cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Narita Adityaningrum
Contact Email
narita.a@trisakti.ac.id
Phone
+6281528282851
Journal Mail Official
reformasihukum@trisakti.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Kyai Tapa No 1, Grogol Jakarta Barat
Location
Kota adm. jakarta barat,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Published by Universitas Trisakti
ISSN : -     EISSN : 2657182X     DOI : https://doi.org/10.25105/refor
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
The scope of this journal is in the field of legal science for case studies in Indonesia and also other regions of the world. Jurnal Reformasi Hukum Trisakti comes from a half of the results of the sudents undergraduate thesis of the Faculty of Law Trisakti University, in subjects : Business Law International Law Labour Law Family Law Land Law Constitutional Law Criminal Law Etc
Arjuna Subject : Seni dan Humaniora - Seni dan Humaniora (Lain-Lain)
Articles 1,070 Documents
 85   86   87   88   89 
PERBANDINGAN PELAKSANAAN FUNGSI LEGISLASI ANTARA DEWAN PERWAKILAN RAKYAT DI INDONESIA DAN REPRESENTATIVES DI URUGUAY: Comparison of the Legislative Functions between the House of Representatives in Indonesia and the Representatives in Uruguay Amirul Huda Musyafa Samudra; Ninuk Wijiningsih
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 6 No 3 (2024): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v6i3.21180

Abstract

A democratic state is characterized by the sovereignty of the people, where the highest power lies with the citizens. One manifestation of this sovereignty is the role of representative bodies in the legislative process. This study examines the role of the Indonesian House of Representatives and the Representatives in Uruguay in the law-making process, and evaluates their legislative performance. The research employs normative legal methodology, with descriptive writing, and uses secondary data. The result and Conclusions are drawn using deductive logic. The study finds that the Indonesian House of Representatives has a national legislative program that includes draft laws, while the Representatives in Uruguay do not have such a program. In Indonesia, 24 out of 247 draft laws in the 2020-2024 period were successfully enacted, whereas in Uruguay, 412 draft laws were passed into law during the same period.
PENERAPAN SYARAT MATERIIL SURAT DAKWAAAN PIDANA PENGEROYOKAN PADA PUTUSAN NOMOR : 813/PID.B/2023/PN.SBY: The Application of the Material Requirements of the Indictment for the Crime of Assault in Decision Number: 813/PID.B/2023/PN.SBY Rizki Firdaus Nuryana Basri; Maria Silvya E. Wangga
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 6 No 3 (2024): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v6i3.21195

Abstract

The Public Prosecutor is responsible for prosecuting, beginning with the reading of the indictment. However, in practice, some indictments do not meet the requirements set out in the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), as seen in Decision Number 813/PID.B/2023/PN.SBY. The research questions are how the indictment for the crime of assault was applied in decision number 813/PID.B/2023/PN.SBY and what are the legal consequences of an inaccurate indictment by the Public Prosecutor in this case, according to KUHAP. This research uses a normative juridical method with a descriptive-analytical approach, relying on secondary data and primary legal materials analyzed qualitatively. The conclusions drawn are that the indictment in Decision Number 813/PID.B/2023/PN.SBY is a cumulative-alternative combination but fails to meet the material requirements of KUHAP. The Public Prosecutor’s negligence in repeating the same article within the indictment reflects a lack of diligence, resulting in a vague indictment that contradicts the principles of criminal procedure law. Such an indictment opens the door for the defense counsel to file an exception, potentially leading to the judge rejecting the indictment and the case being dismissed by law
TESTIMONIUM DE AUDITU  SEBAGAI DASAR PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MEMUTUS TINDAK PIDANA PENCABULAN DAN PERSETUBUHAN ANAK: Testimony by Hearing as the Basis for Judicial Consideration in Deciding Cases of Child Molestation and Rape Fitra Triyana; Maria Silvya E. Wangga
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 6 No 3 (2024): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v6i3.21199

Abstract

Decision No. 254/Pid.Sus/2023/Pn.Mks, which examined and adjudicated a case of sexual assault and intercourse, was based solely on Testimonium de auditu. The issue is to what extent the available evidence supports Decision No. 254/Pid.Sus/2023/PN.Mks in declaring the defendant not proven legally and convincingly guilty according to the applicable legal standards. The research method used involves secondary data and is structured using normative descriptive research techniques. The discussion and conclusion are that Asdar Muhammad should be charged with sexual assault and intercourse based on written evidence, witness statements, and testimony from a minor victim, according to the analysis conducted (Case No. 254/Pid.Sus/2023/PN.Mks). The importance of witness testimony compared to what is seen, heard, or experienced determines the severity of a case, based on Constitutional Court Decision No. 65/PUU-VIII/2010. However, Asdar Muhammad should have been found guilty of committing sexual assault or intercourse, rather than being declared not guilty, as stated in Constitutional Court Decision No. 65/PUU-VII/2010.
Komparasi Sistem Pembuktian Hukum Acara Pidana Antara Indonesia Dengan Republik Rakyat Cina: Comparative Analysis of the Criminal Evidence Systems between Indonesia and the People's Republic of China Muhammad Alvaro Syahputra; Dyah Setyorini
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 6 No 3 (2024): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v6i3.21220

