cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
Notaire@fh.unair.ac.id
Phone
0315023151
Journal Mail Official
Notaire@fh.unair.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Dharmawangsa Dalam Selatan, Surabaya 60286 Indonesia
Location
Kota surabaya,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Notaire
Published by Universitas Airlangga
ISSN : -     EISSN : 26559404     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
The name e-Journal (Notaire) is taken from French which means Notary. The Notaire name is also an acronym of Kenotariatan Airlangga E-Journal (The Airlangga E-Journal Notary). The name selection is based on the specificity of this journal as a journal belonging to the Master Program of Master of Notary of Airlangga University. This journal was established as a means for students of the Master Program of Notary in particular and the academic community in general to share ideas and ideas related to legal issues in the field of notary.
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 220 Documents
 15   16   17   18   19 
Front Matter Volume 6 No. 3, October 2023 Matter, Front
Notaire Vol. 6 No. 3 (2023): NOTAIRE
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Front Matter Volume 6 No. 3, October 2023
Back Matter Volume 6 No. 3, October 2023 Matter, Back
Notaire Vol. 6 No. 3 (2023): NOTAIRE
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Back Matter Volume 6 No. 3, October 2023
Perlindungan Hukum bagi Kreditur selama Proses Penggantian Objek Hak Tanggungan Putri, Thabita Kurnia
Notaire Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): NOTAIRE
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/ntr.v7i1.53426

Abstract

AbstractAs distributors of public funds, banks are extensively involved in credit agreements as creditors with their customers as debtors. When entering into a credit agreement, the bank typically requests collateral from the debtor, often tied to the institution of mortgage rights. Issues arise when a credit agreement is in place but the debtor seeks to replace the collateral object of the mortgage, necessitating an analysis of the replacement procedure and legal protection for creditors during this process. This is normative legal research aimed at addressing legal issues through identification, legal reasoning, and analysis using statute and conceptual approaches. The research findings reveal that the replacement of the collateral object of the mortgage has implications for the termination of the grant of mortgage rights, resulting in a void in collateral for creditors. In the absence of tangible collateral, a general guarantee automatically comes into effect, but additional efforts are still required to protect the bank's interests. This involves creating a written agreement to promptly provide replacement collateral or binding the replacement collateral before releasing the existing collateral.Keywords: Legal Protection; Credit Agreement; Mortgage Right. AbstrakSebagai penyalur dana masyarakat, bank banyak terlibat dalam perjanjian kredit sebagai kreditur dengan nasabahnya sebagai debitur. Dalam mengikat perjanjian kredit, tentu bank akan meminta jaminan kebendaan dari debitur, yang umumnya diikat dengan lembaga jaminan hak tanggungan. Permasalahan timbul ketika perjanjian kredit telah berlangsung namun debitur mengajukan penggantian objek jaminan hak tanggungan, sehingga perlu menganalisis prosedur penggantian hingga perlindungan hukum bagi kreditur selama proses penggantian tersebut. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif untuk memecahkan isu hukum dengan melakukan identifikasi, penalaran hukum, serta analisa dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian ditemukan bahwa penggantian objek hak tanggungan berimplikasi terhadap berakhirnya pemberian hak tanggungan sehingga menimbulkan kekosongan jaminan kebendaan bagi kreditur. Ketika tidak ada jaminan kebendaan, maka secara otomatis berlaku jaminan umum, namun masih diperlukan upaya tambahan untuk melindungi kepentingan bank, yaitu dengan membuat perjanjian tertulis untuk segera memberikan jaminan pengganti atau dengan mengikat jaminan pengganti sebelum melepas jaminan yang sudah ada. Kata Kunci: Perlindungan Hukum; Perjanjian Kredit; Hak Tanggungan.
Aturan Hukum Tentang Kendaraan Electric Bus Sebagai Moda Angkutan Umum (Sebuah Studi Perbandingan Antara Indonesia dan Swedia) Fadhilla, Siti Nurul; Sabrie, Hilda Yunita
Notaire Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): NOTAIRE
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/ntr.v7i1.54210

