cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
Notaire@fh.unair.ac.id
Phone
0315023151
Journal Mail Official
Notaire@fh.unair.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Dharmawangsa Dalam Selatan, Surabaya 60286 Indonesia
Location
Kota surabaya,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Notaire
Published by Universitas Airlangga
ISSN : -     EISSN : 26559404     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
The name e-Journal (Notaire) is taken from French which means Notary. The Notaire name is also an acronym of Kenotariatan Airlangga E-Journal (The Airlangga E-Journal Notary). The name selection is based on the specificity of this journal as a journal belonging to the Master Program of Master of Notary of Airlangga University. This journal was established as a means for students of the Master Program of Notary in particular and the academic community in general to share ideas and ideas related to legal issues in the field of notary.
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 220 Documents
 13   14   15   16   17 
Front Matter Volume 6 No. 1, February 2023 Front Matter
Notaire Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): NOTAIRE
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

-
Problematika Kepailitan Transnasional Terhadap Pengurusan dan Pemberesan Aset Debitur Pailit Zakia Fhadillah; Ni Made Yordha Ayu Astiti; Mochamad Cholil; Muhammad Amirul Alfan; Maghfirah Aliefia
Notaire Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): NOTAIRE
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/ntr.v6i2.43545

Abstract

AbstractDecisions regarding bankruptcy issued by the Indonesian Commercial Court have several legal consequences. One of the legal consequences that arises is regarding the legal authority of the debtor to be able to manage his assets. Since the bankruptcy decision, the debtor’s assets will be subject to general confiscation. However, in implementing the bankruptcy decision, managing the assets of a bankrupt debtor is not as easy as one might imagine. Therefore, this article was created to analyze problems regarding the implementation of bankruptcy decisions such as the authority of foreign courts where the bankrupt debtor’s assets are located to be able to confiscate and auction off the debtor’s assets abroad if the debtor is declared bankrupt by the Indonesian Commercial Court. As well as regarding the status of the curator appointed by the Indonesian Commercial Court. The research in this article is legal research. This research uses statutory approach (statute approach), comparative approach (comparative approach), and conceptual approach (conceptual approach). The results of this study indicate that the implementation of bankruptcy decisions from the Indonesian Commercial Court cannot be executed immediately for the management and settlement of bankrupt debtor assets by the curator. So that finally raises a question about the status of the curator appointed by the Indonesian Commercial Court.Keywords: Bankruptcy; Transnational Bankruptcy; Debtor Assets. AbstrakPutusan pailit Pengadilan Niaga Indonesia memiliki beberapa akibat hukum. Salah satu akibat hukum yang ditimbulkannya berkaitan dengan kemampuan hukum debitur untuk menguasai harta kekayaannya. Harta debitur pada umumnya akan disita sebagai akibat putusan pailit. Namun, mengelola aset debitur pailit setelah keputusan pailit dibuat lebih sulit dari yang diperkirakan. Tujuan artikel ini adalah untuk membahas masalah pelaksanaan putusan pailit, seperti kewenangan pengadilan asing untuk menyita dan menjual aset debitur pailit di luar Indonesia. Juga mengenai status kurator yang diangkat oleh Pengadilan Niaga Indonesia. Penelitian dalam artikel ini adalah penelitian hukum. Pendekatan yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach), pendekatan komparatif (comparative approach), dan pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach). Hasil akhir dari penelitian ini menyatakan bahwasanya pelaksanaan putusan pailit dari Pengadilan Niaga Indonesia tidak bisa untuk dapat segera dilaksanakan mengenai pengurusan dan penyelesaian harta kekayaan debitur pailit oleh kurator. Sehingga akhirnya menimbulkan pertanyaan tentang status dari kurator yang diangkat oleh Pengadilan Niaga Indonesia.Kata Kunci: Pailit; Kepailitan Transnasional; Aset Debitur.
Prinsip Kepemilikan Bersama Hak Cipta Dalam Naskah Film Soekarno Ananda Elena Nurul Izzah
Notaire Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): NOTAIRE
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/ntr.v6i2.43583

