cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Hanantyo Sri Nugroho
Contact Email
hanantyo@amikom.ac.id
Phone
+6285726207814
Journal Mail Official
jurnaljspg@amikom.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jalan Ring Road Utara Kecamatan Depok Kabupaten Sleman, D.I. Yogyakarta
Location
Kota yogyakarta,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Journal of Social Politics and Governance (JSPG)
Published by Universitas AMIKOM Yogyakarta
ISSN : 26860279     EISSN : 26858096     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Social Sciences
Journal of Social Politics and Governance (JSPG) (p-ISSN: 2686-0279, e-ISSN: 2685-8096) is published by Government Studies Program, Universitas AMIKOM Yogyakarta twice a year (June and December). JSPG Journal collaborates with ADIPSI (Asosiasi Dosen Ilmu Pemerintahan Seluruh Indonesia) for Reviewer. Since 2019, JSPG Journal has published scientific articles on socio-political issues and community empowerment. The articles have gone through a process of editorial discussion and review, as well as turnitin checking. JSPG Journal aims to provide a discussion platform for academic research and socio-political practice in the fields of political science, government science, leadership studies, policy innovation studies, public administration studies, community social empowerment and welfare studies.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Ilmu Politik dan Hubungan Internasional
Articles 104 Documents
 7   8   9   10   11 
THE COLLABORATIVE GOVERNANCE IN THE RUMAH PENTING PROGRAM: A STUDY ON STRENGTHENING ADOLESCENT PARTICIPATION IN STUNTING MITIGATION IN JEMBRANA REGENCY I Kadek Marssel Bagia Sedana; Dedy Pribadi Uang
Journal of Social Politics and Governance (JSPG) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): Journal of Social Politics and Governance (June)
Publisher : Prodi Ilmu Pemerintahan, Universitas AMIKOM Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24076/4qs7rr70

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the role of adolescent participation through the Rumah Penting initiative in addressing stunting in Jembrana Regency, Bali Province. This study employs the collaborative governance theory proposed by Chris Ansell and Alison Gash (2008), which emphasizes four key dimensions: initial conditions, facilitative leadership, institutional design, and collaborative processes in achieving collective outcomes. A qualitative case study approach was applied, with data collected through interviews, observations, and document analysis. The findings reveal that the implementation of Rumah Penting reflects an effective collaborative governance process. Initial conditions were characterized by limited resources but supported by social trust, prior collaboration, and shared commitment among stakeholders. Facilitative leadership played a significant role in creating an inclusive and participatory environment, enabling adolescents to act as agents of change in stunting prevention. Institutional support through local policies and the GenRe forum further strengthened youth participation, while the collaborative process was reflected in open communication, shared responsibilities, and collective ownership. These efforts generated tangible outcomes, including increased nutritional awareness, stronger family engagement, and improved adolescent capacity in stunting advocacy. Therefore, this study recommends strengthening institutional support, expanding adolescent-based collaborative initiatives, and replicating the Rumah Penting model to accelerate stunting reduction efforts in Indonesia.
WHY PRODESKEL IMPLEMENTATION VARIES: A COLLABORATIVE GOVERNANCE ANALYSIS OF VILLAGE DIGITAL DATA MANAGEMENT IN GIRI, BANYUWANGI Dirhan Eka Pradipta; Amy Yayuk Sri Rahayu
Journal of Social Politics and Governance (JSPG) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): Journal of Social Politics and Governance (June)
Publisher : Prodi Ilmu Pemerintahan, Universitas AMIKOM Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24076/qra1ax08

