cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Hariyanto
Contact Email
hariyanto@uinsaizu.ac.id
Phone
+6281328319197
Journal Mail Official
volksgeist@uinsaizu.ac.id
Editorial Address
Fakultas Syariah UIN Prof. K.H. Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto Jl. Jend. A. Yani No. 40A Purwokerto 53126 Jawa Tengah - Indonesia
Location
Kab. banyumas,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi
Published by Universitas Islam Negeri Profesor Kiai Haji Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto
ISSN : 2615174X     EISSN : 26155648     DOI : https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi has published by Sharia Faculty of UIN Prof. K.H. Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto. Volksgeist has a focus in publishing the research, and conceptual ideas which specific in the sector of Law science. The topics which relate generally to Law issues in Indonesia and around the world. Articles submitted might cover topical issues in Constitutional Law, Islamic Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Islamic Law, Civil Law, International Law, Agrarian Law, Administrative Law, Criminal Procedural Law, Commercial Law, Civil Procedural Law, Adat Law, and Environmental Law
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 155 Documents
 12   13   14   15   16 
Legal Policy of Disparity in Sentencing as a Ground for Judicial Review in Indonesia Corruption Cases Djatmika, Prija; Rahman, Wahbi; Wibowo, Dwi Edi; Weku, Robert Lengkong; Osman, Noor Dzuhaidah
Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi Vol. 8 Issue 2 (2025) Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Profesor Kiai Haji Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24090/volksgeist.v8i2.13287

Abstract

Article 263 paragraph (2) of Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code limits the grounds on which a Judicial Review of a court decision may be filed. This limitation stems from the extraordinary nature of the Judicial Review, as it provides a mechanism to reopen a case that has obtained permanent legal force (inkracht van gewijsde). Errors in assessing the grounds for a Judicial Review can undermine the principles of legal certainty and justice, which are fundamental to the rule of law. This paper analyzes the use of sentencing disparity in corruption cases as a basis for Judicial Review, as recognized by the Supreme Court of Indonesia. The study employs a normative-descriptive research method. The findings indicate that sentencing disparity in corruption cases is multi-causal, suggesting that it does not always constitute a factual matter but may also involve legal considerations. The study concludes that determining sentencing disparity as an instance of judicial error in a Judicial Review must be conducted with due regard to the principle of judicial independence. Furthermore, with the issuance of Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2020 concerning Sentencing Guidelines under Articles 2 and 3 of the Corruption Eradication Law, issues of sentencing disparity should ideally be resolved through ordinary legal remedies such as appeals or cassation.
The Price of Corruption on State Losses Policy Rahmadi, Aji; Karjoko, Lego; Hartiwiningsih, Hartiwiningsih
Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi Vol. 8 Issue 2 (2025) Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Profesor Kiai Haji Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24090/volksgeist.v8i2.14813

Abstract

Legal instruments and law enforcement agencies have actively pursued efforts to eradicate corruption; however, empirical evidence indicates that the recovery of state financial losses remains disproportionate to the magnitude of economic harm incurred. This study seeks to reformulate the concept of state economic loss in corruption cases to establish a legal framework that is fairer, proportionate, and grounded in legal certainty. The research uses a normative juridical method, analyzing secondary data through three distinct approaches: the statutory approach, which examines the consistency of legal norms; the conceptual approach, which investigates relevant doctrines and theoretical frameworks; and the case study approach, which identifies judicial practices and jurisprudence relevant to the topic. The findings reveal two principal insights. First, the application of the economic loss element in state corruption cases encounters significant challenges, including ambiguous interpretations, the absence of clear normative boundaries, reliance on potential rather than actual loss calculations, and the lack of a standardized methodology. Second, reformulating this element is necessary by clarifying its normative definition, incorporating actual losses, recognizing systemic impacts, and standardizing the methodology for calculating losses. This reformulation enhances the quality of evidence, reduces disparities in legal interpretation, and promotes harmonization across laws and regulations. Moreover, this policy framework is expected to improve coordination among law enforcement agencies, strengthen public trust, and ultimately foster a more effective, transparent, and corruption-free governance environment.
Understanding the Legal Politics of Regional Tax Regulations: Navigating Regional Autonomy in Post-Tax Reform in Indonesia Pamuji, Kadar; Dharmawan, Aditya Riza; Kartono, Kartono; Masum, Ahmad
Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi Vol. 8 Issue 2 (2025) Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Profesor Kiai Haji Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24090/volksgeist.v8i2.12341