Abstract

AbstractCopyright ownership dispute in the Soekarno film script between Rachmawati Soekarnoputri and PT. Tripar Multivision Plus, Ram Jethmal Punjabi, and Hanung Bramantyo have obtained permanent legal force, namely through Supreme Court Decision Number 305K/Pdt.Sus HKI/2014. The purpose of this study is to examine the status of Rachmawati Soekarnoputri in the film “Soekarno: Indonesia Merdeka” and its legal consequences, and to examine the principle of co-ownership of copyright in the film script “Soekarno: Indonesia Merdeka”. This study applies normative legal research methods, using a statutory, conceptual, and case approach. The results of the study show that the status of Rachmawati Soekarnoputri in Soekarno’s film only acts as a reference source (in addition to other reference sources). So based on the Copyright Law, the creator of the Soekarno film scenario, namely Ben Sihombing, was the owner of the copyright, and not Rachmawati Soekarnoputri. As for the principle of joint ownership, the laws and regulations in Indonesia still do not accommodate the joint ownership of the idea reference for filmmaking. However, in the implementation of moral rights, Rachmawati Soekarnoputri actually can still be named as a reference in the film as a form of joint ownership.Keywords: Soekarno Films; Copyright; Collective Ownership. AbstrakSengketa kepemilikan hak cipta dalam naskah Film Soekarno antara Rachmawati Soekarnoputri dengan PT. Tripar Multivision Plus, Ram Jethmal Punjabi, dan Hanung Bramantyo telah memperoleh kekuatan hukum tetap, yakni melalui Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 305K/Pdt.Sus HKI/2014. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengkaji status Rachmawati Soekarnoputri dalam Film “Soekarno: Indonesia Merdeka” dan akibat hukumnya, serta mengkaji prinsip kepemilikan bersama hak cipta dalam naskah Film “Soekarno: Indonesia Merdeka”. Penelitian ini mengaplikasikan metode penelitian hukum normatif, dengan menggunakan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan kasus. Hasil penelitian mengetengahkan bahwa status Rachmawati Soekarnoputri dalam Film Soekarno hanya bertindak sebagai salah satu sumber referensi (selain sumber-sumber referensi lainnya). Sehingga berdasarkan UU Hak Cipta, pencipta skenario Film Soekarno, yakni Ben Sihombing lah selaku pemilik hak cipta, dan bukannya Rachmawati Soekarnoputri. Adapun berkaitan dengan prinsip kepemilikan bersama, peraturan perundang-undangan di Indonesia masih belum mengakomodir berkenaan dengan kepemilikan bersama terhadap pemberi referensi ide terhadap pembuatan film. Namun demikian, dalam pelaksanaan hak moral, Rachmawati Soekarnoputri sejatinya tetap dapat dicantumkan namanya sebagai pemberi refrensi dalam film tersebut sebagai wujud dalam hal kepemilikan bersama. Kata Kunci: Film Soekarno; Hak Cipta; Kepemilikan Bersama.
Perlindungan Hukum bagi Direksi atas Tagihan Pajak yang Masih Terutang Pasca Pemberesan Harta Pailit Ketut Octania Fineta Diarsa; Etik Yuniati; Surahmat; Tofani Yurisar Akbar
Notaire Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): NOTAIRE
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/ntr.v6i2.43650