Abstract

AbstractTechnological advances which are also accompanied by awareness of the importance of protecting the environment are one of the reasons for the presence of electric buses in several cities in Indonesia. The presence of electric buses in big Indonesian cities should also be followed by clear regulations, this is important so that when carrying out transportation activities the parties involved will understand their rights and obligations. However, until now there are no clear regulations regarding the regulation of electric buses in Indonesia. For this reason, it is necessary to compare the legal regulations for electric bus vehicles as a mode of public transportation between Indonesia and Sweden. Sweden is the choice in comparing laws regarding electric buses because Sweden is a country that has clear regulations regarding electric buses. So it is hoped that it can provide input for law makers in Indonesia in making regulations regarding electric buses. This research uses normative legal research methods. The research approaches used are the statutory regulatory approach, the conceptual approach and the comparative legal approach.Keywords: Road Transportation; Electric Vehicles; Electric Buses; Comparative Law. AbstrakKemajuan teknologi yang juga di ikuti dengan kesadaran terhadap pentingnya menjaga lingkungan menjadi salah satu alasan kehadiran electric bus pada beberapa kota di Indonesia. Kehadiran electric bus di kota-kota besar Indonesia seharusnya juga diikuti dengan regulasi yang jelas, hal ini penting agar dalam menjalankan kegiatan pengangkutannya para pihak yang terlibat akan memahami hak dan kewajibannya. Namun sampai saat ini belum ada regulasi yang jelas terkait pengaturan electric bus di Indonesia. Untuk itu perlu kiranya melakukan perbandingan pengaturan hukum kendaraan electric bus sebagai moda angkutan umum antara Indonesia dan di Swedia. Swedia menjadi pilihan dalam perbandingan hukum terkait electric bus karena Swedia merupakan negara yang memiliki aturan yang jelas tentang electric bus. Sehingga diharapkan dapat menjadi masukan bagi pembuat undang-undang di Indonesia dalam membuat regulasi tentang electric bus. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normative. Pendekatan penelitian yang di gunakan adalah pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan (statute approach), pendekatan konseptual conceptual approach dan pendekatan perbandingan hukum (comparative approach). Kata Kunci: Transportasi Jalan; Kendaraan Listrik; Electric Bus; Perbandingan Hukum.
Tracing the Continued Existence of Ulayat Land: Granting Management Rights in the Context of Protecting the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Ma'ruf, Ali; Yakin, Moh. Ainul; Putri, Ervita Septyanto; Karimah, Erlisa Akhlakul; Moechthar, Oemar
Notaire Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): NOTAIRE
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/ntr.v7i1.54223

Abstract

AbstractThe issue of granting management rights over ulayat land to third parties is still being debated. Management rights originating from communal land are contrary to the concept of the management right itself. Management rights, which are part of the authority of State control rights, are contradicted by management rights that can originate from ulayat land because indigenous peoples have ulayat rights on the ulayat land. For ulayat land that still has the status of ulayat rights of indigenous peoples, if given management rights, the ulayat rights must be released by the indigenous peoples. Thus, the communal land becomes free state land. The granting of management rights on ulayat land is becoming increasingly relevant and complex. Several changes related regulations have raised significant questions regarding the existence of ulayat land and its impact on the sustainability of the lives of indigenous peoples. To accelerate the economy, the government needs to pay attention to the ulayat rights of indigenous peoples over their ulayat land and ensure that these rights are protected and respected. The government also needs to ensure that effective national law enforcement mechanisms are in place to resolve ulayat land disputes. As a result of the granting of HPL on ulayat land, legal uncertainty arises. The existence of ulayat land for indigenous peoples is very important in maintaining the identity, culture, and sustainability of indigenous peoples. Ulayat rights protect the rights of ownership and management of communal land by indigenous peoples so that they can continue cultural practices, traditions, and customs that have existed since the time of their ancestors.Keywords: Management Rights; Ulayat Land; Indigenous People.
Pertanggungjawaban PPAT terhadap Akta Jual Beli Berdasarkan Keterangan Palsu yang diberikan oleh Para Pihak Adistia, Meisya
Notaire Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): NOTAIRE
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/ntr.v7i1.54512

