cover
Contact Name
Rengga Satria
Contact Email
renggasatria@fis.unp.ac.id
Phone
+6285263574556
Journal Mail Official
kawakib@fis.unp.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jurusan Ilmu Agama Islam, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial (FIS), Universitas Negeri Padang (UNP) Jl. Prof. Dr. Hamka Air Tawar, Padang, Sumatera Barat 25123
Location
Kota padang,
Sumatera barat
INDONESIA
Al-Kawakib
ISSN : -     EISSN : 27464997     DOI : https://doi.org/10.24036/kwkib.v2i1.15
Al-Kawakib a journal of Islamic studies published twice a year June and December by Major Islamic Studies Faculty Of Social Science Universitas Negeri Padang since 2020 Publishes original (library or field) research articles in the field of Islamic studies It promotes multidisciplinary approaches to Islam and Islamicate societies and focuses on seven main topics Islamic Education the Qur’an and hadith Islamic Law Islamic Theology (Kalam) Islamic Philosophy Islamic Mysticism (Tasawwuf) Islamic Communication and Propogation (Dakwah) It encourages articles that employ a multi-disciplinary approach to those topics. Scholars that are concerned with Islam and its manifestation throughout Muslim history and society can submit their article to Al-Kawakib and use this open access journal as a valuable resource in this field.
Articles 92 Documents
Konstruksi Identitas Kolektif dalam Pidato Abu Ubaidah: Analisis Intertekstual terhadap Hadis Ahmad Bagas Prakoso
Jurnal Kawakib Vol 7 No 1 (2026): Islamic Studies
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24036/kwkib.v7i1.451

Abstract

This study examines the intertextuality of hadith in Abu Ubaidah’s speeches through Julia Kristeva’s theory of intertextuality. It aims to analyze the mechanisms of hadith reformulation and their functions in constructing religious authority and collective identity within religious discourse. This research employs a descriptive qualitative method using purposive sampling on six excerpts selected from five speeches delivered between 2023 and 2025. The findings reveal five mechanisms of hadith reformulation: direct, contextual, conceptual, legitimative, and expansive reformulation. Furthermore, hadith intertextuality functions semantically, rhetorically, and symbolically in producing meaning, strengthening persuasion, and reinforcing collective identity. The study demonstrates that hadith are strategically reformulated to establish religious legitimacy and ideological cohesion in discourse. These findings highlight that hadith intertextuality functions as a dynamic discursive instrument in shaping meaning, authority, and collective identity in contemporary religious discourse.
Uncovering Polygamy: A New Perspective from Al-Majmuʼ Syarh al-Muhadzdzab an-Nawawi through the Lens of Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah by Jasser Auda Muhammad Danil; Al Ikhlas Al Ikhlas; Desi Yusdian; Fathur Rahmi
Jurnal Kawakib Vol 7 No 1 (2026): Islamic Studies
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24036/kwkib.v7i1.453

Abstract

Polygamy remains a persistently contested issue within Islamic jurisprudence, intersecting legal, ethical, and social dimensions. This study examines the concept of polygamy as articulated by Imām al-Nawawī in Al-Majmuʼ Syarh al-Muhadzdzab a seminal encyclopedic work of Shāfiʼī fiqh and evaluates it through the systemic Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah framework of Jasser Auda. Employing a descriptive-analytical library research method followed by a comparative-analytical approach (muwāzanah), this study systematically analyses primary and secondary sources to identify convergences and divergences between classical jurisprudential reasoning and contemporary maqāṣid thought. The findings reveal that al-Nawawī permits polygamy for up to four wives, conditioning it strictly upon material justice (qism and nafaqah) while explicitly recommending monogamy as a prudential preference to avert injustice. Jasser Auda's systemic approach, which prioritises human flourishing, harm reduction (dafʼ al-mafāsid), and contextual holistic justice encompassing emotional, psychological, and social well-being provides a substantially expanded evaluative lens. The comparative analysis demonstrates that, while both perspectives share the foundational telos of justice and welfare, Auda's framework demands an empirical assessment of real-world outcomes, rendering polygamy a highly constrained exception rather than a general permission in contemporary contexts. This study contributes to ongoing scholarly dialogue on the reform of Islamic family law by bridging classical and contemporary maqāṣid methodologies.

Page 10 of 10 | Total Record : 92