cover
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
penamasjurnal@gmail.com
Phone
+6221-4800725
Journal Mail Official
penamasjurnal@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Balai Penelitian dan Pengembangan Agama Jakarta Jl. Rw. Kuning No.6, RT.3/RW.2, Pulo Gebang, Cakung, Kota Jakarta Timur, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta 13950 Telp. : +62-21-4800725 Fax. : +62-21-4800712
Location
Kota adm. jakarta timur,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Penamas
ISSN : 02157829     EISSN : 25027891     DOI : https://doi.org/10.31330.Penamas
PENAMAS (ISSN : 0215 - 7829 e-ISSN : 2502 - 7891) is a peer-reviewed journal published by Office of Religious Research and Development, Jakarta, Agency of Religious Research and Development, Education and Training, The Ministry of Religious Affairs, The Republic of Indonesia (Balai Litbang Agama Jakarta, Badan Litbang dan Diklat Kementerian Agama RI). PENAMAS is the acronym of Penelitian Agama dan Masyarakat translated in English as Research on Religion and Society. The journal publishes research articles focussing on religious and social issues (isu-isu keagamaan dan sosial kemasyarakatan). From 2018 onward, the journal publishes twice a year.
Articles 373 Documents
Hierarchy without Domination: Dalihan Natolu as a Relational Model of Justice and Religious Moderation among the Batak Febri Kurnia Manoppo; Jenri Ambarita
Penamas Vol 39 No 1 (2026): Volume 39, Issue 1, January-June 2026
Publisher : Balai Penelitian dan Pengembangan Agama Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31330/penamas.v39i1.1082

Abstract

This study examines the paradox of ‘dalihan natolu’, the Batak kinship system: how a hierarchy based on inherited roles produces egalitarian relationships whilst simultaneously underpinning religious moderation. This paradox is difficult to explain through John Rawls’s liberal theory of justice, which is grounded in individualism and the equality of basic freedoms, and thus regards ascriptive hierarchies as the antithesis of justice. Building on Rawls, this study interprets the dalihan natolu through the paradigm of relational justice and the theory of reciprocal exchange, asking: through what mechanisms and within what limits can different roles produce fairness and equality? Data were collected qualitatively through in-depth interviews, participatory observation and audiovisual content analysis. The findings reveal asymmetrical equality: rotating reciprocal obligations counterbalance an advantage in one relationship with a subordinate position in another, preventing hierarchies from solidifying into permanent domination. This mechanism transcends religious divides, whilst leaving gender tensions and the burden of customary obligations unresolved. Dalihan natolu challenges the liberal assumption that ascriptive roles preclude justice, whilst simultaneously promoting inter-religious, kinship-based religious moderation.
Governing Religious Identity: State Policy and the Convergence of Muhammadiyah and Nahdlatul Ulama Aris Munandar; Suryani
Penamas Vol 39 No 1 (2026): Volume 39, Issue 1, January-June 2026
Publisher : Balai Penelitian dan Pengembangan Agama Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31330/penamas.v39i1.1083

Abstract

This study examines how contemporary state policies are transforming the traditions and identities of Muhammadiyah and Nahdlatul Ulama (NU), and how both organisations are responding to and negotiating these changes in public life. Drawing on Foucault’s concept of governmentality, Talal Asad’s thesis on the state’s construction of ‘religion’, and coercive isomorphism, this qualitative study—comprising interviews, observation and document analysis—examines policies such as religious moderation, the Pancasila ideology and the regulation of civil society organisations. The findings indicate that the state acts not only as a regulator but also as a normative and discursive force that limits the legitimacy of religious practices; the identities of Muhammadiyah and NU tend to converge towards the state-sanctioned discourse of ‘moderate and nationalist Islam’, although both continue to adaptively preserve their traditional characteristics. This research enriches the theory of religion-state relations by highlighting the governmental and discursive dimensions of religious regulation.
Interpreting the Sego Wiwit Religious Tradition and Its Potential as Teaching Materials for Foreign Speakers Dian Uswatun Hasanah; Ali Imron Al-Ma’ruf; Angger Gilang Praditama; Sigit Arif Bowo; Iqbal Syahrul Akbar Al Aziz; Yusnami Quqotus Namia
Penamas Vol 39 No 1 (2026): Volume 39, Issue 1, January-June 2026
Publisher : Balai Penelitian dan Pengembangan Agama Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31330/penamas.v39i1.1089