Abstract

AbstractCertificates serve as proof of ownership of land registered with authorized PPAT approval, PPAT makes the original act for legal process, land can be transferred from one party to another through the process of purchase, sale, or inheritance. PPAT makes the act as proof of the implementation of legal activity related to a particular land. It is very important for PPAT to consider the components involved in making the PPAT act. Although PPAT may experience errors or inaccuracies in the process of making the act, therefore PPAT should be legally liable, and if proved guilty PPAT must be responsible, deliberately or not, legal consequences can be imposed on PPAT based on the degree of inexactitude or error in the sale and sale act made by PPAT. Based on this, the author is interested to raise this issue in a study entitled Responsibility of the Land Act Maker Officer to the validity of the Sale and Sale of Land Act. This research is focused on the type of normative research, i.e. legal research in which data collection is carried out using library research, data collected is analyzed using qualitative analysis described descriptively analytically. PPAT has full responsibility for the Sale and Purchase Act it makes, but if the fault lies on the other party then this is not part of PPAT's responsibility.Keywords: Deed of Sale and Purchase; Principle of Prudence; Criminalization of PPAT. AbstrakAkta jual beli merupakan salah satu hak dan juga kewajiban PPAT. Dikatakan sebagai hak karena PPAT mendapat mandat khusus untuk berurusan dengan ranah ini. Namun dapat juga dikatakan sebagai kewajiban, karena PPAT wajib menaati berbagai aturan dan prinsip prinsip penting dalam pembuatan akta ini. Tugas menerbitkan akta jual beli bagi PPAT bukan sekedar melegalisir akta tersebut namun juga kewajiban untuk menjalankan prinsip kehati hatian dalam pembuatannya termasuk juga ketika berkoordinasi dengan Badan Pertanahan Nasional, PPAT lain, Perangkat Pemerintahan Daerah dan pihak pihak berkepentingan. Peran PPAT untuk memastikan proses pembuatan akta jual beli tidak bermasalah merupakan poin penting dalam penugasan mereka. ketika PPAT menerbitkan akta jual beli berdasarkan keterangan palsu maka ada bentuk bentuk pertanggung jawaban yang harus dipenuhi. Namun, seringkali bentuk pertanggung jawaban itu bermacam macam. PPAT dapat hanya dikenai hukuman perdata saja, namun di sisi lain, kasus tersebut dapat berubah menjadi proses pemidanaan. Proses pemidanaan pada PPAT ini perlu dianalisi agar kemudian tidak terjadi kriminalisasi. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian berbasis analis normatif yang berfokus pada dasar hukum pertanggungjawaban PPAT jika mensahkan akta jual beli yang berdasarkan keterangan para pihak. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini menegaskan bahwa PPAT tidak dapat dihukum seandainya telah memenuhi prinsip prinsip kerja PPAT termasuk di dalamnya unsur kehati hatian serta aturan aturan yang mengikutinya. Namun ketika terbukti adanya Mens Rea atau tindakan jahat yang dibuktikan lewat proses keterangan saksi dan persidangan, maka PPAT harus mempertanggung jawabkan perbuatannya. Kata Kunci: Akta Jual Beli; Asas Prudence; Pemidanaan PPAT.
Concepts and Challenges in Digitalizing the Land Management System in Indonesia Putri, Andrieta Isabella Edwina; Putri, Naurah Dwirengganis Riata
Notaire Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): NOTAIRE
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/ntr.v7i1.54648