Abstract

This research addresses the urgent changes following the repeal of Law no. 28 of 2009, which governed Regional Taxes and Regional Levies, as incorporated into the Financial Relations between the Central Government and Local Governments Law (Law No. 1 of 2022). The repeal brings forth significant consequences, particularly affecting the authority of regional governments to shape their tax policies. To understand these impacts, we delve into the evolution of regional tax regulations in Indonesia. The legal landscape surrounding regional tax law under the HKPD Law presents a fascinating area of study. Our aim is to explore the legal politics that influence local tax management within the framework of regional autonomy in Indonesia. This study employs a normative juridical approach, utilizing various data collection methods, including interviews, focus group discussions (FGDs), and document analysis. Throughout the research, data processing and analysis occur continually as new information emerges. Our findings indicate a notable shift in legal politics surrounding local tax management in Indonesia. Current regional tax policies are increasingly designed to enhance local revenue, supporting regional autonomy while aligning with the central government’s fiscal harmonization goals. This approach aims to optimize public services and ensure the sustainability of fiscal framework.
Restorative Justice in Settling Criminal Case: A Normative-Empirical Study of the Law Efa Rodiah Nur; Hasan, Zainudin; Dahri, Harapandi
Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi Vol. 8 Issue 2 (2025) Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Profesor Kiai Haji Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24090/volksgeist.v8i2.13017

Abstract

Restorative justice offers an alternative framework for addressing the needs of both victims and offenders in Indonesia. While it presents a more hopeful solution compared to traditional punitive measures, concerns about fairness remain. Specifically, victims may feel that the response to the offense does not match the seriousness of the crime, leading to a sense of being undercompensated. This article explores how restorative justice is integrated into Indonesia’s criminal justice system through both normative and empirical legal research. Bandar Lampung serves as the primary focus of this study due to its establishment of a Restorative Justice House and its reputation as a leading practitioners of restorative justice in the country. The research involved observing practices at the District Prosecutor’s Office in Bandar Lampung, allowing for an empirical understanding of how legal regulations are enacted in practice. Additionally, the study reviews the normative aspects of the law related to restorative justice, particularly focusing on the Attorney General’s Regulation No. 15 of 2020 and its Circular No. 1 of 2021 concerning the termination of prosecution based on restorative justice. The findings indicate that restorative justice is primarily applied to lesser criminal cases that fit specific criteria. These cases often involve first-time offenders, crimes that carry potential sentences of at most five years, and financial damages up to Rp 2,500,000. Of the 13 cases examined, 10 were effectively resolved using restorative justice methods. This highlights the potential of restorative justice on repairing harm, addressing victims’ needs, ensuring that offenders take responsibility, and fostering social cohesion. What sets this study apart is its combination of doctrinal legal analysis and fieldwork, enabling a comprehensive evaluation of how restorative justice norms are operationalized within prosecutorial practices in Indonesia.
Discourse Using Blockchain Technology for the Enforcement of Money Laundering Crimes in Indonesia Huda, Chairul; Yunan, Puan Dinaphia; Paidi, Zulhilmi Bin
Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi Vol. 8 Issue 2 (2025) Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Profesor Kiai Haji Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24090/volksgeist.v8i2.13376

Abstract

Money laundering is a crime aimed at concealing the origin of funds derived from illegal activities, which has become increasingly difficult to detect with the growth of digital transactions and cryptocurrency use. Blockchain, as a distributed ledger technology, can record transactions permanently, transparently, and securely, making it a promising tool to support Anti-Money Laundering (AML) systems. This study examines the role of blockchain in strengthening Indonesia’s AML framework amid rapid growth in digital financial transactions and increasing complexity of money laundering methods. The significant rise in suspicious transaction reports, particularly through digital wallets, e-money, and cryptocurrencies, indicates a shift of money laundering practices to digital channels that challenge existing oversight and law enforcement mechanisms. The study employs a qualitative approach through literature review and secondary data analysis to assess how blockchain features such as immutability, transparency, transaction pattern analysis, and cross-border tracking can enhance detection and verification of suspicious fund flows. The results suggest that blockchain has the potential to strengthen KYC procedures, enhance forensic capabilities, and provide verifiable electronic evidence. Nevertheless, regulatory and institutional limitations remain. OJK Regulation No. 27 of 2024 does not yet incorporate blockchain analytics, regulate privacy coins, mixers, or cross-chain laundering, nor provide a technology-based supervisory framework. Challenges also exist in evidentiary standards, digital chain-of-custody mechanisms, and technical capacity of law enforcement. Effective implementation of blockchain in Indonesia’s AML system requires regulatory refinement, institutional strengthening, and alignment with FATF standards.

Page 16 of 16 | Total Record : 155

 12   13   14   15   16 

Filter by Year

2018 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 8 Issue 2 (2025) Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi Vol. 8 Issue 1 (2025) Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi Vol. 7 Issue 2 (2024) Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi Vol. 7 Issue 1 (2024) Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi Vol. 6 Issue 2 (2023) Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi Vol. 6 Issue 1 (2023) Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi Vol. 5 Issue 2 (2022) Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi Vol. 5 Issue 1 (2022) Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi Vol. 4 Issue 2 (2021) Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi Vol. 4 Issue 1 (2021) Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi Vol. 3 Issue 2 (2020) Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi Vol. 3 Issue 1 (2020) Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi Vol. 2 Issue 2 (2019) Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi Vol. 2 Issue 1 (2019) Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi Vol. 1 Issue 2 (2018) Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi Vol. 1 Issue 1 (2018) Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi More Issue