Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Pemenuhan Asas Keadilan Dalam Penerapan Parliamentary Threshold Pada Pemilihan Umum Legislatif di Indonesia Salim, Patrick Winson; Sitabuana, Tundjung Herning
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v7i3.10907

The purpose of this study is to analyze and find out the application of the parliamentary threshold in Law No. 7 of 2017 and Constitutional Court Decision Number 116/PUU-XIX/2023 and evaluate whether its application meets the principles of justice. This is motivated by the application of the parliamentary threshold regulated in Law No. 7 of 2027 on General Elections and reaffirmed through Constitutional Court Decision Number 116/PUU-XIX/2023 which is considered not fulfilling the principle of justice and violating the 1945 Constitution. The urgency of this research is to provide legal clarity regarding the parliamentary threshold, which is intended to maintain the quality of representation in parliament, but in practice creates problems of injustice for parties that are unable to meet the threshold. The novelty in this author's research is to show that the application of the parliamentary threshold can reduce the diversity of political choices and affect the fairness of representation. The research method used in this study is the normative method. The results show that the application of the parliamentary threshold in Law No. 7/2017 and Constitutional Court Decision Number 116/PUU-XIX/2023 reflects the Court's efforts to consider the principle of justice. Stating that the threshold is still needed, but it must be reviewed to ensure more proportional and democratic representation. This is in line with the concept of justice according to philosophers who view that the review of the threshold also aims to provide opportunities for underrepresented parties, support the principle of justice as fairness, and achieve justice that allows future parliamentary thresholds to be determined based on popular sovereignty. Tujuan pada penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis dan mengetahui penerapan parliamentary threshold dalam UU No. 7 Tahun 2017 dan Putusan MK Nomor 116/PUU-XIX/2023 serta mengevaluasi apakah penerapannya memenuhi asas keadilan. Hal ini dilatarbelakangi oleh penerapan ambang batas parlemen yang diatur dalam UU No. 7 Tahun 2027 tentang Pemilihan Umum dan ditegaskan kembali melalui Putusan MK Nomor 116/PUU-XIX/2023 yang dianggap tidak memenuhi asas keadilan dan melanggar Undang-Undang Dasar Tahun 1945. Urgensi penelitian ini ialah memberikan kejelasan secara hukum mengenai parliamentary threshold yang dimaksudkan untuk menjaga kualitas representasi di parlemen dalam praktiknya justru menciptakan permasalahan ketidakadilan bagi partai-partai yang tidak mampu memenuhi ambang batas tersebut. Kebaruan dalam penelitian penulis ini adalah menunjukkan bahwa penerapan parliamentary threshold dapat mereduksi keberagaman pilihan politik dan memengaruhi keadilan representasi. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penerapan parliamentary threshold dalam UU No. 7 Tahun 2017 dan Putusan MK Nomor 116/PUU-XIX/2023 mencerminkan upaya MK mempertimbangkan asas keadilan. Menyatakan ambang batas tetap diperlukan, tetapi harus ditinjau untuk memastikan representasi yang lebih proporsional dan demokratis. Hal tersebut sejalan dengan konsep keadilan menurut filsuf-filsuf yang memandang peninjauan ambang batas juga bertujuan memberi kesempatan bagi pihak yang kurang terwakili, mendukung prinsip justice as fairness serta mencapai keadilan yang memungkinkan parliamentary threshold masa depan ditetapkan berdasarkan kedaulatan rakyat.

Guarantee, Promotion and Ideas of Omnibus Law on Health in Indonesia Compared to Singapore and Taiwan Sudaryat, Sudaryat
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v7i3.9728

This study aims to compare and analyze macro health policies in Indonesia with those in Taiwan and Singapore. The results of the comparison and analysis will be used as lessons learned and input for improving health policies in Indonesia in the future. Health policies in the form of the BPJS Kesehatan program have not optimally improved the health of the Indonesian people in terms of services, medicines, medical personnel, and health facilities. Taiwan is the country with the most superior health services in the world in 2024 and Singapore is the country with the best health system in the world in 2023. Through a normative legal research method with qualitative legal data analysis, it is known that the health policies implemented by the Taiwanese and Indonesian governments are almost the same, namely using an insurance mechanism with contributions from participants, the government and the private sector, but the differences in the reach and standardization of health services in Taiwan are wider in scope compared to Indonesia, while the Singaporean government in its health policy implements four programs, namely medisave, medishield, medifund, eldershield with control over increasing health financing from the government. Health policies in Taiwan are easier for the Indonesian government to apply in perfecting the BPJS Kesehatan program than those implemented by Singapore because both have implemented health policies through mandatory insurance programs. BPJS Kesehatan must improve its service management and the government needs to increase the number of health facilities and standardization of health facilities by adjusting its characteristics as an archipelagic country. Formulate fair premi for participants so that participants get optimal health services. Health promotion must be encouraged to increase public health awareness. The health omnibus law as a national legal strategy can be used as a trigger to harmonize overlapping health policies so that health programs can be implemented optimally which has an impact on improving the health of the Indonesian people.

