicine but not in Neurology Department. Feasibility is good for both Internal Medicine and Neurology Department.
Persepsi Mahasiswa Terhadap Pelaksanaan Mini Clinical Examination Excercise (Mini-CEX) Pada Program Pendidikan Kepaniteraan Klinik Gusti Raditya K; Yoyo Suhoyo; Tridjoko Hadianto
Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia: The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education Vol 1, No 2 (2012): JULI
Publisher : Asosiasi Institusi Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (251.706 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jpki.25131

Abstract

Background: Mini-CEX was developed to assess the clinical skills of students through direct observation and constructive feedback on student achievement. To test Mini-CEX well as assessment methods, it is necessary to evaluate the implementation of Mini-CEX as Mini-CEX assessment methods and benefits of the learning process, as well as the professional development of students as future doctors, in the form of assessment of students’ perceptions of the Mini- CEX implementation. The objective of this study are to validate an instrumen for measuring the level of student perceptions in the implementation of Mini-CEX in Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Gadjah Mada’s clerkship program, to know the student’s opinions about the implementation of Mini-CEX as a method of assessment in clerkship program and benefits to student learning and professional development, to know the relationship students’ Mini-CEX point to student’s perception in the implementation of Mini-CEX in clerkship program medical faculty of GMU, and to compare the perceptions of students in Mini-CEX implementation in clerkship program Medical Faculty of GMU based on the characteristics of the department.Method: Research was conducted with a cross sectional study design. The research utilized closed questionnaires, each contained 5 likert scales. The questionnaires were given to the students who conducted clerkship in Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Gadjah Mada during the period of September 2010–March 2011. A total number of 103 students who become subjects in this study, which are consisted of 72 students in Internal Medicine Department and 32 students in Neurology Department. The correlation between student perception and Mini-CEX score was analyzed by using spearman correlation test. Mann-Whitney test was used to analyze the differences student perception between both Departments.Results: Students who are conducting clerkship program in Internal Medicine Department and Neurology Department Faculty of Medicine Universitas Gadjah Mada agree that Mini-CEX can be as assessment and learning tools, and promote the development of student professionalism. Perceptions of students towards the implementation of Mini-CEX in clerkship are not associated with Mini-CEX score. There was no significant difference in students’ perceptions towards the implementation of Mini-CEX between Internal Medicine Department students and Neurology Department students.Conclusion: Students perceived the Mini-CEX to be a practical assessment tool with a positive impact on their learning and professionalism development during clerkship.
Tingkat Pelaksanaan Problem-Based Learning di Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Gadjah Mada Berdasarkan Pembelajaran Konstruktif, Mandiri, Kolaboratif, dan Kontekstual Banu Aji Dibyasakti; Gandes Retno Rahayu; Yoyo Suhoyo
Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia: The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education Vol 2, No 1 (2013): Maret
Publisher : Asosiasi Institusi Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (526.116 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jpki.25142

Abstract

Background: Problem-based Learning (PBL) is a new strategy on a learning system. There are four basic theories regarding PBL such as constructive, self-directed, collaborative, and contextual learning. The success of the implementation of PBL in one institution can be measured by the implementation of its four basic theories. Faculty of Medicine UGM (FM UGM) has been implementing PBL as their curriculum since 2002, however there have not been any conducted research that measure the implementation of PBL in FM UGM towards its 4 (four) basic theories. The objectives of this study are to validate instrumen developed by Romauli et al8 that can measure the implementation level of PBL towards its 4 basic theories, to measure the implementation level of PBL in FM UGM towards its 4 basic theories, and to compare the implementation level of PBL based on students’ academic level and regular/international program.Method: This research used quantitative non-experimental research with cross-sectional design. 321 students from 2nd (2008) and 3rd (2007) students’batch regular and international program filled the questionnaire developed by Romauli et al (2009) which had been reliable (Alpha Cronbach) and validated (Pearson Moment Product) twice previously. The data were analyzed using mean analysis to measure the implementation level of PBL towards its four basic theories. This research also compared the implementation level of PBL based on students’ academic level and regular/international by using Independent Sample t-test.Results: Instrument developed by Romauli et al8 had high validity and reliability level (á=0,01 and r=0,931). The implementation level of PBL in FM UGM towards constructive, self-directed, collaborative, and contextual learning were in moderate level (1,72±0,28;min 0 & max 3). There were not any significant differences of the implementation level of PBL among 2007 & 2008 batch (p>0,05). There were any significant differences of the implementation level of PBL among regular & international students regarding constructive & contextual learning (p<0,05), however there were not any significant differences for self-directed & collaborative learning, (p>0,05).Conclusion: Instrument developed by Romauli et al (2009) had high validity and reliability. The implementation level of PBL were in moderate level. There were not any significant differences of the implementation level of PBL among two different students’ batch. There were any significant differences of the implementation level of PBL among reg
Rubrik Nursing Clinical Exercise: Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Kompetensi Klinis Pada Pendidikan Klinik Keperawatan Retno Sumiyarrini; Gandes Retno Rahayu; Yoyo Suhoyo
Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia: The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education Vol 6, No 3 (2017): NOVEMBER
Publisher : Asosiasi Institusi Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (288.13 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jpki.32224

