cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Mahrus Ali
Contact Email
sengkomahrus@gmail.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
sengkomahrus@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Faculty of Law Merdeka University Surabaya Jl. Ketintang Madya VII/2 Surabaya
Location
Kota surabaya,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains
Published by Universitas Merdeka Surabaya
ISSN : 20866852     EISSN : 25985892     DOI : -
Core Subject : Health, Social,
Health Professions Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
The scope of the articles published in YURISDIKSI Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains deal with a broad range of topics in the fields of Civil Law, Criminal Law, International Law, Administrative Law, Islamic Law, Constitutional Law, Environmental Law, Procedural Law, Antropological Law, Medical Law, Law and Economic, Sociology of Law and another section related contemporary issues in Law. YURISDIKSI Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author.
Arjuna Subject : Seni dan Humaniora - Seni dan Humaniora (Lain-Lain)
Articles 13 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 21 No. 3 (2025): December In progress" : 13 Documents clear
Paradigm Transformation in Land Area of Plantation Cultivation Right from Agrarian Basic Law to Job Creation Law wicaksono, setiawan; Imam Koeswahyono; Iwan Permadi; Hanif Nur Widhiyanti
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 21 No. 3 (2025): December In progress
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v21i3.312

Abstract

The regulation of land area for plantation cultivation rights (Hak Guna Usaha/HGU) has changed from 1960 to 2023. Paradigm theory is one of the theories that examines why and what reasons lie behind written regulations. When legal changes occur, a paradigm shift also takes place. This article addresses the issue of what paradigm is used to determine the land area for plantation cultivation rights in several laws and whether a paradigm shift has occurred. A normative research method is chosen to examine the provisions regarding the land area of cultivation rights in four laws. The analysis uses a systematic, conceptual, and historical approach. This study shows a shift in paradigm in the granting of cultivation rights, particularly from 1960, which emphasized social justice, to 2023, which prioritizes economic interests.
The Obligation of Sharia Certification For Notaries In The Preparation of Financing Contract Deeds In Islamic Banking Maulida, Siti Anisa
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 21 No. 3 (2025): December In progress
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v21i3.314

Abstract

This study discusses the urgency and regulation of sharia certification obligations for notaries who make financing agreements in Islamic banking in Indonesia. The main problem arises because there is no legal norm that regulates notary sharia certification, thus creating a legal vacuum (rechtsvacuum) which has an impact on legal uncertainty, low legitimacy of deeds, potential disputes, and the risk of violating sharia principles such as the prohibition of usury, gharar, and maysir. This study formulates two main problems: (1) the urgency of regulating the obligation of notaries to have sharia certificates in making sharia financing agreements, and (2) the design of sharia certification regulations for notaries in order to increase sharia compliance in financing agreements in Islamic banking. The research method used is normative juridical with a statutory, conceptual, and comparative legal approach, based on primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The results of the study indicate that notary sharia certification is very important to ensure the conformity of deeds with sharia principles and positive law. The necessary regulations must include a comprehensive curriculum containing Islamic legal principles, fatwas from the National Sharia Council (DSN-MUI), national regulations, and structured education and competency testing. Furthermore, a regular monitoring and evaluation mechanism by the Sharia Supervisory Board (DPS) is necessary to maintain professional standards and Sharia compliance. Comparison with practices in other countries, particularly Turkey, demonstrates the need for Indonesia to adopt more stringent and systematic regulations. This study recommends the establishment of formal regulations regarding mandatory Sharia notary certification, an integrated certification and supervision body, the implementation of training and competency testing, and optimizing the role of the DPS in overseeing Sharia compliance.
Formulation For Resolution of Partial Or Complete Overlapping of Mining Business Permit Areas Sihaloho, Meylin; Indah Dwi Qurbani; Venny Indria
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 21 No. 3 (2025): December In progress
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v21i3.316