Reformulasi UU ITE terhadap Artificial Intelligence Dibandingkan dengan Uni Eropa dan China AI Act Regulation Respati, Adnasohn Aqilla
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v7i3.10578

This research aims to analyze the legal vacuum in the Electronic Information and Transaction Law (UU ITE) related to the regulation of artificial intelligence (AI) in Indonesia in the context of deepfake. This research is motivated by the existence of several regulations on AI, these regulations are not sufficient to regulate thoroughly, especially regarding the technical aspects, implementation, and supervision of AI. So, the study to further analyze the urgency of reformulating the ITE Law due to the absence of specific regulations that are able to close the legal vacuum related to deepfake. The reformulation of the ITE Law is an urgent need to address the threat of deepfake, an AI-based content manipulation technology that is increasingly prevalent in Indonesia, deepfake creates manipulative content without the victim's consent, causing psychological harm, social stigma, and serious challenges in privacy and security. This research is included in normative juridical writing using a statutory approach through analysis of laws and derivative regulations and a comparative approach through analysis of the EU AI Act and China's regulations to provide reformulation suggestions. The results show that there is a legal vacuum that has not specifically regulated AI, which risks the misuse of technology and hampers legal certainty. Comparing the EU and China AI Acts, key findings include the need to adopt the basic principles of the EU AI Act, such as transparency, security, and fairness, as well as risk classification for AI systems. The current AI Act does not regulate important aspects such as labeling, reporting mechanisms, and supervision of high risks in AI systems, and it is recommended to establish a supervisory body responsible for AI risk management. Penelitian ini ditujukan untuk menganalisis kekosongan hukum dalam Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (UU ITE) terkait regulasi kecerdasan buatan (AI) di Indonesia dalam konteks deepfake. Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi dengan adanya beberapa aturan tentang AI, regulasi ini belum cukup mengatur secara menyeluruh, terutama terkait aspek teknis, pelaksanaan, dan pengawasan AI. Maka, pengkajian untuk menganalsis lebih lanjut atas urgensi reformulasi UU ITE dikarenakan belum adanya peraturan spesifik yang mampu menutup kekosongan hukum terkait deepfake. Reformulasi UU ITE menjadi kebutuhan mendesak untuk mengatasi ancaman deepfake, teknologi manipulasi konten berbasis AI yang semakin marak di Indonesia, deepfake menciptakan konten manipulatif tanpa persetujuan korban, sehingga menimbulkan kerugian psikologis, stigma sosial, dan tantangan serius dalam privasi serta keamanan. Adapun penelitian ini termasuk ke dalam penulisan yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan pendekatan perundang-undangan melalui analisis undang-undang dan peraturan turunannya dan pendekatan komparasi melalui analisis pengaturan EU AI Act dan China untuk memberikan saran reformulasi. Hasilnya menunjukkan adanya kekosongan hukum yang belum mengatur AI secara spesifik, yang berisiko pada penyalahgunaan teknologi dan menghambat kepastian hukum. Maka dengan membandingkan pengaturan EU dan China AI Act, temuan utama mencakup kebutuhan untuk mengadopsi prinsip-prinsip dasar dari EU AI Act, seperti transparansi, keamanan, dan keadilan, serta klasifikasi risiko untuk sistem AI. UU ITE saat ini belum mengatur aspek-aspek penting seperti labelling, mekanisme pelaporan, dan pengawasan terhadap risiko tinggi dalam sistem AI, serta disarankan untuk membentuk badan pengawas yang bertanggung jawab atas pengelolaan risiko AI.

