cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Kamal Fahmi Kurnia
Contact Email
kamal.fahmi1405@gmail.com
Phone
+6281398486424
Journal Mail Official
justicia.sains20@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. Imam Bonjol No. 468 Langkapura
Location
Kota bandar lampung,
Lampung
INDONESIA
JUSTICIA SAINS: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Published by Universitas Sang Bumi Ruwa Jurai
ISSN : 25274201     EISSN : 25021788     DOI : https://doi.org/10.24967/jcs
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
JUSTICIA SAINS: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum [E-ISSN: 2502-1788; P-ISSN: 2527-4201] is the Journal of Legal Studies published by the Faculty of Law of Universitas Sang Bumi Ruwa Jurai, Lampung, Indonesia. Its main aim to disseminate critical and original analysis from researchers and academic practitioners on various contemporary legal issues both local and foreign. The manuscript is published after undergoing a peer-review process by providing an exclusive analysis on law issues from various perspectives. This journal published biannually (June and November). The scopes of Justicia Sains Novelty are: Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Civil Law, Islamic Law, Environmental Law, Human Rights, International Law, and also interconnection study with Legal Studies in accordance with the principle of novelty.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 344 Documents
 31   32   33   34   35 
Paradigma Diskresi Penyidik Polri dalam Tindak Pidana Khusus: Antara Kepastian Hukum dan Keadilan Restoratif Dinar Mahardika; Tian Terina
JUSTICIA SAINS - Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 11, No 1 (2026): JUSTICIA SAINS: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Sang Bumi Ruwa Jurai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24967/jcs.v11i1.5979

Abstract

Berlakunya Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang KUHP dan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2025 tentang KUHAP sejak 2 Januari 2026 memindahkan diskresi penyidik Polri dari ruang peraturan internal ke ruang undang-undang. Pembaruan itu, bagaimanapun, berhadapan dengan watak tindak pidana khusus yang lazim memuat ancaman minimum khusus, rezim pembuktian tersendiri, dan kepentingan publik yang besar. Artikel ini mengkaji bagaimana paradigma diskresi penyidik Polri dikonstruksikan dalam KUHAP dan Undang-Undang Kepolisian hasil perubahan 2026, sejauh mana diskresi itu dapat dijalankan dalam tindak pidana khusus, dan bagaimana kontrolnya dirancang. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual terhadap bahan hukum primer serta buku terbitan 2021–2026. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa diskresi penyidik bergeser dari kewenangan menilai sendiri menurut Pasal 18 UU Polri menjadi diskresi terstruktur yang dibatasi syarat, pengecualian, kewajiban pemberitahuan, penetapan pengadilan, dan praperadilan. Artikel ini menawarkan model tiga zona diskresi, yaitu zona tertutup, zona bersyarat, dan zona prosedural, untuk membaca ruang gerak penyidik dalam tindak pidana khusus. Penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa kepastian hukum baru akan terjaga apabila peraturan pemerintah pelaksana keadilan restoratif diterbitkan dan Peraturan Kepolisian Nomor 8 Tahun 2021 diselaraskan dengan KUHAP.
Penyalahgunaan Mekanisme PKPU terhadap Debitur dalam Perspektif Hukum Kepailitan Indonesia Hendri Kusuma Wardani; Hilal Al Waris Sahim M
JUSTICIA SAINS - Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 11, No 1 (2026): JUSTICIA SAINS: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Sang Bumi Ruwa Jurai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24967/jcs.v11i1.4952

Abstract

The Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (PKPU) is principally intended as a restructuring instrument to maintain the debtor’s business continuity and protect the interests of all parties. However, in practice, the PKPU mechanism is often used by creditors as a means of pressure (abuse of process) to force debtors to accept disproportionate settlement schemes or even as a shortcut to bankruptcy. This study aims to analyze forms of PKPU abuse against debtors and to formulate a concept of legal protection for debtors within the Indonesian bankruptcy law system. The research method applied is normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches through an examination of Law Number 37 of 2004, legal doctrines, and relevant commercial court decisions. The results show that PKPU regulation does not firmly restrict applications submitted without good faith, thereby opening space for the instrumentalization of PKPU. Therefore, interpretative reconstruction by judges and the strengthening of application selection norms are required to achieve a balance of interests between creditors and debtors based on the principles of good faith and substantive justice.
Keabsahan Akta Dibawah Tangan Sebagai Hasil Mediasi Oleh Notaris Nabilah Valda Alisyah; Aldira Mara Ditta Caesar Purwanto
JUSTICIA SAINS - Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 11, No 1 (2026): JUSTICIA SAINS: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Sang Bumi Ruwa Jurai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24967/jcs.v11i1.4972

Abstract

This research is based on legal issues that arise due to the interests of opposing parties to resolve legal issues outside the court that are resolved through mediation with the assistance of another party, namely a Notary as a mediator. Usually the results of the mediation are stated in the form of a mutual agreement deed so as to obtain perfect evidentiary power. However, in practice it does not rule out the possibility that the results of the mediation will be stated only as a private deed according to the choice of the parties. The method used in compiling this paper is a normative legal research using a statutory regulatory approach and a conceptual approach as the basis for analysis. The findings of this research show that the validity of a private deed as a result of mediation will remain legally valid as long as it is recognized by the parties concerned if a dispute arises one day.
Analisis Yuridis Sengketa Harga Limit Lelang Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan Rafi Nuh Aqmal; Dessy Maeyangsari
JUSTICIA SAINS - Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 11, No 1 (2026): JUSTICIA SAINS: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Sang Bumi Ruwa Jurai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24967/jcs.v11i1.4995

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the legal classification regarding the determination of price limits in mortgage execution auctions and examine the judges' thinking in resolving conflicts related to auction limit prices. This research applies a normative legal research strategy through a regulatory approach and a case approach to court decisions related to mortgage execution auction disputes. Legal materials were obtained using a literature study that includes statutory regulations, judges' decisions, and relevant legal references. Several findings indicate that the determination of limit prices in execution auctions must be based on professional judgment that reflects the market value or liquidation value of the collateral object and is carried out in accordance with statutory regulations. In the case analyzed, the panel of judges considered that the determination of limit prices had been carried out based on valid procedures and assessments and therefore was not proven to be an unlawful act.

Page 35 of 35 | Total Record : 344

 31   32   33   34   35 

Filter by Year

2016 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 11, No 1 (2026): JUSTICIA SAINS: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 10, No 2 (2025): JUSTICIA SAINS: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 10, No 1 (2025): JUSTICIA SAINS: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 9, No 2 (2024): JUSTICIA SAINS: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 9, No 1 (2024): JUSTICIA SAINS: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 8, No 2 (2023): JUSTICIA SAINS: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 8, No 1 (2023): JUSTICIA SAINS: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 7, No 2 (2022): JUSTICIA SAINS: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 7, No 1 (2022): JUSTICIA SAINS: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 6, No 2 (2021): JUSTICIA SAINS: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 6, No 1 (2021): JUSTICIA SAINS: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 5, No 2 (2020): JUSTICIA SAINS: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 5, No 1 (2020): JUSTICIA SAINS: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 4, No 2 (2019): JUSTICIA SAINS: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 4, No 1 (2019): JUSTICIA SAINS: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 3, No 2 (2018): JUSTICIA SAINS: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 3, No 1 (2018): JUSTICIA SAINS: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 2, No 2 (2017): JUSTICIA SAINS: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 2, No 1 (2017): JUSTICIA SAINS: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 1, No 2 (2016): JUSTICIA SAINS: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 1, No 1 (2016): JUSTICIA SAINS: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum More Issue