Abstract

Mineral and coal mining plays a strategic role in national development because it contributes to economic growth, energy security, and increased state revenue. However, this sector still faces serious problems in the form of overlapping Mining Business Permit Areas (WIUP), which give rise to legal uncertainty, conflicts of interest, and inefficient natural resource governance. Overlapping permits arise from a weak licensing administration system, regulatory disharmony, and a lack of coordination between central and regional government agencies. This situation has implications for disrupting the investment climate, declining business confidence, and reducing state revenue from the mining sector. As a normative response, Law Number 2 of 2025, specifically Article 171B, regulates the authority of the Central Government to evaluate and revoke Mining Business Permits (IUP) that experience overlap in part or all of their areas. This policy is a strategic step to reorganize licensing and ensure legal certainty in accordance with the mandate of Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution. However, its implementation faces challenges in the form of limited integrated spatial data, a weak national mining information system, and the absence of a standard mechanism for resolving overlapping permit disputes. This study uses a normative juridical method with a statutory, conceptual, and case approach to analyze the urgency and formulation of regulations for resolving overlapping WIUPs. The results of the study indicate that derivative regulations are needed in the form of comprehensive, systematic, and applicable Government Regulations to regulate the evaluation, revocation, and dispute resolution mechanisms in a transparent manner. Thus, clear and integrated regulations are not only able to create legal certainty and justice, but also ensure the utilization of mineral and coal resources for the greatest prosperity of the people.
The Principle of Fault In Absolute Responsibility For Environmental Crimes (Study of Decision Number 107/PDT.G/Lh/2019/PN JMB) Fitria Wildasari; Tongat
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 21 No. 3 (2025): December In progress
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v21i3.317

Abstract

The environment holds an important position in the Indonesian legal system as stipulated in Article 28H paragraph (1) and Article 33 paragraph (4) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, which guarantees the right to a good and healthy environment. However, the increasing number of corporate activities that cause environmental pollution and damage raises fundamental issues related to criminal liability. Classical criminal law adheres to the principle of fault (mens rea), namely that a person can only be punished if they have intent (dolus) or negligence (culpa). The application of this principle becomes problematic when the perpetrator is a corporation that does not have an inner will like humans. To address this, Law Number 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management introduced the principle of strict liability, which allows for criminal punishment without proving the element of fault if environmental pollution or damage is proven to have occurred. This study analyzes the application of the principle of fault and the principle of strict liability in the Jambi District Court Decision Number 107/Pdt.G/LH/2019/PN Jmb using a juridical-normative method with a statutory and case approach. The study's findings indicate that the application of strict liability in the decision reflects a paradigm shift in environmental criminal law from a fault-based model to a system of accountability oriented toward ecological protection. While this principle strengthens the victim's position and the effectiveness of environmental law, it has also generated debate because it potentially undermines the principle of geen straf zonder schuld (no crime without fault).
The Legal Safeguards For Buyers of Land Acquired Through Debt Settlement  (Study of Decision Number 12/Pdt.G/2018/PN.Btl) Ramdhan, Syaffi' Rangga Raditya; Rachmi Sulistyarini; Dyah Ayu Wisnuwardhani
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 21 No. 3 (2025): December In progress
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v21i3.318

Abstract

Legal protection for good-faith land buyers is a fundamental aspect in maintaining the balance between justice, legal certainty, and benefit in the Indonesian civil law system. Problems often arise when the land being traded is previously involved in a debt-to-credit relationship, thus giving rise to potential disputes between creditors and buyers. This article aims to analyze the forms of legal protection for good-faith buyers based on the provisions of the Civil Code, the Basic Agrarian Law, and various Supreme Court jurisprudential decisions. The analysis results show that good-faith buyers receive legal protection in three forms: preventive, repressive, and normative. Preventive protection is realized through land administration mechanisms such as the preparation of a sale and purchase deed by a Land Deed Official (PPAT) and land registration at the land office. Repressive protection is provided through a court decision rejecting a third-party lawsuit if it is proven that the buyer has acted in good faith. Meanwhile, normative protection stems from the principles of good faith, the principle of legal certainty, and the doctrine of justice applicable in Indonesian civil law. Thus, the existence of this legal protection not only guarantees ownership rights for buyers in good faith, but also strengthens public trust in the national land law and governance system.
Regulations On Proofing Marriage Announcement As A Requirement For Catholic Divorce In Indonesia Zamiatun, Arda; Rachmi Sulistyarini; Nur Chanifah
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 21 No. 3 (2025): December In progress
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v21i3.319