Pembagian Royalti Hak Cipta Sebagai Harta Bersama Dalam Perceraian Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 1622/PDT.G/2023PA.JB Zahra, Arsya Yustisia; Roisah, Kholis
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v7i3.8933

This research aims to analyze the distribution of joint property in decision number No. 1622/Pdt.G/2023/PA.JB, marking the first case of its kind in Indonesia involving royalties as an asset for joint property division. Divorce leads to the division of joint property. This study will center on discussing joint property derived from copyright, where the royalties from creative works owned by the creator are considered joint property and are requested by the spouse for division. The primary aim of this research is to explain that intangible movable property, in the form of copyright royalties, can be divided if it becomes joint property. This study uses A normative legal approach with a descriptive-analytical specification. It provides an analysis of the decision that serves as the basis for both parties in dividing copyright royalties as joint property under any applicable marriage law, whether it is customary law, Law No. 1 of 1974 on Marriage, the Civil Code, or the Compilation of Islamic Law. All legal frameworks will yield the same result, which is that each party receives half of the joint property, showing consistency across all regulations concerning joint property. The results of this study show that, in the event of divorce, copyright royalties can be divided as joint property. However, this is not an absolute requirement of such a division, as seen in Decision No. 1622/Pdt.G/2023/PA. Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) acquired during marriage, obtained and created or registered by one spouse during marriage are regarded as joint property. This is because even though the spouse may not be the holder of the rights, they have played a role in the creation of the IPR and are entitled to a share of this property in the event of divorce. Copyright; Joint Property; Royalties Tujuan penelitian ini mengupas pembagian pada sengketa perceraian kekayaan bersama pada putusan dengan nomor 1622/Pdt.G/2023PA.JB merupakan kasus pertama di Indonesia dengan royalti sebagai objek pembagian harta kekayaan bersama. Putusnya perkawinan berakibat pembagian harta gono-gini. Hal yang dibahas pada penelitian kali ini hendak diperkecil ruang lingkupnya mengenai kekayaan bersama yang diperolah dari hak cipta yang dimana royalti hasil dari karya cipta milik pencipta yang menjadi kekayaan bersama diinginkan oleh pasangan kawinnya untuk dilakukan pembagian. Urgensi penelitian ini yakni menjelaskan bahwa benda bergerak tidak berwujud berupa royalti hasil karya cipta dapat dilakukan pembagian apabila menjadi sebuah kekayaan bersama. Metode yang diterapkan yakni yuridis normatif serta deskriptif analitis sebagai spesifikasi penelitian. Penelitian ini menjelaskan mengenai analisis putusan yang menjadi landasan bagi pihak terkait dalam melakukan pembagian royalti hak cipta sebagai kekayaan bersama menggunakan hukum perkawinan apapun, baik berupa Hukum Adat, Undang-Undang Perkawinan, KUHPerdata, dan KHI akan mendapatkan hasil yang sama yakni masing-masing memperoleh separuh dari kekayaan bersama, terdapat konsistensi dalam seluruh pengaturan mengenai kekayaan bersama. Hasil riset ini memperlihatkan bahwa pembagian royalti hasil karya cipta sebagai kekayaan bersama akibat adanya perceraian secara eksplisit tidak diatur dalam Undang-Undang Hak Cipta, walaupun demikian tidak menutup kemungkinan pembagian royalti dapat terjadi seperti dalam Putusan Nomor 1622/Pdt.G/2023/PA.JB Hak Kekayaan Intelektual yang didaftarkan serta didapat dari salah seorang sepanjang perkawinan menjadi kekayaan bersama, karena suami atau istri meskipun bukan pemegang hak akan tetapi turut bersumbangsih terwujudnya HKI tersebut, dan berhak mendapatkan harta tersebut apabila menemui perceraian. Hak Cipta; Kekayaan bersama; Royalti.

Legal Aspects of Women's Political Participation in a Gender Perspective Suryani, Ade Irma; Wardana, Dodi Jaya
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v7i3.10634

This study aims to explore the legal aspects of women's political participation from a gender perspective, emphasizing the problem of the gap between regulation and implementation in legal practice in Indonesia, as well as the obstacles faced by women in achieving an equal position in politics. This study is motivated by the ongoing gap in political participation between men and women in various countries, including Indonesia, which can be seen from the lack of women in important decision-making at the local and national levels. Women's representation in the public sphere, especially in politics and decision-making, has been regulated in various regulations, such as the Election Law and the 30% quota Affirmative Action Policy. However, in practice, these regulations often do not achieve the expected goals due to structural and cultural obstacles, and minimal sanctions for non-compliance. This study finds that although there has been normative progress in building a legal framework that supports women's participation, its implementation is still weak due to various obstacles, including gender-biased legal interpretations, patriarchal dominance in the political system, and the lack of effective monitoring mechanisms. The main contribution of this study lies in the in-depth analysis of the gap between the regulation and practice of women's representation. Using a normative and sociological legal approach, this study offers a new perspective in understanding this problem, not only as a legal issue but also as a structural and cultural problem that requires multidimensional intervention. This study also provides concrete recommendations to strengthen law enforcement and ensure that affirmative policies can run effectively, such as improving legal sanctions, increasing the capacity of supervisory institutions, and ongoing gender education. Uniquely, this study contributes to the legal literature and practice by providing a comprehensive roadmap to address the gap in the implementation of affirmative policies in women's representation. Furthermore, this study emphasizes that improving the gender-responsive legal system is not only a normative need but also a prerequisite for creating substantive justice in Indonesian society.