Abstract

This study examines why the implementation of the Village and Sub-District Profile Information System (Prodeskel) produces uneven outcomes across local settings in Giri, Banyuwangi, Indonesia. The research problem lies in the persistence of administrative, institutional, and participatory constraints despite the formal availability of a digital village information system. This study aims to analyze how collaborative governance shapes the implementation of Prodeskel and to identify the factors that determine its effectiveness at the local level. The analysis is grounded in the collaborative governance ansel and gash (2008) framework, particularly the dimensions of starting conditions, institutional design, facilitative leadership, and collaborative process. This research employed a qualitative comparative case study approach using interviews, document review, and thematic analysis. The findings show that the implementation of Prodeskel is influenced not only by technical capacity but also by the quality of leadership, institutional clarity, inter-actor trust, and the degree of community participation. Villages and sub-district actors with stronger facilitative leadership and clearer coordination mechanisms demonstrate more consistent data updating and better implementation outcomes. This study recommends strengthening institutional coordination, improving local technical capacity, and expanding participatory mechanisms to support inclusive and sustainable village digital governance.
PENTAHELIX MODEL COLLABORATION AS A COLLECTIVE EFFORT IN ANTI-CORRUPTION ECOSYSTEMS Hendrawan Prasetyo; Marynta Putri Pratama; Kus Indarto
Journal of Social Politics and Governance (JSPG) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): Journal of Social Politics and Governance (June)
Publisher : Prodi Ilmu Pemerintahan, Universitas AMIKOM Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24076/sr320t61

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the integration of roles between the government, business sector, civil society, academia, and the media through the Pentahelix framework to create a comprehensive anti-corruption system. This study aims to formulate a strategic collaboration model to close systemic gaps and transform the approach to eradicating corruption into a sustainable collective responsibility. Methodologically, this study uses a descriptive qualitative design to explore the dynamics of intersectoral collaboration. The methods applied include a case study focusing on intersectoral collaboration in corruption eradication efforts. Data collection techniques through data triangulation, which integrates the study of regulatory documentation and official reports with in-depth interviews with representatives from the five pillars of Pentahelix. The data analysis process uses content analysis and thematic analysis techniques through the stages of data reduction, data presentation, and inductive conclusion drawing. The main findings of this study confirm that the effectiveness of corruption eradication is highly dependent on a paradigm shift from sectoral work to interactive collaboration. Synergy between the government, business sector, civil society, academics, and the media is an absolute prerequisite for building a strong anti-corruption ecosystem. Through integrated roles, the Pentahelix model has proven capable of addressing the complexities of corruption more comprehensively.
FAILURES IN THE GOVERNANCE OF COASTAL AUTHORITY IN THE DESIGNATION OF NATIONAL STRATEGIC PROJECTS: A CASE STUDY OF REMPANG ECO CITY FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF LAW NO. 23 OF 2014 ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT Fitriana Fitriana; Yustina Yustina
Journal of Social Politics and Governance (JSPG) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): Journal of Social Politics and Governance (June)
Publisher : Prodi Ilmu Pemerintahan, Universitas AMIKOM Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24076/wc01jn37

Abstract

This study aims to analyze governance failure in the designation of the Rempang Eco City National Strategic Project (PSN) from the perspective of Law Number 23 of 2014 on Regional Government. The central problem lies in whether the PSN designation through Ministerial Coordination Regulation No. 7 of 2023 violated provincial coastal authority as mandated under Article 27 of Law No. 23 of 2014. Drawing on the theories of decentralization, intergovernmental relations, and administrative law, this study employs a qualitative-descriptive approach using a single case study method and document analysis. The findings reveal three administrative defects: (1) overlapping authority between the central and provincial governments in coastal zoning; (2) the absence of the Riau Islands Province Coastal and Small Island Zoning Plan (RZWP-3K) as an investment prerequisite; and (3) the lack of vertical intergovernmental coordination mechanisms consistent with decentralization principles. The revocation of PSN status through Presidential Regulation No. 12 of 2025 confirms this policy failure, yet lacks adequate administrative transition mechanisms. This study recommends reforming PSN designation procedures to mandate fulfillment of provincial coastal spatial planning prerequisites and institutionalizing vertical coordination mechanisms in small island governance.

Page 11 of 11 | Total Record : 104

 7   8   9   10   11 

Filter by Year

2019 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): Journal of Social Politics and Governance (June) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Social Politics and Governance (December) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025): Journal of Social Politics and Governance (June) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024): Journal of Social Politics and Governance (December) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024): Journal of Social Politics and Governance (June) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2023): Journal of Social Politics and Governance (Desember) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2023): Journal of Social Politics and Governance (June) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2022): Journal of Social Politics and Governance (Desember) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2022): Journal of Social Politics and Governance (June) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2021): Journal of Social Politics and Governance (Desember) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2021): Journal of Social Politics and Governance (June) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2020): Journal of Social Politics and Governance (Desember) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2019): Journal of Social Politics and Governance (Desember) More Issue