Abstract

AbstractThe provisions of Article 2 paragraph (6) and Article 32 paragraph (2) of Law Number 6 of 1983 concerning General Provisions and Tax Procedures as last amended by Government Regulation in Lieu of Law Number 2 of 2022 concerning Job Creation (UU KUP) resulted in the Directors of a Limited Liability Company having been terminated bankruptcy can be held personally responsible for tax debt bills that are still outstanding after the settlement of bankruptcy assets. As with the principle of the Business Judgement Rule, directors who run a company with the principles of Good Corporate Governance will avoid being held personally liable when a Limited Liability Company is declared bankrupt. However, the Directorate General of Taxes continues to submit tax debt claims to the directors personally because the bankruptcy assets of the Limited Liability Company are not sufficient to pay off the tax debt. Meanwhile, the tax debt continues to arise because the NPWP of the Limited Liability Company after the settlement is still active. The NPWP which is still active causes the dissolution of a Limited Liability Company that is no longer in operation to be invalid because there is an accrued tax debt that must be paid. This research is normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. This research is expected to provide answers to legal protection and certainty for directors and for Limited Liability Companies which will be dissolved after the process of settling bankruptcy assets is completed by the curator.Keywords: Bankruptcy; Tax Debt; Business Judgement Rule. AbstrakKetentuan Pasal 2 ayat (6) dan Pasal 32 ayat (2) Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 1983 tentang Ketentuan Umum dan Tata Cara Perpajakan sebagaimana diubah terakhir dengan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2022 tentang Cipta Kerja (UU KUP) mengakibatkan Direksi Perseroan Terbatas yang telah diputus pailit dapat diminta pertanggungjawaban secara pribadi atas tagihan utang pajak yang masih terutang pasca pemberesan harta pailit. Sebagaimana prinsip Business Judgement Rule maka direksi yang menjalankan perusahaan dengan kaidah Good Corporate Governance akan terhindar dari pertanggungjawaban secara pribadi ketika Perseroan Terbatas diputus pailit. Akan tetapi Direktorat Jenderal Pajak tetap mengajukan tagihan utang pajak ke pribadi direksi karena harta pailit dari Perseroan Terbatas tidak cukup untuk melunasi utang pajak. Sementara itu, utang pajak tetap timbul karena NPWP Perseroan Terbatas pasca dilakukan pemberesan masih dalam keadaan aktif. NPWP yang masih aktif tersebut mengakibatkan pembubaran Perseroan Terbatas yang sudah tidak beroperasi menjadi tidak dapat dilakukan karena terdapat utang pajak yang masih harus dibayar. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan kasus. Penelitian ini diharapkan dapat memberikan jawaban atas perlindungan dan kepastian hukum bagi direksi dan bagi Perseroan Terbatas yang akan dibubarkan setelah proses pemberesan harta pailit selesai dilakukan oleh kurator. Kata Kunci: Pailit; Utang Pajak; Business Judgement Rule.
Keabsahan Bukti Elektronik Dalam Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang di Pasar Modal Beserta Akibat Hukumnya Modesta Anen M. Batmomolin; Moh. Saleh
Notaire Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): NOTAIRE
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/ntr.v6i2.43788

Abstract

AbstractDevelopments in technology and informatics have led to developments in crimes that are easier and can be carried out anywhere using smartphones. Money laundering is a crime that has an impact on development and social welfare. The capital market is a very attractive field for money laundering. The purpose of this study is to determine the validity of electronic evidence and legal consequences in money laundering crimes committed in the capital market. The research method used is normative law using an analytical approach to legislation. The research results will be presented in a qualitative descriptive manner, so that data can be obtained that can compare theories with existing facts. The results of the study show that evidence in the form of electronic information and documents is valid to be used in deciding on money laundering crimes. As a result of the law, perpetrators of money laundering in the capital market can be sentenced to a maximum fine of Rp. 10,000,000,000,00,- (ten billion rupiahs) or imprisonment for a maximum of 20 (twenty) years in accordance with the articles in law number 8 of 2010.Keywords: Money Laundering; Electronic Media; Capital Markets. AbstrakPerkembangan teknologi dan informatika menyebabkan perkembangan dalam tindak pidana kejahatan yang lebih mudah dan dilakukan dimanapun mengguanakan telepon cerdas. Pencucian uang merupakan kejahatan yang memberikan dampak dalam pembangunan dan kesejahteraan sosial. Pasar modal menjadi ladang yang sangat menarik untuk melakukan pencucian uang. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui keabsahan alat bukti elektronik dan akibat hukum dalam tindak pidana pencucian uang yang dilakukan di pasar modal. Metode penelitian yang digunakan yaitu hukum normatif menggunakan pendekatan analitis perundang-undangan. Hasil penelitian akan disajikan secara deskriptif kualitatif, sehingga didapat data yang dapat membandingkan teori-teori dengan fakta yang ada. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan jika alat bukti berupa informasi dan dokumen elektronik sah digunakan dalam memutuskan pidana pencucian uang. Akibat hukum pelaku pencucian uang di pasar modal dapat dijatuhi hukuman pidana denda paling banyak Rp. 10.000.000.000,00,- (sepuluh miliar rupiah) maupun kurungan penjara paling lama 20 (dua puluh) tahun penjara sesuai dengan pasal-pasal dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2010. Kata Kunci: Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang; Media Elektronik; Bursa Efek.
Pengaturan Perkawinan Beda Agama Antara Penganut Agama Islam dan Katolik, Studi Kasus: Penetapan No. 916/Pdt.P/2022/PN Sby Astrid Amidiaputri Hasyyati; Budi Hermono; Nurul Hikmah
Notaire Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): NOTAIRE
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/ntr.v6i2.44193

