cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Andi Akram
Contact Email
sekretariatjurnalkumdil@gmail.com
Phone
+6221-29079286
Journal Mail Official
jurnalhukumperadilan@mahkamahagung.go.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Jend. A. Yani Kav. 58 Lt. 10 Cempaka Putih Jakarta Pusat
Location
Kota bogor,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan
Published by Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Hukum dan Peradilan MA RI
ISSN : 23033274     EISSN : 25281100     DOI : https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp
Core Subject : Economy, Social,
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan (JHP) is published by the Research Center for Law and Judiciary of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. JHP aimed to be a peer-reviewed platform and an authoritative source of information on legal and judiciary studies. The scope of JHP is analytical, objective, empirical, and contributive literature on the dynamics and development of legal studies, specifically in Indonesia. JHP welcomes scientific papers on a range of topics from research studies, judicial decisions, theoretical studies, literature reviews, philosophical and critical consultations that are analytical, objective, and systematic. However, from a wide range of topics that researchers can choose from, JHP puts more attention to the papers focusing on the sociology of law, living law, legal philosophy, history of national law, customary law, literature studies, international law, interdisciplinary, and empirical studies. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan (JHP) is a media dedicated to judicial personnel, academician, practitioners, and law expertise in actualizing the idea of research, development, and analysis of law and judiciary. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan comes out three times a year in March, July, and November.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 653 Documents
 25   26   27   28   29 
HOW CAN ENVIRONMENTAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION BE RESOLVED WITHOUT GOING TO COURT Leo Nora Elly AM Pandiangan; Nanin Koeswidi; Norti Retiana Silitonga
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 10, No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.10.2.2021.245-254

Abstract

To protect environmental pollution and/or damage, the government has issued legislation on environmental protection and management supplemented by Ministerial Regulations. Environmental pollution and/or damage can occur due to natural factors and human actions that result in losses to the country and/or society. Environmental polluters and/or destroyers can be prosecuted in court. Before environmental disputes are transferred to court, environmental disputes are first resolved through mediation conducted by a mediator and settled out of court (non-litigation) in accordance with applicable laws. Mediators or the role of third-party services are free and neutral /impartial.
EKSISTENSI BANTUAN HUKUM TERHADAP PRAJURIT TNI SEBAGAI PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA DAN PRAKTIKNYA Tumbur Palti D. Hutapea
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 5, No 3 (2016)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.5.3.2016.371-390

Abstract

Legal assistance is an assistance given by an expertise in law area or legal advisors to those who have legal problems at every stage of investigation both outside and inside the court. The role of legal assistance for Indonesian National Armed Forces personnel is important. The Legislation covering legal assistance in the Indonesian National Armed Forces community throughout the history has prioritized internal legal assistance where the personnel itself does not have certification/ accreditation for it. The external is hard to get involve and have to obtain special permission from the Officers hand the case (Papera). Accelerating the Bill on Military Justice to revise the rules on providing legal assistance to Army personnel is priority. Furthermore, the necessary freedom to choose and establish legal assistance services of a professional advocate or by means POSBAKUM, especially cases which threatened the death penalty and additional penalty in the form of dismissal from military service.Keywords: military court, legal assistance, papera, posbakum
MASALAH “LEGAL STANDING” DALAM PUTUSAN - PUTUSAN HAK UJI MATERIIL MAHKAMAH AGUNG REPUBLIK INDONESIA TAHUN 2012 – 2014 Dani Elpah
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 4, No 2 (2015)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.4.2.2015.299-322

Abstract

The paradigm has changed from disadvantaged right equalized with the interest, without classifying the requirement of disadvantaged right that must fulfill 5 (five) requirement, those are : (a) there is a right for applicant that is given on law and regulation (b) this right is disadvantaged if considered by applicant c) the disadvantage must be specific and actual or at least potential (d) causality connectivity must be exist; (e) the disadvantage will not happen if the application is acceptedKeywords : Legal Standing, Judicial Review, Supreme Court
ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP UPAYA HUKUM LUAR BIASA PENINJAUAN KEMBALI (PK) OLEH JAKSA DALAM SISTEM HUKUM ACARA PIDANA INDONESIA Ahmad Fauzi
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 3, No 1 (2014)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.3.1.2014.37-48

