cover
Contact Name
Agung Suharyanto
Contact Email
agungsuharyanto@staff.uma.ac.id
Phone
+628126493527
Journal Mail Official
juncto@uma.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jurusan Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Medan Area, Jalan Kolam No. 1, Pasar V, Medan Estate, Sumatera Utara
Location
Kota medan,
Sumatera utara
INDONESIA
JUNCTO: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum
Published by Universitas Medan Area
ISSN : -     EISSN : 27229793     DOI : 10.31289
Core Subject : Social,
JUNCTO: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum is a Journal of Law for information and communication resources for academics, and observers of Business Law, International law, Criminal law, and Civil law. The published paper is the result of research, reflection, and criticism with respect to the themes of Business Law, International law, Criminal law, and Civil law. All papers are peer-reviewed by at least two referees
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 175 Documents
Kajian Hukum terhadap Prinsip Efisiensi dan Efektivitas Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen melalui Lembaga Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Sektor Jasa Keuangan berdasarkan POJK Nomor 61/POJK.07/2020 Ginting, Monica Br; Lubis, Anggreni Atmei
JUNCTO: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol 7, No 2 (2025): JUNCTO : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum DESEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/juncto.v7i2.6448

Abstract

This study examines the application of the principles of efficiency and effectiveness in resolving consumer disputes through the Alternative Institution for Financial Services Sector Dispute Resolution (LAPS SJK) based on Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 61/POJK.07/2020. Inequality in the position between financial service business actors and consumers often places consumers in a disadvantaged position. Therefore, the existence of regulations governing dispute resolution through LAPS SJK is expected to serve as a solution in providing legal protection for consumers. This research employs a normative legal approach using literature review and interview techniques for data collection. The results indicate that the dispute resolution procedure at LAPS SJK includes the submission of an application, administrative examination, mediation, and a final and binding decision. The principle of efficiency is reflected in simplified procedures and affordable costs, while the principle of effectiveness is demonstrated by fair and enforceable decisions. Although LAPS SJK has made efforts to implement these principles, several challenges remain in practice. Consequently, increased consumer education and the strengthening of LAPS SJK’s institutional capacity are necessary to enhance legal protection for financial service consumers.
Strategi Penjualan “Brithday Cake” Secara Online dalam Mengurangi PHK Harahap, Herlina Hanum; Bangun, Eko Putra; Monica, Eka Syafrina
JUNCTO: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol 7, No 2 (2025): JUNCTO : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum DESEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/juncto.v7i2.6429

Abstract

Perkembangan teknologi digital dan perubahan perilaku konsumen telah mendorong pelaku usaha mikro, kecil, dan menengah (UMKM) untuk beradaptasi melalui strategi penjualan berbasis online. Kondisi ini semakin relevan di tengah pandemi Covid-19 yang menyebabkan penurunan omzet dan meningkatkan risiko pemutusan hubungan kerja (PHK). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis strategi penjualan birthday cake secara online sebagai upaya meningkatkan pendapatan usaha dan mengurangi risiko PHK dari perspektif hukum ketenagakerjaan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif-empiris dengan pendekatan kualitatif, melalui kajian peraturan perundang-undangan di bidang ketenagakerjaan serta penelitian lapangan berupa wawancara, observasi, dan studi dokumentasi pada pelaku UMKM birthday cake. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pemanfaatan media sosial, sistem pre-order, layanan kustomisasi produk, dan kerja sama dengan layanan pesan antar mampu memperluas jangkauan pasar, meningkatkan jumlah pesanan, dan menjaga stabilitas usaha. Peningkatan pendapatan tersebut berdampak langsung pada kemampuan pelaku UMKM dalam mempertahankan tenaga kerja. Dengan demikian, strategi penjualan online tidak hanya berfungsi sebagai upaya adaptasi ekonomi, tetapi juga sebagai instrumen preventif dalam menekan terjadinya PHK.
Kekuatan Eksekutorial Akta Perdamaian sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata di Luar Pengadilan Kurdi, Kurdi; Cahyo, Raul Gindo; Dadek, Teuku Ahmad
JUNCTO: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol 7, No 2 (2025): JUNCTO : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum DESEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/juncto.v7i2.6727

