cover
Contact Name
Arini Azka Muthia
Contact Email
aazkamuthia@gmail.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
aazkamuthia@gmail.com
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota bengkulu,
Bengkulu
INDONESIA
University Of Bengkulu Law Journal
Published by Universitas Bengkulu
ISSN : 25411926     EISSN : 25287656     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
UBELAJ (University of Bengkulu Law Journal) aims to provide a venue for academicians, researchers and practitioners for publishing the original research articles or review articles. The scope of the articles published in this journal deal with a broad range of topics in the fields of Criminal Law, Civil Law, Constitutional Law, International Law, Administrative Law, Islamic Law, Medical Law, Environmental Law and another section related contemporary issues in law. UBELAJ publish twice in a year, April and October.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 111 Documents
PROBLEMS CAUSED BY SMALL PIG FARM ODOR AROUND THE WESTERN SONGKHLA LAKE BASIN Papontee Teeraphan
University Of Bengkulu Law Journal Vol 2, No 1 (2017): APRIL
Publisher : Universitas Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (425.256 KB) | DOI: 10.33369/ubelaj.2.1.1-13

Abstract

Pollution is currently a significant issue arising awareness throughout the world. In Thailand, pollution can often be seen in any part of the country. Air pollution is pointed as an urgent problem. This pollution has not damaged only to human health and lives, it has destroyed environment, and possibly leading to violence. In Phattalung, air pollution is affecting to the residents’ lives. Especially, when the residents who are mostly agriculturists have not managed the waste resulted from the farm. In Phattalung, at the moment, there are many pig farms, big and small. Some of them are only for consuming for a family, some, however, are being consumed for the business which pigs will be later purchased by big business companies. Therefore, concerning pollution, the researcher and the fund giver were keen to focus on the points of the air pollution of the small pig farms. This is because it has been said that those farms have not been aware on the pollution issue caused by the farms. Farm odor is very interesting which can probably lead to following problems. The researcher also hopes that this research can be used as a source of information by the government offices in order to be made even as a policy or a proper legal measurement. As the results, the study shows that, first, more than half of the samples had smelled the farm odor located nearby their communities, though it had not caused many offenses. Second, the majority had decided not to act or response in order to solve the odor problem, but some of them had informed the officers. The proper solutions in reducing offenses caused by pig farm odor were negotiation and mediation. Last, the majority does not perceive about the process under the Public Health Act B.E. 2535.
HARMONIZATION OF ASEAN LAWS ON PROTECTION OF MIGRANT WORKERS AGAINST HUMAN TRAFFICKING Zainal Amin Ayub; Zuryati Mohammed Yusoof
University Of Bengkulu Law Journal Vol 3, No 2 (2018): OCTOBER
Publisher : Universitas Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (460.846 KB) | DOI: 10.33369/ubelaj.3.2.99-108

Abstract

The realization of ASEAN Community 2015 opens a hope of a new era for migrant workers amongst its member countries. The hope is on the comprehensive legal protection for migrant workers against injustice as well as trafficking in the ASEAN Communities. This article aims to looks into the legal framework within few ASEAN countries that provides protection for migrant workers against injustice and human trafficking, and the available recourse to justice for them in case they become the victim of human trafficking. Malaysia becomes the case study as lesson learnt. Doctrinal methodology is adopted in this article. It is found that, in regards to protection of migrant workers, despite the establishment of ASEAN Community 2015, the laws on this regard are scattered. A few members of ASEAN Community are reluctant to embed the protection of migrant workers into their national laws. Also, it is found that ASEAN country like Malaysia has the laws at national level to curb human trafficking of migrant workers. However, though the laws seem to be comprehensive, the effectiveness of its implementation and enforcement of the laws are yet to be seen. It is suggested that the laws on protection of migrant workers to be harmonized and standardised between members of ASEAN Community and the cooperation within members of ASEAN should be enhanced at every level.
DASAR FILOSOFIS DAN INKLUSIVITAS GUGATAN SEDERHANA DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PERDATA Anita Afriana
University Of Bengkulu Law Journal Vol 3, No 1 (2018): APRIL
Publisher : Universitas Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (467.414 KB) | DOI: 10.33369/ubelaj.3.1.1-14

