cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Nur Putri Hidayah
Contact Email
ilrej@umm.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
ilrej@umm.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jalan Raya Tlogomas 246 Malang
Location
Kota malang,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Indonesia Law Reform Journal (ILREJ)
Published by Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang
ISSN : 27769259     EISSN : 27769674     DOI : 10.22219
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Scope of scientific articles published in this journal deals with various topics in the multidisciplinary field of study of Law from around the world, in particular issues related to: 1. Jurisprudence 2. Legal theory 3. Laws in modern countries 4. Comparative law 5. Constitutional law 6. Law and environment 7. Customary law 8. International law 9. Legal institutions 10. Islamic law 11. other legal topics
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 7 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 3 No. 3 (2023): November 2023" : 7 Documents clear
Reclamation Responsibility for Illegal Mining in Indonesia: how should it be? Rohmadanti, Ira Fadila; Rafiqi, Ilham Dwi; Desta Saputra, I Kadek Ramadana Vikram; Akhilesh Kumar
Indonesia Law Reform Journal Vol. 3 No. 3 (2023): November 2023
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22219/ilrej.v3i3.29669

Abstract

Abstract Illegal mining is one of the problems in natural resource management in Indonesia. The enactment of Law Number 3 of 2020 concerning the Amendment to Law Number 4/2009 concerning Mineral and Coal Mining (UU No. 4/2009) further strengthens the concept of ecosystem protection, one of which is through reclamation and post-mining obligations. However, in the current law, there is confusion regarding the assignment of reclamation responsibility. The purpose of this paper is to examine how the concept of legal responsibility for illegal mining, and provide justification or consideration of the urgency of reclamation responsibility for illegal mining. This research employed a normative method and statutory, case, and conceptual approaches. The results of the study indicate that there is a legal vacuum in the current mining regulations regarding reclamation responsibility for illegal mining. The concept of responsibility for reclamation in Law no. 3/2020 is only charged to legal mining but does not cover illegal mining, causing many mine pits to be left unattended, and this situation has claimed many lives. Parties involved in Illegal mining in Indonesia should not only be burdened with liability but also environmental obligations or responsibilities in the form of reclamation and post-mining from illegal mining activities carried out. The first thing that can be done by the Government is to amend Law No. 3/2020 by expanding the concept of recovery responsibility to ensure that it can cover illegal mining. The imposition of reclamation responsibility for illegal mining is expected to provide maximum recovery for the ecosystem around the former mine.   Abstrak Pertambangan ilegal merupakan salah satu masalah dalam pengelolaan sumber daya alam di Indonesia. Lahirnya Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2020 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang- Pertambangan Mineral dan Batubara sebelumnya (UU No. 4/2009) semakin memperkuat konsep perlindungan ekosistem salah satunya melalui kewajiban reklamasi dan pasca tambang. Akan tetapi, dalam aturan hukum saat ini terdapat kerancuan mengenai pembebanan tanggung jawab reklamasi. Tujuan penulisan ini adalah untuk mengkaji bagaimana konsep pertanggungjawaban hukum pertambangan ilegal, dan memberikan justifikasi atau pertimbangan urgensi tanggung jawab reklamasi untuk pertambangan ilegal. Metode penelitian dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan kasus, dan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat kekosongan hukum (legal vacuum) dalam aturan pertambangan saat ini mengenai tanggung jawab reklamasi bagi pertambangan ilegal. Konsep tanggung jawab reklamasi dalam UU No. 3/2020 hanya dibebankan kepada pertambangan legal namun tidak menjangkau pertambangan ilegal. Hal ini menyebabkan banyak lubang tambang yang dibiarkan yang merenggut banyak korban jiwa. Pelaku pertambangan ilegal di Indonesia seharusnya tidak hanya dibebani tanggung jawab pidana, melainkan kewajiban atau tanggung jawab lingkungan dalam bentuk reklamasi dan pasca tambang dari kegiatan tambang ilegal yang dilakukan. Hal pertama yang dapat dilakukan oleh Pemerintah adalah melakukan perubahan terhadap UU No. 3/2020 dengan memperluas konsep tanggung jawab pemulihan sehingga dapat juga menjangkau pertambangan ilegal. Pembebanan tanggung jawab reklamasi bagi pertambangan ilegal ini diharapkan dapat memberikan pemulihan yang maksimal bagi ekosistem sekitar bekas tambang.
Non-Performing Loan Settlement by Fintech Lending in Unsecured Credit Sale and Purchase Transactions: To Do or Not to Do Anggraeny, Isdian; Ayu, Isdiyana Kusuma; Rahmah, Sintia; Nur, Asrul Ibrahim; Wulandari, Siti
Indonesia Law Reform Journal Vol. 3 No. 3 (2023): November 2023
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22219/ilrej.v3i3.30160