Abstract

Peninjauan kembali oleh Jaksa dalam perkara pidana merupakan paradoks yang terjadi dalam sistem hukum pidana, dimana praktek hukum tersebut bertentangan dengan nilai dan norma hukum sebagaimana diatur dalam KUHAP. Tetapi dalam praktek peninjauan kembali seringkali dilakukan oleh jaksa dengan alasan ada yurisprudensi pengadilan yang memutus perkara tersebut, akibatnya hukum tidak mencerminkan keadilan dan kepastian bahkan cenderung menabrak kepentingan hukum terpidana dan ahli warisnya. Metode penelitian menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan menitik beratkan pada studi kepustakaan. analisis dilakukan terhadap norma hukum, baik hukum dalam aturan perundang-undangan maupun hukum dalam putusan-putusan pengadilan). Adapun kesimpulan yang dihasilkan adalah bahwa pengajuan peninjauan kembali adalah sematamata demi kepentingan terpidana dan ahli warisnya, hukum dan undang-undang tidak memberikan wewenang kepada jaksa untuk melakukan peninjauan kembali, bahwa peninjauan kembali yang dilakukan oleh jaksa bukan merupakan penemuan hukum melainkan hanya merupakan penafsiran hukum, pengajuan peninjauan kembali oleh jaksa merupakan bentuk kekeliruan pengadilan yang mengindikasikan kepada adanya sesat logika dalam praktek hukum pidana di Indonesia. Saran bagi pengembangan tema tulisan ini adalah Mahkamah Agung harus mengeluarkan surat edaran yang berisikan larangan dan pembatasan bagi jaksa untuk mengajukan peninjauan kembali atau melakukan uji materiil dan pembatalan bagi perkara-perkara yang diajukan peninjauan kembali oleh jaksa.Kata Kunci: Peninjauan Kembali, Jaksa, Hukum Acara Pidana, Keadilan, kepastian Hukum
PENDISTRIBUSIAN KEADILAN OLEH PENGADILAN SERTA BUDAYA HUKUM DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA Eman Suparman
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 1, No 3 (2012)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.1.3.2012.399-416

Abstract

Handle civil disputes in general, for many the sense how the courts considered too laden with procedures, formalistic, rigid, and slow to make a decision on a dispute. Presumably these factors can not be separated from the judge's perspective on a very rigid laws and normative-procedural law in doing concretization. While a judge should be able to be living interpretator captures the spirit of fairness in society and not bound by the normative-procedural rigor present in a legislation, because the judge is no longer a la bouche de la loi (law funnel). There are indications that the judge did not have enough courage to make decisions that are different from the normative provisions of the law, so that substantial justice is always difficult to achieve through a court verdict, because the judges and the courts will only give formal justice. Assessment of fairness in general terms only from one side only, ie those who receive treatment. The seekers of justice in general, defeated parties in the case, will always provide an assessment that the unjust verdict. It can not be denied is one result of the function and role of the trial run has been oriented towards the success of efforts to support and programs set by the government or the executive. Keywords: normative procedural, formal justice, substantial justice
PENGUJIAN ADA TIDAKNYA PENYALAHGUNAAN WEWENANG MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG ADMINISTRASI PEMERINTAHAN / EXAMINATION TO DETERMINE THE PRESENCE OR ABSENCE OF ABUSE OF AUTHORITY ACCORDING TO GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATION LAW Enrico Parulian Simanjuntak
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 7, No 2 (2018)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.7.2.2018.237-262