Abstract

This study examines the urgency of the annulment letter in the Catholic divorce system in Indonesia as a legal instrument that plays a crucial role in bridging the gap between civil law and the canon law of the Catholic Church. The annulment letter serves not only as an administrative document but also as proof of the legality of the annulment of marriage, determining the validity of the marriage sacrament according to Church law. This study found that the lack of clear regulations regarding the recognition and verification of annulment letters in district courts can lead to legal uncertainty and conflict over the dual status between civil and canonical recognition. The annulment process in the Catholic Church itself is a pastoral judicial mechanism that assesses the validity of a marriage based on the norms of faith and canon law, with stages including filing, examining evidence, and a tribunal decision. This study emphasizes the importance of synchronizing the results of the ecclesiastical tribunal process with the national legal system to ensure justice, legal certainty, and the protection of the rights of Catholics. A comparative approach to the legal systems of other countries shows that the integration of the results of religious tribunal decisions into the national legal system can be achieved through transparent and measurable administrative mechanisms. Thus, the regulation of proof and recognition of annulment letters in Indonesian national law is expected to realize harmonization between religious law and state law, while strengthening legal, spiritual, and social protection for Catholic couples.
Legal Certainty In The Provision of Free Notarial Services For The Underprivileged Syaid, Ishma Safira; Djumikasih; Trie Sulistiowarni
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 21 No. 3 (2025): December In progress
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v21i3.320

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal consequences of incomplete norms governing the obligation to provide free notarial services by notaries to the underprivileged as stipulated in Article 37 of the Notary Law (UUJN). This provision actually reflects the social function of the notary office in ensuring access to justice. However, Article 37 of the UUJN does not yet contain clear parameters regarding the criteria for the underprivileged, the types of notarial services that must be provided, or the financing mechanism. This study uses a normative legal research method with a statutory, comparative, and conceptual approach. The results show that the incomplete norms in Article 37 of the UUJN create legal uncertainty. Based on previous field research, there are differences in the implementation of the obligation to provide free notarial services among notaries for the underprivileged. A comparative study with Law Number 16 of 2011 concerning Legal Aid and Government Regulations related to its implementation shows that the legal aid system has a more comprehensive legal framework, including parameters for beneficiaries, types of services provided, and financing mechanisms from the state. Therefore, it is necessary to establish implementing regulations or technical guidelines that detail the obligation to provide free notarial services, as explained above. This normative reconstruction is crucial to ensuring legal certainty for notaries and the beneficiary community.
Criminal Law Formulation Policy Regarding Payment of Money In Substitution For Criminal Acts of Corruption From The Perspective of Dignified Justice Ni'Am, M. Khoirun; Prija Djatmika; Abdul Madjid
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 21 No. 3 (2025): December In progress
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v21i3.321

Abstract

Corruption is an extraordinary crime that remains a serious problem in Indonesia despite the implementation of various regulations such as Law Number 31 of 1999 in conjunction with Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption. One important instrument in recovering state losses due to corruption is the penalty of replacement money. However, in practice, the application of replacement money as an additional penalty has not been effective due to legal and technical obstacles, such as the difficulty of tracking assets, weak coordination between law enforcement agencies, and the absence of a consistent execution mechanism. This study aims to analyze the legal implications of criminal law formulation policies related to the regulation of replacement money and to formulate a direction for criminal law reform based on the concept of dignified justice. This study uses a normative legal research method with a statutory, case, and conceptual approach. The analysis is conducted prescriptively through grammatical and systematic interpretation of laws and regulations, doctrine, and judicial practice. The results show that the regulation of replacement money as an additional penalty does not reflect substantive justice because it emphasizes the retributive aspect rather than the restorative aspect. Legal reform is needed by making compensation a primary punishment so that the primary objective of punishment is to restore state losses. The dignified justice approach positions humans as moral subjects responsible for redressing public losses, in line with the values ​​of Pancasila. Therefore, this reformulation is expected to create a more just, humane, and socially just criminal legal system.
Business Licensing Obligations for E-Commerce under Government Regulation No. 80/2019 Achmad Haekal; Sudarsono; Shinta Hadiyantina
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 21 No. 3 (2025): December In progress
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v21i3.330

