cover
Contact Name
Abdul Basid Fuadi
Contact Email
jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id
Phone
+6281215312967
Journal Mail Official
jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id
Editorial Address
Pusat Penelitian dan Pengkajian Perkara dan Pengelolaan Perpustakaan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 6, Jakarta 10110 Telp: (021) 23529000 Fax: (021) 3520177 E-mail: jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id
Location
Kota adm. jakarta pusat,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Jurnal Konstitusi
ISSN : 18297706     EISSN : 25481657     DOI : https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1841
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
The aims of this journal is to provide a venue for academicians, researchers and practitioners for publishing the original research articles or review articles. The scope of the articles published in this journal deal with a broad range of topics in the fields of Constitutional Law and another section related contemporary issues in law.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 584 Documents
Konsep Bentuk Perusahaan Pertambangan Mineral dan Batubara dalam Perspektif Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 Hayat Hayat
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 17, No 3 (2020)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (396.932 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1732

Abstract

The concept of mineral and coal mining management provided by business entities, cooperatives and individuals as regulated in Law No.3 of 2020 concerning Amendments to Law No.4 of 2009 concerning Mineral and Coal Mining which is managed under the concept of a Mineral and Coal mining company. constitution based on the 1945 Constitution. The research method used is juridical normative, resulting in that the form of mineral and coal mining companies by the 1945 Constitution is a business entity, cooperative or individual listed in the Mineral and Coal Mining Law. which has a cooperative nature by the 1945 Constitution.
Dampak Jaminan Fidusia Kredit Kendaraan Bermotor yang Tidak Didaftarkan terhadap Penerimaan Negara Bukan Pajak Akhmad Yasin
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 17, No 4 (2020)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (387.502 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1746

Abstract

Motor vehicles ownership through finance companies can be realized after going through a series of procedures before a notary and fiduciary registration office. However, this series of procedures are not done by finance companies in providing motor vehicle financing to consumers. Increasing consumer financing to the public for motor vehicles ownership should also increase the number of non-tax state revenues from fiduciary guarantees. The study purpose is to know the legal consequences for fiduciary recipients who did not register their fiduciary guarantees and to know the impact of unregistered fiduciary guarantees on non-tax state revenue (PNBP). The formulation of the problem in the research question is how the legal consequences for fiduciary recipients who do not register their fiduciary guarantees and how the impact of unregistered fiduciary guarantees on non-tax state revenue (PNBP). The research method used is descriptive qualitative normative legal research using secondary data. The study results found that fiduciary finance companies/ recipients did not register their fiduciary guarantee, so they committed illegal acts by utilizing third parties to execute motorized vehicles that were not actually burdened with fiduciary guarantees. The executor’s right to fiduciary recipient is legally flawed because he does not hold a fiduciary guarantee certificate as a result of not registering a motorized vehicle as a fiduciary guarantee. The impact on state finances because they were not registering motor vehicles as fiduciary guarantees at the fiduciary registration office resulting in non-tax revenue (PNBP) being not optimal for the state.
Karakteristik Ne Bis In Idem dan Unsurnya dalam Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi Ilhamdi Putra; Khairul Fahmi
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 18 No. 2 (2021)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (408.071 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1824

Abstract

Ne bis in idem principle in Mahkamah Konstitusi procedural law (Constitutional Court– CC) found in Article 60 Paragraph (1) of CC Act, in prohibition form to return to trial norms previously reviewed. Discrete from Criminal Code and Civil Code which exact ne bis in idem elements, Article 60 Paragraph (1) has sole element within object review form. This research examines two problems: what are ne bis in idem principle characteristics, and what are the elements in the CC procedural law? The normative judicial research method used to understand ne bis in idem principle elative. Ne bis in idem adaptation in CC procedural law resulted broad philosophical shifts that unaffected Petitioners' legal standing and legality of the object that could bring against them. Based on decision systematics, CC put arguments ne bis in idem at Conclusion, so that it is not a verdict. Meanwhile, ne bis in idem principle in CC procedural law carry several norms, however CC Act only has two elements in legal object and legal subject-relationship forms. Meanwhile, the third element in legal development form is found in the CC decision. Because the legal standing of the Petitioners' and the legality of the object that can be challenged was not disturbed, the three elements did not apply accumulatively, in which the element of legal development was more determinant than the other two elements. As result, constitutionality actualization either occurs through positive decisions granted Petitioners' petition, moreover occurred in cases deemed ne bis in idem.
Menggagas Sanksi atas Tindakan Constitution Disobedience terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Novendri M. Nggilu
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 16, No 1 (2019)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (348.736 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1613