Abstract

The fast litigation procedure stipulates under the Supreme Court Regulation No. 2 year of 2015. That mechanism only requires small amount of permitted claim, it is 200 million Rupiah in maximum, it also settles claims in a very fast manner, 25 days in maximum. This fast procedural mechanism allocated to settle private dispute is called as “the small claims court”, in which, it is already implemented either in states with the civil law system or the common law system. The research methodology used in this article is juridical-normative and juridical kualitative analyze, to aim the SCC phisophy in Indonesia and the effectivity in enacting this mechanism of small claims court as one of the states that enact the civil judicial system. The results shows that the SCC  in indonesia is an advancement as a means of access to justice, in short it is a simple and inexpensive procedure.  that the fast litigation procedure stipulates under the Supreme Court Regulation No. 2 year of 2015 is effectively enacted in civil judicial system in Indonesia. With society needs nowadays, the effort to increasing good services towards justice seeker, it’s inclusive because of the different mechanism of general judicial system under  HIR/RBG, it is not just about time but also with a judge investigation, simple evidentiary, and without legal effort
PENERAPAN PRINSIP UNCITRAL MODEL LAW DALAM PEMBUKTIAN KASUS TRANSAKSI ELEKTRONIK DI INDONESIA Asep Ahmad Fauji
University Of Bengkulu Law Journal Vol 2, No 1 (2017): APRIL
Publisher : Universitas Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (462.124 KB) | DOI: 10.33369/ubelaj.2.1.90-102

Abstract

Pemanfaatan teknologi  informasi  tidak  lagi  dapat  dilakukan melalui sistem hukum konvensional, mengingat kegiatannya tidak lagi bisa dibatasi oleh teritorial suatu Negara. Persoalan yang lebih luas juga terjadi untuk masalah-masalah keperdataan, karena saat ini transaksi e-commerce telah menjadi bagian dari perniagaan nasional dan internasional. Pelanggaran hukum dengan instrumen teknologi informasi seringkali sulit dipecahkan. Tulisan ini akan membahas terkait dengan perapan prinsip UNCITRAL Model Law dalam pembuktian kasus transaksi elektronik di Indonesia dan persyaratan hukum terhadap data elektronik sebagai bentuk pembuktian kasus transaksi elektronik di Indonesia. Kesimpulan yang didapatkan yakni Indonesia telah menerapkan prinsip UNCITRAL Model Law dalam Pembuktian Kasus Transaksi Elektronik dengan pendekatan yang secara fugsinya sama dan pendekatan kenetralan suatu teknologi. Penyelesaian kasus e-commerce di Indonesia harus memenuhi persyaratan hukum terhadap data elektronik sebagai bentuk pembuktian kasus transaksi elektronik dengan mengandung unsur tertulis, syarat adanya tanda tangan, dan juga keaslian.
PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA DI INDONESIA MELAUI HUKUM PIDANA POSITIF DAN HUKUM PIDANA ISLAM Safaruddin Harefa
University Of Bengkulu Law Journal Vol 4, No 1 (2019): APRIL
Publisher : Universitas Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (586.8 KB) | DOI: 10.33369/ubelaj.4.1.35-58

Abstract

Hukum pidana di Indonesia saat ini dirasakan kurang memenuhi suatu keadilan serta ketentraman dalam kehidupan bermasyarakat, sebab banyaknya suatu tindak pidana yang terjadi akhir-akhir ini menjadikan hukum itu tidak lagi sebagai kontrol sosial melainkan banyaknya orang-orang tertentu memanfaatkan hukum sebagai corong untuk berbuat kejahatan, ini disebabkan kurangnya efek jera yang ditimbulkan oleh hukum pidana itu sendiri. Tulisan ini merupakan analisa bagaimana hukum pidana itu mampu mencapai tujuan hukum yang dicita-citakan yang di analisa dari kajian penegakan hukum pidana yang saat ini berlaku dan penegakan hukum melalui hukum pidana islam. Hasil dari analisa ini menyatakan bahwa saat ini di Indonesia masih menggunakan hukum pidana (hukum positif) yang bersumber (ruh dan jiwa) yang dibawa oleh penjajah yaitu Hukum Negara Belanda, sampai saat ini belum adanya suatu pembaharuan hukum pidana yang secara Menyeluruh melainkan hanya pembaharuan secara parsial. Selanjutnya hasil dari analisa juga menerangkan bahwa pemberlakuan hukum pidana islam perlu di pertimbangkan, sebab dalam hukum pidana islam menurut analisa penulis bahwa hukum islam akan mampu memberikan suatu efek jera terhadap suatu perbuatan yang telah dilakukan oleh pelaku tindak pidana, maka dari itu perlu adanya pembaharuan hukum pidana dengan mengadopsi beberapa ruh dari hukum pidana islam.
PEMBUANGAN BAYI DALAM PERSPEKTIF PENELANTARAN ANAK Airlangga Justitia
University Of Bengkulu Law Journal Vol 3, No 1 (2018): APRIL
Publisher : Universitas Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (570.59 KB) | DOI: 10.33369/ubelaj.3.1.23-40