Abstract

Background: Clinical Skills is a fundamental ability that must be mastered by the newly graduated nurses. Therefore, assessment of clinical competence is essential to be considered by educators and education managers. It needs a valid assessment instrument, which is reliable and impactful on learning the process by giving a structured feedback so that qualified graduates can be produced. Some assessment instruments in the clinical nursing education have less evidence of validity and reliability and less feasible, so it requires a development of clinical assessment instruments. This study aims to develop a clinical assessment instrument in the nursing clinic and to test the content validity. Method: This study used a qualitative research design that includes drafting through literature review and expert review by the expert panel.Results: The process of drafting and reviewing produces a rubric named Nursing Clinical Exercise (NCEx) made of six domains consisting the assessment of subjective data, physical examination, diagnosis formulation, treatment planning formulation, communication and interpersonal relationships, and professionalism. The value of content validity is good (CVR of the entire domain = 1)Conclusion: The NCEx Rubric consists of six domains and has good content validity.
CRITICAL REFLECTION AND FEEDBACK FOR MEDICAL STUDENTS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY Imelda Ritunga; Gandes Retno Rahayu; Yoyo Suhoyo
Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia: The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education Vol 7, No 1 (2018): MARET
Publisher : Asosiasi Institusi Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (178.939 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jpki.35556

Abstract

Background: The physician who reflects critically will interpret the experience, aware of its limitations, and will become life long learner. When implementing reflection learning in medical education, it is necessary to assess the ability of learners to help improve the ability of reflection. The objective of the research is to know the students 'reflection ability by giving feedback and different of reflection ability between intervention group and control group.Method: Research using pre and post control group design. The subjects of the study were 62 students medical students of Faculty of Medicine UGM year II who had collected narrative reflection to Gamel (n = 176 students) and willing to participate, divided into 2 groups with simple random sampling. Intervention of treatment group are giving feedback based on the result of narrative reflection from Gamel followed by narrative reflection assignment. The subjects' narrative reflection was assessed using the REFLECT rubric, and analyzed by Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney tests.Results: The results showed that students' pre and post test reflection ability is in the reflection stage. Giving feedback once does not increase the ability from  reflection stage to the critical reflection stage. This result may be due to several things: critical reflection does not occur without significant / dramatic experience that shifts perspective resulting in transformative learning, feedback is given regularly, lack of trustworhty to instructors who are not university lecturers. Another result of a decrease in the ability of reflection in general after 6 months indicates the need to do reflection activity / assignment in each semester to maintain and improve the ability of reflection. Conclusion: Increased reflection ability from reflection stage to critical reflection stage does not occur with single feedback. If reflection is not done regularly, it can cause a decrease in reflection ability.
FACEBOOK® GROUP USAGE TO SUPPORT FLIPPED-CLASSROOM LEARNING ON OCULAR TRAUMA Muhamad Reza Utama; Deny Yuliawan; Yoyo Suhoyo; Widyandana Doni
Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia: The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education Vol 9, No 1 (2020): MARET
Publisher : Asosiasi Institusi Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (493.325 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jpki.46845

Abstract

Background: Facebook has been acknowledged as an alternative media in supporting traditional learning activities. However, its potential in enhancing students’ cognitive engagement on flipped-classroom’ activities is still not much known. This study aims to measure undergraduate medical students’ cognitive engagement changes after joining an ocular trauma flipped-classroom’ Facebook group.Methods: This pre-experimental study was involving 45 third-year undergraduate medical students of Muhammadiyah Surabaya' University who were joining the ocular trauma flipped-classroom' Facebook group. Three cognitive engagement variables were measured before students were joining the group and after the flipped-classroom’ face to face session ended. Finally, metrics data of the group members’ activities, which had been collected using Facebook Insight, used to shown changes between the active and passive user.Results: All users’ (n = 45) cognitive engagement were rising significantly after join the Facebook group (motivation, p = 0,000; self-directed learning readiness, p = 0,000; knowledge towards ocular trauma topic, p = 0,000). Increase in average active user knowledge was 11.09 points higher than passive users. Self-efficacy aspect of the students’ learning motivation and self-management aspects of the students’ self-directed learning readiness were the most increased sub-components.Conclusion: Facebook group has the potential to improve students’ cognitive engagement on ocular trauma’ flipped classroom.  
THE EFFECTIVENESS OF BEDSIDE TEACHING LEARNING METHODS TOWARDS THE SELF-EFFIFACY OF THERAPEUTIC COMMUNICATION IN MIDWIFERY STUDENTS IN CLINICAL PRACTICE Dwi Rahma Wati; Ova Emilia; Yekti Satriandari; Yoyo Suhoyo
Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia: The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education Vol 9, No 2 (2020): July
Publisher : Asosiasi Institusi Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jpki.47364