Abstract

Indonesia regulates its criminal proof system in the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code, while China governs its proof system under the Criminal Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China. Although both Indonesia and China follow a Civil Law system, there are similarities and differences in their criminal proof systems. This study employs a normative legal research approach with a descriptive-analytical nature, utilizing secondary data analyzed qualitatively and drawing deductive conclusions. The research findings indicate that the similarity between the criminal proof systems of Indonesia and China lies in the presence of proof hearings during the trial process in both countries. The difference is found in the types of evidence admissible in court: Indonesia recognizes five types of evidence, whereas China acknowledges seven types.
Analisis Yuridis Putusan  Mahkamah Konstitusi Terhadap Pengujian Undang-Undang (Studi Putusan MK No. 29/PUU-XXI/2023, No. 55/PUU-XXI/2023, No. 90/PUU-XXI/2023): Juridiсal Analysis of the Constitutional Court's Decision on the Examination of Laws Khairunnisa Dini Avianti; Yogo Pamungkas
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 6 No 3 (2024): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v6i3.21242

Abstract

This study evaluates the inconsistencies in the decisions of the Constitutional Court (MK) regarding the judicial review of laws, specifically concerning the decision MK No. 29-51-55-90/PUU-XXI/2023. The aim of this study is to understand the reasons behind the differing positions of the MK when reviewing the same article, namely Article 169 letter q of Law No. 7 of 2017 on General Elections. The method used is normative legal research with a descriptive nature, utilizing secondary data as the source. Data collection is conducted through literature study, data analysis is qualitative, and conclusions are drawn using the deductive method. The research findings reveal inconsistencies in the MK's decisions. In Decision No. 90/PUU-XXI/2023, the MK added a new norm by establishing alternative requirements for Article 169 letter q of Law No. 7 of 2017. In contrast, in Decision No. 29-51-55/PUU-XXI/2023, the request to review the same article was rejected on the grounds that the regulation of the minimum age is an open legal policy of the lawmakers and does not violate the 1945 Constitution. This inconsistency raises questions about the integrity of the MK and reduces public trust in the institution. The study recommends that the MK maintain consistency in judicial review decisions to preserve its authority and public trust.
ANALISIS PENERAPAN SANKSI PIDANA TERHADAP MILITER YANG MELAKUKAN TINDAK PIDANA PERKOSAAN (PUTUSAN NOMOR: 35-K/PM III-17/AD/II/2022): Analysis of Criminal Sanctions Against Military Who Commit the Crime of Rape (Decision Number: 35-K/PM III-17/AD/II/2022) Jenifi Plona Makienggung; Aprima Suar
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 6 No 3 (2024): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v6i3.21249

Abstract

The analysis examines the criminal sanctions applied to a military officer convicted of rape in Decision No. 35-K/PM III-17/AD/II/2022. Under Article 285 of the Criminal Code, rape is a severe crime, and military personnel may face sanctions under the Criminal Code if their actions are not specifically addressed by military law. The research addresses two main issues: 1) Whether the criminal sanctions in this decision are consistent with Article 285, and 2) How criminal sanctions should be aggravated for a military officer found guilty of rape in this case. This normative juridical research, using descriptive analysis, concludes that the sanctions in Decision No. 35-K/PM III-17/AD/II/2022 do not align with Article 285. The judge should have imposed harsher penalties, taking into account the severity of the offense. The aggravation of criminal sanctions should have been guided by Article 52 of the Criminal Code, allowing for an increase of one-third of the original penalty.
PENINJAUAN KEMBALI KEDUA DALAM PERKARA PIDANA BERDASARKAN SURAT EDARAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 7 TAHUN 2014: Second Review In Criminal Cases Based On Supreme Court Circular Letter Number 7 Of 2014 Julian Daniel; Setiyono
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 6 No 3 (2024): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v6i3.21257

Abstract

The right of review is the right of the perpetrator, in contrast to ordinary legal remedies whose application is enshrined in Article 268 paragraph (3) of the Criminal Code. However, in SEMA Number 7 of 2014, a review can be submitted on the grounds that there is a conflict between the decisions. Through Decision 467 Pk/Pid.Sus/2021, the panel of judges decided that the application was unacceptable. From the description above, the author intends to analyze two main issues to be examined, namely whether the decision is in accordance with the Criminal Procedure Code, and whether the reason for the decision is not acceptable to the application. In this paper, the author conducts a descriptive analysis method. Based on the discussion presented in this paper, it is concluded that the decision is not in line with Article 79 of Law Number 14 of 1985 concerning the Supreme Court, using the reason that there is no contradiction submitted as evidences as required in SEMA Number 7 of 2014
DOKTRIN “RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT” DALAM PENANGANAN KEJAHATAN TERHADAP KEMANUSIAAN DI REPUBLIK SUDAN TAHUN 2023: The Principle Of "Responsibility To Protect" In Addressing Crimes Against Humanity In The Republic Of Sudan In 2023 Yonathan Andrew; Ayu Nrangwesti
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 6 No 3 (2024): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v6i3.21258