Abstract

Dalam UUAP (Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan), penyalahgunaan wewenang merupakan genus yang terdiri dari tiga spesies yang berbeda-beda yakni (1) melampaui wewenang; (2) mencampur-adukan wewenang; (3) bertindak sewenang-wenang. UUAP tidak menjelaskan pengertian penyalahgunaan wewenang, ia hanya mengkualifikasi ke tiga jenis spesies penyalahgunaan wewenang sebagaimana disebut di atas. Dikaitkan dengan kewenangan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara (Peratun) dalam menguji penyalahgunaan wewenang vide pasal 21 UUAP haruslah dilihat dalam konteks yang terbatas yakni semata dalam aspek pengujian penyalahgunaan wewenang yang menimbulkan kerugian keuangan negara. Pengujian penyalahgunaan wewenang dalam aspek bersifat parsial dan sangat terbatas jika dibandingkan dengan luasnya ruang lingkup dan kompleksitas pengertian penyalahgunaan wewenang dalam hukum administrasi.In the UUAP (Government Administration Law), abuse of authority is a genus consisting of three different species, namely (1) acting beyond authority; (2) mixing up authority; (3) acting arbitrarily. The UUAP does not clarify the definition of abuse of authority; it only classifies it into the three types of abuse of authority as mentioned above. When associated with the authority of the Administrative Court in examining abuse of authority pursuant to Article 21 of the UUAP, it must be seen in a limited context, namely only in the aspect of examination of abuse of authority that results in state financial losses. Examination of abuse of authority in this aspect is partial and very limited compared to the extent of the scope and complexity of the notion of abuse of authority in administrative law.
“BYSTANDER EFFECT” IN CASES OF CORRUPTION IN CORPORATE, BUREAUCRATIC AND POLITICAL ORDERS Vera Astuti; Ratna Candra Sari
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 8, No 3 (2019)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.8.3.2019.420-438

Abstract

E-KTP Corruption is an organized crime that occurs in Indonesia. The corruption that has been established is to form an organized network due to the phenomenon "baystander effect" where it is a phenomenon of social psychology due to the loss of a sense of virginity to act to do something on an incident that Characterized by the interdependent nature of each other which eventually nothing moves one.  This research aims to prove the existence of a matter of silence because it is triggered by personal interests or "self-interest" of the persons involved until difficult to control by the State apparatus. This method of research refers to the reference of legislation, information submitted by the media, statements from politicians and bureaucracy officials, court decisions and also reference books. The results of the study showed that the corruption that ensnares the bureaucracy officials and the politicians in fact has also dragged corporations. Participating in the case of the persons in corruption cases of intertwining creates a crime that is organized in such a way to harm the country and cause millions of people to be injured in the sleep. When they feel benefited over this corruption case then they choose silence, this is the phenomenon called "baystander effect" thus complicating the investigation in dismantling this corruption case.
SUBJEK HUKUM MENURUT HANS KELSEN DAN TEORI TRADISIONAL: ANTARA MANIPULASI DAN FIKSI E. Fernando M. Manullang
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 10, No 1 (2021)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.10.1.2021.139-154

Abstract

AbstrakKonsep subjek hukum adalah salahkonsep inti dalam hukum. Dalam teori tradisional, konsep ini hanya dimaknai hanya berkaitan dengan hak dan kewajiban belaka. Sementara Hans Kelsen melihat bahwa ada persoalan kuasa dalam hak dan kewajiban. Namun, kuasa ini bukanlah kuasa terutama dalam konsep subjek hukum, karena menurut teori tradisional, ada kuasa di baliknya yang menentukan sesuatu itu adalah subjek hukum yang memiliki kuasa hak atau tidak. Relasi antarkuasa ini berpotensi tidak adil, dan bahkan berpotensi menjadi jahat, karena secara potensial ada manipulasi berbaur fiksi atas nama keyakinan agama atau pandangan sosial tertentu, sehingga si penguasa ini dapat menentukan sesuatu itu adalah subjek hukum yang memiliki kuasa atau tidak. Jikalau tidak memiliki kuasa, maka sanksi akan disiapkan untuk menghukum perilaku yang dianggap menyimpang. AbstractThe concept of legal subject is one of the core concepts in law. In traditional theory, this concept is only interpreted in its relation to the rights and obligations. While Hans Kelsen sees that such concept is related to power in rights and obligations. However, this power is not the supreme power in the concept of legal subjects, because according to traditional theory, there is another power behind it which determines the existence of a legal subject whether it has power or not. This power relation is potentially unfair, and even vicious, because there is plausible manipulation mixed with fiction in the name of a religious belief or a social view, hence such power can determine whether a legal subject has power or not. If it has no power, then sanctions will be defined to punish certain behavior that is considered socially improper.
TITIK SINGGUNG WEWENANG MAHKAMAH AGUNG DENGAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI Saldi Isra
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 4, No 1 (2015)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.4.1.2015.17-30

