cover
Contact Name
Novianita Rulandari
Contact Email
journal@ilomata.org
Phone
+6281289935858
Journal Mail Official
ilomatajournal@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. Pangkalan Asem raya No. 55 Cempaka Putih Jakarta Pusat
Location
Unknown,
Unknown
INDONESIA
Ilomata International Journal of Social Science
ISSN : 2714898X     EISSN : 27148998     DOI : 10.52728/ijss
FOCUS Ilomata International Journal of Social Science aims to provide information on both theoretical and empirical articles and case studies relating to sociology, political science, history, law in society and related disciplines. Published articles use scientific research methods, including statistical analysis, case studies, field research and historical analysis. SCOPE Ilomata International Journal of Social Science concerns on sociology, political science, history, law in society and related domains. through publication of research based articles and critical analysis articles. It describes, compares, interprets, and explains the whole aspects of multi discipline perspectives including anthropology, sociology, psychology, philosophy, education, philology and history of religion. Ilomata International Journal of Social Science acordially welcomes contributions from scholars of related disciplines
Articles 382 Documents
Process, Strategy, and Contextual: The Deadlock Situation in The Negotiation for Resolving Conflict Between Russia and Ukraine (2022-2025) Yusuf, Dedi; Sumadinata, R. Widya Setiabudi; Akim
Ilomata International Journal of Social Science Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): January 2026
Publisher : Yayasan Ilomata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61194/ijss.v7i1.2046

Abstract

The conflict between Russia and Ukraine escalated into a full-scale war following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022. Since then, both parties have engaged in several negotiation efforts aimed at resolving the conflict. However, from all those negotiations conducted none of them produce any agreement or any framework to resolve the conflict. This is seen by the researcher as a deadlocked situation within the negotiation. By using qualitative descriptive research with document analysis using Faure’s deadlock within negotiation framework, this research indicates that negotiation between Russia and Ukraine for resolving their conflict has reached a deadlocked situation. This research also found that several factors such as process, strategy, and contextual factor that are contributing to the deadlock situation within the negotiation. The findings suggest that these factors are creating a condition where during negotiations strategies adopted by both countries during negotiation and social, political, and legal pressure from within the countries makes them have very little maneuver during the negotiation, which creates a lack of any substantial agreement from the negotiation to resolve the conflict. This research contributes to the limited amount of discourse regarding the negotiation conditions that occurred between Russia and Ukraine for resolving their conflict, offering a new perspective by applying Faure’s indicators and factors such as Process, Strategy, and Contextual towards this issue.
Under Two Patriarchal Authorities? Subordination of Female Peacekeepers by Husbands and the State: A Feminist Critique Nabilaputri, Febrie Fitria; Sumadinata, R. Widya Setiabudi; Darmawan, Wawan Budi
Ilomata International Journal of Social Science Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): January 2026
Publisher : Yayasan Ilomata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61194/ijss.v7i1.2047

Abstract

This research examines dual subordination of Indonesian female peacekeepers experiencing layered control from private institutions (family/husbands) and public institutions (state/military). Using critical feminist methodology through qualitative literature-based discourse analysis, this study applies feminist state theory and intersectionality analysis to reveal how the state instrumentalizes marriage institutions controlling female soldiers' professional autonomy. Findings indicate spousal permission requirements for peacekeeping assignments create dual ownership: women belong to husbands privately and the state publicly, making career advancement contingent on spousal approval rather than solely professional competence. Three operational mechanisms function: juridical domestication (codifying marital status as professional determinant), institutional collusion (domestic-military patriarchy collaboration), and internalized patriarchy (women accepting subordination systems). Comparative analysis reveals male soldiers face no equivalent requirements, perpetuating hegemonic masculinity. This study offers a new analytical framework conceptualizing dual ownership through three subordination mechanisms for understanding spousal-permission regulations in troop-contributing countries, advancing knowledge on domestic-institutional patriarchy intersections limiting women's peacekeeping participation.