Eksistensi Kontrak Kegiatan Ekonomi Kreatif Sebagai Jaminan Dalam Pengajuan Kredit Bank Ilhami, Maulidya; Abubakar, Lastuti; Handayani, Tri
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v7i3.9428

This research and article aim to find answers to the difficulties in implementing contracts for creative economy entrepreneurs as collateral, which are indeed regulated, but their implementation has never been carried out in Indonesia itself. The urgency of this research is to support the development of the creative economy industry sector, particularly in terms of funding, and to provide benefits and clarity for the parties involved. Therefore, legal research was conducted using the normative juridical method. This research and article provide new insights regarding contracts in creative economy activities as collateral, which have not been extensively discussed in previous literature. Based on the research conducted, it is known that, in principle, the regulation of contracts for creative economy entrepreneurs as collateral is very likely to be implemented as long as there is a specific mechanism regarding this matter. A mechanism is needed because a contract cannot simply be classified as an object, so the economic value contained in the contract can be guaranteed through fiduciary collateral. Furthermore, there is a need for regulations in the POJK regarding the details of the implementation of contracts by creative economy entrepreneurs as collateral, the approval of the parties involved in the contract related to the collateralization of the contract, and the application of the principle of prudence by banks before accepting creative economy activity contracts as collateral. With the existence of regulations and mechanisms, as well as the approval of the parties involved in using contracts from creative economy entrepreneurs as collateral, it can provide legal certainty in its implementation and protect the parties involved. Penelitian dan artikel ini bertujuan menemukan jawaban atas kesulitan dalam pengimplementasian kontrak pelaku usaha ekonomi kreatif sebagai jaminan yang mana pengaturannya memang sudah ada, tetapi pengimplementasiannya belum pernah dilakukan di Indonesia sendiri. Adapun urgensi dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mendukung pengembangan sektor industri ekonomi kreatif terutama dari segi pendanaan serta memberikan manfaat, dan kejelasan bagi para pihak yang terkait di dalamnya. Oleh karena itu, dilakukan penelitian hukum dengan metode yuridis normatif. Penelitian dan artikel ini memberikan wawasan baru terkait kontrak dalam kegiatan ekonomi kreatif sebagai jaminan yang belum banyak dibahas dalam literatur-literatur sebelumnya. Berdasarkan penelitian yang dilakukan, maka diketahui bahwa pada dasarnya peraturan kontrak pelaku usaha ekonomi kreatif sebagai jaminan sangat mungkin untuk diimplikasikan selama terdapat mekanisme khusus mengenai hal tersebut. Mekanisme dibutuhkan karena kontrak tidak dapat serta merta digolongkan sebagai benda, sehingga nilai ekonomis yang terdapat dalam kontrak tersebut yang dapat dijaminkan melalui jaminan fidusia. Lebih lanjut, perlu adanya pengaturan pada POJK terkait rincian pelaksanaan kontrak pelaku usaha ekonomi kreatif sebagai jaminan, persetujuan dari para pihak dalam kontrak berkaitan dengan penjaminan kontrak tersebut, serta penerapan prinsip kehati-hatian oleh bank sebelum menerima kontrak kegiatan ekonomi kreatif sebagai jaminan. Dengan adanya pengaturan dan mekanisme, serta persetujuan para pihak dalam menjadikan kontrak pelaku usaha ekonomi kreatif sebagai jaminan, dapat memberikan kepatian hukum dalam pelaksanaannya serta melindungi para pihak yang terlibat.

Implementation of Public Complaints to the Ombudsman Regarding Road Infrastructure Wijayanti, Anisa; Al Meida Putri, Ardhita
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v7i3.10646

This research aims to examine the function, role and authority of the Ombudsman representative of Lampung The province accepts public complaints under the Ombudsman Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 37 of 2008. The thing that underlies this research is the alleged maladministration practices carried out by public service officials of Lampung Province regarding road infrastructure that has not been repaired. This research is a field research with a sociological juridical approach. The results of this study indicate that the Ombudsman of Lampung Province has fulfilled his duties and obligations in accordance with Law No. 37 of 2008 on the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia. Where all incoming complaints have been received, processed and submitted to the authorities in tackling this problem.