Abstract

The act of disposing of a newly born child is obviously a criminal offense, since this act does not necessarily reflect the humanism side of the human person. an act which the rule of law is proclaimed as a prohibited act is called a criminal act or it may be referred to as a crime. According to its nature and nature, these criminal acts are unlawful acts. These acts can also harm society, in the sense of contradicting or impeding the implementation of the social order of society that is considered good and fair. There are 3 (three) legal instruments that contain criminal sanctions against the perpetrators of the crime of infant / child disposal namely the Criminal Code, Law No. 23 of 2004 on the Elimination of Domestic Violence, and Law No. 35 of 2014 on Child Protection. However, newly born child abusers are still not eliminated, and one of the factors is the lack of conviction of criminal prosecution.
LANGKAH PENCEGAHAN KONFLIK BERSENJATA MAHFUD MAHFUD
University Of Bengkulu Law Journal Vol 1, No 1 (2016): OCTOBER
Publisher : Universitas Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (567.715 KB) | DOI: 10.33369/ubelaj.1.1.68-85

Abstract

Abstract Completion of the armed conflict in both the legal and political framework set in customary international law and the Hague Convention I of 1899 and 1907 on the peaceful resolution of disputes, as well as the Charter of the United Nations. Mechanisms for resolving armed conflicts as well as measures to prevent the emergence of armed conflict refers to the two methods of dispute resolution, the peaceful resolution of disputes and the settlement of disputes by force or violence. Patterns in the context of conflict resolution approach more focused on the efforts of early stage to prevent the emergence of armed-conflict. Such efforts can be done with diplomacy and political mediation efforts by involving the various parties that are considered to be actors of peace. While humanitarian law in the context of normative law enforcement efforts imprinted on the situation of the ongoing war, one of its forms through foreign intervention in the ongoing armed conflict itself. In the present context of the humanitarian intervention of humanitarian law known as the Responsibility to Protect (R to P). In addition through the UN mechanism for the continuous efforts of the international community to prevent the emergence of armed conflict also involving a number of other actors who can be considered a partner for peace. One of them involving specific groups that can be considered a party to break the chain of armed conflict itself. One of them is through the mechanism of the Kimberley Process.
TINJAUAN HUKUM PELELANGAN BENDA BERHARGA MUATAN KAPAL TENGGELAM (BMKT) Vinca Pretylia
University Of Bengkulu Law Journal Vol 2, No 2 (2017): OCTOBER
Publisher : Universitas Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (516.974 KB) | DOI: 10.33369/ubelaj.2.2.165-184

Abstract

Shipwrecks in Indonesian waters have potential of valuable objects, called Vessels of Sinking Vessels (BMKT), in the appointment of BMKT require high costs, so the government must collaborate with investors. The problems formulated in this study relate to what is the legal basis in the Auction of Vessels of Sinking Vessels (BMKT). The purpose of this research is to obtain comprehensive knowledge about the legal arrangements related to the auction of valuable objects containing sinking vessels (BKMT). This research is a normative legal research using secondary data. The results of this study, there is an inventory of the rules regarding BMKT and there are actions taken by the Indonesian government related to the BMKT case in Indonesia, namely establishing the BMKT Moratorium and the issuance of Presidential Regulation Number 44 Year 2016 concerning List of Closed Business Fields and Business Fields Open with Requirements in the Field of Investment stating that the Appointment of BMKT as a Closed Business Field.
PENERAPAN PRINSIP ULTRA PETITA DALAM HUKUM ACARA PIDANA DIPANDANG DARI ASPEK PERTIMBANGAN HUKUM PUTUSAN PERKARA PIDANA Yagie Sagita Putra
University Of Bengkulu Law Journal Vol 2, No 1 (2017): APRIL
Publisher : Universitas Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (388.427 KB) | DOI: 10.33369/ubelaj.2.1.14-28