Abstract

AbstractThe concept and challenges of digitalizing the land management system in Indonesia are crucial due to the importance of land as a fundamental factor in Indonesian society. A suitable land management system is necessary to accommodate the evolving times, providing certainty and legal protection for its rights holders. This article aims to discuss the concept of modernization in land data management, including the initiation of electronic signatures, electronic Mortgage Rights (HT-el), and the policy of Electronic Land Certificates, which are scheduled to be implemented soon. The discussion will also address the challenges and difficulties in the implementation of digitalization in the field of land related to it. Through qualitative analysis, the research findings reveal that electronic signatures have begun to be applied in several institutions in Indonesia, including in land governance under the Ministry of Agrarian and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency. The HT-el system is also operational, although there are still some challenges in its implementation. However, there are issues related to the transition to Electronic Land Certificates, including concerns about the security of land rights certificate data and the regulation mandating the withdrawal of all physical land rights certificates to be stored in land offices. The implication of this research is that the digitalization of the land management system aims to optimize land services for rights holders and related third parties. However, there are still obstacles, both in terms of infrastructure and practicalities, that need to be addressed to achieve comprehensive digital transformation of the land management system in Indonesia. This article has not been previously published in whole or in part in the form of a journal, working paper, or other published format.Keywords: Land Management; Digitalization; Electronic Signatures; Electronic Mortgage; Electronic Land Certificate.
Pengawasan Terhadap Pengambilan Aset Dalam Perspektif Hukum Persaingan Usaha (Perbandingan Hukum di Indonesia dan Amerika Serikat) Setyawati, Ria; Lolita, Lola
Notaire Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): NOTAIRE
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/ntr.v7i1.54686

Abstract

AbstractDeregulation and debureaucratization policies have had a significant impact, fostering intense business competition in Indonesia, particularly within the digital technology sector. Companies employ various strategies for business development, and one such strategy involves the acquisition of assets, which is governed by Regulation Number 3 of 2019 from the Business Competition Supervisory Commission. This regulation focuses on the assessment of mergers or consolidations of business entities, as well as the acquisition of company shares that may lead to monopolistic practices and/or unfair business competition. The Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) is mandated to oversee asset takeovers with the goal of upholding public integrity and ensuring fair business competition. This research aims to identify a legal comparison of asset takeovers as per business competition law, providing insights and supporting factors for the refinement or elimination of legal rules by scrutinizing the purpose and process of asset takeovers in digital technology sector companies. This study employs a legal approach, a case-based approach, and a comparative approach. The case-based approach involves analyzing asset takeovers, such as Grab's acquisition of Uber in Indonesia and Meta Platform Inc.'s takeover of Within Unlimited in the United States. The comparative approach examines the laws in both Indonesia and the United States. The findings reveal that Regulation KPPU Number 3/2019 serves as a supervisory framework for asset takeovers. However, it highlights that mandatory consultations before the return of assets are not required, and there is an obligatory notification only after the acquisition of assets. This poses challenges for business actors, leading to delays in asset acquisition due to substantial fines and the inefficiency of post-notification procedures mandated by Indonesian law. Notably, this research is an original contribution by the author and does not replicate previous studies on the same topic.Keywords: Asset Acquisition; Supervision; Comparative Law; Business Competition Law. AbstrakKebijaksanaan deregulasi dan debirokratisasi memberikan dampak besar berupa tajamnya persaingan usaha di Indonesia, termasuk pada perusahaan dalam sektor teknologi digital. Perusahaan turut mengembangkan usahanya dengan berbagai macam strategi, salah satunya yaitu pengambilalihan aset yang telah diatur dalam Peraturan Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha Nomor 3 Tahun 2019 Tentang Penilaian Terhadap Penggabungan atau Peleburan Badan Usaha, atau Pengambilalihan Saham Perusahaan yang Dapat Mengakibatkan Terjadinya Praktik Monopoli dan/atau Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat. Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) dituntut untuk melakukan pengawasan pengambilalihan aset dengan menjunjung tinggi integritas masyarakat dan persaingan usaha yang sehat. Penelitian ini mengidentifikasi perbandingan hukum pengambilalihan aset yang ditinjau berdasarkan hukum persaingan usaha dengan tujuan untuk memberi bahan dan faktor penunjang pengembangan atau penghapusan aturan hukum dengan pemantauan tujuan dan proses pengambilalihan aset dalam perusahaan sektor teknologi digital. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan hukum, pendekatan kasus, dan pendekatan komparatif. Pendekatan kasus menggunakan analisa kasus pengambilalihan aset oleh Grab kepada Uber di Indonesia serta pengambilalihan aset oleh Meta Platform Inc. kepada Within Unlimited di Amerika Serikat, sedangkan pendekatan komparatif dengan membandingkan hukum di Indonesia dan Amerika Serikat. Hasil penelitian menemukan bahwa telah diberlakukannya perKPPU 3/2019 sebagai pengawasan dalam melakukan pengambilalihan aset, namun pengawasan dalam bentuk konsultasi yang dilakukan sebelum pengembalian aset bersifat tidak wajib dan adanya notifikasi wajib setelah pengambilalihan aset. Hal tersebut merugikan pelaku usaha yang melakukan keterlambatan pengambilalihan aset dengan dikenakannya denda dalam jumlah besar dan ketidakefisiensian post notification yang diberlakukan hukum Indonesia. Penelitian ini dibuat oleh penulis dengan tidak adanya pengulangan kajian dalam topik yang sama. Kata Kunci: Pengambilalihan Aset; Pengawasan; Perbandingan Hukum; Hukum Persaingan Usaha
Tanggung Jawab Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta Pernyataan Keputusan Sirkuler (Circular Resolution) pada Perseroan Terbatas Permatasari, Anida Setya; Musyafah, Aisyah Ayu
Notaire Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): NOTAIRE
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/ntr.v7i1.54858