Abstract

The mixing of authority between the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court has raised a range of issues. In turn, there is the contact authority of the two institutions which could lead to the occurrence of legal uncertainty. In connection with the authority testing regulations, for example, although the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court have the same right to test the legislation, but with different types and hierarchy of legislation being tested, then the interpretation of the rules of the legislation for which they were these institutions must be subject to a hierarchical system of laws and regulations that apply. Therefore, the validity of the norm is derived from the legislation is higher. Moreover, any decision of the judicial review of the UUD, this decision is erga omnes, including for judges of the Supreme Court and judges of the court under the Supreme Court.Keywords : Authority, Constitutional Court, Supreme Court
UPAYA PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP ANAK SEBAGAI KORBAN TINDAK PIDANA PERDAGANGAN ORANG Nelsa Fadilla
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 5, No 2 (2016)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.5.2.2016.181-194

Abstract

The data findings by the Indonesia Child Protection Commission (KPAI) reported that child trafficking tends to increase during the period of 2010 to 2012. In 2010 there were 410 cases, in 2011 there were 480 cases and in 2012 the case increased again up to 673 cases. The increasing cases of child trafficking have become a serious concern in the attempt of human trafficking eradication, especially children. The business not only in the form of law enforcement, preventively, repressively, and responsively but also related to the restoration or protection of children who become the victims of human trafficking (child trafficking) even after the completion of criminal proceedings with a view of restoring the child future.Keywords : legal protection , children , human trafficking.

Page 27 of 66 | Total Record : 653

 25   26   27   28   29 

Filter by Year

2012 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 14 No 3 (2025) Vol 14 No 2 (2025) Vol 14 No 1 (2025) Vol 13, No 3 (2024) Vol 13 No 3 (2024) Vol 13 No 2 (2024) Vol 13, No 2 (2024) Vol 13 No 1 (2024) Vol 13, No 1 (2024) Vol 12, No 3 (2023) Vol 12 No 3 (2023) Vol 12 No 2 (2023) Vol 12, No 2 (2023) Vol 12 No 1 (2023) Vol 12, No 1 (2023) Vol 11 No 3 (2022) Vol 11, No 3 (2022) Vol 11 No 2 (2022) Vol 11, No 2 (2022) Vol 11, No 1 (2022) Vol 11 No 1 (2022) Vol 10, No 3 (2021) Vol 10 No 3 (2021) Vol 10, No 2 (2021) Vol 10 No 2 (2021) Vol 10, No 1 (2021) Vol 10 No 1 (2021) Vol 9 No 3 (2020) Vol 9, No 3 (2020) Vol 9 No 2 (2020) Vol 9, No 2 (2020) Vol 9 No 1 (2020) Vol 9, No 1 (2020) Vol 8, No 3 (2019) Vol 8 No 3 (2019) Vol 8 No 2 (2019) Vol 8, No 2 (2019) Vol 8 No 1 (2019) Vol 8, No 1 (2019) Vol 7, No 3 (2018) Vol 7 No 3 (2018) Vol 7 No 2 (2018) Vol 7, No 2 (2018) Vol 7, No 1 (2018) Vol 7 No 1 (2018) Vol 6 No 3 (2017) Vol 6, No 3 (2017) Vol 6, No 2 (2017) Vol 6 No 2 (2017) Vol 6, No 1 (2017) Vol 6 No 1 (2017) Vol 5, No 3 (2016) Vol 5 No 3 (2016) Vol 5 No 2 (2016) Vol 5, No 2 (2016) Vol 5 No 1 (2016) Vol 5, No 1 (2016) Vol 4, No 3 (2015) Vol 4 No 3 (2015) Vol 4, No 2 (2015) Vol 4 No 2 (2015) Vol 4 No 1 (2015) Vol 4, No 1 (2015) Vol 3, No 3 (2014) Vol 3 No 3 (2014) Vol 3 No 2 (2014) Vol 3, No 2 (2014) Vol 3, No 1 (2014) Vol 3 No 1 (2014) Vol 2, No 3 (2013) Vol 2 No 3 (2013) Vol 2, No 2 (2013) Vol 2 No 2 (2013) Vol 2, No 1 (2013) Vol 2 No 1 (2013) Vol 1 No 3 (2012) Vol 1, No 3 (2012) Vol 1 No 2 (2012) Vol 1, No 2 (2012) Vol 1, No 1 (2012) Vol 1 No 1 (2012) More Issue