Abstract

AbstractMarriage as part of human rights, especially the right to have a family related to aspects of religion, culture, and state legal policies. Indonesia as a constitutional state provides strict marriage arrangements in the Marriage Law. Even so, there is a phenomenon in society related to the existence of interfaith marriages, especially between adherents of Islam and Catholicism. Today the Surabaya District Court determines the continuity of interfaith marriages through Decree No. 916/Pdt.P/2022/PN.Sby. This research is a normative legal research using statutory, conceptual and case approaches. The results of this study confirm that the application of court decisions, especially the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court in interfaith marriages, must be viewed in a casuistic way and not be the same for everyone (erga omnes). This also emphasizes that marriage is always related to aspects and laws of each religion and beliefs held by each. Thus, in cases of interfaith marriages, it is necessary to pay attention to the provisions of Islamic Law and Canon Law or the Church regarding the implementation of interfaith marriages between Muslims and Catholics.Keywords: Interfaith; Marriage; Human Rights. AbstrakPerkawinan sebagai bagian dari hak asasi manusia khususnya hak berkeluarga yang berkaitan dengan aspek keagamaan, kebudayaan, serta kebijakan hukum negara. Indonesia sebagai negara hukum memberikan pengaturan perkawinan secara tegas dalam UU Perkawinan. Meski begitu, terdapat fenomena di masyarakat terkait adanya perkawinan beda agama khususnya antara penganut Agama Islam dengan Agama Katolik. Dewasa ini Pengadilan Negeri Surabaya menetapkan keberlangsungan perkawinan beda agama melalui Penetapan No. 916/Pdt.P/2022/PN.Sby. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual, serta pendekatan kasus. Hasil penelitian ini menegaskan bahwa penerapan putusan pengadilan khususnya yurisprudensi Mahkamah Agung dalam perkawinan beda agama harus dilihat secara kasuistis serta tidak bersifat sama untuk semua orang (erga omnes). Hal ini juga mempertegas bahwa perkawinan selalu berkaitan dengan aspek serta hukum masing-masing agama dan kepercayaan yang dianut oleh masing-masing. Dengan demikian, dalam kasus perkawinan beda agama perlu memperhatikan ketentuan Hukum Islam dan Hukum Kanonik atau Gereja terkait pelaksanaan perkawinan beda agama antara Islam dan Katolik. Kata Kunci: Beda Agama; Hak Asasi Manusia; Perkawinan.
Formulasi Perjanjian Sewa Tanah Guna Karya Pada Desa Adat Bali Ni Nyoman Junita Krisnadiyanti Devi; Arsin Lukman
Notaire Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): NOTAIRE
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/ntr.v6i2.44343