Abstract

This study analyzes the executorial power and effectiveness of peace deeds (dading) as an alternative instrument for resolving civil disputes outside the courts. Litigation still faces classic problems such as case backlogs, high costs, and lengthy processes, thus contradicting the principles of speedy and efficient justice. Peace deeds offer a peaceful solution, but there is a legal gap regarding their enforceability. This normative legal research finds a fundamental dualism: peace deeds through court mediation (in-court) that are confirmed as decisions have direct executorial power equivalent to a final and binding decision. Conversely, out-of-court peace deeds, even if made in an authentic notarial deed, do not have direct executorial power and only function as evidence, so that disputes over breach of contract must still be sued. The use of grosse akta for reciprocal dading is also legally inappropriate. In practice, the effectiveness of dading shows a paradox: the high number of requests for execution of peace deeds indicates low voluntary compliance and the shift of disputes to the execution stage. The main obstacle to the effectiveness of out-of-court dading is the lack of an execution mechanism in Law No. 30 of 1999. This study recommends amendments to the law to provide a registration mechanism and granting of execution fiat for out-of-court settlement deeds..
Penerapan Persidangan Elektronik (E-Litigation) Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa di Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Dao, Fiktorius Kehidupan
JUNCTO: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol 7, No 2 (2025): JUNCTO : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum DESEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/juncto.v7i2.6711

Abstract

The State Administrative Court (PTUN) is the judicial authority authorized to examine, decide, and resolve cases deemed to constitute state administrative disputes, including petitions related to the scope of the administrative court's jurisdiction. In line with advances in information technology and the demands of simple, expeditious, and low-cost judicial principles, the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia has implemented an electronic-based judicial system through E-Court and E-Litigation. This study aims to analyze the application of electronic trials in dispute resolution at the PTUN and examine the validity of electronic evidence in court practice. The research method used is normative juridical law, utilizing statutory and conceptual approaches. The results indicate that the implementation of electronic trials at the PTUN has a sufficient legal basis, normatively, through Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2019. However, in practice, obstacles remain, particularly related to the authentication and assessment of electronic evidence and limited internet network infrastructure in some regions. Therefore, strengthening the electronic evidence verification mechanism and improving infrastructure support are necessary to ensure the effectiveness and legal certainty in the administration of electronic-based state administrative courts.
Kepastian Hukum Terhadap Kewenangan Balai Harta Peninggalan (BHP) Sebagai Pengurus dalam Perkara PKPU di Indonesia Kennedy, Kennedy; Sunarmi, Sunarmi; Robert, Robert
JUNCTO: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol 7, No 2 (2025): JUNCTO : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum DESEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/juncto.v7i2.6511

Abstract

Kewenangan BHP sebagai Pengurus dalam perkara PKPU di Indonesia masih belum jelas. Undang-undang PKPU telah mengatur mengenai siapa saja yang dapat diangkat menjadi Pengurus. Ketentuan tersebut dapat dilihat dari Pasal 234 ayat 3 UU PKPU. Dalam Pasal tersebut sudah disebutkan secara jelas mengenai siapa saja yang dapat diangkat menjadi Pengurus PKPU yaitu Orang Perseorangan yang berdomisili di wilayah Negara Republik Indonesia. Permasalahan adlaah Bagaimana Ketentuan Hukum terhadap Penetapan Pengurus dalam Perkara PKPU di Indonesia? Bagaimana Kewenangan Balai harta Peninggalan sebagai Pengurus dalam Perkara PKPU di Indonesia? Bagaimana kepastian hukum terhadap kewenangan Balai Harta Peninggalan dalam perkara PKPU. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode penlitian normatif dengan berdasar pada data sekunder dari hasil analisis diketahui penerapannya di lapangan terdapat 3 putusan dimana Hakim pada Pengadilan Niaga menunjuk Balai Harta Peninggalan sebagai pengurus dalam perkara PKPU yaitu nomor 33/pdt sus-PKPU/2022/PN Niaga Medan ; nomor 4/pdt sus-PKPU/2023/PN Niaga Medan dan nomor 22/pdt/sus-PKPU/2020 PN Niaga Medan. Dalam hal ini 3 putusan Hakim menafsirkan bahwa BHP juga berwenang melakukan tugas pengurusan sebagaimana bunyi dari Pasal 69 ayat 1 angka 5 dimana kata pengurusan dianggap sama seperti Pengurus dalam perkara PKPU.
Urgensi Hukum Non-Diskriminasi dalam Diversi Anak Berhadapan dengan Hukum: Kasus Narkotika Rachel Patrecia
JUNCTO: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol 8, No 1 (2026): JUNCTO : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum JUNI
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/juncto.v8i1.6716