Abstract

Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai lembaga yang secara fungsional menjalankan tugas untuk mengawal konstitusi Indonesia, untuk memastikan apakah Konstitusi Indonesia dilaksanakan secara penuh dan bertanggung jawab atau tidak. Putusan-putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi yang mencerminkan jaminan constitution justice value baik dalam perkara Pengujian Undang-Undang terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar Tahun 1945, maupun dalam perkara Perselisihan Hasil Pemilihan Umum yang seharusnya dijalankan oleh semua pihak yang terkait dengan putusan tersebut, tak jarang memunculkan situasi terbalik. Oleh sebab itu, tulisan ini hendak menjawab pertanyaan penelitian tentang ; 1) bentuk-bentuk tindakan constitution disobedience terhadap putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2) implikasi dari tindakan constitution disobedience tersebut, dan 3) bagaimana sanksi bagi tindakan constitution disobedience agar dapat menjamin penegakan konstitusi di Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual, dan pendekatan kasus, dengan sumber bahan hukum kepustakaan dan teknik analisis preskriptif. Temuan dari penelitian ini adalah ; 1) adanya bentuk pembangkangan terhadap putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi baik dengan cara menghidupkan kembali pasal-pasal yang telah dibatalkan oleh MK, atau bahkan pembangkangan terhadap putusan MK melalui putusan pengadilan di lingkungan Mahkamah Agung. 2) pembangkangan terhadap putusan MK berakibat pada ketidakpastian hukum sampai pada terjadinya constitutional justice delay. 3) alternatif sanksi yang dapat dibebankan pada pihak yang melakukan pembangkangan terhadap putusan MK adalah sanksi contempt of court melalui perluasan makna contempt of court, atau dengan cara pembebanan dwangsom atau uang paksa.The Constitutional Court as an institution that functionally carries out the duty to oversee the Indonesian constitution, to ascertain whether the Indonesian Constitution is implemented in full and is responsible or not. Decisions of the Indonesian constitutional court reflecting guarantees of constitutional justice values both in the case of constitution 1945 judicial review and in cases of general election results disputes which should be enforce by all parties related to the decision, often creating inverse situations. Therefore, this paper is about to answer research questions about; 1) forms of constitution disobedience actions of constitutional court decisions, 2) Implications of constitution disobedience actions, and 3) how sanctions for constitution disobedience acts in order to guarantee the enforcement of the constitution in Indonesia. The research method used is normative research with a statute approach, conceptual approach, and case approach, with library legal materials and prescriptive analysis techniques. The findings of this study are; 1) there is a form of defiance of the Indonesian constitutional court's decision either by reviving the articles that have been canceled by the constitutional court, or even disobdiance of the constitutional court's decision through supreme court decisions. 2) The disobdiance of the constitutional court's decision resulted in legal uncertainty until the occurrence of constitutional justice delay. 3) the alternative sanctions that can be imposed on the party who commits disobediance of the constitutional court decision is the contemp of court sanction through the expansion of the meaning of the contemp of court, or by imposing dwansom or forced money.
Menyoal Kekuatan Eksekutorial Putusan Final dan Mengikat Mahkamah Konstitusi M. Agus Maulidi
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 16, No 2 (2019)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (450.453 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1627