Abstract

AbstractThe Balinese Traditional Village has a traditional village wealth (Padruwen desa adat), one of which is Land for Work which is part of the Padruwen Desa Adat. The issue in this article is the ownership of land for communal work which determines if the land can be rented out with the philosophy of Hinduism namely Tri Hita Karana, then how the provisions of the framework of the lease agreement for land for work use this philosophy. The problem approach to writing is used in the form of a factual approach and a statutory approach. It’s concluded, the ownership of Land for Work by confirming with the Decree of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning that the Balinese Traditional Village is the Subject of Joint Ownership Rights (communal) over the Land with the management of the land being carried out by krama desa adat bali which is managed individually, then leasing can be done in the form of a Lease Agreement for Land Use or in the form of a Deed of Granting Building Use Rights for Property Rights, by obtaining approval from a decision by Paruman Desa Adat based on Regional Regulation of the Province of Bali Number 4 of 2019 concerning Traditional Villages in Bali.Keywords: Land for Work; Lease Agreement; Tri Hita Karana Philosophy. AbstrakDesa Adat Bali memiliki Kekayaan desa adat (Padruwen desa adat) yakni salah satunya Tanah Guna Karya bagian Padruwen Desa Adat. Permasalah pada penulisan ini yakni Kepemilikan pada Tanah Guna Karya yang menentukan apabila tanah tersebut dapat disewakan dengan adanya Filosofi ajaran agama Hindu yakni Tri Hita Karana maka bagaimana ketentuan kerangka perjanjian sewa terhadap Tanah Guna Karya dengan filosofi tersebut. Pendekatan permasalahan pada penulisan yakni digunakan berupa pendekatan secara Fakta dan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Dapat disimpulkan, Kepemilikan Tanah Guna Karya dengan ditegaskan dengan adanya Keputusan Menteri Agraria dan Tata Ruang bahwa Desa Adat Bali sebagai Subyek Hak Kepemilikan Bersama (komunal) atas Tanah dengan pengelolaan tanah tersebut dilakukan oleh krama desa adat bali yakni dikelola secara individual, maka dapat dilakukan penyewaan dalam bentuk Surat Perjanjian Sewa Menyewa terhadap Tanah Guna Karya ataupun dalam bentuk Akta Pemberian Hak Guna Bangunan atas Hak Milik, dengan memperoleh persetujuan dari keputusan Paruman Desa Adat berdasarkan Peraturan Daerah Provinsi Bali Nomor 4 Tahun 2019 tentang Desa Adat di Bali. Kata Kunci: Tanah Guna Karya; Perjanjian Sewa Menyewa; Filosofi Tri Hita Karana.
Peralihan Benda Bergerak Aset Harta Bersama Tanpa Persetujuan Salah Satu Pihak Isadora Nathania Edgar; Siti Mahmudah
Notaire Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): NOTAIRE
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/ntr.v6i2.45067