Abstract

PT Shopee International Indonesia is a company that focuses on digital applications, especially e-commerce, and is one of the largest online marketplaces in Indonesia. This online shopping system offers the latest innovations in credit-based payment methods without collateral, such as pay later, along with the advancement of the digital world. This research seeks to find out the procedures for implementing transactions, resolving non-performing loans, and legal protection provided to Fintech Lending (financial technology) organizers in Shopee Pay-Later. This includes identifying the rights and obligations of the parties involved, as well as the legal consequences of the Shopee Pay-later credit financing agreement. The research uses an empirical legal research method, which uses a problem-solving approach to data collected from observations and study findings. The research findings show that in order to finance a Shopee Pay-later unsecured credit agreement, buyers must electronically sign an agreement confirming that they accept its terms. The parties are obligated by the terms of the agreement, under which they must not contravene the relevant laws and regulations and must fulfil their rights and obligations according to the financing agreement. The district court or arbitration can be used to sue either party if they commit a default, as specified in Article 1243 of the Civil Code, or violate the law, as specified in Article 1365 of the Civil Code.   Abstrak Shopee International Indonesia adalah perusahaan yang fokus pada aplikasi digital, terutama e-commerce, dan merupakan salah satu pasar online terbesar di Indonesia. Sistem belanja online ini menawarkan inovasi terbaru dalam metode pembayaran berbasis kredit tanpa agunan, seperti bayar di belakangan, seiring dengan kemajuan dunia digital. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui tata cara pelaksanaan transaksi, penyelesaian kredit macet, dan perlindungan hukum yang diberikan kepada penyelenggara Fintech Lending (financial technology) di Shopee Pay-later. Hal ini termasuk mengidentifikasi hak dan kewajiban para pihak yang terlibat, serta akibat hukum dari adanya perjanjian pembiayaan kredit Shopee Pay-later. Penelitian menggunakan metode penelitian hukum empiris, yaitu dengan menggunakan pendekatan pemecahan masalah terhadap data yang dikumpulkan melalui pengamatan dan temuan studi. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa untuk membiayai perjanjian kredit tanpa jaminan Shopee Pay-later, pembeli harus menandatangani perjanjian secara elektronik yang mengonfirmasi bahwa mereka menerima persyaratannya. Para pihak diwajibkan oleh ketentuan perjanjian, yang berarti mereka tidak boleh bertentangan dengan hukum dan peraturan yang relevan dan harus memenuhi hak dan kewajiban mereka sesuai dengan perjanjian pembiayaan. Pengadilan negeri atau arbitrase dapat digunakan untuk menuntut salah satu pihak jika mereka melakukan wanprestasi, seperti yang ditentukan dalam Pasal 1243 KUH Perdata, atau melanggar hukum, seperti yang ditentukan dalam Pasal 1365 KUH Perdata.
Protecting the Land Tenure Rights of Papuan Indigenous Peoples After New Autonomy Region Wicaksana Prakasa, Satria Unggul; R.S. Rakia, A. Sakti; Wook, Izawati
Indonesia Law Reform Journal Vol. 3 No. 3 (2023): November 2023
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22219/ilrej.v3i3.31352