Abstract

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi bersifat final dan mengikat sejak diucapkan dalam sidang pleno yang terbuka untuk umum. Artinya, sejak saat itu pula putusan MK harus dilaksanakan. Ternyata, masih banyak putusan MK yang tidak diimplementasikan sesuai dengan ketentuan konstitusi, bahkan cenderung diabaikan oleh addressat putusan. Penelitian ini hendak menganalisis mengenai, pertama, alasan putusan final dan mengikat MK tidak implementatif; Kedua, solusi untuk menciptakan putusan final dan mengikat MK yang implementatif. Penelitian ini dikualifikasikan ke dalam penelitian hukum normatif, dengan pendekatan konseptual dan komparatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan, pertama, bahwa putusan MK dengan sifat final dan mengikat yang berlaku sejak diucapkan dalam sidang pleno yang terbuka untuk umum sulit untuk dilaksanakan karena harus ditindaklanjuti dengan instrument hukum baru, padahal untuk melakukan hal tersebut, harus melalui proses hukum yang sangat formal-prosedural; selain itu, beberapa putusan MK cenderung melampaui batas sehingga mempengaruhi keharmonisan hubungan antar-cabang kekuasaan negara. Kedua, diperlukan adanya tenggang waktu putusan, berupa diberikannya jeda waktu agar addressat putusan mempunyai kesempatan menindaklanjuti putusan MK, serta upaya mengekang hakim MK dalam mengeluarkan putusan dengan menormakan semangat judicial restraint.Constitutional court’s decision is legally final and binding since decleared in the opened trial. Since then, constitutional court’s decision must be implemented consequently. Evidently, there are some constitutional court’s decisions doesn’t implemented based on the constitutional provisions, even tend to be ignored. This research aims to analize, first, the reason of the final and binding decision on the constitutional court doesn’t implemented; second, solutions to create a final and binding on constitutional court’s decision that is implementable. This research qualifies into normative legal research, with conceptual and comparative approach. The finding revealed that first, the Constitutional Court’s decision with the final and binding nature which has been effective since it was decleared in the plenary session which opened to the public, is difficult to implemented. This is due to new legal instruments with the formal-procedural proccess are needed to implement the constitutional court’s decision. Furthermore, some of the constitutional court’s decision tend to go beyond the limit wich influence the harmony of relations between branches of state power. Second, a grace period is needed, in the form of given a time lag so that addressat will take the opportunity to follow up on the Constitutional Court’s decision, also restraining constitutional court’s judges in issuing decisions by normalizing judicial restraint.
Hak Pilih Kelompok Penyandang Disabilitas Dalam Pemilihan Umum Tahun 2019 Di Sumatera Barat Henny Andriani; Feri Amsari
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 17, No 4 (2020)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (549.305 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1744

Abstract

In the voting process at elections, the people who vote in the elections believe they can influence the actions of those who are authorized to make binding decisions. In other words, they believe that what they are doing has a political effect (political efficiency). So it is an important thing to protect the political rights of all citizens, including the voting rights owned by groups of people with disabilities. Based on the above background, there are at least two problem formulations that can be used as a fence in this research, namely What are the problems and violations of the rights of groups of persons with disabilities in the 2019 General Election ?; and How are the rights of groups of persons with disabilities protected in the 2019 General Election in West Sumatra?
Ratio Legis Penetapan Pembayar Pajak (Taxpayer) sebagai Kedudukan Hukum dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi M. Yasin Al Arif; Hasanuddin Muhammad
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 17, No 3 (2020)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (474.025 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1731

Abstract

The discourse regarding the determination of the taxpayer standing in judicial review is not a completely new issue to be analyzed. However, it still needs to be examined in the framework of exploring the legal ratio for determining taxpayer standing in judicial review by the Constitutional Court. The findings of this research are an inseparable part of legal research in doctoral degree regarding the dynamics of the Petitioner’s legal standing in judicial review by the Constitutional Court. This research specifically answers the following questions: (a) how is the taxpayer doctrine as a legal standing in judicial review? (b) What is the legal ratio for determining taxpayer standing in judicial review by the Constitutional Court? This is normative legal research, by analyzing secondary data in the form of statutory regulations, Constitutional Court decisions, and literature related to the doctrine of the taxpayer standing in judicial review. The results indicate that the legal ratio for determining taxpayer standing in a judicial review can be traced through the legal considerations of the Constitutional Court decisions in judicial review since 2003-2019.
Sinergitas Kabinet Presidensiil Multipartai pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19 di Indonesia Tundjung Herning Sitabuana; Ade Adhari
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 18 No. 2 (2021)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (443.455 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1828