Abstract

Differing views on sovereignty and intervention gave birth to the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) principle which emphasizes the responsibility of states to protect their people from war crimes, crimes against humanity, and ethnic cleansing. The armed conflict in Sudan showed violations of the R2P principle that caused thousands of casualties and sexual violence. The problem of this article is the status of the R2P principle in international law and whether the UN Security Council resolution implementing R2P can be a precedent for applying the R2P principle in Sudan. This article is normative juridical research, descriptive-analytical in nature, using secondary data, qualitative data processing, and deductive conclusions are drawn. The results show that the position of the R2P principle is internationally recognized in various UN documents and resolutions and the UN Security Council has not applied the R2P principle in the case of Sudan.
TINJAUAN YURIDIS KASUS KEBAKARAN LAPAS KELAS 1 TANGERANG DITINJAU DARI PERSPEKTIF HAK ASASI MANUSIA MENURUT UU NO. 39 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG HAS ASASI MANUSIA: Fire Case at Class 1 Prison in Tangerang in Human Rights Perspective MAULANA ARIF HIDAYATULLAH BARUS; MAULANA ARIF HIDAYATULLAH; Tri Sulistyowati
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 6 No 3 (2024): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v6i3.21268

Abstract

The safety guarantee of the right to life for prisoners in correctional institutions (“lapas”) is often neglected, even though it is the responsibility of the state.  One of the cases that occurred was the alleged negligence of government officials in the management of facilities and infrastructure in prison, such as the fire that occurred in Correctional Institutions Class 1 Tangerang on September 8, 2021. The problems of this article are:  whether there is a violation of human rights in the case of fire in Correctional Institutions Class 1 Tangerang? This article is a normative legal research, descriptive in nature, using secondary data, and deductive inference. The Result and conclusion obtained is that there was a violation of human rights due to the negligence of several prison officers which then caused a fire and resulted in casualties. Related to the case, four prison officers were charged under Articles 359 and 188 of the Criminal Code with a prison sentence of up to five years. Improvement and revitalization of prisons are also needed so that the safety of prisoners in prison can be better guaranteed.
ANALISIS HILANGNYA MEREK I AM GEPREK BENSU PADA PANGKALAN DATA KEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL (PDKI) BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 20 TAHUN 2016 TENTANG MEREK DAN INDIKASI GEOGRAFIS: Analysis of the Disappearance of I Am Geprek Bensu Brand in the Intellectual Property Database under Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications Deva Annisa Nur Yuliana; Rakhmita Desmayanti; Bahasa Indonesia
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 6 No 4 (2024): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v6i4.19721

Abstract

The occurrence of disputes over the use of the "Bensu" trademark made PT Ayam Geprek Benny Sujono as the First to File holder of the "Bensu" trademark suddenly removed unilaterally by the Directorate General of Intellectual Property from the IP Database. This journal examines the regulation of the removal of registered trademarks in the case of the loss of the trademark "I Am Geprek Bensu" by the DJKI from the Database based on Law No.20/2016 Trademark Law and Geographical Indications and its impact. The results showed that the Decree of DJKI which removed the registered mark "I Am Geprek Bensu" owned by Benny Sujono from the Database through a Decree on behalf of the Minister (HKI-KI.06.07-11) caused inconsistency with the MIG Law, as well as contrary to Decision No.57/Pdt.SusMerek/2019/PN Niaga Jkt.Pst and Decision No.575/Pdt.SusHKI/Merek/2020/PN Niaga Jkt.Pst. Also, the impact of the abolition of the "I Am Geprek Bensu" trademark is very detrimental both materially and immaterially to PT. Ayam Geprek Benny Sujono with the loss of exclusive rights to the trademark and creates confusion and uncertainty in the community towards the steps taken by the Government.

Page 87 of 107 | Total Record : 1070

 85   86   87   88   89 

Filter by Year

2019 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 7 No 4 (2025): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 7 No 3 (2025): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 7 No 2 (2025): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 7 No 1 (2025): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 6 No 4 (2024): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 6 No 3 (2024): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 6 No 2 (2024): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 6 No 1 (2024): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 5 No 4 (2023): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 5 No 3 (2023): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 5 No. 2 (2023): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 5 No 2 (2023): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 5 No 1 (2023): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 5 No. 1 (2023): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 4 No 4 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 4 No. 3 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 4 No 3 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 4 No 2 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 4 No. 2 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 4 No. 1 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 4 No 1 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 3 No 4 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 3 No. 4 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 3 No 3 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 3 No. 3 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 3 No 2 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 3 No. 2 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 3 No 1 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 3 No. 1 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 2 No. 2 (2020): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 1 No. 2 (2019): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 1 No. 1 (2019): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti More Issue