Abstract

The study analyzes the diversion procedures in the Juvenile Criminal Justice System Law (UU SPPA) and the obstacles to its implementation for children in conflict with the law related to narcotics in the context of Indonesia's Golden Generation 2045. This research employs a normative legal method with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The findings indicate that although the UU SPPA mandates the principle of non-discrimination (Article 2) and diversion as a priority (Article 5 paragraph 3), there exists a legal gap between Article 7 paragraph 2 of the UU SPPA and the criminal sanctions in the Narcotics Law, which causes children to lose their right to diversion. Hidden discriminatory practices are evident in the differential treatment between child users (Article 127) who tend to receive diversion and child dealers (Article 114) who are criminalized, despite both being victims of exploitation. The main obstacles include: legal gaps in regulations, inconsistency in court decisions, differing perspectives among law enforcement officials, lack of cross-sectoral coordination, limited rehabilitation infrastructure, and social stigmatization. These conditions threaten the achievement of Indonesia's Golden Generation 2045. The study recommends harmonizing the UU SPPA with the Narcotics Law, establishing Joint Regulations among law enforcement agencies or creating Memoranda of Understanding (MoU), strengthening rehabilitation facilities, and conducting public education to reduce stigma.
Dinamika Politik dalam Fit and Proper Test oleh Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat (DPR) dan Implikasinya Terhadap Independensi Hakim Konstitusi Predderics Hockop Simanjuntak
JUNCTO: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol 8, No 1 (2026): JUNCTO : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum JUNI
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/juncto.v8i1.7129

Abstract

The independence of constitutional judges is a fundamental prerequisite for ensuring the rule of law and constitutional democracy. However, in Indonesian constitutional practice, the fit and proper test mechanism conducted by the House of Representatives (DPR) often raises debates regarding the extent to which the process is able to guarantee the independence of constitutional judges from the influence of political interests. This study aims to analyze the political dynamics in the fit and proper test mechanism for constitutional judges by the DPR and its implications for the independence of constitutional judges in Indonesia. The study uses a normative legal method with a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, and a case approach. Legal materials are obtained through library studies that include laws and regulations, court decisions, scientific literature, and other supporting documents. The analysis is conducted qualitatively through legal interpretation and review of several cases, namely the dismissal of Constitutional Justice Aswanto, the appointment of Arsul Sani and Adies Kadir as constitutional judges, and the revision of the 2025 Rules of Procedure of the House of Representatives. The results of the study indicate that the political dynamics in the fit and proper test process are not only related to the selection function of prospective judges but also reflect the strong influence of political configurations in filling constitutional judge positions. This situation has implications for the independence of constitutional judges, both institutionally and personally, which can ultimately influence public perception of the Constitutional Court's impartiality. This research proposes strengthening the constitutional merit-based selection system through an independent selection committee, introducing a cooling-off period for active politicians, increasing public participation, and strengthening ethical mechanisms as efforts to strengthen the independence of the judiciary in Indonesia.
Penguatan Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Kejahatan Bisnis dalam Skema Fraud Korporasi dan Penyalahgunaan Aset Perusahaan Pudjianto Gondosasmito; Aida Ardini
JUNCTO: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol 8, No 2 (2026): JUNCTO : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum DESEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/juncto.v8i2.7159