Abstract

AbstractCircular decision-making has been stated in Article 91 of the Limited Liability Company Law with a statement that the party holding shares can make binding decisions outside the General Meeting of Shareholders. The decision is made by sending documents containing ideas to be determined by all shareholders and these ideas and obtaining approval from all shareholders, so that a binding decision is made. The purpose of this article is to find out the mechanism of the circular decision and the responsibility of the notary to the deed of circular decision statement. The research model is used, namely normative juridical, so that the result is a circular decision by sending a written proposal so that it is determined by all parties holding shares, then the proposal is to obtain written approval from all parties holding shares. In making a circular decision deed, the notary is not responsible for material truth because the notary makes the deed based on the formal correctness of the Circular Resolution submitted to him.Keywords: Circular Resolution; Notary; RUPS. AbstrakPengambilan putusan sirkuler telah tertuang dalam Pasal 91 Undang-Undang No. 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan dengan pernyataan bahwa pihak yang memegang saham dapat menetapan keputusan yang mengikat di luar Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham. Pengambilan keputusan tersebut melalui pengiriman dokumen yang berisikan gagasan yang hendak ditetapkan oleh seluruh pemegang saham dan gagasan tersebut dan mendapatkan persetujuan dari keseluruhan pemegang saham, sehingga memiliki keputusan mengikat. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui mekanisme dari keputusan sirkuler dan tanggung jawab notaris terhadap akta pernyataan keputusan sirkuler. Dipergunakan model penelitian yakni yuridis normatif sehingga diperoleh hasil bahwa keputusan sirkuler dengan mengirim usul tertulis sehingga ditetapkan oleh keseluruhan pihak yang memegang saham, kemudian usualan tersebut agar mendapatkan persetujuan tertulis oleh keseluruhan pihak yang memegang saham. Dalam pembuatan akta keputusan sirkuler notaris tidak bertanggung jawab atas kebenaran materiil karena notaris membuat akta tersebut berdasarkan kebenaran formil dari Circular Resolution yang diserahkan kepadanya. Kata Kunci: Keputusan Sirkuler; Notaris; RUPS.
Permasalahan dan Solusi Kebijakan Dalam Pemanfaatan Rumah Susun Sewa (Rusunawa) yang Efektif dan Efisien di Kota Surabaya Setiyoningrum, Adinda; Saleh, Moh.
Notaire Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): NOTAIRE
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/ntr.v7i1.55236

