cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Agung Suharyanto
Contact Email
agungsuharyanto@staff.uma.ac.id
Phone
+628126493527
Journal Mail Official
juncto@uma.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jurusan Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Medan Area, Jalan Kolam No. 1, Pasar V, Medan Estate, Sumatera Utara
Location
Kota medan,
Sumatera utara
INDONESIA
JUNCTO: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum
Published by Universitas Medan Area
ISSN : -     EISSN : 27229793     DOI : 10.31289
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
JUNCTO: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum is a Journal of Law for information and communication resources for academics, and observers of Business Law, International law, Criminal law, and Civil law. The published paper is the result of research, reflection, and criticism with respect to the themes of Business Law, International law, Criminal law, and Civil law. All papers are peer-reviewed by at least two referees
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 165 Documents
 13   14   15   16   17 
Kajian Hukum terhadap Prinsip Efisiensi dan Efektivitas Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen melalui Lembaga Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Sektor Jasa Keuangan berdasarkan POJK Nomor 61/POJK.07/2020 Ginting, Monica Br; Lubis, Anggreni Atmei
JUNCTO: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol 7, No 2 (2025): JUNCTO : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum DESEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/juncto.v7i2.6448

Abstract

This study examines the application of the principles of efficiency and effectiveness in resolving consumer disputes through the Alternative Institution for Financial Services Sector Dispute Resolution (LAPS SJK) based on Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 61/POJK.07/2020. Inequality in the position between financial service business actors and consumers often places consumers in a disadvantaged position. Therefore, the existence of regulations governing dispute resolution through LAPS SJK is expected to serve as a solution in providing legal protection for consumers. This research employs a normative legal approach using literature review and interview techniques for data collection. The results indicate that the dispute resolution procedure at LAPS SJK includes the submission of an application, administrative examination, mediation, and a final and binding decision. The principle of efficiency is reflected in simplified procedures and affordable costs, while the principle of effectiveness is demonstrated by fair and enforceable decisions. Although LAPS SJK has made efforts to implement these principles, several challenges remain in practice. Consequently, increased consumer education and the strengthening of LAPS SJK’s institutional capacity are necessary to enhance legal protection for financial service consumers.
Strategi Penjualan “Brithday Cake” Secara Online dalam Mengurangi PHK Harahap, Herlina Hanum; Bangun, Eko Putra; Monica, Eka Syafrina
JUNCTO: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol 7, No 2 (2025): JUNCTO : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum DESEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/juncto.v7i2.6429

Abstract

Perkembangan teknologi digital dan perubahan perilaku konsumen telah mendorong pelaku usaha mikro, kecil, dan menengah (UMKM) untuk beradaptasi melalui strategi penjualan berbasis online. Kondisi ini semakin relevan di tengah pandemi Covid-19 yang menyebabkan penurunan omzet dan meningkatkan risiko pemutusan hubungan kerja (PHK). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis strategi penjualan birthday cake secara online sebagai upaya meningkatkan pendapatan usaha dan mengurangi risiko PHK dari perspektif hukum ketenagakerjaan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif-empiris dengan pendekatan kualitatif, melalui kajian peraturan perundang-undangan di bidang ketenagakerjaan serta penelitian lapangan berupa wawancara, observasi, dan studi dokumentasi pada pelaku UMKM birthday cake. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pemanfaatan media sosial, sistem pre-order, layanan kustomisasi produk, dan kerja sama dengan layanan pesan antar mampu memperluas jangkauan pasar, meningkatkan jumlah pesanan, dan menjaga stabilitas usaha. Peningkatan pendapatan tersebut berdampak langsung pada kemampuan pelaku UMKM dalam mempertahankan tenaga kerja. Dengan demikian, strategi penjualan online tidak hanya berfungsi sebagai upaya adaptasi ekonomi, tetapi juga sebagai instrumen preventif dalam menekan terjadinya PHK.
Kekuatan Eksekutorial Akta Perdamaian sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata di Luar Pengadilan Kurdi, Kurdi; Cahyo, Raul Gindo; Dadek, Teuku Ahmad
JUNCTO: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol 7, No 2 (2025): JUNCTO : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum DESEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/juncto.v7i2.6727