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the strengthening of law enforcement against business crimes in corporate fraud schemes and the misappropriation of company assets. This research employs normative legal research using statutory and conceptual approaches. Legal materials are analyzed qualitatively through grammatical, systematic, and conceptual interpretation. The findings show that company asset misappropriation is a common form of corporate fraud, occurring through cash embezzlement, inventory manipulation, misuse of company facilities, and irregularities in goods and services procurement. Law enforcement already has a normative basis through the Criminal Code, the Limited Liability Company Law, and Supreme Court Regulation Number 13 of 2016. However, its effectiveness is still constrained by complex corporate structures, evidentiary difficulties, limited capacity of law enforcement officials, and weak internal supervision systems. Therefore, stronger law enforcement must be integrated with preventive mechanisms through Good Corporate Governance, internal control, legal compliance culture, whistleblowing systems, and monitoring technology to create transparent, accountable, and high-integrity corporations.
Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Pejabat Pemerintahan Atas Penyelenggaraan Pengelolaan Sampah Yang Tidak Memenuhi Norma, Standar, Prosedur, Dan Kriteria (NSPK) Kurdi Kurdi
JUNCTO: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol 8, No 1 (2026): JUNCTO : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum JUNI
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/juncto.v8i1.7042

Abstract

This study examines the legal accountability of government officials for failures in waste management, particularly the operation of final disposal sites (landfills) employing the open dumping system in violation of the established Norms, Standards, Procedures, and Criteria (NSPK). Using a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches, the research analyzes the boundaries between official liability (fautes de service) and personal liability (fautes personnelles) of public officials. The findings indicate that public officials may incur personal liability when they are proven to have committed gross negligence, abuse of authority, or violations of the General Principles of Good Governance (AUPB) in disregarding the imperative prohibition of the open dumping system. Furthermore, the NSPK framework functions as a technical–juridical parameter (standard of care) in assessing the elements of unlawful acts committed by public authorities (Onrechtmatige Overheidsdaad). Systemic disregard of NSPK constitutes a form of maladministration that infringes upon citizens’ constitutional right to a good and healthy environment. Strengthening oversight mechanisms and ensuring consistent enforcement of sanctions are therefore essential to secure governmental compliance with national waste management standards.
Kekuatan Mengikat Konvensi Ketatanegaraan dalam Penetapan Waktu Pelantikan Presiden: Urgensi Kodifikasi dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia Kiki Fatmawati; Rosmini Rosmini; Herdiansyah Hamzah
JUNCTO: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol 8, No 1 (2026): JUNCTO : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum JUNI
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/juncto.v8i1.7117

Abstract

This article aims to analyze the role of constitutional conventions in determining the timing of the inauguration of the President and Vice President, as well as to examine the legal and political implications should the inauguration not be conducted in accordance with established conventions. The focus is on the legal vacuum that results in the practice of holding the inauguration on October 20 being based solely on unwritten conventions without formal sanctions. To address this issue, the author draws upon the theory of constitutional conventions according to Dicey and Jennings, as well as legal-political theory. Data were collected through a literature review using primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources and analyzed qualitatively using a normative legal research method that employs statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. This study concludes that the October 20 inauguration convention functions as unwritten law that is morally and politically binding but lacks formal legal force, and that deviations from this convention have the potential to create legal uncertainty, a crisis of legitimacy, and a threat to the stability of Indonesia's presidential system. This study offers a normative model for codifying constitutional conventions into positive law as an effort to strengthen legal certainty and prevent constitutional crises in national leadership succession, filling the gap in existing literature that has not specifically examined the urgency of codifying the timing of presidential inauguration.