Abstract

Implement the simultaneous election in Indonesia has supported by the multiparty system. The multiparty system has an impact on the President’s leadership. In the formation of the cabinet, the President must accommodate political party coalition interest. One form of that accommodations occurs of the minister which came from the coalition political party. Different from the minister's interest background has an impact on the different policies each minister especially on COVID-19 handler in Indonesia. The research method is normative research with a case approach and concept approach. This research used secondary data that used primary, secondary, and tertiary materials. This research shows that the presidential cabinet in Indonesia is a cabinet which forms by multi-party coalitions. On multiparty coalition implementation of Kabinet Indonesia Maju 2019-2024, there were several times, the minister has different policy among the minister or with local governments such as the case of the ban on taking passengers for online biking and prohibition against homecoming. Different policies among the minister or with local government can be minimized by the President’s political leadership.
Menimbang Model Pengujian Keputusan Pejabat Publik oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia (Studi Perbandingan Indonesia dan Korea Selatan) Yunita Nurwulantari; Anna Erliyana
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 18 No. 1 (2021)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (454.615 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1818

Abstract

Testing public officials decision in Indonesia, which has been the authority of the State Administrative Court (PTUN) should be done through a constitutional complaint mechanism, written under the authority of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia (MKRI). This is due to all public officials have the potential to perform acts that violate or harm the constitutional rights of citizens as guaranteed in the 1945 Constitution (UUD 1945). This additional authority to examine and decide cases of constitutional complaints should be possible in the framework of carrying out the functions of the Constitutional Court as the guardian of the constitution as implemented in countries that apply the principle of constitutional supremacy, one of which is as applied in the Constitutional Court of The South Korea. Even though South Korea has an administrative court which also has the authority to examine the decision of public officials, South Korea still open space for its citizens to file constitutional complaint in Constitutional Court of South Korea when there is a public official decision that harm and violating the constitutional rights of the citizens that have been guaranteed in constitution. Thus, when all legal remedy for violations of constitutional rights as a result of the issuance of public official decision has been exhausted, but violations still occur, then this constitutional complaint mechanism into the need to provides maximum protection and respect the constitutional rights of citizens. Therefore, the additional authority to examine and decide constitutional complaint can not be separated from the authority of the Constitutional Court.
Menakar Independensi Hakim Pengadilan Pajak Pasca Putusan MK Nomor 10/PUU-XVIII/2020 Ananthia Ayu Devitasari
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 17, No 4 (2020)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (387.976 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1748

Abstract

Judicial independence is the main foundation for the of justice and legal certainty. Regarding the discourse on the independence of judicial power, the Constitutional Court decided on Case Number 10/PUU-XVIII/2020 which examined Article 5 paragraph (2) and Article 8 paragraph (2) of Law Number 14 of 2002 concerning the Tax Court. The Petitioners challenged the authority of Ministry of Finance to develop the organization, administration and finance for the Tax Court, the authority of the Minister of Finance to propose the chairperson and deputy chairman of the Tax Court. Furthermore, the Court in its ruling states that “the Chairperson and Deputy Chairperson are appointed by the President who is elected from and by the Judges who are subsequently proposed through the Minister with the approval of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court for 1 (one) term of office for 5 (five) years”. This study examined the independence of the tax court judges after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 10 / PUU-XVIII / 2020 with independent judicial theory approach. This study showed that the Court’s decision not only supports the independence of the tax court judges but also draws a demarcation line between judicial power and executive power.

Filter by Year

2015 2024