Abstract

Sego wiwit, as an agrarian tradition of Javanese society, has so far been studied merely as a cultural description, despite its great potential as teaching material for international students. International students require contextual material rooted in local culture to explore the transformation of cultural meanings, particularly within the sego wiwit tradition. This study aims to examine the history, ritual processions, symbols and philosophy of sego wiwit, as well as its relevance to the socio-cultural life of the community and to the education of international students. Research data, collected using a qualitative descriptive approach with ethnohistorical methods, was obtained through observation, in-depth interviews and documentation, and analysed using an interactive model. The research findings indicate that ‘sego wiwit’ functions as a medium of symbolic communication representing the harmonious relationship between humans, nature, and the community’s spirituality. Cultural and religious negotiation through the reinterpretation of ritual meaning—as an expression of gratitude and social solidarity—serves not only as a cultural heritage but also holds potential as learning material for international students based on local culture and for strengthening intercultural literacy.

Filter by Year

2014 2026


Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 39 No 1 (2026): Volume 39, Issue 1, January-June 2026 Vol 38 No 2 (2025): Volume 38, Issue 2, July-December 2025 Vol 38 No 1 (2025): Volume 38, Issue 1, January-June 2025 Vol 37 No 2 (2024): Volume 37, Issue 2, July-December 2024 Vol 37 No 1 (2024): Volume 37, Issue 1, January-June 2024 Vol 36 No 2 (2023): Volume 36, Issue 2, July-December 2023 Vol 36 No 1 (2023): Volume 36, Issue 1, January-June 2023 Vol 35 No 2 (2022): Volume 35, Issue 2, July-December 2022 Vol 35 No 1 (2022): Volume 35, Issue 1, January-June 2022 Vol 34 No 2 (2021): Volume 34, Nomor 2, Juli-Desember 2021 Vol 34 No 1 (2021): Volume 34, Nomor 1, Januari-Juni 2021 Vol 33 No 2 (2020): Volume 33, Nomor 2, Juli-Desember 2020 Vol 33 No 1 (2020): Volume 33, Nomor 1, Januari-Juni 2020 Vol 32 No 2 (2019): Volume 32, Nomor 2, Juli-Desember 2019 Vol 32 No 1 (2019): Volume 32, Nomor 1, Januari-Juni 2019 Vol 31 No 2 (2018): Volume 31, Nomor 2, Juli-Desember 2018 Vol 31 No 1 (2018): Volume 31, Nomor 1, Januari-Juni 2018 Vol 30 No 3 (2017): Volume 30, Nomor 3, Oktober-Desember 2017 Vol 30 No 2 (2017): Volume 30, Nomor 2, Juli-September 2017 Vol 30 No 1 (2017): Volume 30, Nomor 1, April-Juni 2017 Vol 29 No 3 (2016): Volume 29, Nomor 3, Oktober-Desember 2016 Vol 29 No 2 (2016): Volume 29, Nomor 2, Juli-September 2016 Vol 29 No 1 (2016): Volume 29, Nomor 1, April-Juni 2016 Vol 28 No 3 (2015): Volume 28, Nomor 3, Oktober-Desember 2015 Vol 28 No 2 (2015): Volume 28, Nomor 2, Juli-September 2015 Vol 28 No 1 (2015): Volume 28, Nomor 1, April-Juni 2015 Vol 27 No 3 (2014): Volume 27, Nomor 3, Oktober-Desember 2014 Vol 27 No 2 (2014): Volume 27, Nomor 2, Juli-September 2014 Vol 27 No 1 (2014): Volume 27, Nomor 1, April-Juni 2014 More Issue