Abstract

The issues with indigenous peoples are very frequent, the impact of development, investment, and deforestation is accompanied by land conversion activities for oil palm plantations and mining, making the rights of indigenous peoples marginalized. In this context, this study seeks to investigate: (1). What problems are experienced by the Papuan Indigenous Peoples and what protection should be accepted by legal and human rights approaches? (2) What are the challenges of Special Autonomy in Papua following the stipulation of the latest Special Autonomy Law, especially in Southwest Papua, and what kind of projections and challenges are needed to protect the Papuan people at large? This research uses socio-legal methods to identify legal procedures related to socio-cultural and political-economic aspects of the Papuan community. The result of this study shows that several points are specified to protect Indigenous Peoples rights in Papua, especially after Special Autonomy, namely the importance of protecting the human rights of Indigenous Peoples related to the right to self-determination, recognition of adat rights, and basic rights that should have affirmative policies carried out by the state to ensure that Indigenous Peoples can play a major role in protecting the environment and contributing to climate change prevention. Investment or state authority must be limited to protect, promote, and respect Indigenous Peoples in Papua and also Southwest Papuans. Then, with regard to the DOB in Papua, of course, it must be returned to its noble goal of protecting the rights of the Papuan people in realizing welfare and independence. Abuse of various forms of authority, including special autonomy funds in Papua must be condemned and strictly processed. Abstrak Problematika terhadap masyarakat adat sangat sering terjadi, dampak pembangunan, investasi, deforestasi disertai dengan aktivitas alih-fungsi lahan untuk perkebunan kelapa sawit dan pertambangan, menjadikan hak-hak masyarakat hukum adat menjadi tersingkirkan. Pada konteks ini kita perlu mengidentifikasi lebih dalam: (1). Bagaimana  problematika yang dialami MHA Papua dan perlindungan yang harusnya diterima pendekatan hukum dan HAM; (2). Bagaimana tantangan Otsus Papua pasca UU Otsus terbaru, khususnya di Papua Barat Daya, proyeksi dan tantangan seperti apa yang dibutuhkan untuk melindungi masyarakat Papua secara luas. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode sosio-legal untuk mengidentifikasi prosedur hukum serta lebih dari itu berkaitan dengan aspek sosio-kultur, dan  politik-ekonomi masyarakat Papua. Hasil penelitian ini adalahsetidaknya ada beberapa point untuk melindungi hak MHA di Papua khususnya pasca Otsus, yaitu pentingnya melidungi hak asasi dari MHA, berkaitan dengan hak menentukan nasibnya sendiri, pengakuan terhadap hak ulayat, serta hak-hak dasar yang harusnya ada kebijakan afirmatif yang dilakukan oleh negara untuk meastikan bahwa MHA dapat menjalankan peran besarnya dalam melindungi lingkungan hidup serta berkontribusi terhadap pencegahan perubahan iklim. Atas nama investasi atau otoritas negara yang berlebih, harus dibatasi dalam rangka perlindungan, pemajuan, dan penghormatan terhadap MHA, khususnya MHA di Papua. Kemudian, berkaitan dengan DOB di Papua termasuk di Papua Barat Daya, tentu harus dikembalikan kepada tujuan mulianya untuk melindungi hak masyarakat Papua dalam mewujudkan kesejahteraan dan kemandirian.
Capturing Law Reform in The Digital Age: Indonesian and Estonian Perspectives Al-Fatih, Sholahuddin; Sinha, Sara
Indonesia Law Reform Journal Vol. 3 No. 3 (2023): November 2023
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22219/ilrej.v3i3.31970

Abstract

This article examines how law reform in the digital age happens in Indonesia and Estonia. Indonesia and Estonia are located in different cultures and also areas. While law reform in the digital age happens, the two countries above will also demonstrate differences. This article uses normative legal studies to capture which legal instrument is better in both countries. This article found that Estonia is leading in providing legal instruments to face the digital age, while Indonesia needs to catch up. Some legal instruments in Indonesia such as AI law, Digital ID law, and e-government law should be drafted and implemented. Abstrak Artikel ini mengkaji bagaimana reformasi hukum di era digital terjadi di Indonesia dan Estonia. Indonesia dan Estonia terletak dalam budaya dan wilayah yang berbeda. Meskipun reformasi hukum di era digital terjadi, kedua negara di atas pasti akan menunjukkan perbedaan dalam menghadapinya. Artikel ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif untuk menemukan instrumen hukum mana yang lebih baik di kedua negara. Hasilnya, artikel ini menemukan bahwa Estonia lebih unggul dalam menyediakan instrumen hukum untuk menghadapi era digital, sementara Indonesia tertinggal dalam hal tersebut. Beberapa instrumen hukum di Indonesia harus dirancang dan diterapkan, seperti Rancangan Undang-Undang AI, Rancangan Undang-Undang Identitas Kependudukan Digital, dan Rancangan Undang-Undang Pemerintahan Digital.
The Incorporation of Customary Water Rules under the Ethiopian Formal Water Governance System: Clash of Values between Commodification and Preservation Degu, Temesgen
Indonesia Law Reform Journal Vol. 3 No. 3 (2023): November 2023
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22219/ilrej.v3i3.31995

Abstract

Customary water rules need to be adequately incorporated into the Ethiopian formal water governance system despite their significance for ensuring sustainable and equitable utilization of scarce water resources. This research, using the textual analysis method and employing the theory of institutional incongruence, seeks to explore the extent of recognition of customary water rules under the formal water governance system of Ethiopia. The article argues that there needs to be more recognition of customary water rules under the Ethiopian formal water governance system, which has led to conflicts, inefficiencies, and unsustainable use of water resources. This is due to the value clash between the formal water rules built on the notion of water as a resource for commodification and customary water rules that see water as a sacred and communal part of communities' sociocultural and ecological being. As a result of this value clash, customary water rules, however important sustainability tenets they might lend, are only easily amenable to the formal water governance framework in the first place, questioning its basic foundations. Strategies such as incorporating ecosystems-based approaches, recognizing and integrating traditional knowledge, and promoting participatory decision-making processes can assist in bridging the gaps between commodification and preservation values. This, in turn, requires and largely depends on finding the right balance between economic development and environmental sustainability. This entails a fundamental reconsideration of the very goals of the Ethiopian water resources management policy, proclamation and regulation. 
Impacts of Justice Collaborator Revocation from Prisoner Remissions for Extraordinary Crimes in Class 1 Correctional Facilities in Tangerang Amiludin, Amiludin; Dias Saputra, Muhamad; Bukhari Razif, Imran; Nurfauziah Ahmad, Dwi
Indonesia Law Reform Journal Vol. 3 No. 3 (2023): November 2023
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22219/ilrej.v3i3.32022