Abstract

Background: One of the competencies that must be mastered by health workers is therapeutic communication. Effective communication can increase patient satisfaction but on the contrary communication failure can cause poor information exchange, misdiagnosis, decreased participation and stressors in patients, and even death. Poor communication can be caused by low self efficacy. Bedside teaching learning through preseptor modeling can affect self efficacy in communication. The study aimed to determine the effectiveness of bedside teaching learning method towards the self-efficacy of therapeutic communication in midwifery students in clinical practice.Method: This research is a quantitative descriptive study. The research sample was all midwifery students in the fifth semester who had clinical practice at PKU Muhammadiyah Hospital of Gamping, and Queen Latifa Hospital as many as 20 students. The sampling technique used saturated features. The research instrument used SE-12 and the preceptor’sassessment in bedside teaching. The bivariate analysis used paired t-test and independent t-test.Results: The results showed that the self-efficacy analysis of prior and after bedside teaching therapeutic communication in the certified group obtained mean different of 19.50 and those in the non-certified group obtained mean different of 5.13. There were differences, but not statistically significant with p-value of 0.153.Conclusion: Bedside teaching effectively increased the self-efficacy of midwifery student communication taught by certified preceptors compared to non-certified preceptors. The stages of bedside teaching in the certified group had a betterlevel of preceptor competence than the group that had not been certified. Clinical advisors are suggested to follow preceptorscertification to increase knowledge.
THE USE OF REFLECTION FOR SPIRITUAL CARE LEARNING IN CLINICAL EDUCATION: A PILOT STUDY Gisella Anastasia; Yoyo Suhoyo; Prattama Santoso Utomo; Doni Widyandana
Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia: The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education Vol 9, No 3 (2020): November
Publisher : Asosiasi Institusi Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jpki.56923

Abstract

Background: Indonesian society assume spirituality as an important aspect in life especially in sickness. Spiritual care can restore patients’ quality of life by providing them comfort, strength, and compassion. Because lack of education about spiritual care, doctors often feel not fully equipped. Reflection has proven to increase awareness of spiritual care, but the impact of this method still needs further research. This study aims to explore the impact of reflection on student awareness about spiritual care.Methods: This study used Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis with reflective writing and in-depth interview. Nine clinical medical students divided into four groups which was facilitated by clinical teacher. Intervention were three reflective writings interspersed with two small group discussion. The writings were analyzed using Transtheoretical Model to identify behavioral change then content analysis for the transcript to explore the study’s impact and the feasibility.Results: Five students increased their awareness because clinical experience, time-management, writing volume, and reflective thinking. Three students increase faster because learning from peers, engage with patient, and role-model. Two students increase slower because lack understanding of reflection and incorrect facilitators’ feedbacks. Two students stable because lack understanding of discussion and low engagement with patient. One student experienced a decrease because lack of task-commitment and interest. One student did not get awareness because difficulty interpreting emotions.Conclusion: Reflection method can be used to teach spiritual care to clinical medical students by considering several factors that might play a role. Further research with improvement to the method is still needed. Keywords: Spiritual care; spirituality; reflection; clinical medical student
FEEDBACK THAT AFFECTS FIRST YEAR MEDICAL STUDENT’S LEARNING IN HIGH POWER DISTANCE & COLLECTIVISM CULTURE Ida Ayu Triastuti; Gandes Retno Rahayu; Yoyo Suhoyo
Berkala Ilmiah Kedokteran Duta Wacana Vol 4, No 2 (2019): BERKALA ILMIAH KEDOKTERAN DUTA WACANA
Publisher : Faculty of Medicine Universitas Kristen Duta Wacana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (7686.452 KB) | DOI: 10.21460/bikdw.v4i2.149

Abstract

Background: Constructive feedback is an essential component of learning for medical undergraduate. Communication culture of high-power distance and collectivism might have influence in shaping students' perception of the benefit of feedback. Aim: This study is aimed to identify feedback characteristic which associated with students' perception of learning benefit, and further explored the mechanism feedback influence on students learning process. Method: This is a mixed method study, with explanatory sequential approach. The setting is first-year medical undergraduate students at FK UKDW who enrolled in skill lab class (pulmonary physical examination). The first phase is a quantitative study using questionnaire on feedback characteristics and student’s perception of feedback benefits, further analysed with linear regression methods. The next phase is an interview study on selected students with semi-structured questions, and further analysed with thematic analysis. Result: There are 82 students who returned the questionnaire. Quantitative analysis showed that feedback including comparison to standard (B=2,26; p = 0,003) and follow-up planning (B=3,47; p < 0,001) are associated with perceived benefit by students. Further interview of 11 students discovered that students have received clear and concise outline through the feedback process. On the other hand, the communication culture, poor execution of feedback process, and interconnectedness between each characteristic may influence the students' perception of benefits. Conclusion: Feedback is beneficial for medical undergraduate students in high power distance and collectivist culture, specifically feedback with comparison to standard and follow-up planning.