cover
Contact Name
Dr. Rudi Natamihardja, S.H.,DEA
Contact Email
rudi.natamiharja@fh.unila.ac.id
Phone
+6281388420240
Journal Mail Official
lajil@fh.unila.ac.id
Editorial Address
Gedung B, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Lampung. Jl. Prof. Soemantri Brojonegoro, Gedong Meneng, Bandar Lampung
Location
Kota bandar lampung,
Lampung
INDONESIA
Lampung Journal of International Law (LaJIL)
Published by Universitas Lampung
ISSN : 26566532     EISSN : 27232603     DOI : https://doi.org/10.25041/lajil
Core Subject : Social,
The Lampung Journal of International Law or abbreviated as LaJIL, is an international journal published by the Faculty of Law, University of Lampung. The scope of this Journal is the development of international law sciences. LaJIL is a means of publication from results of the research, and a means of sharing developments in international law field. The background of the establishment of LaJIL Journal is focus on international law in Indonesian aspect. Therefore, Faculty of Law, University of Lampung took the initiative to establish a journal that specifically develops the issue of international law. Thus, we hope that the results of LaJIL publishing will provide an important output for the development of international law in generally, and to provide knowledge of international law of the sea, international human rights law, international of humanitarian law, international organization law, international trade and economics law, diplomatic law, international settlement disputes law, air and outer space law, international environmental law, international criminal law, and informatics and technology law in particularly. The article which will be published by LaJIL is a review article relating to the development of international law, both public and private international law. LaJIL is available in both print and online version.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 5 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025)" : 5 Documents clear
Responsibility to Protect (R2P): Exploringthe Dilemma Between International Intervention and State Sovereignty Ernawati, Ninin; Sukardi, Dina Haryati; Yatani, Vincent Godana
Lampung Journal of International Law Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/lajil.v7i2.4520

Abstract

The Responsibility to Protect (R2P) is an international law principle that affirms the obligation of the international community to protect populations from genocide, crimes against humanity, and other mass atrocities. The Rohingya crisis in Myanmar highlights the persistent tension between R2P and state sovereignty. This article analyzes that tension by examining the challenges of implementing R2P in Myanmar, where the government has consistently rejected foreign intervention. Using a conceptual analysis and a case research of the Rohingya refugee crisis, the research explores how sovereignty claims and regional norms, particularly ASEAN’s principle of non-interference, constrain international responses. The findings show that although R2P provides a normative framework for addressing gross human rights violations, its implementation in Myanmar has been hindered by state resistance and regional political dynamics. This article contributes to debates on international justice and sovereignty by offering insights into the limitations and potential pathways for more effective R2P implementation within the ASEAN context.
Climate Change Refugees in Indonesia: Human Rights Protection amid Legal Vacuums and UNHCR Single Submission Octaviani, Rury; Syahrin, M. Alvi; Becanics, Adrienn; Rahmah, Shafiyah
Lampung Journal of International Law Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/lajil.v7i2.4736

Abstract

Climate change has become a major driver of cross-border displacement, creating the phenomenon of climate refugees. Although the 1951 Refugee Convention does not explicitly recognize this category, the reality of climate-induced displacement demands legal and policy responses from states, including Indonesia. As a transit country, Indonesia lacks a national legal framework specifically addressing the status and protection of climate refugees, and in practice, protection relies on the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees through the single submission scheme, the only system for refugee identification and registration in the country. This reliance exposes a regulatory vacuum and legal vulnerabilities related to state sovereignty. This paper examines Indonesia’s response, highlighting the importance of updating national regulations and strengthening coordination with UNHCR to provide inclusive, human rights-based protection for climate refugees.
Balancing National Constitutions and International Trade Commitments: Comparative Insights from Indonesia, Thailand, and India Widodo, Hananto; Lovisonnya, Intan; Disantara, Fradhana Putra; Chansrakaeo, Ruetaitip; Ezenduka, Uzodinma Yurriens
Lampung Journal of International Law Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/lajil.v7i2.4813

Abstract

Economic globalization has heightened tensions between national sovereignty and international trade obligations. This study compares constitutional review mechanisms in Indonesia, Thailand, and India, representing civil law and common law systems. Using normative legal methods with statute and comparative analysis, it finds that Indonesia applies ex post review of ratification laws, Thailand uses preventive ex ante review, and India employs substantive, precedent-based judicial review. Effectiveness varies: India achieves high substantive effectiveness through judicial activism, Thailand excels procedurally, and Indonesia remains limited to formal review. The study concludes that constitutional review effectiveness depends on institutional design, legal tradition, and the ability to balance constitutional supremacy with international commitments.
State Recognition of Indigenous Peoples’ Territorial Rights under International Human Rights Law: A Comparative Study of Indonesia and Russia Gemilang, Kharisma; Sulistiyandari, Sulistiyandari; Kartono, Kartono; Handayani, Sri Wahyu; Farhani, Athari
Lampung Journal of International Law Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/lajil.v7i2.4904

Abstract

This study analyzes the recognition and protection of indigenous peoples’ territorial rights in Indonesia and Russia within the framework of international human rights law and identifies factors affecting their effectiveness. Using a normative legal method with conceptual and comparative approaches, the study finds that Indonesia has a relatively progressive framework through constitutional recognition of indigenous communities, yet implementation remains weak due to fragmented sectoral regulations and reliance on regional administrative recognition. Russia, by contrast, adopts a centralized model that recognizes only small-numbered indigenous peoples and limits collective ownership and meaningful participation. Both countries face tensions between state sovereignty over natural resources and international obligations to protect indigenous collective rights. The study recommends adopting a multi-level governance model that balances national interests and indigenous autonomy, alongside legal reforms to strengthen implementation of the Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC) principle, enabling more effective integration of international human rights norms into domestic legal systems..
Integrating State Sovereignty and International Obligations: A Comparison of Indonesian and Philippine International Law into Domestic Constitutional Systems Adnyani, Ni Ketut Sari; Suryana, Kadek Dedy; Wiratini, Ni Made; Dantes, Komang Putri Komang Febrinayanti; Tee-Anastacio, Princess Alyssa D.
Lampung Journal of International Law Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/lajil.v7i2.4909

Abstract

Indonesia and the Philippines integrate international law into their constitutional systems to uphold global commitments, protect human rights, and strengthen the rule of law. This study examines how both countries regulate state sovereignty and position international obligations within the national legal order by addressing two questions: how sovereignty is constructed in the Indonesian and Philippine constitutions and how each state views the relationship between sovereignty and international obligations; and how international law, including treaties and customary rules, is integrated into their domestic legal systems. Using a normative-comparative approach, the study analyzes similarities and differences in the acceptance, ratification, and implementation of international norms at the national level. The findings indicate that although both countries uphold state sovereignty, they differ in how international law is adopted and given binding force. These differences demonstrate how constitutional structures and political-legal orientations influence the implementation of international obligations and shape the relationship between national and international law.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5