Abstract

This study examines the discrepancy between das sollen and das sein regarding the obligation to register a business license as mandated in Article 15(1) of Government Regulation Number 80 of 2019. Although the regulation requires all business actors to register their licenses with the Central Government, its implementation in Malang City remains ineffective. Of approximately 85,200 MSMEs, only about 22,000 had obtained official licenses by 2024. The study addresses two issues: (1) the factors contributing to the low compliance of micro-enterprise actors with licensing requirements, and (2) the legal implications for those operating without a business license. Using a socio-legal method with a juridical-sociological approach, the research relies on primary and secondary data collected through fieldwork and literature study. The sample consists of 13 respondents and 2 key informants, analyzed qualitatively. The findings reveal that the main cause of ineffective implementation is the low level of legal awareness and knowledge among micro-enterprise actors. Eight respondents were unaware of the obligation to register with the Disnaker PMPTSP of Malang City, while five respondents were aware but had not complied. This demonstrates that regulatory implementation has not been optimal. The legal implications for non-compliant business actors include the loss of legal validity of their operations and the potential imposition of administrative sanctions under applicable laws.
The Urgency of Obligation To Establish A Legal Entity For Foreign Over-The-Top (OTT) Service In Indonesia Ibadi, Mohamad; Sukarmi; Ruslijanto, Patricia Audrey
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 21 No. 3 (2025): December In progress
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v21i3.331

Abstract

This study evaluates the effectiveness and legal urgency of requiring foreign Over-the-Top (OTT) service providers to establish a legal entity in Indonesia. The existing regulatory framework—comprising the Income Tax Law, the Harmonization of Tax Regulations Law, and Circular Letter No. 3/2016—remains limited and has not fully adapted to digital economic realities, particularly the principle of significant economic presence. Using a normative juridical method combined with Economic Analysis of Law, this study finds that foreign OTT operations have created legal uncertainty due to regulatory fragmentation, lack of physical presence requirements, and weak enforceability. Comparative analysis with the U.S. economic nexus model demonstrates the need for Indonesia to shift towards digital presence–based taxation. The study concludes that harmonizing tax, communications, and trade regulations—supported by risk‑based and adaptive digital governance—is essential to strengthening fiscal justice, consumer protection, and national digital sovereignty.

Page 1 of 2 | Total Record : 13

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2025 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 21 No. 3 (2025): December In progress Vol. 21 No. 2 (2025): September Vol. 21 No. 1 (2025): June Vol. 20 No. 4 (2025): March Vol. 20 No. 3 (2024): December Vol. 20 No. 2 (2024): September Vol. 20 No. 1 (2024): June Vol. 19 No. 4 (2024): March Vol. 19 No. 3 (2023): December Vol. 19 No. 2 (2023): September Vol. 19 No. 1 (2023): June Vol. 18 No. 4 (2023): March Vol. 18 No. 2 (2022): 30 September 2022 Vol. 18 No. 3 (2022): December Vol. 18 No. 1 (2022): June Vol. 17 No. 4 (2022): March Vol. 17 No. 3 (2021): December Vol. 17 No. 2 (2021): September Vol. 17 No. 1 (2021): Juni Vol. 16 No. 4 (2021): March Vol. 16 No. 3 (2020): Desember Vol. 16 No. 2 (2020): September Vol. 16 No. 1 (2020): Juni Vol. 15 No. 2 (2020): March Vol. 14 No. 1 (2019): September Vol. 13 No. 2 (2019): March Vol. 12 No. 1 (2018): September Vol. 11 No. 2 (2018): March Vol. 10 No. 1 (2017): September More Issue