Abstract

The elimination of Justice Collaborator as a requirement for an Extraordinary Crime convict to obtain sentence reduction or remission, in accordance with the provisions stated in the Minister of Law and Human Rights Regulation Number 7 of 2022, which amends the Minister of Law and Human Rights Regulation Number 3 of 2018 regarding the requirements and procedures for granting sentence reduction, has changed the mechanism for granting remission to prisoners at Class 1 Tangerang Correctional Institution, both in terms of administrative and subjective requirements. This change has both positive and negative impacts on the existing regulations. The research methodology employed is empirical legal research, as it relates to the effectiveness of the law. The recommendations obtained are related to communication, education, and transparency regarding the implementation of Minister of Law and Human Rights Regulation Number 7 of 2022 at Class 1 Tangerang Correctional Institution, in order to be accepted and understood by the inmates, their families, and relevant stakeholders
Legal Liability for Celebrities Promoting Goods Through The Instagram Platform Dwi Ratna Indri Hapsari; Devlita Almi Az Zahra; Herwastoeti
Indonesia Law Reform Journal Vol. 3 No. 3 (2023): November 2023
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22219/ilrej.v3i3.32107

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the Legal Position of celebrities in promoting goods through the Instagram platform and the form of legal liability by celebrities for endorsements or advertised products. With a normative Legal method supported by statutory and conceptual approaches in the context of problem-solving, and Library Research, this research reveals that the legal position of celebrities holds no legal basis which specifically regulates the legal position of celebrities and no rules used and applied, resulting in a vacuum in norms. When a problem regarding endorsement with indications of products not in accordance with what is advertised emerges, this issue involves Liability based on fault. In such a case, the relevant form of liability where the celebgram is responsible for losses caused by mistakes contravening Article 4 letter h of Law No. 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection asserting that consumers are entitled to compensation, compensation and/or replacement if the goods and/or services received are not by the agreement or not as they should be. Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk dapat mengetahui tentang Kedudukan Hukum selebgram dalam mempromosikan barang melalui platform Instagram serta untuk dapat mengetahui tentang bentuk pertanggungjawaban hukum oleh selebgram atas endorsement atau produk yang diklankan. Metode penelitian yang dipakai adalah jenis Penelitian Hukum Normatif dengan metode pendekatan perundang-undangan (the statute approach), penelitian ini juga menggunakan pendekatan konseptual (the conceptual approach) yang digunakan dalam rangka pemecahan masalah, serta penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kepustakaan (Library Research). Hasil penelitian yang didapat adalah Kedudukan hukum selebgram secara khusus ditegaskan bahwasanya tidak ada dasar hukum yang mengatur secara khusus mengenai kedudukan hukum selebgram dan belum memiliki aturan yang dipakai dan diterapkan akibatnya terjadi kekosongan norma. Ketika terjadi permasalahan mengenai endorsement dengan indikasi produk yang tidak sesuai dengan yang diklankan maka bentuk pertanggungjawaban yang dilakukan adalah Liability base on fault. Dimana dalam hal ini dapat dijelaskan bahwa Bentuk pertanggungjawaban yang relevan adalah dimana selebgram bertanggungjawab atas kerugian yang disebabkan oleh kesalahan yang dilakukannya terdapat dalam Pasal 4 huruf h UU No. 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen yang berbunyi konsumen berhak untuk mendapatkan kompensasi, ganti rugi dan/atau penggantian, apabila barang dan/atau jasa yang diterima tidak sesuai dengan perjanjian atau tidak sebagaimana mestinya.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 7

 1 

Filter by Year

2023 2023


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 4 No. 3 (2024): November, 2024 Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024): July, 2024 Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): March, 2024 Vol. 3 No. 3 (2023): November 2023 Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023): July 2023 Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023): March, 2023 Vol. 2 No. 3 (2022): November, 2022 Vol. 2 No. 1 (2022): Maret, 2022 Vol. 2 No. 2: July, 2022 Vol. 1 No. 3 (2021): November 2021 Vol. 1 No. 2 (2021): Juli 2021 Vol. 1 No. 1 (2021): Maret 2021 More Issue