Pemberantasan Mafia Tanah di Indonesia: Dalam Mewujudkan Keadilan dan Kepastian Hukum Bagi Pemilik Tanah Zamil, Yusuf Saepul; Eprilia, Farina Firda; Firdaus, Hendri; Maharso, Triadi; Rizal, Nursyah
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v7i3.10239

The purpose of this study is to find solutions to prevent and eradicate land mafia in Indonesia. This is because the practice of land mafia in Indonesia has been going on for a long time, and is very worrying and detrimental to the state and society. The urgency of this study is to ensure legal certainty for legitimate land owners from land grabbing by the land mafia. This study uses a normative legal research method, namely a research method using secondary data or library data as its main data supported by primary data. Efforts that can be made to eradicate the land mafia are by changing land data into digital data including digitally integrated land maps. By changing land data digitally, it produces accurate land data so that there is no loophole for the land mafia to claim land belonging to others. The digital land data includes land maps per plot which are contained in the land book and then issued electronic land certificates or hard copy land certificates based on digital data that has one hundred percent accuracy. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mencari solusi pencegahan dan pemberantasan mafia tanah di Indonesia. Hal ini dilatarbelakangi karena praktik mafia tanah di Indonesia sudah berlangsung sangat lama, sangat mengkhawatirkan dan merugikan negara dan masyarakat. Urgensi dari penelitian ini adalah agar adanya kepastian hukum bagi pemilik tanah yang sah dari perampasan tanah oleh mafia tanah. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif, yaitu metode penelitian dengan menggunakan data sekunder atau data kepustakaan sebagai data utamanya dengan didukung oleh data primer. Upaya yang dapat dilakukan untuk memberantas mafia tanah adalah dengan merubah data pertanahan menjadi data digital termasuk peta tanah yang terintegerasi secara digital. Dengan merubah data pertanahan secara digital, maka menghasilkan data pertanahan yang akurat sehingga tidak ada celah bagi mafia tanah untuk mengklaim tanah milik orang lain. Data pertanahan secara digital tersebut meliputi peta tanah perbidang yang dimuat dalam buku tanah kemudian diterbitkan sertifikat tanah secara elektronik atau sertifikat tanah berbentuk hard copy berdasarkan data digital yang mempunyai keakuratan seratus persen.

Kewajiban Notaris Membacakan Akta Autentik Bagi Penghadap Disabilitas Rungu Analisis Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris Sesung, Rusdianto; Putri, Ria Riani
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v7i3.10695

This study aims to analyze the obligation of Notaries to read authentic deeds for deaf parties. The limited access of deaf parties to the process of making authentic deeds is due to the absence of translators or facilitators who understand their needs in communicating. This problem is important because of the potential for the failure to fulfill the validity of authentic deeds and the protection of the rights of deaf parties. The normative legal method is used in this study through a legal approach to analyze the obligation of Notaries to read authentic deeds for deaf parties. The updates in this study show that Notaries have an important responsibility in reading authentic deeds to the parties involved as stipulated in Article 16 paragraph (1) letter (l) of the Notary Law. However, until now, the Notary Law (UUJN) has not expressly regulated the obligation of Notaries to provide sign language interpreters for clients with deaf disabilities, which is a form of solution for deaf parties. The results of the study indicate that there is a regulatory gap that does not fully cover Notaries in handling the special needs of people with hearing disabilities, which in turn can cause potential problems related to the validity and authenticity of authentic deeds. This study concludes that changes are needed to the UUJN which explicitly requires Notaries to provide sign language interpreters for people with hearing disabilities. Penelitian ini memberikan tujuan untuk melakukan analisis kewajiban Notaris membacakan akta autentik bagi penghadap disabilitas rungu. Keterbatasan akses penghadap disabilitas rungu terhadap proses pembuatan akta autentik sebagai akibat dari ketiadaan penerjemah atau fasilitator yang memahami kebutuhan mereka dalam berkomunikasi. Masalah ini menjadi penting karena adanya potensi tidak terpenuhinya keabsahan akta autentik dan perlindungan hak dari penghadap disabilitas rungu. Pada penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif untuk melakukan analisis kewajiban Notaris membacakan akta autentik bagi penghadap disabilitas rungu. Pembaharuan dalam penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa Notaris memiliki tanggung jawab yang penting dalam membacakan akta autentik kepada para pihak yang terlibat sebagaimana Pasal 16 ayat (1) huruf (l) UUJN. Namun hingga saat ini, UU Jabatan Notaris (UUJN) belum secara tegas mengatur kewajiban Notaris dalam menyediakan juru bahasa isyarat bagi klien dengan disabilitas rungu yang merupakan bentuk solusi untuk penghadap disabilitas rungu. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat kekosongan regulasi yang belum mencakup sepenuhnya bagi Notaris dalam menangani kebutuhan khusus para penyandang disabilitas rungu, yang pada gilirannya dapat menimbulkan potensi permasalahan terkait validitas dan keaslian akta autentik. Penelitian ini memberikan kesimpulan bahwa diperlukan perubahan pada UUJN yang secara tegas kewajiban Notaris menyediakan juru bahasa isyarat bagi penghadap disabilitas rungu.

Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Tenaga Kerja Sebagai Kreditur Istimewa Arapenta, Deary Christian; Karsona, Agus Mulya; Sari, Deviana Yunita
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v7i3.10103

This research analyzes the impact of corporate bankruptcy and the legal protection that must be provided to workers, particularly regarding the normative rights that workers are entitled to receive. In such circumstances, workers' normative rights, such as wages, severance pay, and benefits, are often not fulfilled. Workers are in a weak position as creditors in bankruptcy proceedings, as the regulations prioritize secured creditors. This research employs the normative juridical method. The novelty of this research lies in the comprehensive analysis of legal certainty and justice for workers as preferred creditors in bankruptcy cases, as well as the proposal for legal reforms to harmonize conflicting regulations to strengthen the protection of workers' normative rights. The conclusion drawn from the discussion is that workers, as preferred creditors, must be prioritized in the payment of bankruptcy debts. There is a need for stricter supervision, stronger legal protection for workers in bankruptcy proceedings, and the necessity for reforms in bankruptcy law, especially in the mechanism for the settlement and distribution of bankruptcy assets to each creditor. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dampak kepailitan perusahaan dan bagaimana perlindungan hukum yang harus diberikan kepada tenaga kerja, terutama hak-hak normatif yang harus diterima pekerja. Dalam kondisi ini, hak-hak normatif pekerja, seperti gaji, pesangon, dan tunjangan, sering kali tidak dipenuhi. Pekerja berada pada posisi yang lemah sebagai kreditur dalam proses kepailitan, karena aturan lebih mengutamakan kreditur yang memiliki jaminan. Yuridis normatif adalah metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini. Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada analisis komprehensif mengenai kepastian hukum dan keadilan bagi pekerja sebagai kreditur preferen dalam kasus kepailitan, serta usulan reformasi hukum untuk menyelaraskan peraturan yang bertentangan guna memperkuat perlindungan hak-hak normatif pekerja. Kesimpulan yang dapat diambil dari hasil pembahasan bahwa pekerja sebagai kreditur preferen harus didahulukan dalam pembayaran utang pailit, diperlukan pengawasan yang lebih ketat, perlindungan hukum yang lebih kuat bagi tenaga kerja dalam proses kepailitan, dan diharuskan adanya pembaharuan undang-undang kepailitan khususnya dalam mekanisme pemberesan dan pembagian boedel pailit kepada masing-masing kreditur.

Home Page

OAI Link

Editorial Team

Contact

Reviewer

Google Scholar

Contact Name
Zaenal Arifin

Contact Email
zaenal@usm.ac.id

Phone
+6282242226898

Journal Mail Official
usmlawreview@usm.ac.id

Editorial Address
Jl. Soekarno - Hatta

Location
Kota semarang,

Jawa tengah

INDONESIA

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Home Page

OAI Link

Editorial Team

Contact

Reviewer

Google Scholar

Contact Name Zaenal Arifin

Contact Email zaenal@usm.ac.id

Phone +6282242226898

Journal Mail Official usmlawreview@usm.ac.id

Editorial Address Jl. Soekarno - Hatta

Location Kota semarang, Jawa tengah INDONESIA

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Contact Name
Zaenal Arifin

Contact Email
zaenal@usm.ac.id

Phone
+6282242226898

Journal Mail Official
usmlawreview@usm.ac.id

Editorial Address
Jl. Soekarno - Hatta

Location
Kota semarang,

Jawa tengah

INDONESIA