Abstract

AbstractUnlike immovable thing, movable thing can move or be moved more easily. The transfers of movable things are often done with a short and practical process so that the origin of the object is not explored in detail first. This opens a loophole for violations of the authority to act on marital community of property assets in the form of movable things. This research aims to clearly know the authority to act on marital community of property assets and also how about the legal protection in case there is a transfer of movable thing of marital community of property assets without the consent of one of the parties. The research method used in this study is normative-juridical. Based on the results of this research, it is known that eiher the husband or wife individually doesn’t have the authority to make transfer movable thing of marital community of property without the consent of their spouse who is the owner of it too. The legal act of transferring registered movable thing of marital community of property assets that is carried out by the approval of their spouse means violating the authority to act that has been determined by the law which caused the legal action is being invalid and void, while for unregistered movable thing applied Article 1977 of Indonesian Civil Code and there’s protection for receipient of that movable thing in good faith which causes the legal action to remain valid and the aggrieved party can claim compensation from their spouse.Keywords: Marital Community Of Property; Authority To Act; Violation. AbstrakBerbeda dengan benda tak bergerak, benda bergerak bersifat dapat berpindah atau dipindahkan dengan lebih mudah. Peralihan benda bergerak acapkali dilakukan dengan proses singkat dan praktis sehingga asal – usul benda tersebut tidak ditelusuri secara rinci terlebih dahulu. Hal ini membuka celah bagi terjadinya pelanggaran atas kewenangan bertindak terhadap aset harta bersama yang berupa benda bergerak. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui secara jelas kewenangan bertindak atas aset harta bersama dan juga bagaimana perlindungan hukum dalam hal terjadi peralihan benda bergerak aset harta bersama tanpa persetujuan salah satu pihak. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah yuridis normatif. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian diketahui bahwa suami atau istri secara masing – masing tidak memiliki wewenang untuk melakukan perbuatan pengalihan hak atas benda bergerak aset harta bersama tanpa persetujuan kawan kawinnya yang merupakan pemilik juga atas aset harta bersama tersebut. Perbuatan hukum pengalihan aset harta bersama berupa benda bergerak terdaftar yang dilakukan tanpa persetujuan salah satu pihak artinya melanggar wewenang bertindak yang telah ditentukan oleh undang – undang yang mengakibatkan perbuatan hukum tersebut tidak sah dan konsekuensinya adalah batal, sedangkan untuk benda bergerak tidak terdaftar berlaku pasal 1977 Kitab Undang – Undang Hukum Perdata serta terdapat perlindungan bagi penerima pengalihan benda tersebut dengan itikad baik yang mengakibatkan perbuatan hukumnya tetap sah dan pihak yang dirugikan dapat meminta ganti kerugian kepada pihak yang mengalihkan harta bersama tersebut.Kata Kunci: Pailit; Kepailitan Transnasional; Aset Debitur.
Inter-Religious Marriage: A Comparison Analysis of Indonesian Law With Other Countries Tomi Hidayatullah; Oemar Moechthar; Dimipta Aprilia
Notaire Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): NOTAIRE
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/ntr.v6i2.45871

Abstract

AbstractInter-religious marriage is not something new in Indonesia. Judging from the diversity of religions that exist, it does not rule out the possibility of inter-religious marriages. However, inter-religious marriage is still a polemic among the public because the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage, does not explicitly regulate and accommodate the problem of inter-religious marriage, especially after the enactment of Law Number 23 of 2006 concerning Administration Population, the opportunity to legalize inter-religious marriages seems to be wide open, namely with the availability of the option of submitting an application for interfaith marriages to the District Court to issue a stipulation allowing interfaith marriages and instructing Civil Registry office employees to record these interfaith marriages into Register of Marriage Registration. In the end, people often smuggle laws in ways that are not justified, for example by providing false information that they have changed religions and follow the religion of their partners. Or by carrying out marriages abroad which allow marriages of different religions, and then registering them at the civil registry office. This study aims to find out how Indonesian law views inter-religious marriages and how inter-religious marriages are regulated from a comparison of the laws of other countries, such as those in Canada, Singapore, England and the Netherlands. This study uses a statutory approach, namely an approach that is carried out by examining all laws and regulations that are related to the legal issues under study. The results of this study will provide input to Indonesian legislators which can be used as an improvement in regulations, especially provisions related to inter-religious marriage.Keywords: Interfaith Marriage; Reduced Inequalities; Comparative Civil Law; Peace and Justice.
Front Matter Volume 6 No. 2, June 2023 Front Matter
Notaire Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): NOTAIRE
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Volume 6 No. 2, June 2023

Page 15 of 22 | Total Record : 220

 13   14   15   16   17 

Filter by Year

2018 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 8 No. 3 (2025): NOTAIRE Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): NOTAIRE Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): NOTAIRE Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): NOTAIRE Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): NOTAIRE Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): NOTAIRE Vol. 6 No. 3 (2023): NOTAIRE Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): NOTAIRE Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): NOTAIRE Vol. 5 No. 3 (2022): NOTAIRE Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): NOTAIRE Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): NOTAIRE Vol. 4 No. 3 (2021): NOTAIRE Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021): NOTAIRE Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021): NOTAIRE Vol. 3 No. 3 (2020): NOTAIRE Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020): NOTAIRE Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020): NOTAIRE Vol. 2 No. 3 (2019): NOTAIRE Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019): NOTAIRE Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019): NOTAIRE Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018): NOTAIRE Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018): NOTAIRE More Issue