Abstract

Ultra petita, demikian istilahnya, dimana hakim menjatuhkan putusan atas perkara yang tidak dituntut atau meluluskan lebih dari pada yang diminta, dengan kata lain ultra petita adalah penjatuhan putusan oleh hakim atas perkara yang tidak dituntut atau mememutus melebihi dari pada yang diminta. Dalam konteks Hukum Acara Pidana, Putusan  tersebut dikeluarkan, dikarenakan  dakwaan  Jaksa  Penuntut  Umum  kurang  sempurna  dan sebagai  wujud  pengembangan  hukum  progresif  dimana  Hakim  bukan hanya sebagai  corong  undang-undang  tetapi  merupakan  corong  keadilan yang  mampu memberikan  putusan  yang  berkualitas  dengan  menemukan  sumber  hukum  yang tepat.Bahwa  putusan  hakim  tidak harus  berpedoman  pada  undang-undang sebagai prosedur mutlak sebab bila putusan hakim hanya berlandaskan prosedur, maka  roh  dan  cita-cita  dari  Hukum  Pidana (Hukum  Materiil) maupun  Hukum Acara  Pidana (Hukum  Formil) yang  tertuang  dalam  asas-asas  hukum  tersebut tidak  akan  bisa  diwujudkan. Hal  ini  bukan  berarti  prosedur  hukum  yang  ada dalam  undang-undang  tidak  perlu  dilaksanakan  tetapi  harus  diterapkan  secara cerdas  dan  bijaksana,  serta  diharapkan  semua  pihak  agar  lebih  kritis dalam menyikapi perkembangan hukum demi kesejahteraan bersama. Untuk  meneliti  permasalahan  ini  penulis  berusaha  menganalisis Yurisprudensi  Mahkamah  Agung NO.  675  K/Pid/1987,  tanggal  21-03-1989  dan putusan Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Nomor : 17/PID.SUS/TPK/2014/PN.JKT.PST. dikaitkan dengan Hukum Acara Pidana, dengan menggunakan kajian dari segi filosofis dan yuridis.
KEADILAN RESTORATIF SEBAGAI ALTERNATIF DALAM PENYELESAIAN TINDAK PIDANA DAN PENGARUHNYA DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA DI INDONESIA Henny Saida Flora
University Of Bengkulu Law Journal Vol 3, No 2 (2018): OCTOBER
Publisher : Universitas Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (440.967 KB) | DOI: 10.33369/ubelaj.3.2.142-158

Abstract

Sistem hukuman pidana dalam KUHP pada dasarnya masih mempertahankan paradigma retributif, yaitu memberikan pembalasan yang sesuai untuk kejahatan yang dilakukan oleh pelaku dan masih fokus pada penuntutan pelaku kejahatan, belum memperhatikan pemulihan kerugian. dan penderitaan para korban hilang karena kejahatan. Paradigma retributif dengan tujuan untuk memberikan efek jera bagi pelaku untuk tidak mengulangi kejahatan lagi dan mencegah masyarakat melakukan kejahatan. Penggunaan paradigma retributif belum mampu memulihkan kerugian dan penderitaan yang dialami korban. Meskipun pelaku telah dinyatakan bersalah dan dijatuhi hukuman, kondisi korban tidak bisa kembali normal. Dengan kelemahan ini, muncul gagasan tentang sistem hukuman yang berorientasi pada pemulihan korban dan penderitaan korban, yang disebut keadilan restoratif, karena korban adalah pihak yang paling dirugikan karena kejahatan. Dengan menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dapat disimpulkan bahwa penyelesaian kejahatan dengan peradilan restoratif dapat mengakomodasi kepentingan para pihak, termasuk korban karena korban terlibat dalam penentuan sanksi bagi pelaku. Keadilan restoratif mengembalikan konflik ke pihak yang paling terkena dampak - korban, pelaku, dan masyarakat, dan mengutamakan kepentingan mereka. Dengan penegakan hukum melalui peradilan restoratif diharapkan bahwa kerugian dan penderitaan yang dialami oleh korban dan keluarga mereka dapat dipulihkan dan beban rasa bersalah para penjahat dapat dikurangi karena mereka telah menerima pengampunan dari korban atau keluarganya. 

Page 2 of 12 | Total Record : 111