Abstract

AbstractOne of the basic human needs is a decent and healthy place to live. Based on the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 20 of 2011 concerning Flats, the state is obliged to fulfill the need for affordable housing for low-income people (MBR). One form of government assistance for MBR is by providing rental public flats (RUSUNAWA). In Surabaya City there are 23 (twenty-three) RUSUNAWA locations managed by the Surabaya City Government, both owned by the Surabaya City Government and managed by the Surabaya City Government. The RUSUNAWA is not only used as a form of government intervention for MBR residents, but also used for the relocation of residents affected by the policing. As a basis for occupancy, a usage permit/lease agreement is required. As time went on, various problems arose in the use of the RUSUNAWA, one of which was in the process of the usage permit/lease agreement. In this study, a discussion was carried out regarding the problems that arise in the use of RUSUNAWA apartments in the city of Surabaya. That is how the process and flow of RUSUNAWA utilization is effective with various conditions that occur, how the form of payment of RUSUNAWA retribution rates is effective and efficient, and what are the actions of the Regional Government to facilitate requests for RUSUNAWA occupants that do not comply with the provisions. The problems that were discussed were problems that occurred in the process of permit use / rental agreement of RUSUNAWA. With this research it is expected to be able to resolve legal issues that occur in the implementation of the use of RUSUNAWA in the city of Surabaya, so that effective and efficient utilization of RUSUNAWA in the city of Surabaya can be realized.Keywords: Public Flats For Rent; The Use Of Rental Public Flats; Surabaya's Rental Public Flats; Policy Solutions. AbstrakSalah satu kebutuhan dasar manusia adalah tempat tinggal yang layak dan sehat. Berdasarkan Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2011 tentang Rumah Susun, negara berkewajiban memenuhi kebutuhan tempat tinggal yang terjangkau bagi masyarakat berpenghasilan rendah (MBR). Salah satu bentuk bantuan Pemerintah untuk MBR adalah dengan penyediaan rumah susun umum sewa(RUSUNAWA). Di Kota Surabaya terdapat 23 (dua puluh tiga) lokasi RUSUNAWA yang dikelola oleh Pemerintah Kota Surabaya, baik yang dimiliki oleh Pemerintah Kota Surabaya maupun dikelola oleh Pemerintah Kota Surabaya. RUSUNAWA tersebut tidak hanya digunakan sebagai bentuk intervensi Pemerintah untuk warga MBR, tetapi juga digunakan untuk tempat relokasi warga yang terdampak penertiban. Sebagai dasar kepenghuniannya, diperlukan adanya izin pemakaian/perjanjian sewa-menyewa. Seiring berjalannya waktu, timbul berbagai permasalahan dalam pemanfaatan RUSUNAWA, salah satunya dalam proses izin pemakaian/perjanjian sewa-menyewanya. Dalam penelitian ini dilakukan pembahasan mengenai permasalahan-permasalahan yang timbul pada pemanfaatan RUSUNAWA di Kota Surabaya. Yaitu bagaimana proses dan alur pemanfaatan RUSUNAWA yang efektif dengan berbagai kondisi yang terjadi, bagaimana bentuk pembayaran tarif retribusi RUSUNAWA yang efektif dan efisien, dan bagaimana tindakan Pemerintah Daerah untuk memfasilitasi permohonan penghuni RUSUNAWA yang tidak sesuai ketentuan. Masalah-masalah yang dilakukan pembahasan adalah masalah yang terjadi dalam proses izin pemakaian/perjanjian sewa-menyewa RUSUNAWA. Dengan penelitian ini diharapkan dapat menyelesaikan permasalahan-permasalahan hukum yang terjadi dalam pelaksanaan pemanfaatan RUSUNAWA di Kota Surabaya, sehingga dapat terwujud pemanfaatan RUSUNAWA yang efektif dan efisien di kota Surabaya. Kata Kunci: Rumah Susun Umum Sewa; Pemanfaatan Rumah Susun Umum Sewa; Rusunawa Surabaya; Solusi Kebijakan.

Page 17 of 22 | Total Record : 220

 15   16   17   18   19 

Filter by Year

2018 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 8 No. 3 (2025): NOTAIRE Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): NOTAIRE Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): NOTAIRE Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): NOTAIRE Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): NOTAIRE Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): NOTAIRE Vol. 6 No. 3 (2023): NOTAIRE Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): NOTAIRE Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): NOTAIRE Vol. 5 No. 3 (2022): NOTAIRE Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): NOTAIRE Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): NOTAIRE Vol. 4 No. 3 (2021): NOTAIRE Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021): NOTAIRE Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021): NOTAIRE Vol. 3 No. 3 (2020): NOTAIRE Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020): NOTAIRE Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020): NOTAIRE Vol. 2 No. 3 (2019): NOTAIRE Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019): NOTAIRE Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019): NOTAIRE Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018): NOTAIRE Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018): NOTAIRE More Issue