Abstract

This study analyzes the executorial power and effectiveness of peace deeds (dading) as an alternative instrument for resolving civil disputes outside the courts. Litigation still faces classic problems such as case backlogs, high costs, and lengthy processes, thus contradicting the principles of speedy and efficient justice. Peace deeds offer a peaceful solution, but there is a legal gap regarding their enforceability. This normative legal research finds a fundamental dualism: peace deeds through court mediation (in-court) that are confirmed as decisions have direct executorial power equivalent to a final and binding decision. Conversely, out-of-court peace deeds, even if made in an authentic notarial deed, do not have direct executorial power and only function as evidence, so that disputes over breach of contract must still be sued. The use of grosse akta for reciprocal dading is also legally inappropriate. In practice, the effectiveness of dading shows a paradox: the high number of requests for execution of peace deeds indicates low voluntary compliance and the shift of disputes to the execution stage. The main obstacle to the effectiveness of out-of-court dading is the lack of an execution mechanism in Law No. 30 of 1999. This study recommends amendments to the law to provide a registration mechanism and granting of execution fiat for out-of-court settlement deeds..
Penerapan Persidangan Elektronik (E-Litigation) Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa di Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Dao, Fiktorius Kehidupan
JUNCTO: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol 7, No 2 (2025): JUNCTO : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum DESEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/juncto.v7i2.6711

Abstract

The State Administrative Court (PTUN) is the judicial authority authorized to examine, decide, and resolve cases deemed to constitute state administrative disputes, including petitions related to the scope of the administrative court's jurisdiction. In line with advances in information technology and the demands of simple, expeditious, and low-cost judicial principles, the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia has implemented an electronic-based judicial system through E-Court and E-Litigation. This study aims to analyze the application of electronic trials in dispute resolution at the PTUN and examine the validity of electronic evidence in court practice. The research method used is normative juridical law, utilizing statutory and conceptual approaches. The results indicate that the implementation of electronic trials at the PTUN has a sufficient legal basis, normatively, through Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2019. However, in practice, obstacles remain, particularly related to the authentication and assessment of electronic evidence and limited internet network infrastructure in some regions. Therefore, strengthening the electronic evidence verification mechanism and improving infrastructure support are necessary to ensure the effectiveness and legal certainty in the administration of electronic-based state administrative courts.
Kepastian Hukum Terhadap Kewenangan Balai Harta Peninggalan (BHP) Sebagai Pengurus dalam Perkara PKPU di Indonesia Kennedy, Kennedy; Sunarmi, Sunarmi; Robert, Robert
JUNCTO: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol 7, No 2 (2025): JUNCTO : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum DESEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/juncto.v7i2.6511

Abstract

Kewenangan BHP sebagai Pengurus dalam perkara PKPU di Indonesia masih belum jelas. Undang-undang PKPU telah mengatur mengenai siapa saja yang dapat diangkat menjadi Pengurus. Ketentuan tersebut dapat dilihat dari Pasal 234 ayat 3 UU PKPU. Dalam Pasal tersebut sudah disebutkan secara jelas mengenai siapa saja yang dapat diangkat menjadi Pengurus PKPU yaitu Orang Perseorangan yang berdomisili di wilayah Negara Republik Indonesia. Permasalahan adlaah Bagaimana Ketentuan Hukum terhadap Penetapan Pengurus dalam Perkara PKPU di Indonesia? Bagaimana Kewenangan Balai harta Peninggalan sebagai Pengurus dalam Perkara PKPU di Indonesia? Bagaimana kepastian hukum terhadap kewenangan Balai Harta Peninggalan dalam perkara PKPU. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode penlitian normatif dengan berdasar pada data sekunder dari hasil analisis diketahui penerapannya di lapangan terdapat 3 putusan dimana Hakim pada Pengadilan Niaga menunjuk Balai Harta Peninggalan sebagai pengurus dalam perkara PKPU yaitu nomor 33/pdt sus-PKPU/2022/PN Niaga Medan ; nomor 4/pdt sus-PKPU/2023/PN Niaga Medan dan nomor 22/pdt/sus-PKPU/2020 PN Niaga Medan. Dalam hal ini 3 putusan Hakim menafsirkan bahwa BHP juga berwenang melakukan tugas pengurusan sebagaimana bunyi dari Pasal 69 ayat 1 angka 5 dimana kata pengurusan dianggap sama seperti Pengurus dalam perkara PKPU.

Page 17 of 17 | Total Record : 165

 13   14   15   16   17 

Filter by Year

2019 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 8, No 1 (2026): JUNCTO : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum JUNI Vol 7, No 2 (2025): JUNCTO : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum DESEMBER Vol 7, No 1 (2025): JUNCTO : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum JUNI Vol 6, No 2 (2024): JUNCTO : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum DESEMBER Vol 6, No 1 (2024): JUNCTO : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum JUNI Vol 5, No 2 (2023): JUNCTO : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Desember Vol 5, No 1 (2023): JUNCTO : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Juni Vol 4, No 2 (2022): JUNCTO : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Desember Vol 4, No 1 (2022): JUNCTO : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Juni Vol 3, No 2 (2021): JUNCTO : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Desember Vol 3, No 1 (2021): JUNCTO : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Juni Vol 2, No 2 (2020): JUNCTO : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Desember Vol 2, No 1 (2020): JUNCTO : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Juni Vol 1, No 2 (2019): JUNCTO : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Desember Vol 1, No 1 (2019): JUNCTO : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Juni More Issue